MIDS Performance Goals

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
To response to litigation, thirty Minnesota Cities were directed to perform antidegradation reviews or Loading Assessments for two time periods: (1) (1)
Advertisements

To response to litigation, thirty Minnesota Cities were directed to perform antidegradation reviews or Loading Assessments for two time periods: (1) (1)
Post-construction rates and volume of stormwater runoff on-site will be equal to or less than that of pre-development rates and volume of stormwater runoff?
Minimal Impact Design Standards (MIDS) Calculator Training WELCOME November 13, 2013.
NPDES Phase II Storm Water Regulations: WHAT MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS NEED TO KNOW.
Simplified Sizing Tool for LID Practices in western Washington Alice Lancaster, PE Herrera Environmental Consultants.
LID and Stormwater Technical Resource Center Update County Road Administration Board November 3,
Rule Change Update MPCA 1/13/ Mid-Sized ISTS (MSTS)
Low Impact Development Overview  Alternative to end of pipe approach to SWM  Maintain hydrologic function of local ecosystem  Treat stormwater close.
Effective Stormwater Management Through the Use of Low-Impact Development (LID) Techniques Justin Gregory, PE Jones Edmunds & Associates October 3, 2012.
L-THIA Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment Model ….provides relative estimates of change of runoff and non point source pollutants caused due to land.
6 th Edition CCCWP Management Committee February 15, 2012.
How do Wetlands Factor into New Infiltration Policies?
Steve Harrison, Environmental Manager Bureau of Entomology and Pest Control -Mosquito Control Section.
Background and Overview Stormwater NPDES Compliance For New Developments.
SAINTPAUL SUSTAINABLE BUILDING POLICY Saint Paul Sustainable Building Policy Training Module 7 Stormwater Management.
VOLUME CONTROL using Inter-Event Dry Periods by Marty Wanielista, Josh Spence, and Ewoud Hulstein Stormwater Management Academy UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA.
New Stormwater Regulations “C.3” Provisions in effect Feb. 15, 2005.
Design Manual Update City of Tacoma Public Meeting April 10, 2014 Jim Parvey, P.E., LEED AP City of Tacoma Senior Principal Engineer.
DC Draft Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan Stakeholder Meeting March 1, 2012 Metropolitan Washington Council Of Governments Hamid Karimi Deputy Director.
Department of Public Works NPDES Low Impact Development and Green Streets Resolutions City Council August 17, 2015.
Discussion of Proposed MS4 Permit Design Standards Language.
1 Questions Addressed What are the options for reducing pollutant inputs to Lake Tahoe? Pollutant Reduction Opportunities.
Best Practices in Addressing NPDES and Other Water Quality Issues in Highway System Management NCHRP 20-68A, Scan DOMESTIC SCAN PROGRAM Scan Overview.
Why are we here today? To discuss the challenges we face in meeting NPDES Phase II minimum requirements for stormwater control. The NPDES program requires.
VI. Developing a VSMP Program General Stormwater Training Workshop.
Stormwater Treatment and Flow-Control Requirements in Phase I and Phase II Municipal NPDES Permits Dan Cloak, Principal Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting.
Florida’s Unified Stormwater Rule Status Lake Okeechobee WRAC November 2007 FDEP, Chad Kennedy Presenting for Eric Livingston and Michael Bateman.
Stormwater Water Quality Treatment Options Alvin Shoblom, P.E. Hydraulics Engineer.
Low impact development strategies and techniques jennifer j. bitting, pe the low impact development center, inc. june 2008.
Stormwater and C.3 Overview Tom Dalziel, Assistant Manager Contra Costa Clean Water Program.
Countywide Model SUSMP July 17, Topics SUSMP Timeline Goals Approach to Compliance NPDES Permit Requirements NPDES Permit Requirements Model SUSMP.
Low Impact Development (LID)
Phase II National Storm Water Regulations What’s in it for you?
Oregon Department of Transportation Stormwater Management Initiative: Meeting New Challenges Presented by: William Fletcher, ODOT February 5, 2008.
Post-Construction Requirements Design Challenges Dan Cloak, P.E.
Lisa Hair, PE, USEPA 2012 USACE Silver Jackets Workshop.
New Development and Significant Development 12/21/20151 New Development & Significant Redevelopment.
Low Impact Development Training: Planning Exercise Presented by: The Low Impact Development Center, Inc. A non-profit water resources and sustainable design.
Resourceful. naturally. Protecting Non-Impaired Resources West Metro Water Alliance September 21, 2011 Greg Wilson, Barr Engineering Company.
Nutrient Issues Review of Nutrient Management Issues Addressed by EPA NODA for Proposed CAFO Regulations.
Presented by David C. Nyman, P.E. Comprehensive Environmental Inc. Annual Nonpoint Source Conference April 29, 2014.
Municipal Stormwater Permit Overview of Order R Issued by: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region NPDES No. CAS
County-Wide Act 167 Plan “County-wide Act 167 Stormwater Management Plan for Chester County, PA” was prepared by: Chester County Water Resources Authority.
1. Wolfeboro’s Tool Kit Implemented tools for water quality protection Municipal Watershed District Ground Water Protection Overlay District Steep Slope.
1 Staff Public Workshops Fall 2011 Policy for Siting, Design, Operation and Management of Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems San Luis Obispo: October.
MIDS Calculator Fundamentals
Urban Runoff Pollution Ordinance 2017 Proposed Update
MS4 and Trading Considerations
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit
Supervisor, RIDEM RIPDES Permitting Program
Stormwater Infiltration on Contaminated Sites
L-THIA Online and LID in a watershed investigation
L-THIA Online and LID Larry Theller
City Council Meeting December 20, 2016
Test Drive Results and Revisions of the New Stream Restoration Crediting Protocols Bill Stack & Lisa Fraley-McNeal December 2, 2013.
PENNSYLVANIA STORMWATER BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES MANUAL
What is Required to Achieve Worksheet 10
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
MIDS calculator Quantifies reductions in runoff volume for a given BMP or group of BMPs Quantifies reductions in phosphorus (P) and TSS runoff for a given.
Anne Arundel County Maryland
Protecting Non-Impaired Resources
Minimal Impact Design Standards (MIDS) calculator Module 1:
Kickoff example Create a new file
Intro MIDS Calculator Use
Infiltration at sites with potential contamination
MIDS Calculator Use - Intermediate
MS4 = Municipal Separated Storm Sewer System
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
Presentation transcript:

MIDS Performance Goals

Jargon Performance goal: Stormwater standard/rule Flexible Treatment Option (FTO): Alternative performance goal used when conformance to the volume retention performance goal is not feasible or not allowed TP: Total Phosphorus LID: Low Impact Development BMP: Best Management Practices LGU: Local Government Unit

Four basic components: Performance goals What is MIDS? Four basic components: Performance goals Calculator to standardize and quantify (“credit”) the benefits of LID BMPs Design specifications for a variety of LID BMPs (continuing in Stormwater Manual update) A model MIDS ordinance package 4 basic components to MIDS…. While today’s workshop is focused on #2/the MIDS calculator…you need to understand the performance goals (#1) when using the Calculator. I’ll give you a brief overview of the performance goals, a tool that is used to determine the performance goal—the Design Sequence Flow Chart, and introduce a couple of features of the MIDS Calculator in regards to the performance goals.

What are the Performance Goals? Most Sites Retain on site 1.1” of runoff from new and/or fully reconstructed impervious surfaces Retain 0.55” of runoff from the new and/or fully reconstructed impervious surfaces AND Remove 75% of the annual TP load FTO 1: Clay, etc. FTO 2: Contam-ination Achieve as much volume reduction as practicable AND Remove 60% of the annual TP load FTO 3 Off-site mitigation

Why are there different Performance Goals Why are there different Performance Goals? Site restrictions might require FTO Different performance goal if site has “restrictions” (including, but not limited to): zoning/land use requirements karst shallow bedrock slow-draining soils high groundwater contamination So…why are there different performance goals?

How do I know which performance goal applies? Restrictions included in Design Sequence Flow Chart—Use it to Determine Performance Goal How do I know which performance goal applies? The MIDS Redevelopment and Linear Subgroup with input from the MPCA developed the design sequence flow chart. The group wanted a tool that could be used by designers and regulators to be on the same page when looking at a site, considering various site features, and incorporating LID practices where they make sense. One regulator on the work group called this the “convince me” flow chart…meaning, if the permit applicant used this flow chart, it would convince her that the applicant has done a good faith effort to incorporate LID practices. The Design Sequence Flow Chart is need to determine what Performance Goal applies to the site.

How is the Design Sequence Flow Chart related to the MIDS Calculator? Use Flow Chart to define Performance Goal Once Performance Goal is determined, MIDS Calculator can be used to show compliance

Flexible Treatment Options & MIDS Calculator Defining Performance Goal Starting Performance Goals: New, Nonlinear Developments and Reconstruction/Redevelopment Projects: Retain on site 1.1 inches of runoff from the new and/or fully reconstructed impervious surfaces

Flexible Treatment Options & MIDS Calculator Defining Performance Goal Starting Performance Goals: Linear Projects: Retain on site the larger of 0.55 inches of runoff from the new and fully reconstructed impervious surfaces 1.1 inches of runoff from the net increase in impervious surfaces

Flexible Treatment Options & MIDS Calculator Defining Performance Goal FTO #1: Applicant attempts to comply with the following conditions: 1a Achieve at least 0.55” volume reduction goal, and 1b Remove 75% of the annual TP load, and 1c Options considered and presented shall examine the merits of relocating project elements to address, varying soil conditions and other constraints across the site

Flexible Treatment Options & MIDS Calculator Defining Performance Goal FTO #2: Applicant attempts to comply with the following conditions: 2a Achieve volume reduction to the maximum extent practicable (as determined by the LGU), and 2b Remove 60% of the annual TP load, 2c Options considered and presented shall examine the merits of relocating project elements to address, varying soil conditions and other constraints across the site.

Flexible Treatment Options & MIDS Calculator Defining Performance Goal FTO #3: Off-site mitigation (including banking or cash or treatment on another project, as determined by the local authority) equivalent to the volume reduction performance goal can be used in areas selected in the following order of preference: Check out the re-worded FTO #3

Flexible Treatment Options & MIDS Calculator Defining Performance Goal FTO #3 continued: Locations that yield benefits to the same receiving water as that receiving runoff from the original construction activity Locations within the same DNR catchment area as the original construction activity Locations in the next adjacent DNR catchment area upstream Locations anywhere within the local authorities’ jurisdiction Check out the re-worded FTO #3

Flexible Treatment Options & MIDS Calculator Defining Performance Goal MIDS Calculator defaults to the 1.1 inch volume retention performance goal User can change volume retention performance goal to 0.55 inches (or another goal); the calculator will provide warning that the value has been changed from 1.1 For water quality performance goals, user/reviewer needs to compare calculator results to performance goal FTOs include pollutant reduction goals MIDS Calculator quantifies annual pollutant removals

Question What 4 values are noteworthy in regards to FTOs?