Fundamentals of the Eurostar evaluations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Livestock Improvement through Selection
Advertisements

Organic Beef Production – Sire breed comparison Richard Fallon, Brendan Swan & Elaine Leavy Organic Production Research Conference 2nd December 2008.
Importance of Genetic Evaluation for Structure in the US Dairy Industry October 10, 2012 Sam Comstock, Ph.D.
Impact of selection for increased daughter fertility on productive life and culling for reproduction H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright*, R. H. Miller Animal Improvement.
BEEF CATTLE GENETICS By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
AI Promotion Breeding Future Profits. Breeding Workshop for Stakeholders. March 2006.
But who will be the next GREAT one?. USA Bull Proofs * Bulls are ranked based upon their DAUGHTER’S (progeny) production and physical characteristics.
Principles of Selecting and Mating Farm Animals (Chapter 9) Genetic improvement of farm animals –Involves selection (choosing the best to be parents) –Involves.
December 2014 Proof Changes
Genetic evaluation of beef cattle in the Czech Republic J. Přibyl 1, J. Přibylová 1, P. Šafus 1, Z. Veselá 1, L. Vostrý 1, J. Kopecký 2, K. Malát 2, K.
Breed and Trait Selection Considerations Dan W. Moser Dept. of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University.
Straightbreeding – A simple way to reduce your bottomline D. A. Daley California State University, Chico NCBCEC Brown Bagger Session October 17, 2012.
Using EPDs in Selection Stolen and edited by: Brandon Freel and Daniel Powell Originally compiled by Colorado Agriscience Curriculum.
Livestock and Poultry Evaluation Animal Science II.
EBLEX Better Returns Programme Material produced for EBLEX Beef BRP by Signet Breeding Services Genetic Improvement of Beef Cattle in the UK.
A.I. Management Manual Fifth Edition CHAPTER 15 HEIFER A.I.
WHAT ARE EPD’S?. What is an EPD? E-xpected P-rogeny D-ifference A measure of the degree of difference between the progeny of the bull and the progeny.
The Brown Bagger Beef Cattle Adaptability Current Tools of Assessment John L. Evans Oklahoma State University 1.
CROSSBREEDING SYSTEMS for BEEF CATTLE By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
Chapters 13 & 14. Objectives Understanding of the concept of genetic variation Knowledge of quantitative vs. qualitative traits Appreciation for genetic.
Wade Shafer American Simmental Association. In the pursuit of genetic improvement all traits are antagonistically related to each other.
Brown Bagger – Beef Cattle Genetics: Fine Tuning Selection Decisions 1 How do I decide what traits are important ? Selection Indices Dorian Garrick Department.
Dr BE Mostert Geneticist SA Stud Book The Genetics of Longevity… A Quantitative Perspective.
Animal Genomics and Biotechnology Education “Economic value of genomic information: Sire and commercial heifer selection" Van Eenennaam 10/19/2011.
B66 Heritability, EPDs & Performance Data. Infovets Educational Resources – – Slide 2 Heritability  Heritability is the measurement.
2005 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD An Example from Dairy.
Evaluating Longevity: 10 Years of Using Stayability EPD Larry Keenan Research & Special Projects Coordinator, RAAA.
Achieving NISBP Targets – Stephen Maguire. Starting Baseline NISBP Av farm size (Ha adj Grassland) 118 (69ha owned) Av Cow herd 93 Av Stocking rate (LU/ha)
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
Beef and Dairy Cattle. Objectives: 1.Label the parts of cattle 2.Define key terms associated with cattle 3.Detail the history of cattle 4.Explain the.
2015 – 2020 Beef Data Genomics Programme October/November 2015 Information Sessions.
Beef Data & Genomics Programme Information Meetings 2015 Teagasc Beef Specialists.
How Does Additional Information Impact Accuracy? Dan W. Moser Department of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University, Manhattan
Genetic and environmental factors that affect gestation length H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, M. T. Kuhn, S. M. Hubbard,* and J. B. Cole Animal Improvement.
EPD’s: What They Are and How to Use Them. Introduction EPDs = Expected Progeny Differences Progeny = Offspring, usually the offspring of the sire Differences.
Breeding Objectives for Terminal Sires Michael MacNeil USDA ARS Miles City, MT.
Cow Herd Performance Testing. Introduction Help evaluate economically important traits Calving ease Birth weight Weaning weight Calving interval Calf.
What is an EPD? Expected Progeny Difference
Selection & Judging of Beef Cattle
Advanced Animal Breeding
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Dairy Cattle Reproductive.
Genetics – Trait Selection An S 426 Fall Genetics – Trait Selection Has led to development of Economically Relevant Traits (ERT) and Indicator Trait.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Select Sires‘ Holstein.
Using EPDs in Selection Edited by: Jessica Hawley & Brandon Freel Originally compiled by Colorado Agriscience Curriculum.
Meori Rosen Past, Present, and Future Dairy Cattle Breeding in Israel.
 Genes- located on chromosomes, control characteristics that are inherited from parents.  Allele- an alternative form of a gene (one member.
Evaluation & Use of Expected Progeny Differences in Beef Cattle Dr. Fred Rayfield Livestock Specialist Georgia Agricultural Education To accompany lesson.
Upgrading a Suckler Herd Beef Conference 2016 Derek O’Donoghue Salesian Agricultural College.
Bull Selection: Beef Kay Farmer Madison County High School edited by Billy Moss and Rachel Postin July 2001.
Beef Genomics and Data Programme
Cattle Breeding in Ireland.
Sustainable Agriculture
ICBF Beef & Dairy Industry Meeting. 22 May 2015.
Jeremy Bryant NZ Animal Evaluation Ltd Manager
Validation of €uro-Star Replacement Index.
Selection and Judging of Beef Cattle
Using EPDs in Selection
Predicted economic and greenhouse gas benefits from using improved maternal genetics in UK beef cattle Cheryl Quinton1, Peter Amer1, Tom Kirk1 & Eileen.
Key Trends from National Suckler Herd.
Keith Vander Velde UW Extension
WHAT ARE EPD’s?.
Selection Tools for Beef Cattle Improvement
Using EPDs in Selection
Correlations Among Measures of Dairy Cattle Fertility and Longevity
Genetic evaluation of an index of birth weight and yearling weight
History of Selection From Phenotypes to Economic Indexes
Expected Progeny Differences
Expected Progeny Difference EPD
Japie van der Westhuizen & Colleagues SA Stud Book
Unit 4: Genetic Selection & Mating
Presentation transcript:

Fundamentals of the Eurostar evaluations

Agenda Traits evaluated, heritability and rec levels Genetic relationships between traits Consequence of the focus on output traits Reliability and movement in indexes Relationship between skeletal and calving Replacement index relative emphasis Comparing Milk weighting across countries Maternal weaning weight and cow milk score Calving difficulty EV and differences in sires Replacements from dairy v suckler herds Summary

1. Traits evaluated, heritability and recording levels

Traits evaluated and nature of inheritance records heritability Birth Calving difficulty 8,675,435 0.09 Gestation length 2,732,100 0.36 2 calf mortality traits 12,615,329 0.04 Growth and efficiency 9 live-weight traits 3,218,046 0.32 – 0.5 Farmer scored quality 1,124,875 0.25 Farmer scored docility 1,390,158 0.35 3 auction price traits 1,454,007 0.3 – 0.49 16 linear classification traits 210,210 0.08 – 0.39 Feed intake 4,528 0.43 Slaughter 7 carcass traits 4,669,459 0.21 – 0.39 3 cow carcass traits 1,115,898 0.17 – 0.29 Maternal Cow age 1st calving 734,908 0.31 Maternal weaning weight 221,024 Calving interval 1,991,001 0.02 Maternal calving difficulty 1,742,091 Cow survival 2,515,318

2. Genetic relationships between traits

Genetic relationship between traits

3. Consequence of the focus on output traits

Consequence of focus on output

Consequence of focus on output Commercial cow herd has higher maternal genetics than the young pedigree animals

4. Reliability and movement in indexes

Effect of reliability on movement of Calving difficulty PTAs for AI sires

Effect of reliability on movement of Carcass difficulty PTAs for AI sires

5. Relationship between skeletal and calving

Relationship between skeletal and calving difficulty

Relationship between skeletal and calving difficulty

Relationship between skeletal and calving difficulty

6. Replacement index relative emphasis

The Replacement index Bull A 50% males 50% females Generation 1: Replacement females. Traits: Milk, fertility, survival, cow maintenance costs & cull cow value. Generation 1: Progeny for sale/slaughter. Key traits: Calving, feed intake & beef merit. Generation 2: Progeny for slaughter. Males & surplus females. Traits: Calving, feed intake & beef merit. Generation 2: Replacement females. Selected females only. Traits: Milk, fertility & cull cow value. Terminal Index Replacement Index

Relative emphasis in the Replacement Index 19 traits 10 of the calf 9 of the cow

Relative emphasis in the Replacement Index Calculated from two key pieces of info on each traits Genetic variation in that trait Economic value for that trait Only relevant at an overall breeding program level The relative emphasis of each trait to the overall index is different for every trait because their genetic merit is different

Relative emphasis in the Replacement Index Diff of €77 Diff of €31 Diff of €74 Diff of €121

7. Comparing milk weighting across countries

8. Maternal weaning weight and cow milk score

Maternal weaning variation by breed

Maternal weaning wt – a problem trait Need 2 generations of ancestry Spread out calving interval results in not all animals in eligible age range Confounding issues: Early meal feeding, grass intake, double suckling, foster mothers (pedigree), calf ill health all lead to inaccuracies Very low level of on farm recording (<10%) and unlikely to change! Is there an alternative or predictor??

Milkability predictor trait Milkability score has been recorded since 2012 on a voluntary basis (~40,000) heritability of 0.3, correlation of 0.65 with maternal weaning weight Now a key requirement for payment under the BDP program Multiple records across years on cows New analysis h2 = 0.3, repeatability = 0.14 correlation of 0.83 with maternal wean wt 500,000 records Dec 14, 1million + April 15

Trait definition

Milkability Stats on AI sires

9. Calving difficulty EV and differences in sires

Economic value of calving difficulty

Calving: Relationship between PTA and performance on the ground Calving difficulty is predicted based on use ~ 20% heifers

10. Replacements from dairy versus suckler herds?

First cross dairy or breed from suckler herd?

First cross dairy or breed from suckler herd? Calving merit of dairy herd is improving Beef merit of dairy herd is declining

Summary Plenty of genetic variation in all traits to select from but going in wrong direction. Replacement Index is a compromise across all traits affecting profitability, if a trait is needed more then concentrate on that trait in tandem with higher indexes Cow milkability score is a real alternative for the industry in terms of evaluating milk merit Indexes reflecting strengths and weaknesses of dairy herd v beef herd replacements