Presented by: Antony N. Gichia Regional Audit Center Mombasa

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Nicholas Kissen Thomas Frith Islington Leaseholders Association 12 th June 2013.
Advertisements

Medicaid1 SANDHILLS CENTER PARTICIPATING PROVIDER VIOLATIONS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTIONS (Medicaid & State Funded)
Last Topic - Administrative Tribunals
ICC Amicable Dispute Resolution Services Mediating Corporate Governance Disputes By Mélanie Meilhac.
Maine Board of Tax Appeals 1. What we are: An independent Board of three individuals appointed by the Governor to resolve controversies between Taxpayers.
Law Library Four Courts Dublin 7. December Types of Appeal Conventional – S.933 – Assessment is excessive Specific - S Time limits S.195 -
WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER 1 Ignacio de Castro WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center February, 2008 Arbitration of Intellectual.
1 AUDIT IMPROVEMENT AND GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK 17 TH JUNE 2015.
Workers Compensation Commission Sian Leathem Registrar 29 September 2008.
New Expedited Jury Trials Administrative Office of the Courts Office of the General Counsel Anne M. Ronan December 6, 2010.
IFTA Appeals Process and the Impact of the Commercial Activity Tax (CAT) on the Transportation Industry Sarah Hedman Ohio Department of Taxation Legal.
تقديم وسائل تسوية المنازعات Presentation of dispute settlement means.
April 2, 2007 Ontario Human Rights Commission Introduction to the Enhanced Complaints Process (ECP) – Pilot.
Income Tax Bar Association Karachi WORKSHOP ON INCOME TAX Hotel Sheraton, Karachi August, 2005.
IRSDA Conference What Do the Amendments to Indiana Code Section Mean to You? Kristina Kern Wheeler, General Counsel Ja-Deen L. Johnson, Consumer.
Office of the Chief Tax Counsel Jean Cordue Acting Director Adjudication.
July 2013 What you need to know about procuring suppliers Deborah Ramshaw and Lois Shield.
THE REVIEW PROCESS. 2 OVERVIEW Taxpayers’ Bill of Rights Request Departmental Review Review Process Documentation Conference Final Determination Other.
1 WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center Rome Conference, December 11, 2009 Theme 6: Dispute Settlement and Enforcement of IP Rights by MSMEs WIPO Arbitration.
1 Resolving Special Education Disputes Understanding When and How to Use the New Procedural Safeguard System Education Law Center November 28,
Mediation with the Information Commissioner’s Office Cory Martinson Appeals and Policy Analyst 25 November 2009.
DISPUTE RESOLUTION: CUSTOMS AND EXCISE ACT – (STAKEHOLDERS) Stakeholders page1.
ODAO Information Sharing Day Presentation February/March Office of the Disability Appeals Officer Oifig an Oifigigh Achomhairc um Míchumas National.
أداة التقييم التشخيصي للإدارة الضريبية المجال السابع لنتائج الأداء (POA7): حل المنازعات الضريبية.
Appeals under the Income Tax Ordinance, January 2016 By: Syed Hassaan Naeem.
ICC Dispute Resolution Services The ICC Court powers under Article 6(2) of the Rules Alina Leoveanu Deputy Counsel, ICC International Court of Arbitration.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
Change Orders, Extras and Claims Presented by Geoffrey Cantello, City of Ottawa.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 16 – Taxation Bilateral screening:
ARBITRATION ACT. Challenge of arbitrator The appointment of an arbitrator may be challenged on the issues of – (i) impartiality, – (ii) independence,
Improving Compliance with ISAs Presenters: Al Johnson & Pat Hayle.
Overview of Standards on Cost Auditing By: CMA Pradip H.Desai.
AN OVERVIEW OF ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) MECHANISMS BY MUENI MUTUNGA.
The Mediation Centre of Chamber of Notaries in Gdańsk
SURAT CHAPTER OF WIRC OF ICAI
Mason County School District
Dispute Resolution Between ICT Service Providers in Saudi Arabia
Resolving IP Disputes outside the Courts through WIPO ADR
INTERCONNECTION GUIDELINES
Objections, Appeals and Reviews
Marketplace Eligibility Appeals
Court Procedures for Negligence Cases
PRESENTATION BY THE LOA TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON FINANCE
Principles of Administrative Law <Instructor Name>
Overview of the Electricity Regulation Bill
First Collective Agreements
STEP PRESENTATION November 2017 Advocate Eric Mkhawane
Marcus Claridge Director Energy and Water October 2017
OFFICE OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Arbitration and Procedures. Default (rule 2 (d)) Means failure on the part of any person, to repay to the financing bank or to any other society a loan.
Education Employment Procedures Law of 2001
Municipal Net Profit Tax
SIMAD UNIVERSITY Keyd abdirahman salaad.
Election Contracts, Joint Election Agreements & Leases For Equipment
Standardised PPT on GST
Texas Secretary of State Elections Division
OFFICE OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Resolving Issues ADR, Due Process and CDE Complaints
Car Service Car Hire Arbitration
Key Knowledge The purposes and appropriateness of consumer affairs Victoria in resolving civil disputes Key Skills Discuss and justify the appropriateness.
Appeal Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
ALRB Responses to Recent Legislative Changes
Transmission Workstream 2nd December 2010
The Office of Open Records webinar will begin soon
APPEALS UNDER GST () CA.Cyrjoe V J.
VAT Module 10 (b) VAT Administration and Compliance
CMS PDR 101 ICE Presentation 2014.
What is a non-compliant event?
What are a parent’s options when they and the school disagree?
Stakeholders sensitization PRESENTED BY ANTHONY GACHAI PTA
Presentation transcript:

Presented by: Antony N. Gichia Regional Audit Center Mombasa TAX DECISIONS, OBJECTIONS & APPEALS ALTERNATIVE TAX DISPUTE RESOLUTION FRAMEWORK Presented by: Antony N. Gichia Regional Audit Center Mombasa 10th & 11th November, 2016

Principle of Equity in Taxation The principle of equity in Taxation which is now anchored in the Kenya Constitution 2010 underscores that every taxable citizen must pay taxes and that everyone must pay their fair share of the taxes. Article 201 (a) (i) “The burden of taxation must be shared fairly.” Mathew 22:21 "So give back to Caesar what is Caesar's, and to God what is God's.”

Scope Of Presentation Introduction Tax Decisions & Overview of The Dispute Process Valid Objections & Valid Appeals What is the ADR Framework? Objectives/ Purpose of ADR Framework Legal Support for the Framework Salient Features of the ADR Framework The ADR Agreement Improving the ADR Framework Initiating the ADR Process

TAX DECISIONS BY THE COMMISSIONER The Tax Procedures Act 2015 (TPA) – effective 19th January 2016 is to guide administration of taxes – Section 2(2). Tax disputes arise from Tax decisions. Tax decisions that may be made by the Commissioner under The Tax Procedures Act including: Assessments – Sections 29, 30 & 31- Default, Advance or Amended assessment Determinations under sections 15,17 and 18 on appointed persons Refund decision Demand for penalty

THE DISPUTE PROCESS Tax Decision – Section 2 & 50 TPA Objection by Taxpayer – Section 51(1) TPA- within 30 days Objection decision – Section 51(8) to (11) TPA– Within 60 days Appeal to Tax Appeals Tribunal– Section 52 TPA Appeal to High Court / Court of Appeal – Section 53 &54 TPA

VALID OBJECTION TO A TAX DECISION Are lodged under Section 51(1) of the TPA before proceeding to any other written law Timeliness - Lodged within 30 days – Section 51(2) TPA Precisely states objection grounds – Section 51(3)(a)TPA States amendments required to correct decision and reasons for amendments- Section 51(3)(a) TPA Entire amount not in dispute paid in full – Section 51(3)(b) TPA Taxpayer to be notified in writing where an objection is not valid – Section 51(4) TPA

