How to improve FADN efficiency in the field of economic analysis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Implementation Structure DG AGRI, October 2005
Advertisements

Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, July 2005 Rural Development.
How to measure the CMEF R2 Indicator about Gross Value Added in agricultural holdings without reliable accounting data ? A methodological proposal applied.
Biodiversity/HNV indicators and the CAP Zélie Peppiette Rural Development Evaluation Manager DG AGRI, European Commission UK seminar on HNV farming policy,
1 Jela Tvrdonova,  Strategic approach to rural development  Common approach to evaluation: legal background and CMEF  Monitoring and evaluation.
Agriregionieuropa Methodological and practical solutions for the evaluation of the economic impact of RDP in Latvia M.oec. Armands Veveris Latvian University,
MALAWI CAADP IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS A PRESENTATION MADE AT THE FANRPAN REGIONAL POLICY DIALOGUE- MAPUTO, MOZAMBIQUE. 3 rd September, 2000 By K. Ng’ambi.
The implementation of the rural development policy and its impacts on innovation and modernisation of rural economy Christian Vincentini, European Commission.
2_Monitoring and Evaluation of CAP 2014 – 2020 Approach of PII
Evaluation methods and tools (Focus on delivery mechanism) Jela Tvrdonova, 2014.
European Health Forum, Gastein 2002 REGIONAL DIFFERENCES IN HEALTH, SOCIO-ECONOMIC DETERMINANTS AND LIFE STYLE J. Maucec Zakotnik, M.D. State secretary,
Ex-ante evaluation for RDPs 4 th International Evaluation Conference Budapest, 26th September 2013 Zélie Peppiette, DG AGRI Rural Development.
MARKETS II M&E FRAMEWORK AND CHALLENGES Joseph Obado.
The use of impact indicators for the evaluation of support for investment in agricultural holdings : case study of the Rural Development Programme for.
Workshop II Monitoring and Evaluation INTERACT ENPI Annual Conference December 2009 | Rome.
1 Case Study: Performance-oriented budgeting in Slovenia – Achievements so far and obstacles encountered Mateja Bizilj Ministry of Finance, Slovenia Tbilisi,
Belgrade, Donor Coordination Meeting Belgrade, 30 th of November 2011.
4/5 June 2009Challenges of the CMEF & Ongoing Evaluation 1 Common monitoring and evaluation framework Jela Tvrdonova, 2010.
Results achieved under IFAD VII and directions for results measurement under IFAD VIII Edward Heinemann Programme Manager, Action Plan Secretariat, Office.
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
MONITORING SYSTEM OF EU STRUCTURAL FUNDS: PHYSICAL INDICATORS International Conference for New Member States February 1-2, 2012, Vilnius (Lithuania) European.
Guidelines for LDS preparation for Croatian LAG’s Estonian Leader Union Kadri Tillemann and Kristiina Timmo 28 th of September, Zagreb.
DESCRIPTION OF THE MONITORING AND EVALUATION SYSTEM IN POLAND Action Plan and the Two-year NRN Operational Plans.
Evaluation of NRNs Andreas Resch, Evaluation Advisor.
4/5 June 2009Challenges of the CMEF & Ongoing Evaluation Common monitoring and evaluation framework for evaluation of rural development programs.
Croatia: Result orientation within the process of preparation of programming documents V4+ Croatia and Slovenia Expert Level Conference Budapest,
Implementation of Leader program in Estonia Kristiina Tammets.
Evaluation Experts Meeting, DG AGRI L4, Brüssel, The Monitoring- and Evaluation System of the Austrian RDP Karl M. Ortner (AWI) Otto.
1 INCENTIVES AND MONITORING THE AKIS IN FLANDERS Anne Vuylsteke.
Montenegrin FADN FAO project Szilárd Keszthelyi, PhD.
Common monitoring and evaluation framework for evaluation of rural development program Jela Tvrdonova, 2016.
Monitoring and Evaluating Rural Advisory Services
Project monitoring and evaluation
Session 9 – Data exploitation and publication
TAIEX Workshop: Improving data collection and the Use of the Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN) Communication in process of data collection and data.
GUIDELINES Evaluation of National Rural Networks
Ministry of Finance Contribution of the Operational Programmes to the implementation of the NSRF objectives Boriana Pencheva Director Management.
TAIEX Workshop: Improving data collection and the Use of the Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN) National experiences in adopting new information needs.
Cost analysis of key statistical products
Session 1 – Study Objectives
Data validation on data collection software level –improving the system of data quality Tomaž Cör Beograd, 15th-16th September 2016.
Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations
UNECE Work Session on Gender Statistics, Belgrade,
Supervisor: Thierry Benoit Intern: Da Silva Cabral Daniel
Common Monitoring and Evaluation System for Rural Development
AEIs State of play DG AGRI Eurostat Working Group AEI Statistics
P C Girihagama, T U Thilakawardane
Draft Guidance Document (ERDF/ESF)
Current budgetary and regulatory position of the CAP
Policy developments and the use of statistical data
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland
DG AGRI, Unit F6 Bioenergy, biomass, forestry and climatic changes
Monitoring & Reporting 2019
SSG on WFD and agriculture
Opening seminar of the project
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Task Force on Target Setting and Reporting TFTSR
Danish Case Study presentation
Relevance of GNB for CAP monitoring and evaluation system
Policy needs for rural development statistics and data analysis
The Estonian experience with ex-ante evaluation – set-up and progress
Environmental Protection Expenditure Accounts
The CAP post-2013: statistical needs in the field of rural development
Monitoring programs and projects Using Results Framework
Lecture was elaborated with the help of grant project of Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports, FRVŠ n „Innovation of Subject Financing of Building.
ESF monitoring and evaluation in Draft guidance
AEI where DG AGRI is in the lead
Project intervention logic
INFORMATION SEMINAR Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania programme
AAdopted Rural Development Programmes – implications for second RBMPs
Presentation transcript:

How to improve FADN efficiency in the field of economic analysis Tomaž Cör Belgrade, 15th-16th September 2016

Use of FADN data Farmers for their own purposes; Agricultural Advisory Service; Start of the strategic farm management; Universities and other research institutions (models) Statistical Office; MAFF; Strategic analyses, Monitoring and Reporting.

Do you know who this is?

Why Monitoring and Evaluation of RDP and how? Importance of knowing if our policy or in our case Rural Development Program is going the right way - by using CMEF Common Monitoring and evaluation framework). A key-tool for programming, monitoring and evaluation is so-called “Intervention logic”, which establishes the causal chain from the budgetary input, via the output and the results of measures, to their impact. The intervention logic guides the progressive assessment of a measure’s contribution to achieving its objectives.

Intervention logic

Why indicators? Indicators are used as a tool to assess different effects on particular level (output, result, impact): how far the expected objectives have been achieved by measures or whole programme indicators should be specific, measurable, available/achievable in a cost effective way, relevant for the programme and timely available indicators can not always be filled with quantitative statistical data; in some cases, indicators might also include qualitative assessments or logical assumptions Indicators are common (proposed by EC) and additional/national. Each MS can define additional indicators due to program’s specialty or monitoring improvement.

Types of indicators? Baseline indicators: important reference points. Input indicators: they refer to the budget or other resources allocated at each level of the assistance. Output indicators: they measure activities directly realized within programs. Result indicators: they measure the direct and immediate effects of the intervention. Impact indicators: they refer to the benefits of the program both at the level of the intervention but also more generally in the program area.

Data gathering Data sources: statistical data (SORS) approved applications by different measures (IT support; AAMRD) economic and other results: FADN reports (holdings), accountancy reports-AJPES (enterprises) and other reports impact assessment of different measures on economic operations of beneficiaries cooperation with other institutions (Agricultural Institute, Environmental agency, DOPPS - BirdLife Slovenia)

Economic indicators One of the most important objectives of the RDP is increase of competitiveness. Result indicator for competitiveness is Productivity -Gross value added on Annual working unit (GVA/AVU). It is important to assess, how is/was productivity meliorated by the invested grunts. If we want to do that, we have to know the value of the same indicator before and after the investment on single farm level. Formula to calculate GVA: GVA = output - intermediate consumption.

Economic indicators In Slovenia, farmers are not obligate to do any kind of bookkeeping so it was quite an important question, how to measure this. Possibilities for economic indicators (GVA, GVA/AWU) Estimations on the basis of gross margin (Statistics) Not precise, a lot of speculations - but cheap. Introduction of some kind of bookkeeping. Precise but demanding - legal base needed.

“Compulsory” farms For this purpose we have invented so called „Compulsory FADN farms“ – farms that received investment grants from RDP. Since previous programming period “Compulsory” farms have to start with FADN accountancy when they received the letter from paying agency, that their application for the grants has been excepted. In new RDP FADN data is used also for preparation of the business plans – if the business plans are based on FADN or two sided bookkeeping, the applications get additional points at the evaluation, so they have advantage.

“Compulsory” farms Legal basis for introduction of FADN to the recipients of RDP investment money was first in natoinal RD regulation and then also in public tender documentation. 30 days after the approval of application the applicants should start with FADN accountancy. For at least 5 years after receiving the money they should send every year standard FADN results in the electronic form (1 excel line) to the FADN unit at the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Food(MAAF).

“Compulsory” farms MAFF EC, DG Agri arround 2000 individual farms Accountancy offices Kranj, Ptuj, Ljubljana, Celje, Maribor, Nova Gorica, Murska Sobota, Novo mesto MAFF EC, DG Agri Agency RS of Agricultural Markets and Rural Development arround 2000 individual farms

“Compulsory” farms “Compulsory” farms are responsible for collection and processing of the data!!! Agricultural Advisory Service is available for help. Farms can process data by themselves or they can hire accountancy office to do that for them. Standard results for one year should be sent to the FADN Unit at MAAF by the end of March next year. The price for processing the data at the accountancy office is between 200 and 250 €.

Calculating the indicators Calculation of economic indicators from Standard Results: Taking the data on farm level and compere it to data before the investment (from application documentation), so we can assess if the investment was justified and according to business plan. GVA (SE 310), AWU (SE 010), income... Calculation on national level GVA/AWU, income of supported activity

Conclusions It is important to know, where you are and where are you going with RDP. Economic indicators for farms are difficult to access without any kind of bookkeeping. FADN results can be very good source of the economic data, both for preparation of business plans and annual reports. Legal basis for this kind of FADN data use should be prepared.

Thank you for your attention!