Mutagenic Impurities: Guidances Update w/ CMC Perspectives

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EPAA Conference 5 November 2007 Georgette LALIS Enterprise and Industry DG European Commission The international dimension of regulatory acceptance.
Advertisements

Patients’ Perspective on HTA and Off-label use David Head MBA Chief Executive RP Fighting Blindness 25th Annual EuroMeeting 4-6 March 2013 RAI, Amsterdam.
ICH Q4B Regulatory Acceptance of Analytical Procedures and/or Acceptance Criteria (RAAPAC) Overview and Update Robert H. King, Sr. Office of Pharmaceutical.
Data Monitoring Models and Adaptive Designs: Some Regulatory Experiences Sue-Jane Wang, Ph.D. Associate Director for Adaptive Design and Pharmacogenomics,
Best Practices and Application of GMPs for Small Molecule Drugs in Early Development Best Practices and Application of GMPs for Small Molecule Drugs in.
Integrating CMC Review & Inspection Industry Recommendations Joe Anisko April 24, 2003.
Executive summary prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT.
Nonclinical Studies Subcommittee Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science CMC Issues for Screening INDs Eric B. Sheinin, Ph.D. Acting Deputy Director.
Barry Cherney, Ph.D., Deputy Director DTP/OBP/CDER/ FDA Perspectives on Comparability of Biotechnology Derived Protein Products.
ICH V1 An FDA Update Min Chen, M.S., RPh Office of Drug Safety Center for Drug Evaluation and Research FDA January 21, 2003.
Exploratory IND Studies
1 Impurities: Positions of the regulatory authorities (like FDA and EMA) worldwide Dr. Christian Zeine, Warsaw, Nov 18, 2014 Science for a safer world.
DETERMINATION OF RELATED SUBSTANCES & IMPURITIES IN DRUGS BY ICH GUIDE LINES BY M.PAUL RICHARDS.
FDA’s Biosimilars Guidance -- Legal and Regulatory Considerations James S. Cohen, Esq. McDermott Will & Emery DIA Webinar April 10, 2012.
Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in the following PowerPoint slides are those of the individual presenter and should not be attributed to Drug.
Introduction to Drug Rediscovery John Lisman Attorney-at-law Lisman Legal Life sciences Insert your logo in this area then delete this text box.
(Dr). Santosh Kumar Narla, Formulation Regulatory Affairs,
How to audit the role of the vendor in the conduct of outsourced studies Kristel Van de Voorde Director Global Quality Regulatory Compliance Bristol-Myers.
Presenter Name Title Organization Twitter Handle Insert your logo here, then delete text.
Overview of FDA's Regulatory Framework for PET Drugs
PhRMA Perspective on FDA Final Report FDA Advisory Committee on Pharmaceutical Sciences October 20, 2004 G.P. Migliaccio, Pfizer Inc.
Click to add Presentation Title Arial 32, 5 line max title space line 3, title space line 4, title space line 5 Presenter Title Organization Insert your.
Bayesian approach to equivalence study of medical device 1 1.
ICH Quality Topics Update
Comparability Protocols Nancy Sager Associate Director, QIS-Chemistry FDA/CDER/OPS.
VICH General Principles and current update of VICH Outreach Forum activity 1.
Making Comments Count for High-Impact Regulations and Guidelines in the US Virginia (Ginny) Beakes-Read Executive Director, Global Regulatory Policy and.
Horst Kastrup September 8, 2015 The “T” in PETD.  The views and opinions expressed in the following PowerPoint slides are those of the individual presenter.
Strategic Analyses and Interpretation: Regulatory Intelligence for Decision Making Amy N. Grant Director, Regulatory Strategy & Science ViroPharma Incorporated.
INDEX WHAT IS ICH ? HISTORY INITIATION INTRODUCTION TOPICS QUALITY GUDILINES.
Good Laboratory Practices and Inspection Readiness Paul Swidersky President/Sr. Consultant Quality Associates, Inc.
Meredith Brown-Tuttle, RAC Director APT Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Draft White Paper “Protocol Deviations”
Heavy Metals: Regulatory Aspects DIA-SIG RA-CMC working group 15Mar12 Anders Neil Principal Consultant PAREXEL Consulting.
DIA ERS SIAC IND CMC eCTD Submissions Part II – IND to NDA
Process-based Metadata From a DIA Presentation: eTMF – Migrating from Paper Trial Master Files to Electronic Eldin Rammell, Managing Director, Rammell.
Experiences from building a lessons- learned database for regulatory interactions Åsa Rembratt Sr Reg Intelligence Manager Novo Nordisk A/S 26th Annual.
Group Sequential Tests for Delayed Responses Christopher Jennison Department of Mathematical Sciences University of Bath Lisa Hampson Department of Mathematics.
Making Comments Count for High-Impact Regulations and Guidelines in Canada, EU, Japan, and US Chairperson: Amy N. Grant Director, Regulatory Strategy &
GMP IN THE CURRENT REGULATORY EMVIRONMENT
Gabor Fari Life Sciences Solution Strategist Microsoft Corporation
Strengthening the Medical Device Clinical Trial Enterprise
The IFPMA Code and how to set up a national self-regulation system Presentation to China/EU Pharmaceutical Industry Forum 17 May 2017, Shanghai, China.
- A “Portable” Implementation
Presenter Title Organization
Track 11 Symposium 27 June :30 – 3:00 PM
Perspective on GCP Warning Letters
Molly Butler Auditor II Quality Associates, Inc.
Interactive Session: Presentation of Scenarios and Q&A
Michelle Limoli, Pharm.D.
Community-Based and Cluster-Randomized Studies –‘Pragmatic’ Approaches for Life Cycle Evidence? Florian Eichmann, PhD Principal Scientific Affairs and.
FirstPoint and FirstDoc Application of the DIA EDM Reference Model
Presenter Name Title Organization.
1 Topic Title First slide 2 line 3 line 4 line
1 Topic Title First slide 2 line 3 line 4 line
PMI® Leadership Institute Meeting 2018―EMEA
What is ICH? ICH is a joint initiative involving both regulators and research-based industry representatives of the EU, Japan and the US in scientific.
Chapter 1: Financial Accounting and Accounting Standards
Implementation of Quality by Design (QbD): Status, Challenges and Next Steps Moheb M. Nasr, Ph.D. Office of New Drug Quality Assessment (ONDQA), OPS, CDER.
Fundamentals of Electronic Submissions and eCTD
Presenter Name Title Organization.
Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in the following PowerPoint slides are those of the individual presenter and should not be attributed to Drug.
1 Session Title 2 line 3 line 4 line
Centers of Excellence and Expertise
Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in the following PowerPoint slides are those of the individual presenter and should not be attributed to.
1 Session Title 2 line 3 line 4 line
1 Topic Title First slide 2 line 3 line 4 line
1 Topic Title First slide 2 line 3 line 4 line
GL18 (R) – Impurities: Residual Solvents in New Veterinary Medicinal Products, Active Substance and Excipients.
William W. Gregory for the CIOMS MLG Exploratory Team Pfizer Inc
Presentation transcript:

Mutagenic Impurities: Guidances Update w/ CMC Perspectives David DeAntonis July 21, 2011

Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in the following PowerPointslides are those of the individual presenter and should not be attributed to Drug Information Association, Inc. (“DIA”), its directors, officers, employees, volunteers, members, chapters, councils, Special Interest Area Communities or affiliates, or any organization with which the presenter is employed or affiliated. These PowerPoint slides are the intellectual property of the individual presenter and are protected under the copyright laws of the United States of America and other countries. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Drug Information Association,Drug Information Association Inc., DIA and DIA logo are registered trademarks. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Topics to Cover Regulatory History of Mutagenic Impurity Guidance Current status of ICHM7 effort CMC hot topics

Regulatory History 2000-2004: ICH Q3A/B (R) issued in 2002 “Lower thresholds may be appropriate for unusually toxic impurities” Increased awareness and regulatory scrutiny on residual levels of genotoxic impurities in API and drug products EMEA issues draft guidance for genotoxic impurities stressing avoidance vs. acceptance of a low limit 2004 EMEA updates draft guidance and introduces the TTC limit (1.5 micrograms/day) 2005/06 PhRMA Position Paper: PhRMA GTI Task Force in 2005- Muller L. et al, A Rationale for Determining, Testing and Controlling Specific Impurities in Pharmaceuticals that Possess Potential for Genotoxicity Introduces concept of the staged TTC for clinical trial materials

Regulatory History 2007 CHMP Guideline on the Limits of Genotoxic Impurities. CPMP/SWP5199/02 EMEA/CHMP/QWP/251344/2006: became effective on January 1, 2007. Q&A document generated based on industry questions and EMEA answers – latest version published September 2010 now includes 2008 FDA Draft Guidance for Industry. Genotoxic and Carcinogenic Impurities in Drug Substances and Products: Recommended Approaches. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research: 2009 November 2009 – Concept paper issued and ICHM7 topic agreed 2010 November 2010 – Initial ICHM7 Expert Working Group (EWG) Meeting in Fukuoka Japan June 2011 – ICHM7 EWG meeting #2 in Cincinnati, Ohio

ICHM7 Expert Working Group

ICHM7: High Level Status Two face to face EWG meetings have been completed Current title: Assessment and Control of DNA Reactive (mutagenic) Impurities in Pharmaceuticals to Limit Carcinogenic Risk Progress is being made towards a Step 1 document with a completed Step 1 document targeted November 2011 Target Step 2 document released for consultation November 2012

ICHM7: Key topics of Discussion Refining Scope Applies to new products for marketing authorization and products in clinical development Application to existing products in certain instances Changes to existing products (for example, new API synthesis, new dosage forms) Cause for concern – need to define Excipients

ICHM7: Key topics of Discussion Structure Activity Relationship (SAR): Approaches to ID functional groups associated with mutagenic/carcinogenic potential DNA Reactive functional groups well known Expert systems widely used by industry/regulatory agencies Criteria for in-silico system performance Single system vs. two systems vs. expert/literature knowledge

ICHM7: Key topics of Discussion Risk Characterization Compound Specific Limits Class Specific Limits TTC based limits potentially adjusted for less than lifetime exposure Process/Product Control How to determine impurities that require an assessment for genotoxicity Control approaches for impurities in alignment with Q11 Differentiating control strategies for clinical development Assessing degradation products

CMC Hot Topics Determination of impurities to assess that are below standard ICH ID thresholds Well established processes for API related impurities leveraging in-silico SAR systems to inform overall mutagenic impurity risk and the need for lower level control approaches Practices for prediction of low level degradation products is less mature as focus has been on higher risk API reactive impurities

CMC Hot Topics Control approaches for mutagenic impurities Acceptance of chemistry based arguments based on process knowledge/quality by design principles in- lieu of routine analytical testing Alignment with ICHQ11 Differentiating clinical development control approaches vs. new products at the marketing registration phase It is understood that products in the clinical stage will have less development control strategies, but how should this be articulated in guidance

CMC Hot Topics Documentation in regulatory filings A discussion of genotoxic impurities in CTD and clinical filings is needed to enable a proper review by regulators ICHM7 will strive to provide guidance for documenation expectations The importance of a companies overall quality system to manage change (process change, supplier changes etc)

Q&A e-mail: david.m.de.antonis@pfizer.com