Christopher M. Savage Fine Theoretical Physics Institute

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Constraining CMSSM dark matter with direct detection results Chris Savage Oskar Klein Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics Stockholm University with Yashar.
Advertisements

Combined Energy Spectra of Flux and Anisotropy Identifying Anisotropic Source Populations of Gamma-rays or Neutrinos Sheldon Campbell The Ohio State University.
Status of XMASS experiment Shigetaka Moriyama Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, University of Tokyo For the XMASS collaboration September 10 th, 2013.
Tensions in DM Direct Detection Qing Wang Tsinghua Univ. Beijing 2 nd Internationl Workshop on 2 nd Internationl Workshop on Particle Physics and Cosmology.
What mass are the smallest protohalos in thermal WIMP dark-matter models? Kris Sigurdson Institute for Advanced Study Space Telescope Science Institute.
Comprehensive Analysis on the Light Higgs Scenario in the Framework of Non-Universal Higgs Mass Model M. Asano (Tohoku Univ.) M. Senami (Kyoto Univ.) H.
Constraining Dark Matter Hai-Bo Yu University of Michigan, Ann Arbor USTC, 06/17/2011.
Neutrino Physics - Lecture 6 Steve Elliott LANL Staff Member UNM Adjunct Professor ,
The positron excess and supersymmetric dark matter Joakim Edsjö Stockholm University
DARK PARTICLES Jonathan Feng, UC Irvine APS April Meeting Garden Grove, California 3 May 2011.
DARK MATTER PHENOMENOLOGY CIPANP Jonathan Feng San Diego
MACRO Atmospheric Neutrinos Barry Barish 5 May 00 1.Neutrino oscillations 2.WIMPs 3.Astrophysical point sources.
6/2/07GLCW8 1 Detecting galactic structure via the annual modulation signal of WIMPs Christopher M. Savage Fine Theoretical Physics Institute University.
12/9/04KICP - Spin Dependent Limits 1 Can WIMP Spin Dependent Couplings explain DAMA? Limits from DAMA and Other Experiments Christopher M. Savage University.
Significant enhancement of Bino-like dark matter annihilation cross section due to CP violation Yoshio Sato (Saitama University) Collaborated with Shigeki.
30 Ge & Si Crystals Arranged in verticals stacks of 6 called “towers” Shielding composed of lead, poly, and a muon veto not described. 7.6 cm diameter.
Dark Matter  Evidence for Dark Matter  Dark Matter Candidates  How to search for DM particles?  Recent puzzling observations (PAMELA, ATIC, EGRET)
Luminous Dark Matter Brian Feldstein arXiv: B.F., P. Graham and S. Rajendran.
Form Factor Dark Matter Brian Feldstein Boston University In Preparation -B.F., L. Fitzpatrick and E. Katz In Preparation -B.F., L. Fitzpatrick, E. Katz.
Annual Modulation Study of Dark Matter Using CsI(Tl) Crystals In KIMS Experiment J.H. Choi (Seoul National University) SUSY2012, Beijing.
Applications of Micro-TPC to Dark Matter Search 1. WIMP signatures 2. Performance of the Micro-TPC 3. WIMP-wind measurement 4. Future works 5. Conclusions.
Singlet Dark Matter, Type II Seesaw and Cosmic Ray Signals Nobuchika Okada Miami Fort Fauderdale, Dec , 2009 University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.
Assegnazioni Pd Ricercatori 11 Tecnologi 44.6 FTE.
IDM 2000, September, 2000 Joakim Edsjö, Paolo Gondolo, Joakim Edsjö, Lars Bergström, Piero Ullio and Edward A. Baltz.
IceCube Galactic Halo Analysis Carsten Rott Jan-Patrick Huelss CCAPP Mini Workshop Columbus OH August 6, m 2450 m August 6, 20091CCAPP DM Miniworkshop.
The Tokyo Dark Matter Experiment NDM03 13 Jun. 2003, Nara Hiroyuki Sekiya University of Tokyo.
Directional Statistics for WIMP direct detection Anne Green Astro-Particle Theory and Cosmology Group University of Sheffield Ben Morgan, AMG and Neil.
