Models and Modeling in the High School Physics Classroom

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Inquiry-Based Instruction
Advertisements

Advances in the PARCC Mathematics Assessment August
Mathematics in the MYP.
Understanding the Research Base Presentation to CSSS October 1, 2011.
An Introduction to Modeling Instruction Mark Schober Columbia Secondary School, New York City Jeff Saul University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
NCTM’s Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making.
Models and Modeling in the High School Physics Classroom
The Modeling Method of Physics Teaching Taken from the MM Web Site.
The Modeling Method of Instruction for Science and Mathematics Arizona State University Modeling Method Web Site.
Status and Plans for Professional Development in Modeling in Indiana in Physics, Chemistry and Biology Gordon Berry, Physics Department University of Notre.
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
1 New York State Mathematics Core Curriculum 2005.
M ATH C OMMITTEE Mathematical Shifts Mathematical Practices.
ACOS 2010 Standards of Mathematical Practice
Big Ideas and Problem Solving in Junior Math Instruction
Physics Curriculum Projects Modeling Method Active Physics Comprehensive Conceptual Curriculum for Physics (C 3 P) Constructing Physics Understanding (CPU)
Math Instruction What’s in and What’s out What’s in and What’s out! Common Core Instruction.
Models and Modeling in the High School Physics Classroom.
Scientific Inquiry: Learning Science by Doing Science
Mike Rospenda Math practices, mike rospenda 1. students actually do math use mathematics using math knowledge engaging in mathematical thinking investigate.
Marzano Instructional Strategies. Research-Based Instruction Robert Marzano, Debra Pickering, and Jane Pollock reviewed hundreds of studies on instructional.
2014 Mathematics Institutes Grade Band: High School Algebra 1.
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS AND READING K-5 Curriculum Overview.
Laura Ritter K-12 Science Coordinator Troy School District Engaging Students in Scientific Practices with Modeling.
Mathematical Processes. 2 What We are Learning Today Mathematical Processes What are they? How do we teach through these processes? How do students learn.
Models and Modeling in the High School Chemistry Classroom
TEA Science Workshop #3 October 1, 2012 Kim Lott Utah State University.
1 Issues in Assessment in Higher Education: Science Higher Education Forum on Scientific Competencies Medellin-Colombia Nov 2-4, 2005 Dr Hans Wagemaker.
1 Science as a Process Chapter 1 Section 2. 2 Objectives  Explain how science is different from other forms of human endeavor.  Identify the steps that.
PROCESS STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICS. PROBLEM SOLVING The Purpose of the Problem Solving Approach The problem solving approach fosters the development of.
An Introduction to the Cycles of Modeling Mark Schober John Burroughs School, St. Louis, Mo. Hilary Haugen California High School, San Ramon Matt Greenwolfe.
1 A Modeling Approach to Science Teaching Nicholas Park Greenhill School.
USING VIDEO TO THINK ABOUT WHAT THE MATH PRACTICES LOOK LIKE IN K-5 CLASSROOMS.
Decompressing Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge: The Case of Division Presented by: DeAnn Huinker Melissa Hedges Kevin McLeod Jennifer Bay-Williams Association.
Effective mathematics instruction:  foster positive mathematical attitudes;  focus on conceptual understanding ;  includes students as active participants.
Preparing for NGSS: Analyzing and Interpreting Data Add your information here:
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them How would you describe the problem in your own words? How would you describe what you are trying.
AP Biology Revised Framework MSTA 2012 Tina Wagner.
Why Change How We Teach?. 2 The “Modeling Chemistry” Approach to Science Teaching Cheryl Litman.
CREATING A SOCIAL STUDIES CLASSROOM
Design Question 4 – Element 22
Conceptual Change Theory
Mathematical Practice Standards
Inquiry-Based Instruction
5 E’s - Instructional Model
Common Core State Standards: Myths vs. Facts
Helping Students Examine Their Reasoning
Using Scientific Inquiry to Drive Engineering Design
Modeling Instruction in the High School Physics Classroom
Models and Modeling in the High School Chemistry Classroom
Using Cognitive Science To Inform Instructional Design
Big Ideas & Problem Solving A look at Problem Solving in the Primary Classroom Lindsay McManus.
Classroom Discussions to Support Problem Solving
OSEP Leadership Conference July 28, 2015 Margaret Heritage, WestEd
Writing in Math: Digging Deeper into Short Constructed Responses
Cluster Cycle 3: Meeting 4: Introducing the Inference Strategy Chunk 1: C+S=I Cluster Cycle 3 Goal: By the end of the cycle 80% of students in grades.
teacher-centered supervision
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 6
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 7
Creating an Active Learning environment
SCIENCE DEPARTMENT CURRICULUM NIGHT
Science Matters September-October 2012.
Common Core State Standards Standards for Mathematical Practice
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PRACTICES
Lesson Structure From September we will be using Maths No Problem text books. Text books have been developed based on excellent mastery practise across.
Using Scientific Inquiry to Drive Engineering Design
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Setting Writing Goals in Science The Living Environment
mastery Maths with Greater Depth at Rosehill Infant SCHOOL
Presentation transcript:

Models and Modeling in the High School Physics Classroom Larry Dukerich Modeling Instruction Program Arizona State University We’re here to tell you about the Modeling Method of instruction: developed in a collaborative effort by Malcolm Wells, a HS teacher and David Hestenes, prof of physics at ASU. These are the folks who developed the FCI and MB test which appearedin Mar 92 TPT. The MM, using results of physics education research attemprs to match instructional design to the way we believe students learn

