Factsheet # 17 Understanding multiscale dynamics of landscape change through the application of remote sensing & GIS Estimating Tree Species Diversity.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS/EROS Data Center Global Land Cover Project – Experiences and Research Interests GLC2000-JRC.
Advertisements

Centennial Grove College of Forest Resources University of Washington April 28 th, 2007 This visualization was produced by Dr. L. Monika Moskal at the.
FOR 474: Forest Inventory Plot Level Metrics from Lidar Heights Other Plot Measures Sources of Error Readings: See Website.
Remote sensing is up! Inventory & monitoring Inventory – To describe the current status of forest Landcover / landuse classification Forest structure /
Overview of Biomass Mapping The Woods Hole Research Center Alessandro Baccini, Wayne Walker and Ned Horning November 8 – 12, Samarinda, Indonesia.
DR. JOHANNES HEINZEL (Dipl.-Geogr.) University of Freiburg, Department of Remote Sensing and Landscape Information Systems, Freiburg, Germany Use.
Landscape-scale forest carbon measurements for reference sites: The role of Remote Sensing Nicholas Skowronski USDA Forest Service Climate, Fire and Carbon.
Computer modelling ecosystem processes and change Lesson 8 Presentation 1.
USDA Forest Service Remote Sensing Applications Center Forest Inventory and Analysis New Technology How is FIA integrating new technological developments.
Introduction OBJECTIVES  To develop proxies for canopy cover and canopy closure based on discrete-return LiDAR data.  To determine whether there is a.
Chapter 17 Frontiers in Ecosystem Science © 2013 Elsevier, Inc. All rights reserved. From Fundamentals of Ecosystem Science, Weathers, Strayer, and Likens.
Quantitative Estimates of Biomass and Forest Structure in Coastal Temperate Rainforests Derived from Multi-return Airborne Lidar Marc G. Kramer 1 and Michael.
Biomass Mapping The set of field biomass training data and the MODIS observations were used to develop a regression tree model (Random Forest). Biomass.
The US National Greenhouse Gas Inventory of Forests: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going Christopher W. Woodall with Domke, Smith, Coulston, Healey,
__________. Introduction Importance – Wildlife Habitat – Nutrient Cycling – Long-Term Carbon Storage – Key Indicator for Biodiversity Minimum Stocking.
1 UNFCCC Workshop on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation in Developing Countries 30/08-01/9/2006, Rome, Italy Overview of scientific, socio- economic,
Citation: Moskal, L. M. and J. Kirsch, Calibrating Estimates of Above- and Below- Ground Forests Biomass Using Remotely Sensed Metrics. Factsheet.
Investigating the Carbon Cycle in Terrestrial Ecosystems (ICCTE) Scott Ollinger * -PI, Jana Albrecktova †, Bobby Braswell *, Rita Freuder *, Mary Martin.
DN Ordinate Length DN Difference Estimating forest structure in tropical forested sites.
LiDAR Remote Sensing of Forest Vegetation Ryan Anderson, Bruce Cook, and Paul Bolstad University of Minnesota.
THE ISSUE: Physically occupying every location for data collection is not always possible. A blue- tooth enabled laser rangefinder allows the user to collect.
Automated Tree-Crown Delineation Using Photogrammetric Analyses Austin Pinkerton * and Eben Broadbent ** Spatial Ecology and Conservation Lab (
Examination of Canopy Disturbance in Logged Forests in the Brazilian Amazon using IKONOS Imagery Michael Palace 1, Michael Keller 1,2, Bobby Braswell 1,
Remote Sensing of Forest Structure Van R. Kane College of Forest Resources.
Citation: Richardson, J. J, L.M. Moskal, S. Kim, Estimating Urban Forest Leaf Area Index (LAI) from aerial LiDAR. Factsheet # 5. Remote Sensing and.
Citation: Moskal., L. M. and D. M. Styers, Land use/land cover (LULC) from high-resolution near infrared aerial imagery: costs and applications.
Citation: Zhang Z.Y.,Kazakova A.N. and Moskal L.M Integrating LIDAR with Hyperspectral Data for Tree Species Classification in Urban Ecosystems.
FOR 274: From Photos to Lidar Introduction to LiDAR What is it? How does it work? LiDAR Jargon and Terms Natural Resource Applications Data Acquisition.
Biomass and Carbon Residence Time Estimation by Remote Sensing and Direct Measurements at the Santa Rita Experimental Research Station 1 Theodore Jones.
