The Chemical Signatures of First-Generation Stars

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Carbon Enhanced Stars in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey ( SDSS ) T. Sivarani, Young Sun Lee, B. Marsteller & T. C. Beers Michigan State University & Joint.
Advertisements

Probing the first stars with metal poor stars
Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2.
The Milky Way Galaxy part 2
SLEUTHING MASS OUTFLOW FROM EVOLVED STARS Optical/IR Spectroscopy from the MMT, KECK II, and Magellan Andrea Dupree (SAO/CfA) Sz. Meszaros (SAO), Jay Strader.
The Milky Way PHYS390 Astrophysics Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 19.
Stars science questions Origin of the Elements Mass Loss, Enrichment High Mass Stars Binary Stars.
The Search for New “r-process-Enhanced” Metal-Poor Stars Timothy C. Beers Michigan State University.
Class 24 : Supermassive black holes Recap: What is a black hole? Case studies: M87. M106. MCG What’s at the center of the Milky Way? The demographics.
GALAXIES, GALAXIES, GALAXIES! A dime a dozen… just one of a 100,000,000,000! 1.Galaxy Classification Ellipticals Dwarf Ellipticals Spirals Barred Spirals.
Galaxies Chapter 13:. Galaxies Contain a few thousand to tens of billions of stars, Large variety of shapes and sizes Star systems like our Milky Way.
Black holes: do they exist?
The Dual Origin of a Simulated Milky Way Halo Adi Zolotov (N.Y.U.), Beth Willman (Haverford), Fabio Governato, Chris Brook (University of Washington, Seattle),
Galaxies Read Your Textbook: Foundations of Astronomy
The origin of the most iron - poor star Stefania Marassi in collaboration with G. Chiaki, R. Schneider, M. Limongi, K. Omukai, T. Nozawa, A. Chieffi, N.
{ SDSS Timothy C. Beers National Optical Astronomy Observatory The AEGIS Survey (and more …)
Carbon-Enhanced Metal-Poor (CEMP) in the Milky Way KASI Seminar, May 27, 2015 Young Sun Lee Chungnam National University.
1 Galaxies The Andromeda Galaxy - nearest galaxy similar to our own. Only 2 million light years away! Galaxies are clouds of millions to hundreds of billions.
{ Carbon-Enhanced Metal-Poor (CEMP) stars: probes of nucleosynthesis from the first generation of stars in the Universe SDSS Timothy C. Beers National.
The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.
Abundance patterns of r-process enhanced metal-poor stars Satoshi Honda 1, Wako Aoki 2, Norbert Christlieb 3, Timothy C. Beers 4, Michael W.Hannawald 2.
IAS, June 2008 Caty Pilachowski. Visible in the Southern Sky Listed in Ptolemy's catalog Discovered by Edmond Halley in 1677 –non-stellar –"luminous spot.
Searching for Brown Dwarf Companions to Nearby Stars Michael W. McElwain, James E. Larkin & Adam J. Burgasser (UC Los Angeles) Background on Brown Dwarfs.
Galaxies (And a bit about distances). This image shows galaxy M 100 in which the Hubble Space Telescope detected Cepheid variables.
Anna Frebel University of Texas at Austin
HST Observations of Low Z Stars HST Symposium, Baltimore May 3, 2004 Collaborators: Tim Beers, John Cowan, Francesca Primas, Chris Sneden Jim Truran.
Old Metal-Poor Stars: Observations and Implications for Galactic Chemical Evolution Timothy C. Beers Department of Physics & Astronomy and JINA: Joint.
AIMS OF G ALACTIC C HEMICAL E VOLUTION STUDIES To check / constrain our understanding of stellar nucleosynthesis (i.e. stellar yields), either statistically.
Galactic structure and star counts Du cuihua BATC meeting, NAOC.
Galactic Archaeology: The Lowest Metallicity Stars Timothy C. Beers Department of Physics & Astronomy Michigan State University & JINA: Joint Institute.
1 The Most Metal-Poor Stars in the Galaxy Timothy C. Beers Department of Physics & Astronomy Michigan State University & JINA: Joint Institute for Nuclear.
The High Redshift Universe Next Door
SEGUE Target Selection on-going SEGUE observations.
Low-Metallicity DLAs. The Development of the “Cosmic Web” - the First Galaxies! Observing the High - z universe and metal enrichment - QSO and GRB lines.
{ The Origin of the r-Process SDSS Timothy C. Beers University of Notre Dame.
Galaxy Evolution and WFMOS
What Lies Beyond.
The Big Bang The Big Bang Theory is the accepted scientific theory about the origin of the universe based upon multiple lines of evidence. The “Big Bang”
Type 1a Supernovae Astrophysics Lesson 17.
The different types and how they form.
Discovery of the Chemical Signature of First-Generation Massive Stars
The morphology and angular momentum of simulated galaxy populations
28-1 A Closer Look at Light A. What is Light?
A Survey of Starburst Galaxies An effort to help understand the starburst phenomenon and its importance to galaxy evolution Megan Sosey & Duilia deMello.
Lecture 18 : Weighing the Universe, and the need for dark matter
B. Barbuy IAG - Universidade de São Paulo
Peculiar Massive Globular Clusters in the Milky Way
Other Stars.
III. Cycle of Birth and Death of Stars: Interstellar Medium
Mapping the Universe With radio galaxies and quasars.
Timothy C. Beers University of Notre Dame
Frequency of Mature Planets orbiting neighboring stars
Galaxies.
N. Tominaga, H. Umeda, K. Maeda, K. Nomoto (Univ. of Tokyo),
When Giovanni Riccioli used a telescope like this one to observe a star in the handle of the Big Dipper, he discovered two stars that orbit each other.
New Trends of Physics 2005, Hokkaido University, March 1
The SAURON Survey - The stellar populations of early-type galaxies
The Stellar Population of Metal−Poor Galaxies at z~1
Galaxies.
Supernova Nucleosynthesis and Extremely Metal-Poor Stars
Nucleosynthesis in Early Massive Stars: Origin of Heavy Elements
Takuma Suda, Asao Habe, Masayui Fujimoto (Hokkaido Univ.)
Pair Instability Supernovae
What is Metallicity? Metallicity refers to the proportion of matter made of chemical elements heavier than Hydrogen & Helium. A celestial object’s metallicity.
Nucleosynthesis in Pop III, Massive and Low-Mass Stars
Modeling Star Formation and Chemical Evolution in the Local Group dwarfs Oleg Gnedin University of Michigan.
Enormous black holes in galaxies
The Link Between Underluminous Supernovae Explosions, Gravitational Waves and Extremely Low Mass White Dwarfs Alex Gianninas Mukremin Kilic, Warren Brown,
Borislav Nedelchev et al. 2019
Presentation transcript:

