Jason D. Vescovi1 and Todd D. Brown2

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Inhibition as a predictor of performance on an Old/New recognition memory task Chase Kluemper 1, Seth Kiser 1, Yang Jiang 1, Jane E. Joseph 2, & Thomas.
Advertisements

The Effect of Predisposing Factors and Concussion Rate on DIII College Football Players: A Retrospective Study Jon Purvis, Robert Blume, Jenna Chinburg,
Comparison of Knee Kinematics during Anticipated and Unanticipated Landings Tony Moreno PhD CSCS School of Health Promotion and Human Performance Eastern.
◄ ▼ ► ▲ Figure 2: Percent change ([(P 1 – P 2 )/P 1 ]*100) in pre- to post-step test heart rates in oxygen saturation observed at different elevations.
Consistency in Reports of Early Alcohol Use Supported by grants AA009022, AA007728, & AA (NIAAA); HD (NICHD) and DA18660 (NIDA) Carolyn E.
Physiological Profile Review for Women’s Lacrosse Shae Smith ESS 110.
Introduction Introduction Alcohol Abuse Characteristics Results and Conclusions Results and Conclusions Analyses comparing primary substance of abuse indicated.
Examining The Effects of Detraining and Retraining on Health Outcomes in Community Fitness Program Participants Grotthus, J.L. and Dalleck, L. (Faculty.
Statistics for Psychology CHAPTER SIXTH EDITION Statistics for Psychology, Sixth Edition Arthur Aron | Elliot J. Coups | Elaine N. Aron Copyright © 2013.
Copyright © 2013, 2010 and 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter Numerically Summarizing Data 3.
LORAS.EDU Abstract Introduction We were interested in exploring general stereotypes undergraduates might have about students who choose to major in artistic.
Chapter 11: Test for Comparing Group Means: Part I.
Printed by Kendall M, Zanetti K & Hoshizaki TB. School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa. Ottawa, Canada A Novel Protocol for.
Use of Alternative Deadlift Training Can Be Effective At Improving Strength and Teaching the Olympic Deadlift in Novice Lifters DR. BENJAMIN SNYDER AND.
Tabata Interval Exercise: Energy Expenditure and Post-Exercise Responses Michele Olson, PhD, FACSM Scharff-Olson Kinesiology Lab, Auburn University Montgomery,
The Effect of Music Tempo on Memory Matthew Le Rockdale Magnet School for Science and Technology Students commonly listen to music while studying for tests.
CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS
An evaluation of athlete perceptions of ACE assistance upon
Association of Body Mass Index (BMI) and Depression Severity
Statistics & Evidence-Based Practice
W. Hoffstetter, A. Box, H. Mimms, P. Serafini, M. Smith, B. M
ScWk 298 Quantitative Review Session
CARDIOVASCULAR RESPONSES TO RECREATIONAL SKATEBOARDING IN YOUTH
Better to Give or to Receive?: The Role of Dispositional Gratitude
Crosswalk & Pedestrian Signal No protection/separation from traffic
The effect of sport specific tasks in hockey on planned and unplanned agility. Philip McMorris Introduction: The importance of.
The Effects of Caffeine Consumption on Sprint Performance in College-Age Females Michelle Seeger, Sara Wynne, Kori Burnett, Whitney Forde, Ashley Fleming.
Anaerobic Power Output and Blood Lactate in Wheelchair Rugby Athletes Laurie A. Malone1, Ildiko Nyikos1, J. P. Barfield2 1Lakeshore Foundation, Birmingham,
Further Validation of the Personal Growth Initiative Scale – II: Gender Measurement Invariance Harmon, K. A., Shigemoto, Y., Borowa, D., Robitschek, C.,
Heart Rate Variability is Enhanced in Individuals with Migraine & Tension Headaches during Mindfulness Meditation after Cognitive Stress – A Randomized.
Diabetes and Hypertension Health Screening in the Fresno Sikh Population: A Cross Sectional Approach Baljit Singh Dhesi 1,2 1University of California,
Ventricular Arrhythmias And Sports Activity Follow Up L. Stefani, G
Sport-Specific Stressor
Ilanna Fricks, Emma Murphy, Yana Mayayeva
Training Method Influences on Postural Stability
LOW INTENSITY CYCLING THROUGHOUT A SEMESTER-LONG LECTURE COURSE DOES NOT INTERFERE WITH STUDENT TEST PERFORMANCE Matthew A. Kilgas, Alexandrea M. Holley,
Conclusions & Implications
Laboratory of Systems Physiology
The locomotive requirements during Rugby Union competition:
Figure 3: Comparison of Linear Accelerations
Measures of Position & Exploratory Data Analysis
Effect of Short-Term Plyometric Training on Speed, Strength and Power.
