Governing Body QAPI 2013 Update for ASC

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Welcome Safety Regulatory Function Handbook April 2006.
Advertisements

Appendix L, Ambulatory Surgical Centers Comprehensive Revision
Hospital Emergency Management
ASCs 2009 Nashville, TN Dawn Q. McLane RN, MSA, CASC, CNOR Lakeshore Surgicare (NRG Managed) – Administrator Jonathan Beal –ASC Association Changes to.
25 TAC Quality Assurance in a licensed ASC
Introduction 3.03 Understand support services Introduction.
Standar-standar yang melibatkan radiologi
Indiana Association for Healthcare Quality May 8, 2014 To promote and provide essential public health services.
Hospital Patient Safety Initiatives: Discharge Planning
Standard 5: Patient Identification and Procedure Matching Nicola Dunbar, Accrediting Agencies Surveyor Workshop, 10 July 2012.
1 Status of Adverse Event Public Reporting Ben Steffen Presented to the Maryland Health Quality and Cost Council September 19, 2014.
by Joint Commission International (JCI)
Introduction to ISO International Organization for Standardization (ISO) n Worldwide federation of national standards bodies from over 100 countries,
Ship Recycling Facility Management System IMO Guideline A.962
Laura Strohmeyer RN, CGRN, CASC AmSurg Corp Dallas, Texas Texas ASCS 2013 Annual Meeting.
SMS Operation.  Internal safety (SMS) audits are used to ensure that the structure of an SMS is sound.  It is also a formal process to ensure continuous.
Module 3. Session DCST Clinical governance
BENCHMARKING. Definition The process of establishing a standard of excellence and comparing your center’s business or clinical functioning to that standard.
Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement: What’s New in QAPI for 2015! June 17, 2015 Michele Kala, MS, RN, Director of Accreditation and Certification.
National Patient Safety Goals 2011
Introduction to the new SHC Health Information Record Manual Presented by Rhonda Anderson, RHIA President Anderson Health Information Systems, Inc
Hazards Identification and Risk Assessment
ISO DOCUMENTATION. ISO Environmental Management Systems2 Lesson Learning Goals At the end of this lesson you should be able to:  Name.
© Copyright, The Joint Commission 2015 National Patient Safety Goals.
Guidance Training (F520) §483.75(o) Quality Assessment and Assurance.
Office of Human Research Protection Georgia Health Sciences University.
RISK MANAGEMENT. PURPOSE: Risk Management is the process of making and carrying out our decisions that will minimize the adverse effects of accidental.
1 National Quality Forum Patient Safety Initiatives Melinda L. Murphy, RN, MS, CNA.
The Accreditation Process Presented by: Thomas Terranova, MA AAAASF Director of Accreditation
Health Facility Compliance Patient Quality Care Unit Division of Regulatory Services Texas Department of State Health Services.
National Patient Safety Goals (NPSG) Online Orientation -the purpose is to improve patient safety -the goals focus on problems in health care safety and.
JCIA Update (April – May 2011). KFSH&RC Mission JCIA accreditation is designed to create that culture. KFSH&RC provides the highest level of specialized.

Community Health Centers of Arkansas Hazard Vulnerability Assessment Workshop August 11, 2017 Mark Fuller.
Tanishah Nellom MSPH, MHA, CPHQ SCAHQ September 9, 2016
Randall (Randy) Snyder, PT, MBA Division Director January 27, 2016
Disaster and Emergency Planning
CMS Emergency Preparedness Rule
Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis (VTE)
CMS Policy & Procedures
Understanding and learning from errors and managing clinical risks
Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement - QAPI
3.03 Understand support services Introduction
A “Fireside” Chat with CDPH
Development Policies and Procedures Manual
Quality Assurance Ten Step Studies
3.03 Understand support services Introduction
Environmental Health and Safety (EH&S) Supplier Awareness Training
PROMOTING PATIENT SAFETY BY PREVENTING MEDICAL ERRORS
3.03 Understand support services Introduction
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
The Medical Director F Tag-501Guidance*
PIMC Semiannual Report- Quality January – June 2017
Event & Disclosure Reporting
Human Factors & Patient Safety
QAPI Implementation: Phase 3 CMS Requirements of Participation
HOSPITAL READMISSION REDUCTION’S IMPACT ON ASSISTED LIVING
3.03 Understand support services Introduction
3.03 Understand support services Introduction
How to conduct Effective Stage-1 Audit
3.03 Understand support services Introduction
3.03 Understand support services PP1
Emergency Preparedness Requirements
MAKING QAPI PAINLESS It doesn’t have to hurt!! Joan Balducci, RN, BS
8 Medication Errors and Prevention.
Trending Requirements and Results
UTI Toolkit Module 1 – The Regulatory Rationale for Improving the Management of UTIs in Nursing Homes.
3.03 Understand support services Introduction
Quality Assurance in Clinical Trials
LAUSD INJURY AND ILLNESS PREVENTION PROGRAM FOR SUPERVISORS AND EMPLOYEES As required by California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 3203.
Presentation transcript:

