Ethical Considerations in Human Subjects Research

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

Human Subjects Research at the University of Michigan
University Research Ethics Committee Workshop on procedure and data protection issues 30th May 2008.
Informed consent requirements
Research Involving Human Subjects All research involving the participation of human subjects must be submitted for review by the IRB (Institutional Review.
The Consent Process: It’s More Than Just a Form A “10 Minute Training” Brought to you by Cyndi Long, MS, RD, CCRC CU Sports Medicine.
© HRP Associates, Inc. Informed Consent, Parental Permission & Assent Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D., CIP President, HRP Associates, Inc.
Human Studies Program Office of Research Compliance Vice Chancellor for Research and Graduate Education Denise Lin-DeShetler, M.P.H., M.A. Director, Human.
Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), Informed Consent, and Responsibilities Requirement for IRBs -DHHS: 45 CFR Part 46 -FDA: 21 CFR 56 Requirement for and.
Ethical Considerations when Developing Human Research Protocols A discipline “born in scandal and reared in protectionism” Carol Levine, 1988.
Vicki Hammen, Vice Chair, IRB IRB Brown Bag February 9, 2009.
Behavioral Research Chapter Three Ethical Research.
Human Subjects & Research Understanding the protection of human subjects, HSRC, and the nature of the process.
Obtaining Informed Consent: 1. Elements Of Informed Consent 2. Essential Information For Prospective Participants 3. Obligation for investigators.
PPA 691 – Seminar in Public Policy Analysis Lecture 1d – The Belmont Report.
Ethical Guidelines for Research with Human Participants
8 Criteria for IRB Approval of Research 45 CFR (a)
Ethics in Research Stangor Chapter 3.
FOUNDATIONS OF NURSING RESEARCH Sixth Edition CHAPTER Copyright ©2012 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Nursing Research,
Scientific Data Management for the Protection of Human Subjects Robert R. Downs NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC) Center for International.
Research Methods for the Social Sciences: Ethics Ryan J. Martin, Ph.D. Thomas N. Cummings Research Fellow March 9, 2010.
Ethical Issues in Research
Educational Research and the VCOM Institutional Review Board
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
A History of Human Research Protections and Institutional Review Boards Roger L. Bertholf, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Pathology Chair, University of.
The Goals and Principles of Human Participant Protection Part 4: Vulnerable Populations.
Regulatory criteria for approval Bob Craig, July 2007.
The IRB Approval Process Michael Bingham, JD Assistant Director, University of Wisconsin-Madison Education IRB
Human Research Protection Program 101 July 19-20, 2007 Milwaukee, WI.
May I have your permission please? The consent process: What, Where, When, Who and Why Valerie Smith OHRP IRB Program Manager
1 Protection of Vulnerable Subjects in Research Melody Lin, Ph.D. December 2012.
Chapter 18 Ethical Precautions in Music Therapy Research.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) What is our Purpose and Role for Ethical Research.
Ethics Ethics Applied to Research. Ethics in Nursing Research Scientific Misconduct – a fabrication, falsification, plagiarism or other practice that.
Human Subject Protection Research Imperatives. History World War II - Nuremberg Tuskegee Study Belmont Report Modern Problems - Inadequacy of “Good Intentions”
Deception in Human Research Learning Objectives Define Deception and Incomplete Disclosure Understand when Deception or Incomplete Disclosure are allowable.
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
TUN IRB: The Basics February 26, IRB Function Review human-subject research Ensure the rights & welfare of human subjects are adequately protected.
APPROVAL CRITERIA AN IRB INFOSHORT MAY CFR CRITERIA FOR IRB APPROVAL OF RESEARCH In order for an IRB to approve a research study, all.
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
Donna B. Konradi, DNS, RN, CNE GERO 586 Understanding the Ethics of Research.
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
M6728 Ethics in Research Informed Consent/IRBs Reporting Research Results.
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
Pediatric Research Ethics and the Research Subject Advocate Tomas Jose Silber, MD, MASS RSA and Director, Office of Ethics, CNMC Professor of Pediatrics,
 What is an IRB and why do we need one at Western?  Who needs to submit proposals to the IRB?  If approved, how long is your proposal good for?  Is.
Chapter 2: Ethical Issues in Program Evaluation. Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) Federal mandate for IRBs –Concern during 1970s about unethical research.
Copyright c 2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.1 Chapter 5 Research Ethics All researchers, even students, have a responsibility to conduct ethical research.
Doing IRB Right … Together JOHN POTTER, OD, MA Chair, Institutional Review Board.
Ethics in Research Each research study involves a careful risk/benefit analysis prior to beginning data collection. The question each researcher must ask.
Ethics. The branch of philosophy that involves systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong conduct Moral principles that govern.
Susan Sonne, PharmD, BCPP Chair, MUSC IRB II
Back to Basics – Approval Criteria
IRB BASICS Ethics and Human Subject Protections Summer 2016
Research on Populations Prone to Being Vulnerable
Risk Determinations and Research with Children
Chapter 5 Research Ethics
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. CIP President HRP Associates, Inc.
The Importance of Ethics and the Protection of Subjects By Westley R
© 2016 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN THE CONDUCT OF HEALTH SCIENCES RESEARCH
IRB BASICS: Ethics and Human Subject Protections
Ethics in Research.
Greg Nezat CRNA, PhD CDR/NC/USN Chairman, IRB II
Ethics Review Morals: Rules that define what is right and wrong Ethics: process of examining moral standards and looking at how we should interpret and.
Exploring 45 CFR , Criteria for IRB Approval of Research
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
Informed Consent Allison Blodgett, PhD, CIP Director of IRB Operations
Presentation transcript:

Ethical Considerations in Human Subjects Research Presenter: Dr. Debbiesiu L. Lee Associate Professor/ Associate Chair Educational and Psychological Studies Department School of Education and Human Development University of Miami

Outline and Purposes of Presentation Define human subjects research and Institutional Review Boards (IRB) Review the basic ethical principles of human subjects research Review the application of these ethical principles

Defining Research & Human Subjects Research Research is the systematic collection, analysis, and interpretation of data to answer a certain question or solve a specific problem. Human Subjects Research Any research that involves human beings as providers of information or data.

The Research Process Discovery of New Knowledge (research) Dissemination of Knowledge (publication, education) Application of Knowledge (translation of research to policies and practices in the community) The research process is not only the creation or discovery of new knowledge, but also the dissemination of that knowledge for wider consumption, including publication and education. As well as, when it comes to human subjects research, the application of this knowledge into policies and practices.

Why do we need Human Subjects Protection? Premises (1) Human subjects are essential to conducting research intended to improve human health and well- being. (2) The relationship between investigator/s and research participants should be based on trust, honesty, and respect. (3) Investigators (who design and implement research) should understand their obligations to protect the rights of research participants. Unfortunately, in our past, research has sometimes neglected the rights and well-being of participants, and so these protections were created as a result.

Institutional Review Boards (IRB) Institutional Review Boards are establishments (typically associated with institutions of higher learning) that are responsible for and oversee the protection of human subjects. IRBs are also responsible for ensuring that the investigators understand and fulfill their obligations to protect the rights and welfare of research participants. IRB monitors the research to ensure the rights and welfare of research participants. Institutional review boards were further created to ensure that human subjects were protected in research.

Basic Ethical Principles Guiding Human Subjects Research

Basic Ethical Principles Guiding Human Subjects Research Respect for Persons (respect people’s decisions, protect the vulnerable) (2) Beneficience (do no harm, do good) (3) Justice (treat people equitably)

1. RESPECT FOR PERSONS Individuals should be treated as autonomous agents. “Participants, to the degree that they are capable, should be given the opportunity to choose what shall or shall not happen to them.” Individuals with diminished autonomy are entitled to special protections. Children People who are mentally incapacitated Prisoners They should be fully informed about the research and should be able to make a free choice about whether or not they would like to participate in the research.

2. BENEFICENCE a. Do no harm b. Maximize potential benefits and minimize possible harms (risks).

3. JUSTICE (1) Individuals and groups be treated fairly and equitably in terms of bearing the burdens and receiving the benefits of research. (2) Investigators “should not offer potentially beneficial research only to some patients who are in their favor or select only ‘undesirable’ persons for risky research.” It should not be that one group of people suffer for research, and another group of people benefit.

Application of Ethical Principles Into Research Practices

APPLICATION OF ETHICAL PRINCIPLES INTO RESEARCH RESPECT FOR PERSONS: Informed Consent BENEFICIENCE: Assessment of Risks and Benefits JUSTICE: Selection of Participants

Informed Consent A legally-effective, voluntary agreement that is given to a prospective research participant following comprehension and consideration of all relevant information pertinent to a decision to participate in a study. (1) Information (2) Comprehension (3) Voluntariness Reduces the potential for coercion or undue influence . Thus, there are three components necessary in Informed Consent. (1) information, (2) comprehension, (3) voluntariness.

INFORMED CONSENT (1) Information Researcher should ensure that potential participants are informed of the research procedures, and potential risks and benefits of participating in the research. Coercion undue influence

INFORMED CONSENT (1) Information The purpose of the study Any reasonably foreseeable risks to the individual Potential benefits to the individual or others Alternatives to the research protocol The extent of confidentiality protections for the individual Compensation Contact information for questions regarding the study, participants’ rights, and in case of injury The conditions of participation, including right to refuse or withdraw without penalty.

INFORMED CONSENT (2) Comprehension Individuals must have the mental or decisional capacity to understand the information presented to them in order to make an informed decision about participation in research. Participants must be able to accurately comprehend (1) the risks and benefits associated with research, (2) weigh them according to their own opinions, beliefs, and values, and (3) should be able to take appropriate action.