The Chemical Signatures of First-Generation Stars Timothy C. Beers University of Notre Dame The  Chemical  Signatures  of   First-Generation   Stars SDSS

Expected Signatures First-generation objects of high mass presumably formed from metal-free gas Lived short lives (Myrs not Gyrs) Exploded Distributed (pre or post explosion) their nucleosynthetic products Next-generation objects formed from the gas polluted by first-generation objects A wider range of masses allowed, perhaps including stars with main-sequence lifetimes > a Hubble time Further star formation (Pop II) contributed additional material, and diluted the signatures of first/next-generation stars We should look for a characteristic set of abundance signatures ONLY found among the lowest metallicity stars

Expected Signatures Among the lowest metallicity stars, there are two basic “families” Stars with enhanced abundances of carbon (CEMP stars), and other light elements (including the lowest [Fe/H] star yet discovered), and lack of over-abundances of neutron-capture elements (CEMP-no stars) Associated with production by “faint SNe” – progenitors with mass on the order of 10-100 Mo undergoing mixing and fallback, or rapidly rotating mega metal-poor (MMP; [Fe/H] < -6.0) stars, both of which eject large amount of CNO, but little heavy metals. Low-mass stars formed with the help of C, O cooling Stars with “normal” carbon and light-element abundances, apparently formed with cooling other than C, O – perhaps by silicates ? Possibly associated with production by first-generation objects of very high mass (100-300 Mo), which produce large amounts of heavy metals, but little carbon

Frequencies of CEMP Stars Based on Stellar Populations Carbon-Enhanced Metal-Poor (CEMP) stars have been recognized to be an important stellar component of the halo system CEMP star frequencies are: 20% for [Fe/H] < -2.5 30% for [Fe/H] < -3.0 EMP 40% for [Fe/H] < -3.5 75% for [Fe/H] < -4.0 UMP 100% for [Fe/H] < -5.0 HMP But Why ? – Atmospheric/Progenitor or Population Driven ? Carollo et al. (2012,2014) suggest the latter

Cumulative Frequencies of CEMP Stars from SDSS/SEGUE

Cumulative Frequencies of CEMP-no (ONLY) Stars from SDSS/SEGUE, with Luminosity Corrections Placco et al. (2014)

Exploration of Nature’s Laboratory for Neutron-Capture Processes Beers & Christlieb ARAA (2005)

The UMP/HMP Stars are (Almost) ALL CEMP-no Stars Aoki et al. (2007) demonstrated that the CEMP-no stars occur preferentially at lower [Fe/H] than the CEMP-s stars About 80% of CEMP stars are CEMP-s or CEMP-r/s, 20% are CEMP-no Global abundance patterns of CEMP-no stars incompatible with AGB models at low [Fe/H]

CEMP-no Stars are Associated with UNIQUE Light-Element Abundance Patterns (Aoki et al. 2002) CS 29498-043: [Fe/H] = -3.8; [C/Fe] = +1.9 Harbingers of Things to Come!

Last but Definitely NOT Least… (Christlieb et al. 2002; Frebel et al HE 0107-5240 [Fe/H] = -5.3 [C/Fe] = +3.9 It is the SAME pattern among the light elements !

