Telescope Access Metrics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Creating the Continuous Improvement Classroom Developing Ground Rules and Mission Statements.
Advertisements

Geometry Section 1.1 Patterns and Inductive Reasoning
Extremely Large Telescopes and Surveys Mark Dickinson, NOAO.
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Participants Committee Meeting (FCPF PC3) Montreux, Switzerland, June 16-18, 2009 Sources and Uses of Funds in the Readiness.
December 21-22, 2005Subaru Users Meeting, Mitaka Status of Remote Observation / Service Observation Junichi Noumaru Subaru Telescope National Astronomical.
19 Oct 2005Chandra Users' Committee Cycle 7 Peer Review: June 2005  747 proposals, 12 panels, 101 reviewers  Hilton, Logan Airport.
Chandra Users’ Committee, Apr 2007 Chandra Director’s Office Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle 9  661 submitted proposals  *5.5 oversubscribed.
Chandra Users' Committee, 27 April 2010 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 12  CfP Release: Dec  GTO Deadline: 11 March 2010  GO Deadline: 18 March.
Chandra Users’ Committee, 9-10 Apr 2008 Chandra Director’s Office Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle 10  639 submitted proposals  *5.6 oversubscribed.
Director's Office Chandra Users’ Committee, Sept 2007 Chandra Cycle 9  661 submitted proposals  *5.5 oversubscribed (based on time)  48 LP, 10.
Chandra Users’ Committee, 6-7 Apr 2009 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 11  CfP Release: Dec  POG, final A Eff : 15 Jan 2009  GTO: 43 proposals.
Chandra Users’ Committee, Oct 2008 Chandra Director’s Office Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle 10  639 submitted proposals  *5.6 oversubscribed.
Providing Access for US Astronomers to the Next Generation of Large Ground Based OIR Telescopes 1.Scientific Potential 2.Current Design Efforts 3.Complementarity.
Strategies for Optimizing Scientific Productivity for Future Observatories: A “Flat World” for Astronomical Research.
The KPNO 4m “Mayall” Telescope Arjun Dey (NOAO). National Optical Astronomy Observatory Mission: provide the best ground-based astronomical capabilities.
Kitt Peak National Observatory Status and Plans Richard F. Green Tucson, AZ 23 October, 2003 National Optical Astronomy Observatory.
Keck Observatory and The System: Astro2010 Activities Mike Bolte, Shri Kulkarni, Taft Armandroff Keck Strategic Planning Discussions September 18, 2009.
This Week: Testing relationships between two metric variables: Correlation Testing relationships between two nominal variables: Chi-Squared.
OPTICON Access Programme. OPTICON Access Programme. Mid-term review September Corfú OPTICON Trans-national Access Programme under the auspices of.
National Radio Astronomy Observatory May 17, 2006 – Legacy Projects Workshop VLA/VLBA Large Projects Jim Ulvestad Assistant Director, NRAO.
AAAC Meeting February, New GSMT Role NSF has asked that AURA/NOAO act as NSF’s "Program Manager" for the GSMT Technology development effort at a.
SSSC 02/18/2010 P. Marcum Science Utilization Policies SOFIA SCIENCE UTILIZATION POLICIES Pamela M. Marcum SOFIA Project Scientist SSSC Feb 19, 2010.
At A Glance VOLT is a freeware, platform independent tool set that coordinates cross-mission observation planning and scheduling among one or more space.
SSHRC Partnership and Partnership Development Grants Rosemary Ommer 1.
Harvey Tananbaum Director Chandra X-ray Center Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics 13th HEAD Meeting April 8, 2013 Building International Space.
Cycle 1 Planning Process B-G Andersson (SOFIA Science Operations Manager) & Ravi Sankrit (User Support Scientist) SSSC, May 11, 2011 Mountain View.
Report from Subaru Advisory Committee The main issues of the current SAC: ・ Extensive (strategic) program of Subaru telescope ・ International collaborations.
WFMOS Status Report Doug Simons Gemini Observatory January 2008.
AST Supported Programs for Astronomical Instrumentation Division of Astronomical Sciences Program Officers: Andrew Clegg, Jeff Pier, Gary Schmidt.
John Peoples for the DES Collaboration BIRP Review August 12, 2004 Tucson1 DES Management  Survey Organization  Survey Deliverables  Proposed funding.
1 NOAO – National Optical Astronomy Observatory Overview for the AST Committee of Visitors February 2011 Jeff Pier, Program Officer.
“From the Ground Up: Balancing the NSF Astronomy Program” Senior Review Major Recommendations November 2006 Implications for GSMT.
MNRF Management and milestone achievements Chris Evans AAO.
May 17, 2004SSWG - PFIS Shared Risk1 PFIS Commissioning, Shared Risk, and Transition to Operations.
What European needs to do to take the lead in Space Astronomy ESO Astronomy Faculty May 2004.
USDA, RURAL DEVELOPMENT LOAN & GRANT FINANCING WATER & WASTE FACILITIES Tim Rickabaugh, B&CP Specialist Rural Development State Office October 20, 2008.
ALTAIR: Access to Large Telescopes for Instruction and Research Chair: Larry Ramsey (14 members, 8.5L, 2S, 3.5U) Report: Submitted Mar 9, 2009
Toward the Senior Review Rob Petre. Senior Review proposal details Due March 12, 2008 Competing against: XMM, INTEGRAL, RXTE, Swift, Galex, WMAP, Spitzer.
S. Ritz 1 GLAST Science Policy Document Outline Action Item GUC Meeting June 2005 R. Brissenden S. Ritz Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
GO Program: Cycle 1 process, results, and Cycle 2 schedule Koji Mukai Astro-E2 Guest Observer Facility.
Bidders Conference PI-SNAP-Ukraine-01 Kyiv, Ukraine _________________________________ February 12, 2015 Matthew Krause Partnership Development Lead Feed.
Telescope Access Metrics Presentation to Program Review Panel September 16, 2004.
Senior Review of NSF Facilities NOAO Users Committee October 4, 2005.
VLBA Key Science: Making It Happen Bob Dickman AD for New Mexico Operations.
Heliophysics Research Program Arik Posner Heliophysics R&A Lead.
Science Process Skills. What is Science?
Scientific Method Mr. Chon / Science. Introduction Includes purpose Includes purpose What will you learn from this experiment? What will you learn from.
GSMT SWG Meeting November, New GSMT Role NSF has asked that AURA/NOAO act as NSF’s "Program Manager" for the GSMT Technology development effort.
Legacy Proposals for GLAST GI Program? (Aug. 04 AI # 11, Josh and Rita) The GI program for GLAST should allow for Legacy Projects defined as: very large.
LOFAR/SKA Meeting, Bonn, 2009 Oct 27 James M Anderson 1 /13 LOFAR Status  James M Anderson On behalf of the LOFAR collaboration.
Business Models and Economics of Sustainable Data Infrastructures Robert J. Hanisch Space Telescope Science Institute Virtual Astronomical Observatory.
Science Operation of Subaru Telescope Tae-Soo Pyo 2014.Feb.25 2/25/ Subaru Winter KASI.
T. Axelrod, NASA Asteroid Grand Challenge, Houston, Oct 1, 2013 Improving NEO Discovery Efficiency With Citizen Science Tim Axelrod LSST EPO Scientist.
Preparing for the Future: NASA's Planning for the Decadal Survey
Future Blanco Instrumentation and how to get it…
Connect Grant and College Collaborations
JWST Science Policy & Science Parallels
Statistical Measures M M O D E E A D N I A R A N G E.
SOAR Observatory Strategic Planning Initial Concept Presentation
Experimental Psychology
JCMT Observation Management Project
Hyper-V Cloud Proof of Concept Kickoff Meeting <Customer Name>
Science Policies and Timeline
Letizia Stanghellini NOAO 16 June 2008 – Science with Giant Telescopes
User instrument policy
Astro Space Center of Lebedev Physical Institute, Moscow
The principle of proportionality and the contents of a contract
Scientific Potential Current Design Efforts Complementarity with JWST
The Nature of Science What is Science About?.
LAMAS Working Group 7-8 December 2015
Presentation transcript:

