CEDAR and SEQUOIA Protocol Amendment Summary

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Industry Issues: Dataset Preparation for Time to Event Analysis Davis Gates Schering Plough Research Institute.
Advertisements

The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network
We’re all in this Together! Moving From Good to Great! CARF Update June 2014.
A Clinical Trial Sketch: VEGF in the Treatment of AMD.
Overview of the Clinical Trial & Protocol Jane Fendl March 31, 2010
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network
TA298 Ranibizumab for treating choroidal neovascularisation associated with pathological myopia Dr.Muhammad Hamza North Devon District NHS Hospital NICE.
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Protocol I: Clinical Applications Supported through a cooperative agreement from the National Eye Institute.
Laser-Ranibizumab-Triamcinolone for DME Study DRCR.net Protocol I
Gene Transfer for Neovascular Age- Related Macular Degeneration Peter A. Campochiaro The Wilmer Eye Institute The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Expanded 2-year Follow-up of Ranibizumab Plus Prompt or Deferred Laser or Triamcinolone Plus Prompt.
Phase IIIb Randomized, Double-Masked, Sham-Controlled Trial of Ranibizumab for Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration PIER Study Year 1 Regillo CD,
Rev.04/2015© 2015 PLEASE NOTE: The Application Review Module (ARM) is a system that is designed as a shared service and is maintained by the Grants Centers.
How to Start An Industry Sponsored Clinical Trial
Alexander J. Brucker, M.D. Protocol Chair
1 Slides Shown at FDA Advisory Committee Eyetech Pharmaceuticals Pfizer, Inc. Dermatologic and Ophthalmic Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting 27 August 2004.
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network DRCR.net Prompt PRP vs Ranibizumab+Deferred PRP for PDR Study Jeffrey G. Gross, M.D. – Protocol Chair.
Macugen (pegaptanib sodium injection) Advisory Committee Meeting August 27, 2004 Jennifer D. Harris, MD Medical Officer Division of Anti-Inflammatory,
Copyright restrictions may apply JAMA Ophthalmology Journal Club Slides: Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Age-Related Macular Degeneration Maguire MG,
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network
CATT objectives To determine whether off-lable “Avastin” works as well as approved medication for neovascular AMD- “Lucentis” To evaluate how often treatment.
Secondary Analysis of Clinical Trials Data – A Biostatistician’s Experience Gui-shuang Ying, PhD Center for Preventive Ophthalmology and Biostatistics.
IMPAACT 2010 Protocol Specifications for Recruitment, Screening, and Enrollment No updates.
Collaborative Practice Agreements
IMPAACT 2010 Screening Visits
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Writing Objectives Understand the ways in which the writing assessment differs from other assessments Administer the Writing Performance Assessment.
IMPAACT 2010 Screening Visits
Observational Study Working Group
VESTED Quiz Game
가톨릭대학교 의과대학 안과 및 시과학 교실 R3 장동진 / Pf.이원기
Volume 122, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Clinicaltrials.gov Update
VESTED Quiz Game
Maternal Toxicity Management
Protocol References Section Title 6.2 Entry Visit 5.1
Retina Centre of Ottawa Clinical Trials
AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION (AMD)
Protocol References Section Title 6.2 Entry Visit 5.1
IMPAACT 2010 Eligibility Criteria
Michigan Department of Education ACT WorkKeys® Q&A Session
IMPAACT 2010 Screening Visits
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network
Copyright © 2009 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Protocol U Short-Term Evaluation of Combination Dexamethasone + Ranibizumab vs. Ranibizumab Alone for Persistent Central-Involved DME Following Anti-VEGF.
Part C State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report:
Randomized Clinical Trial Jeffrey G. Gross, M.D. for the DRCR Network
DESIGN ISSUES OF A NON-INFERIORITY TRIAL
Common Protocol Template (CPT)
Larry Bugh ECAR Standard Drafting Team Chair January 2005
Larry Bugh ECAR Standard Drafting Team Chair January 2005
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network
HOW TO ENTER BASELINE DATA
MTN-037 Protocol Overview
CPT and Disclosure: Connecting Critical Processes
Maryland Online IEP System Instructional Series – PD Activity #8
Short-Term Evaluation of Combination
English Language Proficiency Assessment
Teresa Diago, MD, Jose S. Pulido, MD, MPH, MS, Julian R
Development Plans: Study Design and Dose Selection
English Language Proficiency Assessment
Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network
Prompt PRP vs. Ranibizumab + Deferred PRP for PDR Study
DRCR Retina Network Treatment for Center-Involved DME in Eyes with Good Visual Acuity (Protocol V)
STEPS Site Report.
Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network
Serious Adverse Event Reconciliation
Finding a Balance of Synergy and Flexibility in Master Protocols
Presentation transcript:

