Http://www.pennvest.pa.gov/Tools/Pages/Subsidy-Calculator.aspx.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OHIO ENERGY POLICY PROGRESS & REVIEW UCEAO 6 th Annual Conference Securing Ohio’s Energy and Economic Future THE BEST OF TIMES, THE WORST OF TIMES: ADVANCED.
Advertisements

Wastewater Collection Options for Lakota Beach Area Sub-Basin Special Meeting June 27, 2001 John Bowman Lakehaven Utility District (253)
1 Collection System And Wastewater Treatment Plant Sewer Update
Funding for Municipal Infrastructure Ruth Noemí Colón Acting Secretary of State George Stafford Deputy Secretary of State Public Finance and Management.
From – A Report of the Connecticut Regional Institute for the 21 st Century by Michael Gallis & Associates, 1999 (known as the “Gallis Report”) Knowledge.
Cuba’s Future Development Needs, Funding Models, and Alternatives. A Perspective of the Operation of a Cuban Water & Sewer Utility. Eduardo Vega-Llort,
Hide-A-Way Lake, Inc. Low Pressure Sewer System Prepared by Dungan Engineering, P.A.
Nebraska Investment Finance Authority © 2007 Tax Credit Basics.
Creating New Opportunities
Fairview Township, York County May 28, 2015
Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection.
Michigan Economic Development Corporation Michigan 2007 CDBG Program.
State Financing Programs for Brownfield Redevelopment.
U.S Conference of Mayors August 2004 Mayor’s ’04 Metro Agenda Bipartisan Priorities Statement Directed for candidates in Presidential and Congressional.
City of Polson April 5, 2010 PUBLIC HEARING Water System Improvements PRESENTATION ON PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT.
California Needs Assessment of Workforce Issues for Energy Efficiency, Demand-Side Management, Renewable Energy and the Green Economy Conducted by the.
Incentive Services Presented by D.E. Baetsen & Associates, LLC.
Water & Waste Disposal Loans and Grants The funding purpose is to construct, enlarge, extend or improve water, wastewater and solid waste systems in rural.
Economic challenges of wastewater treatment and use in agriculture Javier Mateo-Sagasta, FAO Pay Drechsel, IWMI.
Project History Town of Newport Population: 550 Vermillion County Seat.
California Needs Assessment of Workforce Issues for Energy Efficiency, Demand-Side Management, Renewable Energy and the Green Economy Conducted by the.
Access to Capital/Resources for Entrepreneurs Lynne Shea, CEcD Business Development Manager.
Economic Development for a Healthy Community! League of Oregon Cities Portland, Oregon 2009 By Dennie Houle Business Development Officer Oregon Business.
Wastewater Treatment Plant # 2 Engineering Services Council Workshop July 8, 2014.
Department of Environmental Quality Water Infrastructure November 17, 2015 Water Infrastructure Funding to Financing.
CITY OF BEND | ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE IN AN URBAN AREA JIM LONG, AFFORDABLE HOUSING MANAGER HOUSING LAND ADVOCATES 2015 CONFERENCE, NOVEMBER 6, 2015.
Town of Genoa October 6, Agenda Why are we here? Background Capacity Analysis & Facilities Plan Preferred Alternative Board Direction Implementation.
A P LAN TO C ONNECT W EST V IRGINIA ’ S C OMMUNITIES.
Operating Efficiencies Costs to operate and maintain the water and sewer system have not varied significantly during the first 5 years of operation.
USDA Rural Development Program Overview Brian Queen Community & Economic Development Specialist.
PARK STREET/CAMPANELLI PARK SEWER EXPANSION PROJECT Public Meeting Wednesday, June 22, 2016.
Loan Programs.  What is the PFA?  How does PFA financing work?  What is the Capital Financing Program?  What is the State Revolving Fund Program?
Affordable housing, energy efficiency, and the role of utilities
HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS
McLean County Regional Water Consolidation Project
What is Planning for Progress?
Elaine Dietz MD Water Quality Financing Administration
Severn Trent is a leading operator of U.S. water & wastewater assets
Drinking Water State Revolving Fund and Performance Based Infrastructure Janet Cherry, PE Office of Drinking Water.
City of dayton department of economic development
American Recovery & Reinvestment Act Funding for Rural Communities
Wisconsin’s Safe Drinking Water Loan Program
Streamlining Integrated Infrastructure Implementation: Workshop Report
Mangawhai Wastewater Strategy and Options 7 August 2017.
Meeting Standards and Expectations in the Water Industry
Sewer User Rate Increase PUBLIC HEARING
Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada Leveraging Infrastructure Funds
«Water Sector Reform in Kenya »
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES September 26, 2017
Housing Development Program (HDP) in Ethiopia
HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS
Best Practices in Public Policy
Don’t waste a good investment
TITLE VI LOAN GUARANTEE PROGAM
AMERIND Critical Infrastructure Tribes Bringing Tribes Broadband
Where Californians find financing for their energy improvements.
Renewable Energy Program Geothermal and Wind Projects
Where Californians find financing for their energy improvements.
Preparing a River Basin Management Plan What are the open questions?
VIRGINIA INCENTIVES TOOLS IN THE TOOLBOX
BROWARD COUNTY GO SOLARFEST
Controlling Project Cost and Schedule
Brackish Water Desalination Project
Missed Funding Opportunities
Where Californians find financing for their energy improvements.
Arizona Public Service Company 2012 Renewable Energy Standard Implementation Plan Arizona Corporation Commission Open Meeting August 17, 2011.
VIRGINIA INCENTIVES TOOLS IN THE TOOLBOX
The Wausau Wastewater Treatment Facility
Dollars and Cents: Ways to Save and be More Resourceful
Where Californians find financing for their energy improvements.
Presentation transcript:

http://www.pennvest.pa.gov/Tools/Pages/Subsidy-Calculator.aspx

Why and When do you need multiple funding sources? Private Funding Sources do not result in an affordable project Available Public Sources are insufficient to provide for an affordable funding package to allow project to Proceed Projects are too large for any one funding entity to cover Pockets of residential users may have difficulty in paying for improvements and could help project qualify for additional subsidy. Economic Development Opportunities may qualify the project for participation by related funding entities Existing funding may require matching funds

How to Succeed when using Multiple Funding Sources for your Capital Improvement Project Meet Early on in the process – Earlier is better, no matter what…you can always have a subsequent meeting to follow-up if necessary. Strive to set the pace for a successful project at the start. Have Regular Progress Reports and Involve Public Keep Funders in the loop – build a good report, co-opt them into the project Public involvement is necessary for successful implementation of any project Develop a sense of ownership top to bottom / the locals own the system at the end Involve the Regulators in the Process Nothing to loose but valuable time and $ with non compliance – make them your advocates Coordinate Funding Requirements Minimize duplication – target funding where it best fits the project for implementation and eligibility – You may have to step out of our comfort zone a bit but it keeps everyone’s idea of the project on the same page. Reach out, don’t wait. Manage Implementation Schedules With Funding Cycles This can be targeted at the planning meetings – no need to Hurry Up….and wait but…. Be Prepared to Move as soon as the Planets Align! I have seen more projects move to construction because they were ready to move when the $ was there, than projects that just begin the process when the money becomes available.

Total Project Cost = $6,102,640 Funding Sources: State H2O PA Grant $ 400,000 Tap Fees $ 103,360 PENNVEST (SRF Loan) $5,598,640 Service Connections = 747 Monthly Fee = $65.50 Project Description: installing service extension of 37,000 ft of low pressure sewers, 1,100 ft of gravity sewer, 129 grinder pumps and a 65 GPM pump station and related appurtenances. Problem Statement: documented on lot malfunctions greater than 50%, including a number of wildcat sewer systems. Leverage other state programs with local contribution with a low interest loan to move this project forward.

Total Project Cost = $4,100,000 Funding Sources: US Army Corps Grant $ 500,000 Tap Fees $ 148,500 PENNVEST (SRF Loan) $ 741,500 PENNVEST (SRF P/F) $2,710,000 Service Connections = 296 Monthly Fee = $50.00 Project Description: extension of 20,000 ft of gravity sewers, 4,700 ft of force main, 6 grinder pumps and 800 ft of low pressure sewers, and related appurtenances. Problem Statement: documented on lot malfunctions greater than 55%, including a number of wildcat sewer systems. This project was able to utilize US Army Corps Grant, local tap fees, and PV Loan and Grant. Army Corps can play a significant role for some projects, but will tend to slow down the implementation.

Total Project Cost = $9,110,000 Funding Sources: Economic Development Administration (EDA) Grant: $ 1,000,000 Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) Grant $ 400,000 Tap Fees $ 125,000 PENNVEST (SRF Loan) $ 6,585,000 PENNVEST (State Grant) $ 1,000,000 Service Connections = 1,016 Monthly Fee = $37.75 Project Description: Construction to expand the treatment facilities to .95 MGD to provide adequate treatment for existing as well as capacity for neighboring communities. Problem Statement: Hydraulic and Organic overloading of the existing treatment facilities and documented on lot malfunctions greater than 26%. Benefits – environmental and economic development / consent order compliance and support creation of tech related 500 jobs

Total Project Cost = $40,246,700 Funding Sources: US Dept of Agriculture (Loan) $ 17,640,000 Local Financing $ 2,606,700 PENNVEST (SRF Loan) $ 7,760,000 PENNVEST (SRF PF) $ 12,240,000 Service Connections = 7,741 Monthly Fee = $42.85 Project Description: increasing the existing treatment facilities from 7 to 8.5 MGD and provide enhanced nutrient Problem Statement: hydraulically overloaded treatment facilities, need to treat to a lower discharge limits in order to comply with the Chesapeake Bay Tributary Strategy. Extra Benefits – this project will support the investment of over $11 Million in private investment in local industries securing existing and creating over 250 new jobs Good example of using USDA and SRF to help with a project that may have been too large for either one individually

Stockton -

Hazelton City Authority – Stockton / White Knight Total Project Cost = $2,210,181 Funding Sources: PENNVEST (SRF PF) $2,210,181 Service Connections = 43 Monthly Fee = $35.50 Project Description: extend water service, and replace existing distribution to residents in the Village of Stockton. Problem Statement: unfiltered and contaminated surface water source.