Governing Body QAPI 2013 Update for ASC California Department of Public Health

2013 Update Many facilities now being re-surveyed on the CMS 3 year schedule Pleased to report that a significant number of those facilities have demonstrated marked improvement and compliance Reviewed Policies & Procedures have been updated and corrected

2013 Update An ASC by any other name is still a surgical facility, first and foremost This means the facility must meet all applicable State and Federal regulations concerning operating room environments

Governing Body

Governing Body The ASC must have a GB that assumes full legal responsibility for determining, implementing, and monitoring policies governing the ASC’s total operation. The GB has oversight and accountability for the quality assessment and performance improvement program (QAPI)

Governing Body Policies must be effective and compliant GB responsibilities are closely tied to the requirements under Medical Staff, QAPI, and Patient Rights CMS is stressing in the new regulations that the GB is completely responsible for the QAPI program and its implementation

Governing Body Specific responsibilities include: Adopting formal P&P that govern all operations within the ASC Direct oversight and accountability for the QAPI program Ensure the overall quality of the ASC’s healthcare services Ensure a safe environment for all care Develop & maintain a disaster preparedness plan

Governing Body The GB may delegate certain day-to-day operational responsibilities To administrative, medical, and support personnel Must retain overall responsibility Delegations must be documented in writing

Governing Body Important to recognize that deficiencies noted under the QAPI tag may well result in citation under the GB tags as well Similar situation for “safe environment”

Governing Body When services are provided through a contract with an outside resource, the ASC must assure that these services are provided in a safe and effective manner. GB oversight includes following the performance of these contracts under the QAPI program

Governing Body The ASC must have an effective procedure for the immediate transfer to a hospital of patients requiring emergency medical care beyond the capabilities of the ASC

Governing Body The ASC must: Have a written transfer agreement with that hospital Ensure that all physicians performing surgery at the ASC have admitting privileges at an available hospital Stabilize and provide emergency care for a patient awaiting such transportation Take necessary steps to arrange admission for patient to hospital

Governing Body The ASC must maintain a written disaster preparedness plan which provides for the emergency care of patients, staff, and others in the facility, in the event of fire, natural disaster, or other unexpected events or circumstances that are likely to threaten the health and safety of those in the ASC

Governing Body The ASC should conduct at least yearly disaster drills to test the plan’s effectiveness The ASC should maintain a written evaluation of each drill and promptly correct any corrections needed

QAPI

QAPI The ASC must develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, data-driven quality assessment and performance improvement (QAPI) program.

QAPI QAPI must include an ongoing program that demonstrates measurable improvement in patient health outcomes, as well as uses quality indicators or performance measures associated with improved health outcomes and reduction of medical errors. Focus on process rather than specific issues

QAPI The program must measure, analyze, and track quality indicators, adverse patient events, infection control, and other aspects of performance covering care and services furnished in the ASC

QAPI Types and Examples of Quality Indicators Outcomes: results of care, HAI rates, complications, hospital transfers and cases requiring over 24 hours of care Process of care: checking on how often well-defined processes such as antibiotic prophylaxis before surgery are carried out Patient perceptions of care received

QAPI ASC’s performance improvement activities must focus on areas with most impact: High risk areas High volume procedures Problem-prone areas Consider the following 3 areas: Incidence Prevalence Severity

QAPI Examples of quality indicators include: Patient burns Patient falls Hospital transfers Wrong site surgeries Use of prophylactic IV antibiotics and timing in relation to the procedure

QAPI ASCs must: Identify and reduce medical errors Failure of planned action to be completed as intended, or using a wrong plan to achieve an aim Measure and analyze adverse patient events Errors don’t necessarily have to result in patient harm Adverse event which is due to an error is “preventable”

QAPI Some examples of adverse events are: Patient burns due to surgical fire Transfer to an acute care facility Patient fall Wrong site or procedure Retained instruments or sponges Surgical site infection

QAPI ASC must track all adverse patient events to determine: Whether they were due to an error and could be preventable How to reduce the likelihood of recurrence

QAPI Based upon that analysis, ASC must implement corrective actions which are likely to reduce medical errors and adverse patient events Must monitor the corrective actions to see if improvement occurs

QAPI Each ASC must undertake performance improvement projects each year: Activities should correlate to issues or problems identified Must document showing: Why project was chosen What data was collected and why What evidence that project will lead to improvement (i.e. a national standard) Show current status of project

QAPI The Governing Body is responsible to ensure that the QAPI program: Is defined, implemented, and maintained Specifies data collection methods, frequency, and details Evaluate all improvements for effectiveness Clearly establish expectations for safety Have enough staff, time, and information systems, as well as training, to implement the QAPI program