Telescope Access Metrics Presentation to NOAO Users Committee October 12, 2004

Ground rules Categorize telescopes as Large: 6.5m or greater Gemini, others with TSIP (FIP) access Medium: 3-4.2m Mayall, Blanco, WIYN, SOAR Small: 0.9-2.1m KP 2.1m, WIYN 0.9m, SMARTS Count nights available for science for past semesters Extrapolate for future semesters Gemini ramps up to 60 U.S. nights/telescope/semester Currently averages ~50 SOAR begins science observations in 2005B and ramps up over 1 year

Precommitments-Surveys Note that surveys are subject to the same peer review as regular proposals 20% cap Proposals only taken once per year Program started in 1999; none solicited in 2003 or 2004 Surveys can run up to 5 years Actual nights committed run 10-20% for both medium and small telescopes No surveys have been granted on large telescopes

Precommitments - NASA Agreements with HST, Chandra, Spitzer Up to 5% of NOAO time available for complementary (not follow-up) ground-based observations connected with successful proposals Proposals go through NASA peer review and NOAO technical review Actual nights committed typically are 5-15 per semester on all telescopes << 15% maximum

Precommitments – instrument partnerships Aimed at providing new instrumental capabilities on NOAO telescopes for guaranteed time U Maryland agreement: 20% of Mayall time Exchangable for WIYN or 2.1m U. Md contribution (cash plus manpower) for NEWFIRM Flamingos: base (4m: 3n, 2.1m: 5n) plus 4-6n for every 14 nights (after first 14) allocated to community GSFC IRMOS: draft MOU – 4-5 n per semester on 4m, 8-10 n per semester on 2.1m, Ge Exoplanet Tracker: draft MOU – 21 n per semester on 2.1m All “guaranteed time proposals” go through TAC If they do not succeed (which is rare), they are deferred to a later semester so the proposal can be improved

Current tally 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Large-total Precommit remaining 146 201 253 265 263 278 Medium-total 739 207 532 698 166 654 168 486 714 132 582 774 47 727 786 Small-total 1071 186 885 633 141 492 653 119 534 640 29 611 12 628

Reasonable predictions TSIP will continue to add 25-30 large telescope-nights per year TSIP will also add 30-60 medium telescope-nights per year The survey program will resume in 2005, leading to a future level of precommitment about the same as the past The NASA precommitments will continue at a level of a few nights per semester PREST will add approximately 200 nights of small telescope time per year

Tally with reasonable predictions 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Large-total Precommit remaining 146 201 253 277 290 305 Medium-total 739 207 532 698 166 654 168 486 744 170 574 834 664 846 676 Small-total 1071 186 885 633 141 492 653 119 534 690 140 550 740 600 840 700

Nights remaining with predictions

Oversubscription rates Nights requested divided by nights available after precommitment Even with devolution of small telescopes, access is reasonable Survey proposals (not included in graph) run 4.5-5.5 for medium telescopes; 1.5-2.5 for small telescopes

Conclusions All oversubscription rates are in healthy range – and increase with increasing aperture Status quo results in reasonable access TSIP and PREST are expected to improve the situation – particularly for medium and small telescopes Large telescope access is limited by willingness of independent observatories to give up more nights (TSIP) and by our fraction of Gemini.