Effects of Whole Body Heating During Warm-up on Strength, Power, and Flexibility Trevor Krzyzanowski, Caleb Ross, Daniel Newmire, Dustin Slivka University.
Effects of Educating URI General Education Students on Physical Activity, Exercise, and Disease Prevention and Maintenance Julie Gastall, Department.
To compare the economy of elite and non-elite men and women runners.
SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY
Multiple Regression Analysis and Model Building
The effects of two different neuromuscular training programs on physical fitness parameters of prepubertal girls. Moustogiannis A., Philippou A. and Maridaki,
John R. Harry • Leland A. Barker • John A. Mercer • Janet S. Dufek
CHAPTER 2 Research Methods in Industrial/Organizational Psychology
1 University of Chichester, Chichester UK
Name Surname, Name Surname Sports University of Tirana, Albania
Anticipatory Testosterone Response to Competition in Female Collegiate Endurance Athletes Becca Adams and Gary McCall Department of Exercise Science, University.
Balfour, Nick CSU, Chico Math 615 INTRODUCTION METHODS RESULTS
Data Analysis AMA Collegiate Marketing Research Certificate Program.
Doyle M. Cummings, Pharm.D.,FCP, FCCP
Comparison of corneal powers obtained from four different devices
Introduction to Statistics
DEVELOPING A FIT.GREEN.HAPPYTM CAMPUS: A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY OF
Scottish Health Survey What we know so far
Overall Wellness of First-Generation College Student-Athletes
Funding and Acknowledgements
Descriptive Statistics
One-Way Analysis of Variance
Protzner,A. ,Trájer,E. ,Udvardy,A. ,Komka,Zs. ,Bosnyák,E. ,Szendrei,B
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
Oregon Health & Science University Oregon Child Development Coalition
Sprint Review.
Jonathan E. Burton and Ezra Edmonds
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, College of Aviation
Presentation transcript:

Jason D. Vescovi1 and Todd D. Brown2 Comparison of linear sprint times among middle school, high school, and college aged female soccer players Jason D. Vescovi1 and Todd D. Brown2 1Faculty of Physical Education and Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; 2The Sports Performance Essentials, LLC, Marlton, NJ, U.S.A. Abstract Percentiles for Cumulative Splits   Min 90 75 50 25 10 Max 9.1 m Middle School 1.72 1.85 1.92 1.99 2.09 2.15 2.42 High School 1.68 1.81 1.87 1.94 2.03 2.08 2.41 College 1.91 1.97 2.04 2.22 18.2 m 2.97 3.20 3.30 3.39 3.58 3.66 4.19 2.98 3.12 3.22 3.33 3.44 3.57 4.04 3.14 3.23 3.43 3.53 3.73 27.4 m 4.18 4.47 4.60 4.76 5.02 5.15 5.92 4.08 4.33 4.45 4.62 4.78 5.58 4.38 4.51 4.58 4.77 4.90 5.16 36.6 m 5.39 5.76 5.94 6.16 6.50 6.67 7.85 5.22 5.56 5.70 5.95 6.15 6.51 7.15 5.35 5.55 5.71 5.87 6.08 6.30 Percentiles for Individual Splits   Min 90 75 50 25 10 Max 2nd 9.1 m Middle School 1.24 1.34 1.37 1.42 1.50 1.53 1.77 High School 1.29 1.33 1.38 1.43 1.51 1.63 College 1.19 1.26 1.32 1.35 1.40 1.46 1.56 3rd 9.1 m 1.25 1.31 1.49 1.73 1.06 1.20 1.30 1.36 1.59 1.10 1.47 4th 9.1 m 1.21 1.27 1.48 1.54 1.93 1.14 1.60 1.07 1.17 1.23 1.28 Introduction No single study has presented linear sprint times for a group of female soccer players spanning a wide age range1-3, thus it is unclear if we can distinguish between different age groups based on linear sprint times of varying distances. We hypothesized that older players would demonstrate faster sprint times, regardless of the distance, compared to younger players. Methods Data from 451 female soccer players aged 12-21 years who participated in several previously conducted studies from our group were gathered retrospectively and evaluated in a cross-sectional design. Participants were divided based on age into the following groups: middle school (12-13 yr, n=89); high school (14-17 yr, n=236); and college (18-21 yr, n=126). Linear sprint performance was assessed every 9.1m for 36.6m using infrared timing gates (Brower Timing, Utah). Participants were instructed to begin when ready and to run at maximal speed through the final pair of sensors. Participants performed the sprint test in duplicate; the fastest time for the 36.6m and all associated split times were used for statistical analysis. We compared cumulative, individual and flying split times between the age groups using a one-way ANOVA with LSD post-hoc analysis. Results Cumulative split times were greater in middle school soccer players compared to high school players for 9.1m (1.99±0.13 vs. 1.95±0.11s, p=0.003), and greater than high school and