Daily Modulation of the Dark Matter Signal in Crystalline Detectors Nassim Bozorgnia UCLA TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you.
Vergados DSU11 29/09/11 Direct Dark Matter Searches- Exploiting its Various Signatures J.D. Vergados J.D. Vergados University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Implications of CoGeNT's New Results For Dark Matter Chris Kelso University of Chicago DESY Theory Workshop Sep. 28, 2011.
V. Bertin - CPPM - MANTS Paris - Sept'10 Indirect search of Dark Matter with the ANTARES Neutrino Telescope Vincent Bertin - CPPM-Marseille on behalf.
WIMP search Result from KIMS experiments Kim Seung Cheon (DMRC,SNU)
? At Yangyang beach, looking for something in the swamp of particles and waves. 1 The recent results from KIMS Seung Cheon Kim (Seoul National University)
Indirect detection of Dark Matter with the ANTARES Neutrino Telescope Miguel Ardid on behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration Rome – September 2015.
Robert Cooper. What is CENNS? Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering To probe a “large” nucleus Recoil energy small Differential energy spectrum.
P Spring 2002 L18Richard Kass The Solar Neutrino Problem M&S Since 1968 R.Davis and collaborators have been measuring the cross section of:
Dark Matter Mass Constrained by Relic Abundance, Direct Detections, and Colliders Ho-Chin Tsai CYCU 2013/03/22 Academia Sinica 3/22/13 Ho-Chin Tsai
PyungChang 2006/02/06 HYUNSU LEE CsI(Tl) crystals for WIMP search Hyun Su Lee Seoul National University (For The KIMS Collaboration)
Potential for Dark Matter Direct Searches in Australia Professor Elisabetta Barberio The University of Melbourne.
Limits on Low-Mass WIMP Dark Matter with an Ultra-Low-Energy Germanium Detector at 220 eV Threshold Overview (Collaboration; Program; Laboratory) Physics.
Recent developments in Dark Matter Malcolm Fairbairn.
Hypercharged Dark Matter and A New Approach to Halo-Independent Direct Detection Analysis Brian Feldstein -B.F., M. Ibe, T. Yanagida Phys. Rev. Lett. 112.
Roma International Conference on Astroparticle Physics Rome, May 2013 Juan de Dios Zornoza (IFIC – Valencia) in collaboration with G. Lambard (IFIC) on.
Dark Matter Detectors and the Neutrino Wall Malcolm Fairbairn IDM 2016 Sheffield.
KIMS & Inelastic DarK Matter(iDM)
WIMP direct detection:
Felix Kahlhoefer Dark LHC 27 September 2014 Oxford
Ben Morgan & Anne Green University of Sheffield
Direct Detection of Vector Dark Matter
Neutrino astronomy Measuring the Sun’s Core
Gluon Contribution to Dark Matter Direct Detection
Irina Bavykina, MPI f. Physik
Topics in Higgs Portal Dark Matter
Dark Matter Phenomenology of the GUT-less CMSSM
Outline Find a signal, have champagne Calculating the (relic) density
Direct Detection of Dark Matter
John Kelley IceCube Journal Club 27 February 2008
Neutral and charged Higgsino as carriers of residual SUSY effects.
Christopher M. Savage University of Michigan – Ann Arbor
Search for Dark Matter physics 805 fall 2008.
micrOMEGAs_2.2 : direct detection and new models
Dark Matter Search with Stilbene Scintillator
The Current and Future Status of the Search for Dark Matter
We-Fu Chang, Wei-Ping Pan
Detecting WIMPs using Au-DNA Microarrays
Yue, Yongpyung, Korea Prospects of Dark Matter Search with an Ultra-Low Threshold Germanium Detector Yue, Yongpyung, Korea
- - Interpreting DAMA with Inelastic Dark Matter:
The Estimated Limits For A 5g LE-Ge Detector
Intae Yu Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Korea KNO 2nd KNU, Nov
Dark Matter Detection,Models and Constraints
Presentation transcript:

The Status of DAMA and Direct Detection of WIMPs Limits from DAMA and Other Experiments Christopher M. Savage Fine Theoretical Physics Institute University of Minnesota Katie Freese (University of Michigan) Graciela Gelmini (UCLA) Paolo Gondolo (University of Utah) arXiv:0808.3607 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection Overview DAMA/NaI (1996-2002) Observes annual modulation (6.3)  first claimed signal for direct detection of WIMPs Apparent incompatibilities with other experiments in standard frameworks Many proposed explanations, including spin-dependent couplings DAMA/LIBRA (2003+) Confirms annual modulation (8.2) Can WIMP scattering still explain both DAMA signal and null results of other experiments? 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection Outline WIMP direct detection & modulation DAMA modulation signal Explanations and detector effects Compatibility with other experiments (effective WIMP-nucleon couplings) 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Elastic Scattering and WIMP Detection Direct detection Annual modulation Indirect detection (Sun/Earth) 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection Talk by Uwe Oberlack Detector WIMP Scatter Goodman & Witten (1985) Elastic scattering of WIMP off detector nuclei Rate: X = Ge, Xe, … Recoils: Efficiencies, quenching, multiple elements CDMS, XENON, CRESST, TEXONO, CoGeNT, COUPP, etc. 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection Recoil spectrum 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection Annual Modulation 30 km/s ~300 km/s WIMP Halo Wind Drukier, Freese & Spergel (1986) Earth’s motion With disk (June) Against disk (December) 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection Annual Modulation 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection Annual Modulation DAMA/NaI & DAMA/LIBRA (R. Bernabei et al., 2008) Modulation amplitude: Sm = 0.0131 ± 0.0016 /kg/day/keVee (2-6 keVee) 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection Indirect Detection Silk, Olive & Srednicki (1985), Freese (1986) Elastic scattering of WIMP off Sun/Earth nuclei  gravitational capture  annihilation (neutrinos) Flux   X X = H, He, … SuperK, AMANDA/IceCube, etc. n WIMP 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection Indirect Detection Cross-sections Gravitational capture  scattering Annihilation  ann Assumptions No large WIMP/anti-WIMP asymmetry Annihilation cross-section large “enough” Annihilation not to light quarks Majorana () Relic abundance <ann v> ~ 10-26 cm3/s Majorana () 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Effective Coupling Effective Lagrangian (-quark): SUSY  2q, 3q Axial vector (spin-dependent) Scalar (spin-independent) 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Scattering Cross-Section Spin-independent (SI) Couples to scalar density of quarks and gluons Scales as A2 MSSM: fp  fn  only one parameter: SI,p Spin-dependent (SD) Couples to spin Multiple form factors due to spins of proton and neutron groups Does not scale with A 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Scattering Cross-Section Total Couplings fp , fn , ap , an  SI,p , SI,n , SD,p , SD,n (+ 2 signs) SD scattering cross-section for a nucleon typically much larger (102 - 104+) than SI cross-section in CMSSM Indirect detection: Sun is primarily hydrogen Direct detection: SI A2 boost 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection DAMA Modulation DAMA/NaI (1996-2002) R. Bernabei et al., Riv. Nuovo Cim. 26N1, 1 (2003) Observes annual modulation (6.3)  first claimed signal for direct detection of WIMPs DAMA/LIBRA (2003+) R. Bernabei et al., arXiv:0804.2741 [astro-ph] Confirms annual modulation (8.2) 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection DAMA Modulation DAMA/NaI (6.3) Bernabei et al. (2003) 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection DAMA Modulation DAMA/NaI + DAMA/LIBRA (8.2) Bernabei et al. (2008) 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection DAMA Modulation 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection DAMA Modulation Requirements for DM signal Cosine modulation 1 year period Phase ~ June 2nd (standard halo) Modulation at low energies only Modulation in single scatter events only (not in multiples) Modulation amplitude  ~7% Multiple hits 2-6 keVee -0.0004 ± 0.0006 cpd/kg/keVee High energies 90+ keV -0.05 ± 0.19 cpd/kg (one cycle) 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection DAMA Modulation Backgrounds/systematics Temperature Neutrons + other backgrounds Radon Muon flux modulation Detector noise None reproduce all signal characteristics or capable of producing level of signal 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection DAMA/NaI Incompatible? Standard framework Spin-independent Isothermal halo Cutoff: mass > 30 GeV 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection DAMA/NaI Explanations/effects Low mass WIMPs P. Gondolo & G. Gelmini, PRD 71, 123520 (2005) Streams/caustics Gondolo & Gelmini (Ibid) Spin-dependent couplings CS, P. Gondolo & K. Freese, PRD 70, 123513 (2004) F. Giuliani & T.A. Girard, PRD 71, 123503 (2005) P. Ullio, M. Kamionkowski & P. Vogel, JHEP 0107, 044 (2001) Inelastic scattering D. Tucker-Smith & N. Weiner, PRD 72, 063509 (2005) Mirror matter R. Foot, PRD 74, 023514 (2006) Etc. Channeling effect Migdal effect 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection Low mass WIMPs Relax 30 GeV mass cut – scattering off Na P. Gondolo & G. Gelmini, PRD 71, 123520 (2005) 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection Spin-dependent Spin-dependent couplings CS, P. Gondolo & K. Freese, PRD 70, 123513 (2004) F. Giuliani & T.A. Girard, PRD 71, 123503 (2005) P. Ullio, M. Kamionkowski & P. Vogel, JHEP 0107, 044 (2001) 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection Channeling Nuclear recoil energy (keV) Electrons – ionization/scintillation electron equivalent (keVee) Other nuclei – phonons/heat Quenching factor Q: fraction of recoil energy into measured channel QNa  0.3, QI  0.09  2 keVee DAMA event from: 6.7 keV Na recoil 22 keV I recoil 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection Channeling Ion channeling (R. Bernabei et al., 2008) Recoils along channels in crystal Energy dependent fraction of recoils have Q  1 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection DAMA Channeling Bernabei et al. (2008) 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection Migdal Effect Migdal (1941) Velocity change of recoiling nucleus  excited/ionized electrons Extra EM energy (ionization/scintillation) Bernabei et al. (2007) 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection DAMA Migdal Effect Bernabei et al. (2008) 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection DAMA/LIBRA DAMA/LIBRA analyses (selected) CS, G. Gelmini, P. Gondolo & K. Freese, arXiv:0808.3607 [astro-ph] F. Petriello & K.M. Zurek, arXiv:0806.3989 [hep-ph] S. Chang, A. Pierce & N. Weiner, arXiv:0808.0196 [hep-ph] D. Hooper, F. Petriello, K.M. Zurek & M. Kamionkowski, arXiv:0808.2464 [hep-ph] Assumptions Isothermal spherical halo model Elastic scattering 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection DAMA/LIBRA Binning Channeling Statistical methods Spin-independent (SI) Spin-dependent (SD) Proton-only coupling (an = 0) Neutron-only coupling (ap = 0) Equal magnitude (an = ±ap) General couplings 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection DAMA Binning DAMA/NaI: 2 bins Low energy 2-4 keVee 0.0252 ± 0.0050 cpd/kg/keVee 2-5 keVee 0.0215 ± 0.0039 cpd/kg/keVee 2-6 keVee 0.0200 ± 0.0032 cpd/kg/keVee High energy 6-14 keVee -0.0009 ± 0.0019 cpd/kg/keVee DAMA/NaI + DAMA/LIBRA: 36 bins Low energy (2-5 keVee): positive modulation signal High energy (~6-20 keVee): consistent with zero modulation 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection DAMA Binning 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection DAMA Binning 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection DAMA Binning 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection DAMA Channeling 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection DAMA Channeling 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

