IB Psych 10/05/16 Today’s Agenda: Results of IQ “Test” Turn in: IQ Results Take out : Planner Writing Implement Notes Your Notes from your Reading… Today’s Learning Objectives: BLOA: To what extent does genetic inheritance influence behavior? Examine one evolutionary explanation of behavior. Today’s Agenda: Results of IQ “Test” The Genetics of Psychology—Twins HW: CRA 2.5-2.9

37 participants (validity?) IQ “Test” 37 participants (validity?) Range: 105-170 Mean: 135.51 Median: 137 Mode: 142 (3) 4 participants responded affirmatively when asked about the accuracy of the test measuring intelligence. “no because if I do have a IQ score of 146 I should have found math easier...” How do you think your parents would do? Could that impact YOUR score? Regardless of your thoughts about this individual test: is the ability to reason, problem solve, conduct complex mental tasks (or however you would like to define intelligence) genetic?

What is inherited? Which of the following do you think might be inherited? Why or why not? Intelligence Depression Risk-taking behavior Homosexuality Problem solving skills Coulrophobia

Why Would We Study Twins? Using correlational research to establish a genetic argument for the origin of human behavior… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRKbZtpBcgI

Correlation—a recap… Correlations show the relationship between two variables. There is no manipulation of an IV, so cause and effect are not established. A correlation of +1.0 means as x increases, y increases. -1.0 means that x increases, y decreases. In twin research, we expect to find a higher correlational than when comparing a child to someone outside of the family.

Techniques Comparing Monozygotic twins (MZ) with Dizygotic twins (DZ). Since MZ twins have identical DNA, there should be a higher concordance rate. Comparing MZ twins reared together vs. MZ twins reared apart. Why might this be better than the first technique?

ADOPTION STUDIES Adoption studies tend to compare the adopted child with the biological mother and the adoptive mother to determine which has the higher concordance rate for a given behavior. Why might adoption studies at times be preferable to twin studies?

Prospective Studies Prospective studies identify traits that are considered to be inherited. Those who are considered “genetically vulnerable” are then followed over many years to see if they actually manifest the behavior. This is used, for example, in the study of schizophrenia. There is an ethical concern in such research that it may cause undue stress and lead to iatrogenic effects in those who are labeled as vulnerable.

STRENGTHS OF TWIN STUDIES Twin studies have produced a great deal of data in support of biological roots of disorders; this has helped psychologists to stress prevention for those who are vulnerable to such disorders. There is a high cross-cultural reliability of concordance levels.

Limitations OF TWIN STUDIES MZ twins are rarely separated at birth and raised in a totally different environment, yet this is really necessary to substantiate claims. MZ twins reared together share many of the same experiences. DZ twins reared together may not share the same experiences due to levels of attractiveness or temperament.

STRENGTHS OF Adoption STUDIES Adoption studies allow researchers to isolate variables. If a biological mother has no contact since birth and still matches for a specific trait – for example, the adopted child’s IQ is better than the adoptive mother and in concordance with the birth mother - this is strong evidence that genes play a significant role in the development of this trait.

Limitations OF Adoption STUDIES Selective placement is a problem. Babies tend to placed with families similar in background to the natural parents. Adopted children – as well as twins - are not representative of all children. The act of being given up for adoption may affect the child’s behavior.