college athletes for 18.3 (3.42±0.20 vs. 3.34±0.17 and 3.33±0.15s, p<0.000), 27.4 (4.80±0.28 vs. 4.64±0.25 and 4.62±0.21s, p<0.000), and 36.6m (6.20±0.39 vs. 5.97±0.34 and 5.90±0.28s, p<0.000), but there was no difference between high school and college players for any of the cumulative split times. Individual split times were different between each age group for the second (1.43±0.09 vs. 1.39±0.08 vs. 1.36±0.07s, p≤0.001) and fourth (1.41±0.12 vs. 1.33±0.10 vs. 1.28±0.09s, p<0.000) 9.1m distances. For the third 9.1m individual split, middle school soccer players had greater times compared to high school and college players (1.37±0.09 vs. 1.31±0.09 and 1.29±0.07s, p<0.000). Differences between each age group were also observed for flying 18.3m sprint times (2.80±0.17 vs. 2.69±0.13 vs. 2.65±0.17, p≤0.021). Discussion Sprint time for the first 9.1m was different only between the middle school and high school soccer players, whereas the cumulative split times for longer distances (i.e., ≥18.2m) were greater for middle school players compared to both the high school and college players, with no differences observed between the two older age groups. In contrast, individual split times for the second and fourth 9.1m splits, as well as the flying times were different between each of the three age groups suggesting that individual or flying, rather than cumulative, split times may be more useful when attempting to distinguish between middle school, high school, and college female soccer players. Future research should examine linear sprint characteristics in professional and Olympic level female soccer players to determine if these indices can distinguish between higher and lower level players, or between selected compared to non-selected players for a given team within a particular level of play 1. * Purpose The purposes of this study were to: Determine linear sprint times for female soccer players over a wide age range. Compare linear sprint times between middle school, high school and college aged female soccer players. Methods Participants Data from 451 female soccer players aged 12-21 years who participated in several previously conducted studies from our group were gathered retrospectively and evaluated in a cross-sectional design. Participants were divided based on age into the following groups: middle school (12-13 yr, n=89); high school (14-17 yr, n=236); and college (18-21 yr, n=126). Linear Sprint Linear sprint performance was assessed every 9.1m for 36.6m using infrared timing gates (Brower Timing, Utah) positioned at a height of approximately 1.0 m. Participants stood upright at the start line, were instructed to begin when ready and to run at maximal speed through the final pair of sensors. Participants performed the sprint test in duplicate; the fastest time for the 36.6m and all associated split times were used for statistical analysis. Statistics We compared cumulative, individual and flying split times between the age groups using a one-way ANOVA with LSD post-hoc analysis. We determined percentiles for each age over the entire range of our sample. * * Results Cumulative Splits Cumulative split times were greater in middle school soccer players compared to high school players for 9.1m (1.99±0.13 vs. 1.95±0.11s, p=0.003), and greater than high school and college athletes for 18.3 (3.42±0.20 vs. 3.34±0.17 and 3.33±0.15s, p<0.000), 27.4 (4.80±0.28 vs. 4.64±0.25 and 4.62±0.21s, p<0.000), and 36.6m (6.20±0.39 vs. 5.97±0.34 and 5.90±0.28s, p<0.000), but there was no difference between high school and college players for any of the cumulative split times. Individual Splits Individual split times were different between each age group for the second (1.43±0.09 vs. 1.39±0.08 vs. 1.36±0.07s, p≤0.001) and fourth (1.41±0.12 vs. 1.33±0.10 vs. 1.28±0.09s, p<0.000) 9.1m distances. For the third 9.1m individual split, middle school soccer players had greater times compared to high school and college players (1.37±0.09 vs. 1.31±0.09 and 1.29±0.07s, p<0.000). Flying Splits Differences between each age group were also observed for flying 18.3m sprint times (2.80±0.17 vs. 2.69±0.13 vs. 2.65±0.17, p≤0.021). Conclusions * References 1.Hoare DG, Warr CR. Journal of Sports Sciences. Sep 2000;18:751-758. 2.Tumilty D, Darby S. Journal of Sports Sciences. 1992;10:145. 3.Vescovi JD, Brown TD, Murray TM. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness.2006;46:221-226. Acknowledgement This project was supported in part by a student grant from the Gatorade Sports Science Institute.