CEDAR 150998-005 and SEQUOIA 150998-006 Protocol Amendment Summary April 2016

Protocol Amendment Summary Amendment 2 Title: Safety and Efficacy of Abicipar Pegol (AGN-150998) in Patients With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration Protocol 150998-005 and 150998-006 Amendment 2 Date of Amendment: April 2016

Amendment Summary This summary includes changes made to Protocol 150998-005/150998-006 Amendment 1 (approved March 2015). Following is a summary of content-oriented changes that were made to each section of the protocol, and a brief rationale for these changes. Minor editorial and document formatting revisions have not been summarized.

Summary of Changes Section Revision Rationale Title Page (page 2) Updated title of Allergan Signatory Administrative change Protocol Summary, Duration, Visit Schedule, General Statistical Methods and Types of Analyses; Figure 1; Sections 3, 5.6.2, 6.4.3.1, 7, 8.3.20, 8.7 Updated study duration from 100 to 104 weeks throughout protocol to reflect change in study duration Based on the MHRA’s comment to have last follow up visit occur at least 5 human vitreous half-lifes of the study drug, either abicipar or ranibizumab, whichever is longer. Abicipar’s vitreous half-life is longer than ranibizumab, it is estimated to be 12 days. Protocol Summary, Endnote; Table 1, footnote “l”; Sections 5.6, 5.9 Clarified that preparation for all treatment administration procedures, including sham injections, will follow a standard protocol defined in procedure manual Clarification that details of the pre- treatment patient preparation procedure are provided in the procedure manual

Summary of Changes Section Revision Rationale Protocol Summary, Key Ocular Inclusion Criteria (study eye); Section 4.3, Criterion 4 Revised inclusion criterion as follows: Presence of active subfoveal and/or juxtafoveal CNV (1 to 200 micron from the center) secondary to AMD assessed by fluorescein angiogram. In addition, presence of retinal fluid on optical coherence tomography (OCT) and/or fluorescein leakage under the fovea as assessed by the investigator at screening and confirmed by the central reading center prior to baseline (day 1). Revised language for purposes of clarification only Protocol Summary, Key Ocular Exclusion Criteria (either eye); Section 4.4, criterion 8 Revised exclusion criterion as follows: Active periocular, ocular, or /intraocular infection at baseline (day 1)

Summary of Changes Section Revision Rationale Protocol Summary, Key Ocular Exclusion Criteria (study eye); Section 4.4, criterion 18 Revised exclusion criterion as follows: Previous or concurrent macular laser treatment for macular drusen Revised language for purposes of clarification only Section 4.4, criterion 21 Revised exclusion criterion as follows: Structural damage to the center of the macula that is likely to preclude improvement in BCVA following the resolution of macular edema, including atrophy of the RPE, or retinal fibrosis/scarring as assessed by the investigator at screening and confirmed by the central reading center prior to baseline (day 1) including any of the following: Macular hole stage 3 or 4 Atrophy of the RPE Retinal fibrosis or scarring  

Summary of Changes Section Revision Rationale Table 1 Added week 104 as study exit or early termination visit, week 100 will be a study assessment visit without study treatment for all treatment groups Based on the MHRA’s comment to have last follow up visit occur after at least 5 human vitreous half- lifes of the study drug, either abicipar or ranibizumab, whichever is longer. Abicipar’s vitreous half-life is longer than ranibizumab, it is estimated to be 12 days. Visit windows for weeks 4 through 24, weeks 28 through 48, weeks 52 through 96, and weeks 100 through 104/early exit has been changed from ±5 days to ±7 days; accompanying footnote “p” was updated to include that the minimum interval between 2 study visits ≥ 20 days. The visit windows have been updated to accommodate site operations; while all indicated study procedures (including study treatment administration) are intended to be completed in the same visit, this footnote clarifies post-baseline visit dates and visit windows, in particular if the study treatment is administered on a different day as the other baseline (day 1) procedures and further clarifies that the minimum interval between 2 study visits should be at least 20 days.