Citation: Moskal, L. M., D. M. Styers, J. Richardson and M. Halabisky, Seattle Hyperspatial Land use/land cover (LULC) from LiDAR and Near Infrared.
Citation: Kato, A.., L. M. Moskal., P. Schiess, M. Swanson, D. Calhoun and W. Stuetzel, LiDAR based tree crown surface reconstruction. Factsheet.
Puulajeittainen estimointi ja ei-parametriset menetelmät Multi-scale Geospatial Analysis of Forest Ecosystems Tahko Petteri Packalén Faculty.
Integrating LiDAR Intensity and Elevation Data for Terrain Characterization in a Forested Area Cheng Wang and Nancy F. Glenn IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE.
Remote sensing technologies that utilize lasers are becoming increasingly available to researchers and can quickly provide landscape level coverage of.
Module 2.8 Overview and status of evolving technologies REDD+ training materials by GOFC-GOLD, Wageningen University, World Bank FCPF 1 Module 2.8 Overview.
Citation: Halabisky, Meghan A, Moskal, LM Monitoring Wetlands Dynamics Across Spatial Scales and Over Time. Factsheet # 7. Remote Sensing and Geospatial.
Forest ecological applications of ALS ALS provide 3D information where each point has height (and intensity) value Even with low pulse density data, say,
Factsheet # 26 Understanding multiscale dynamics of landscape change through the application of remote sensing & GIS CREATING LIDAR-DRIVEN MODELS TO IMPROVE.
Factsheet # 27 Canopy Structure From Aerial and Terrestrial LiDAR
Presentation Outline What is an irregular shelterwood system?
Factsheet # 8 Predicting an Invasive Species’ Distribution with
Land Cover Mapping and Habitat Analysis
Retrieval of Information from Different Optical 3D Remote Sensing Sources for Use in Forest Inventory (3D-FORINVENT) HRVATSKI ŠUMARSKI INSTITUT CROATIAN.
Factsheet # ? Understanding multiscale dynamics of landscape change through the application of remote sensing & GIS Title Goes Here, Capitalize Each Word,
Factsheet # 20 Understanding multiscale dynamics of landscape change through the application of remote sensing & GIS Title Goes Here, Capitalize Each Word,
Factsheet # 23 Study Area Methods
Factsheet # 12 Understanding multiscale dynamics of landscape change through the application of remote sensing & GIS Land use/land cover (LULC) from high-resolution.
College of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry.
Factsheet # 19 Understanding multiscale dynamics of landscape change through the application of remote sensing & GIS Hyperspectral Remote Sensing of Urban.
Factsheet # 9 Decadal Analysis of Wetland & Agricultural Change
Factsheet #11 Understanding multiscale dynamics of landscape change through the application of remote sensing & GIS Small Stream Mapping Method: Local.
Factsheet # 2 Leaf Area Index (LAI) from Aerial & Terrestrial LiDAR
Factsheet # 12 Understanding multiscale dynamics of landscape change through the application of remote sensing & GIS Monitoring Ecological Restoration.
REMOTE SENSING & GEOSPATIAL ANALYSIS LABORATORY
Factsheet # 6 Spatiotemporal Analysis of Mountain Goat Habitat
Factsheet # 21 Understanding multiscale dynamics of landscape change through the application of remote sensing & GIS Quantifying Vertical and Horizontal.
USGS contribution to assessing mangrove conditions using a multidisciplinary approach Elitsa Peneva-Reed 24 October, 2017.
Land Cover Mapping and Habitat Analysis
Precision Forestry Cooperative Lidar Projects
Why LiDAR makes hyperspectral imagery more valuable for forest species mapping OLI 2018 Andrew Brenner, Scott Nowicki & Zack Raymer.
National Forest Inventory for Great Britain
By: Paul A. Pellissier, Scott V. Ollinger, Lucie C. Lepine
A Comparison of Forest Biodiversity Metrics Using Field Measurements and Aircraft Remote Sensing Kaitlyn Baillargeon Scott Ollinger,
WNPS Native Plant Stewardship Program
Lucie C. Lepine, Scott V. Ollinger, Mary E. Martin
Finnish experiences in deriving CORINE land cover information
Using Airborne Hyperspectral and LiDAR Remote Sensing to Map
Evaluating the Ability to Derive Estimates of Biodiversity from Remote Sensing Kaitlyn Baillargeon Scott Ollinger, Andrew Ouimette,
Factsheet # 15 Coastal Wetlands: Monitoring Estuarine Topographic Change with Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) Understanding multiscale dynamics of landscape.