VALID APPEALS TO TAX APPEALS TRIBUNAL GUIDED BY TAX APPEALS TRIBUNAL ACT, 2013 No. 40 of 2013 – Effective 2nd December 2013 (TATA) Give notice in writing to the Commissioner & pay a non-refundable fee of twenty thousand shillings to the Tax Appeals Tribunal– Section 12 of TATA Serve a notice of appeal to the Tribunal in writing within thirty days upon receipt of the decision of the Commissioner – Section 13 TATA Within fourteen days from the date of filing the notice of appeal, submit enough copies, as may be advised by the Clerk, of a memorandum of appeal, statements of facts and the tax decision – Section 13 TATA. The appellant shall, unless the Tribunal orders otherwise, be limited to the grounds stated in the appeal to which the decision relates. – Section 13(6) TATA For the appeal to be valid Appellant to pay tax not in dispute -Sec 52 TPA Detailed guidelines in The Tax Appeals Tribunal Procedure Rules 2015

What is the ADR Framework The ADR Framework is a document which governs the Alternative Dispute Resolution process in KRA. Quick facts about the Framework; Launched on 17th June 2015 Effective from 1st July 2015 Applies to Tax Disputes Users of the Framework include internal and external stakeholders, i.e. Taxpayers and the Commissioner. Available on the KRA website www.kra.go.ke www.kra.go.ke

What are the Objectives of this Framework? To provide; A taxpayer focused approach to dispute resolution. Internal structures to support tax dispute resolution through oversight, monitoring and management of the ADR processes. Support for creation of a central database on tax disputes handled in ADR to guide future dispute resolution for consistency. Guidelines for the parties during the ADR discussions. Timelines for resolving tax disputes so as to bring efficiency to the process. An additional approach for dispute management & resolution of tax disputes

Is ADR anchored/backed by Law? Constitution of Kenya, 2010 Article 159 (2) (c) Revenue Statutes The Tax Appeal Tribunal Act - TATA (Sec. 28) Tax Procedure Act (Sec. 55)

Salient Features of the ADR Framework Suitability Test- The Framework provides for factors to consider in assessing suitability of Cases for ADR. Not all disputes may be settled under ADR e.g , illegalities. Conduct - ADR Discussions must be held within an environment of decorum, flexibility and parties must subscribe to standards of conduct and rules. Timelines - 90 days as in Clause 55 of Tax Procedure Bill (Section 55 TPC Act). Tribunal Court initiated ADR - dependent on Court deadlines given Documentation-ADR discussions must be supported by relevant documentation. Termination of Discussions- Upon lack of co-operation by either party, conduct unbecoming of ADR discussions, mutual agreement to terminate.

The ADR Agreement Where parties to the dispute have agreed on terms; Agreement terms must be put into writing, signed by both parties/their representatives and witnessed by the Facilitator. Each party is to retain a copy of the signed agreement Signed agreement shall be in full & final settlement and shall be binding to both parties. Agreement can be adduced as evidence.

Improving the ADR Framework KRA’s ADR Framework is a living document and shall be reviewed from time to time to reflect changes in Law, Policy and other Regulatory Frameworks, as well as to enhance service delivery. Strategic and Innovative interventions are key in ensuring the growth of the framework into a dependable and efficient document, which will address the needs of both our internal and external customers.

Initiating the ADR process The process begins after an objection decision is communicated to the taxpayer. The taxpayer or tax representative make a formal appeal to the Tax Appeal Tribunal first before requesting for the ADR process A formal application is then made to the Tax Appeals Tribunal and forwarded to Corporate Tax Dispute Resolution Division (CTDR) . CTDR is the office charged with the responsibility of facilitating the ADR process between the Taxpayer and the Commissioner Settlement of the dispute within 90 days of date the Tribunal/Court permits the settlement - Section 55(1) of the TPA or it shall be referred back to the Tribunal/ Court - Section 55(2) TPA.

END OF PRESENTATION THANK YOU!