BD+44:493 – A 9th Magnitude Messenger from the Early Universe Ito et al. (2009) report on discovery that BD+44 is an [Fe/H] = -3.8, CEMP-no star; more detailed observations by Ito et al. (2013) Light-element abundance patterns similar to those for other CEMP-no stars Previous RV monitoring by Carney et al. indicate no variation at levels > 0.5 km/s over past 25 years The same is true for other CEMP-no stars with available RV monitoring (Hansen et al. 2013, and in prep; Norris et al. 2013)

Something You Don’t Often See An Object of COSMOLOGICAL Significance with Diffraction Spikes

Abundance Pattern Compared to 25 Mo Mixing/Fallback Model Ito et al. (2013) : Note the low N, compared with some other CEMP-no stars with enhanced N

HST/STIS Observations of Be and B in BD+44 at the Lowest Levels Measured for Metal-Poor Stars

Dust in the Early Universe (Watson et al. 2015 – Nature) This image, taken by the Hubble Space Telescope, shows a part of the galaxy cluster, Abell 1689, whose gravitational field amplifies the distant galaxy behind it. The distant dust-filled galaxy in zoom in the box, at a redshift z ~ 7.5

The Carbon-Low and Carbon-High Bands Recent observational evidence strongly suggests that CEMP-no stars are associated with “low” absolute C abundances (A(C) ~ 6.5), while CEMP-s stars are associated with “high” absolute C abundances (A(C) ~ 8.25) This recognition may provide a more fundamental definition of CEMP-no stars, rather than simply [Ba/Fe] < 0 (which may take on higher values) Spite et al. (2013)

The Carbon-Low and Carbon-High Bands Similar results seen in the HERES sample (Barklem et al. 2005), as summarized by Placco (private communication) Placco et al. based on HERES Sample

The Carbon-Low and Carbon-High Bands Similarly from Hansen et al. (2015) Note that A(C) has been corrected for luminosity effects following Placco et al. (2014) CEMP-no ONLY  Including stars from Yong et al. (2013) 

The Carbon-Low and Carbon-High Bands Similarly from Bonifacio et al. (2015)

The Distribution of A(C) for the Carbon-Low and Carbon-High Bands (Bonifacio et al. 2015)

Bottom Line We have observed (!) the nucleosynthesis products CEMP stars in the Galaxy likely have had multiple sources of carbon production CEMP-s in AGB stars CEMP-no in massive (50-100 Mo) rapidly rotating MMP stars CEMP-no in intermediate high-mass (25-50 Mo) “faint” SNe CEMP-no stars occur preferentially at the lowest metallicities, including all but 2 of the 20 stars known with [Fe/H] < -4.0 CEMP stars are found in substantial numbers in the ultra-faint SDSS dwarf galaxies, some of which have low n-capture abundances High-z DLA systems exhibit similar abundance patterns as CEMP-no stars Discovery of “dusty galaxies” at high-z We have observed (!) the nucleosynthesis products of first generation stars (Pop III)

The Path Forward Expansion of numbers of identified CEMP stars, in particular with [Fe/H] < -2.5, which include both CEMP-s and CEMP-no stars, both from HK/HES and the ~ 5-10 million medium-res spectra coming from LAMOST We need bright stars to obtain Be, B with HST/STIS and CUBES (Be) High-resolution follow-up spectroscopy of a core sample of 100-200 CEMP stars, in order to assign classifications based on heavy elements, and to determine CNO, alpha elements, and other light-element abundances Radial velocity monitoring of CEMP stars, in order to determine binary nature, as well as characterize correlations between chemical patterns and nature of the detected binary Full numerical GCE models, taking into account the effects of local mixing, in order to match frequencies of CEMP stars and C-normal stars, as well as Li-depletion phenomenon for very metal-poor stars

RV Monitoring – Hansen et al. (in prep): rI / rII

RV Monitoring – Hansen et al. (in prep): CEMP-s and CEMP-r/s

RV Monitoring – Hansen et al. (in prep): CEMP-no

New Surveys for JINA-CEE Medium-res follow-up of HES VMP and carbon-selected stars using “bad weather” time on Gemini 8m telescopes – some 2000 stars Medium-resolution follow-up of MP candidates from Australian SkyMapper Southern Sky Survey on the AAT 3.9m telescope – some 70,000 stars High-resolution follow-up with various 8m telescopes (Magellan) ongoing for both samples of stars

New Surveys for JINA-CEE Medium-resolution follow-up of [Fe/H] < -2.0 stars from RAVE, with various 4m and 8m telescopes, in order to identify the important subset of BRIGHT CEMP stars among them – some 1000 stars (some with B ~ 10) Medium-resolution follow-up of disk and halo stars of the MW, with the LAMOST 4m telescope in China – some 6 Million stars High-resolution follow-up with various 8m telescopes ongoing for both samples of stars

Medium-Res Spectra of RAVE Stars with [Fe/H] < -2.0

[C/Fe] vs. [Fe/H] (Medium-Res Results)