Big data for Global Change Ecology (Biogeography)
Presentation transcript:

Factsheet # 17 Understanding multiscale dynamics of landscape change through the application of remote sensing & GIS Estimating Tree Species Diversity Using Aerial LiDAR & Multispectral Imagery This research was funded by the BLM and the UW Precision Forestry Co-op Introduction Gradients in plant community composition and diversity may be important drivers of patterns in C cycling and productivity. Stand diversity (richness, evenness, and diversity of dominant species), especially tree species dominance within the stand could represent major biotic influences on ecosystem C dynamics (Fig.1). Species-specific differences in plant functional traits are well recognized as important controls on ecosystem processes and can be important drivers productivity. Experiments suggest a positive relationship between ecosystem productivity and species diversity (Naeem et al. 1994, Tilman et al. 1996, 2001, Hector et al.1999). Recent research in the Pacific Northwest also suggests a positive relationship between ecosystem carbon uptake and species diversity in natural forested systems (Liang et al. 2007, Kirsch et al. unpub.) (Fig.1) However there is a need for studies investigating biodiversity-ecosystem function patterns in natural systems (Duffy 2009). Figure 2. LiDAR canopy height map of the study area and photos of 3 types of plots found in the EEON network. Mixed stands have a tendency to be more productive. Study Area: This study area is adjacent to Puget Sound, Washington, USA in the Evergreen Ecological Observation Network (EEON), a long-term permanent plot network of 44 ecological monitoring plots located throughout a 380-ha forest reserve owned and managed by The Evergreen State College. The ecosystem is a structurally complex, second-growth temperate forest last clear-cut in 1937-39 . The overstory is dominated by a mixed canopy of P. menziesii and four primary codominant species: A. macrophyllum, A. rubra, T. heterophylla and T. plicata, with an understory dominated primarily by Polystichum munitum and Gaultheria shallon. Figure 1. Relationship between above-ground biomass increment carbon (ABI), aboveground Net Primary Productivity of trees (ANPPtree) and overstory richness of five most dominate tree species; P. menziesii, A. macrophyllum, A. rubra, T. heterophylla, and T. plicata. (from Kirsch et al. in prep.) Traditional Approach Traditionally tree species identification data is collected as part of field-based forest inventory or aerial image interpretation. These processes can be very labor- and time- intensive. Field-based inventory analysis is usually restricted to smaller and accessible areas. Although time-consuming, data collected in the field can be used as training and validation data for species discrimination processes based on remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing Approach Remote sensing provides the tools to monitor temporal changes in both species diversity and carbon flux over large areas. There are several biomass equations that have been derived from LiDAR metrics for PNW forest systems, however the need for accurate tree species discrimination with low omission errors is still needed for forests with high vertical complexity. High resolution images have been used for species classification based on crown shape, branch structure and species-specific spectral signature. Intensity and 3-D point cloud data from aerial LiDAR can be used for estimations of species-specific proportions. The fusion of LiDAR and high resolution multispectral datasets can provide better classification results than either dataset used individually. Objectives This study will utilize airborne LiDAR and multispectral imagery to: Investigate the feasibility of measuring tree species diversity using remote sensing in a structurally and compositionally complex, non-managed second growth PNW Forest. Future objectives might involve: Development of species-specific biomass equations based on LiDAR-derived metrics for the study area. Determining diversity and productivity relationships in a natural forest system using remote sensing data. An obstacle in using remote sensing for estimating tree species diversity is the detection of shade tolerant species positioned in the subcanopy and obscured by the crowns of dominant species. Figure 3. Stem map derived from field-based measurements from one of the study plots. ⓒ RSGAL 2011 THE ISSUE: Tree species identification is important for understanding many ecosystem processes. There is a great need for a uniform, high-accuracy, low-omission model for tree species discrimination in high density, natural forest ecosystems. Through the combination of active (LiDAR) and passive (optical) remote sensing we provide fast and spatially explicit datasets that address this need. THE KEY QUESTIONS: Can LiDAR and multi-spectral imagery be used to estimate tree species diversity? Citation: Kazakova A.N., L.M. Moskal, D.M. Styers and D.G. Fischer, 2011. Estimating Tree Species Diversity Using Aerial LiDAR and Multispectral Imagery. Factsheet # 17. Remote Sensing and Geospatial Application Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. Digital version of the fact sheet can be downloaded at: http://dept.washington.edu/rsgal/