Summary of Changes Section Revision Rationale Table 1 The timing for specular microscopy (at selected sites) was set to a fixed visit at week 32. The accompanying footnote “i” was updated to reflect this change The timing for specular microscopy has been set to a fixed visit for consistency across sites Section 1 Updated to include additional support for dosing regimens used in the study Revised language for purposes of clarification only Section 3 Updated the minimum and maximum number of visits scheduled Revised based on adding visit at week 104 Section 3.1 Updated to include purpose of monitoring. Revised language for purposes of clarification only Section 4.4, criterion 3 Updated exclusion criterion to refer to povidone iodine solution Section 4.5.1.1 Updated to include use of condoms as preferred method of contraception for male patients participating in the study To specify male contraceptive measures

Summary of Changes Section Revision Rationale Section 4.5.2 Removed topical ocular corticosteroids from prohibited medication list Use of topical ocular corticosteroids is not likely to impact study outcome Section 5.6.2 Added clarification to criteria for escape to standard of care as follows: Persistent fluid (subretinal and intraretinal) by OCT, judged to be the cause of the BCVA loss (not explained by reasons other than the progression of neovascular AMD) Revised language for purposes of clarification only Updated as follows: Patients who escape to standard of care will be required to complete the study exit procedures indicated at the week 100 104/early exit visit and will be reevaluated at the subsequent follow-up visits: 1) 4 or 8 weeks after receiving first standard-of-care treatment for BCVA, CRT, and adverse event assessments, 2) approximately 16 weeks after the last study medication injection for immunogenicity, BCVA, CRT, and adverse events assessments, and 3) approximately 52 and 100 weeks after baseline for BCVA, CRT, and adverse event assessment. Revised to include evaluation at approximately 52 and 100 weeks after baseline based on DSMC recommendations.

Summary of Changes Section Revision Rationale Section 6.4.3.4 Added: In addition, a post-injection safety follow-up phone call (up to 3 days following the office visit) should be performed for all enrolled patients after the administration of each study treatment. The post-injection safety follow- up may be completed in-office for patients who participate in blood sample collection for PK analysis. Added for consistency with other sections of protocol Section 7.3.1 Added that if non-inferiority for both abicipar arms is established, that superiority testing of abicipar over ranibizumab will be performed Updated to reflect changes to the statistical analysis plan Section 7.3.2 Analysis updated to be based on ANCOVA with baseline BCVA as a covariate Section 7.3.3 Updated to describe additional analyses if non-inferiority for both abicipar arms is established Updated to align with FDA’s comments at the end-of- Phase 2 meeting Section 7.3.4 Removed reference to SAS® This detail is covered in statistical appendix

Summary of Changes Section Revision Rationale Sections 8.3.1, 8.3.7, 8.3.13, and 10.4.1 Revise 3-field color imaging to Field 2 for each mention of dilated color fundus photography (screening and week 24, 52, and source documents) For consistency with the requirement stated in central reading center charter Sections 8.3.9, 8.3.11, and 8.3.13 Removed specular microscopy at weeks 28, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52. For consistency with change to Table 1 Section 8.3.10 Revised specular microscopy to be prior to study medication administration at week 32 Section 8.3.19 Updated week 100 visit procedures to reflect changes to Table 1 based on addition of week 104/exit visit For consistency with changes to Table 1 and addition of week 104/early exit Section 8.3.20 New section to list visit procedures at week 104/early exit

Summary of Changes Section Revision Rationale Section 8.7 Updated as follows: Patients who discontinue early due to other reasons will be required to complete the study exit procedures indicated at the week 104/early exit visit and will be reevaluated at the subsequent follow-up visits: 1) approximately 16 weeks after the last study medication injection or 100 weeks from baseline whichever occurs earlier for immunogenicity, BCVA, CRT, and adverse events assessments, and 2) approximately 52 and 100 weeks after baseline for BCVA, CRT, and adverse event assessments. Revised to include evaluation at approximately 52 and 100 weeks after baseline based on DSMC recommendations Section 10.5.3 Added the following: If local policy does not allow storage of used study medication vials, the site may destroy the used vials per their local policy, but must keep the kit box for the detailed inventory of the study medication. Revised language for accommodating the local policy of handling the used study medication Section 12.1 Added abbreviations for the following: ANCOVA, PDT, and PEG Included abbreviations that were either added or not previously defined. Note: Stricken text was removed and underlined text was added

Thank you