The Problem with Traditional Instruction It presumes two kinds of knowledge: facts and knowhow. Facts and ideas are things that can be packaged into words and distributed to students. Knowhow can be packaged as rules or procedures. We come to understand the structure and behavior of real objects only by constructing models. First some background on what is the problem with conventional instruction. p1 Leads to marketing model of education: researchers and university professors as producers , HS teachers as retailers, and students as consumers of knowledge. p2

“Teaching by Telling” is Ineffective Students usually miss the point of what we tell them. Key words or concepts do not elicit the same “schema” for students as they do for us. Watching the teacher solve problems does not improve student problem-solving skills. Our students don't share our background, so key words, which conjure up complex relationships between diagrams, strategies, mathematical models mean little to them. To us, the phrase inclined plane conjures up a complex set of pictures, diagrams, and problem-solving strategies. To the students, it's a board. All my careful solutions of problems at the board simply made ME a better problem-solver.

Memorization vs Understanding What does it mean when students can readily solve the quantitative problem at left, yet not answer the conceptual question at right? For the circuit above, determine the current in the 4 W resistor and the potential difference between P and Q. Bulbs A, B and C are identical. What happens to the brightness of bulbs A and B when switch S is closed?

Instructional Objectives Construct and use scientific models to describe, to explain, to predict and to control physical phenomena. Model physical objects and processes using diagrammatic, graphical and algebraic representations. View small set of basic models as the content core of physics. Evaluate scientific models through comparison with empirical data. Recognize modeling as the procedural core of scientific knowledge. What should we teach? Our students should learn to do the following: They should see that physics involves learning to use a small set of models, rather than mastering an endless string of seemingly unrelated topics.

Why modeling?! To make students’ classroom experience closer to the scientific practice of physicists. To make the coherence of scientific knowledge more evident to students by making it more explicit. Construction and testing of math models is a central activity of research physicists. Models and Systems are explicitly recognized as major unifying ideas for all the sciences by the AAAS Project 2061 for the reform of US science education. Robert Karplus made systems and models central to the SCIS elementary school science curriculum. Emphasis on points 1 and 2.

Models vs Problems The problem with problem-solving Students come to see problems and their answers as the units of knowledge. Students fail to see common elements in novel problems. “But we never did a problem like this!” Models as basic units of knowledge A few basic models are used again and again with only minor modifications. Students identify or create a model and make inferences from the model to produce a solution. We use the ability to solve problems as a means for evaluating our students’ understanding. But our students come to see problems and their answers as the essential units of knowledge. They call for us to show them as many examples as possible and pray that the test has problems like the ones they saw. How do novices solve problems? They reach into their gunny sack of equation and find one with nearly the same variables. How do experts solve problems? They start by drawing a diagram.

What Do We Mean by Model? This word is used in many ways. The physical system is objective; i.e., open to inspection by everyone. Each one of us attempts to make sense of it through the use of metaphors. Unfortunately, there is no way to peek into another’s mind to view their physical intuition. Instead, we are forced to make external symbolic representations; we can reach consensus on the way to do this, and judge the fidelity of one’s mental picture by the kinds of representations they make. So the structure of a model is distributed over these various representations; later we’ll provide some specific examples.

Multiple Representations Multiple representations. We all use them, but before I began to use this method, I didn't make the connection between the features of the various representation explicit. with explicit statements describing the relationship between these representations

constructivist vs transmissionist How to Teach it? constructivist vs transmissionist cooperative inquiry vs lecture/demonstration student-centered vs teacher-centered active engagement vs passive reception student activity vs teacher demonstration student articulation vs teacher presentation lab-based vs textbook-based Here are the key ways in which the modeling method differs from conventional instruction. Students present solutions to problems which they have to defend, rather than listen to clear presentations from the instructor. The instructor, by paying attention to student’s reasoning, can judge the level of student understanding.

I - Model Development Students in cooperative groups design and perform experiments. use computers to collect and analyze data. formulate functional relationship between variables. evaluate “fit” to data. Instead of following a set of pre-determined instructions, students devise their own procedures. (collectively, with guidance?) Computers are used in the collection and analysis of data - a novel use when you consider what students ordinarily use computers for is word-processing or tutorial activities. All of the kinematic equations we use in mechanics come from experimental results.

I - Model Development Post-lab analysis whiteboard presentation of student findings multiple representations verbal diagrammatic graphical algebraic justification of conclusions Students articulate their findings to their peers using white boards. We all know that the first time we really learned a topic was when we had to prepare to teach it. Giving our students the same opportunity allows them to work out the details clearly in their minds.

Preparing Whiteboard

Making Presentation

II - Model Deployment In post-lab extension, the instructor brings closure to the experiment. fleshes out details of the model, relating common features of various representations. helps students to abstract the model from the context in which it was developed. Instructor reinforces what students have learned in the lab, points out essential features of the model, and demonstrates appropriate modeling techniques.

II - Model Deployment In deployment activities, students learn to apply model to variety of related situations. identify system composition accurately represent its structure articulate their understanding in oral presentations. Students get to apply model to a variety of situations. They develop confidence because they realize there is NOT a separate approach to each situation. Instructor elicits thorough explanation from presenters, encourages students to appeal to a model for justification of their claims, and brings students to confront their misconceptions. Instructor is no longer the source of explanations or the final authority. are guided by instructor's questions: Why did you do that? How do you know that?

II - Model Deployment Objectives: Ultimate Objective: to improve the quality of scientific discourse. move toward progressive deepening of student understanding of models and modeling with each pass through the modeling cycle. get students to see models everywhere! Ultimate Objective: autonomous scientific thinkers fluent in all aspects of conceptual and mathematical modeling.