INFORMED CONSENT (2) Comprehension Special Protections for Vulnerable Populations “Special provisions may need to be made when an individual’s comprehension is severely limited or when a class of research participants is considered incapable of informed decision making” children, people who are mentally incapacitated, prisoners. In some cases, respect for persons may require seeking the permission of other parties, such as a parent or legal guardian.”

Children’s Participation in Research Children may not have full capacity to make decisions in their own best interests; and therefore: Children are unable to provide “legally effective informed consent” Because children cannot provide informed consent, children provide assent to participate in research, to the extent that they are able, and parents/guardians give permission for a child to participate in research. Assent: “Affirmative agreement to participate in research. Mere failure to object should not, absent affirmative agreement, be construed as assent.”

INFORMED CONSENT (3) Voluntariness Individuals’ decisions about participation in research should not be influenced by anyone involved in conducting the research: “...consent must be freely given or truly voluntary.” Avoiding influencing potential participants’ decisions either through (coercion) or through (undue influence)

INFORMED CONSENT (3) Voluntariness Coercion (threats) “Influencing an individual decision about whether or not to do something by using explicit or implied threats (loss of good standing in job, poor grades, etc.)”

INFORMED CONSENT (3) Voluntariness Undue Influence (Excessive rewards) “ An offer of an excessive, unwarranted, inappropriate, or improper reward or other overture in order to obtain compliance” “offers that are too attractive may blind prospective subjects to the risks or impair their ability to exercise proper judgment; and they may prompt subjects to lie or conceal information that, if known, would disqualify them from enrolling — or continuing — as participants in a research project.”

INFORMED CONSENT/ Voluntariness Undue Influence –vs- Compensation Some types of research involve a significant commitment from research participants in terms of time or effort, and investigators may wish to provide compensation. Compensation is meant to reimburse research participants for their time, research-related inconveniences, and/or research-related discomforts. Compensation is not a benefit of the research.

INFORMED CONSENT Obtaining Informed Consent Investigators should present informed consent in a manner that is understandable to the potential participants. Methods used in addition to a consent form to enhance individuals’ comprehension: Oral presentations (opportunity to discuss the information and ask questions), Providing additional educational materials, such as brochures, Video presentations.

INFORMED CONSENT Requirements for Documentation Informed consent must be documented using a written form that either contains all of the required elements, or a short form that states that all of the required elements have been presented orally. This form must be signed by either the participant or the participant’s legally authorized representative. Informed consent legally authorized representative

APPLICATION OF ETHICAL PRINCIPLES INTO RESEARCH RESPECT FOR PERSONS: Informed Consent BENEFICENCE: Assessment of Risks and Benefits JUSTICE: Selection of Participants

Assessment of Risks and Benefits Benefits Greater than Potential Harms Research requires that: Risks are minimized . Unavoidable risks are justified as necessary for sound scientific design. Research studies should provide important, new knowledge for society.

Assessment of Risks and Benefits Potential Risks in Research A. Physical Physical risks may include pain, injury, and impairment of a sense such as touch or sight. These risks may be brief or extended, temporary or permanent, occur during participation in the research or arise after. Should follow protocols to minimize risks.

Risk in Research (cont.) B. Psychological Psychological risks can include anxiety, sadness, regret and emotional distress, among others. Possible ways to protect against psychological risks: (1) reminding participants of their right to withdraw from research (2) limit their participation if they become uncomfortable (3) providing counseling or psychological support for participants who experience distress

Risk of Research (cont.) C. Social Social risks can range from jeopardizing the individual’s reputation and social standing, to placing the individual at-risk of political or social reprisals. Minimizing social risks to participants involves protecting confidential data.

Privacy and Confidentiality Protecting privacy of individuals Privacy means being “free from unsanctioned intrusion”. Do not ask more personal questions than needed to answer the research questions. Confidentiality of data Confidentiality means holding secret all information relating to an individual, unless the individual gives consent permitting disclosure Investigators

APPLICATION OF ETHICAL PRINCIPLES INTO RESEARCH RESPECT FOR PERSONS: Informed Consent BENEFICIENCE: Assessment of Risks and Benefits JUSTICE: Selection of Participants

3. Justice/ SELECTION OF PARTICIPANTS (1) Individuals and groups be treated fairly and equitably in terms of bearing the burdens and receiving the benefits of research. (2) Arises in decisions about inclusion and exclusion criteria for participation in research. (3) Investigators “should not offer potentially beneficial research only to some patients who are in their favor or select only ‘undesirable’ persons for risky research.”

INCLUSION/ EXCLUSION CRITERIA Equitable Distribution In order to achieve an equitable distribution of the risks and potential benefits of the research, Investigators must determine the distribution of different groups (men and women, racial or ethnic groups, adults and children). These should be reported.

References and Links: CITI. Collaborative Institutional Training Institute. https://about.citiprogram.org/en/homepage/ National Institute of Health. NIH Office of Extramural Research. Protecting Human Research Participants https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/index.html Belmont Report https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/

Thank you!