DAMA Statistical Tests Likelihood ratio confidence region Parameter estimation – preferred region 2 goodness of fit (g.o.f.) Excluded region 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

DAMA Statistical Tests 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

DAMA Statistical Tests 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection Null Experiments 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection Spin-independent 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection Spin-independent 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection Spin-independent 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Spin-dependent: proton-only (an = 0) 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Spin-dependent: proton-only (an = 0) 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Spin-dependent: proton-only (an = 0) 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Spin-dependent: neutron-only (ap = 0) 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Spin-dependent: neutron-only (ap = 0) 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Spin-dependent: neutron-only (ap = 0) 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Spin-dependent (an = ap) 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Spin-dependent (an = ap) 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Spin-dependent (an = -ap) 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Spin-dependent (an = -ap) 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Spin-dependent couplings a = 2  N  1 pb a = 20  N  100 pb 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Spin-dependent couplings a = 2  N  1 pb a = 20  N  100 pb 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection SuperK Analysis Original: S. Desai et al. [SuperK Collaboration], PRD 70, 083523 (2004) Analysis down to 10 GeV WIMP mass No neutrino oscillations Reanalysis: D. Hooper, F. Petriello, K.M. Zurek & M. Kamionkowski, arXiv:0808.2464 [hep-ph] Low WIMP masses Neutrino Oscillations Spin-independent Talk by Kathryn Zurek 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection (from Kathryn Zurek) SuperK Analysis 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection (from Kathryn Zurek) SuperK Analysis 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection Results Parameter spaces still remain which are compatible with DAMA signal and all null results Spin-independent: 7-10 GeV (SuperK constrained) Spin-dependent (proton only): 3-10 GeV (SuperK constrained) Spin-dependent (neutron only): 7-9 GeV Spin-dependent (mixed): 3-10 GeV (SuperK constrained) Allows for comparable proton and neutron couplings (e.g. ap = an = 2.5 at 5 GeV) 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection

Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection Conclusions DAMA can still be explained by low mass WIMPs with spin-independent and/or spin-dependent couplings Isothermal halo SuperK further constrains couplings (if valid) Spin-dependent neutron coupling survives Probing compatible parameter space: Odd-Z experiments (SIMPLE/PICASSO, COUPP, KIMS, etc.) Thresholds more important than exposure 8/29/08 Cosmo 08 - DAMA and Direct Detection