Development of source terms Resulting full Boltzmann Equation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nuclear Reactors, BAU, 1st Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Steady State Diffusion Equation HW 20 Study example 5.3 and solve problem 5.8 in Lamarsh.
Advertisements

Chapter 5 Orthogonality
METO 621 Lesson 11. Azimuthal Dependence In slab geometry, the flux and mean intensity depend only on  and . If we need to solve for the intensity.
1 MECH 221 FLUID MECHANICS (Fall 06/07) Tutorial 6 FLUID KINETMATICS.
3D Schrodinger Equation
Ch 7.3: Systems of Linear Equations, Linear Independence, Eigenvalues
Chapter 3 Determinants and Matrices
1 Stratified sampling This method involves reducing variance by forcing more order onto the random number stream used as input As the simplest example,
Boyce/DiPrima 9th ed, Ch 11.2: Sturm-Liouville Boundary Value Problems Elementary Differential Equations and Boundary Value Problems, 9th edition, by.
Ground State of the He Atom – 1s State First order perturbation theory Neglecting nuclear motion 1 - electron electron 2 r 1 - distance of 1 to nucleus.
Louisiana Tech University Ruston, LA Slide 1 Krogh Cylinder Steven A. Jones BIEN 501 Wednesday, May 7, 2008.
1 February 24 Matrices 3.2 Matrices; Row reduction Standard form of a set of linear equations: Chapter 3 Linear Algebra Matrix of coefficients: Augmented.
CHAPTER FIVE Orthogonality Why orthogonal? Least square problem Accuracy of Numerical computation.
1 Lesson 9: Solution of Integral Equations & Integral Boltzmann Transport Eqn Neumann self-linked equations Neumann self-linked equations Attacking the.
University of Texas at Austin CS384G - Computer Graphics Fall 2008 Don Fussell Orthogonal Functions and Fourier Series.
4-1 Lesson 4 Objectives Development of source terms Development of source terms Review of Legendre expansions Review of Legendre expansions Resulting full.
P D S.E.1 3D Schrodinger Equation Simply substitute momentum operator do particle in box and H atom added dimensions give more quantum numbers. Can.
1-1 Lesson 1 Objectives Objectives of Course Objectives of Course Go over syllabus Go over syllabus Go over course Go over course Overview of Course Overview.
Section 5.7: Additional Techniques of Integration Practice HW from Stewart Textbook (not to hand in) p. 404 # 1-5 odd, 9-27 odd.
Lesson 4: Computer method overview
Lesson 6: Computer method overview  Neutron transport overviews  Comparison of deterministic vs. Monte Carlo  User-level knowledge of Monte Carlo 
Eigenvalues The eigenvalue problem is to determine the nontrivial solutions of the equation Ax= x where A is an n-by-n matrix, x is a length n column.
CH.III : APPROXIMATIONS OF THE TRANSPORT EQUATION
13-1 Lesson 13 Objectives Begin Chapter 5: Integral Transport Begin Chapter 5: Integral Transport Derivation of I.T. form of equation Derivation of I.T.
6-1 Lesson 6 Objectives Beginning Chapter 2: Energy Beginning Chapter 2: Energy Derivation of Multigroup Energy treatment Derivation of Multigroup Energy.
Fick’s Law The exact interpretation of neutron transport in heterogeneous domains is so complex. Assumptions and approximations. Simplified approaches.
The Hydrogen Atom The only atom that can be solved exactly.
1 SYSTEM OF LINEAR EQUATIONS BASE OF VECTOR SPACE.
Quantum Two 1. 2 Angular Momentum and Rotations 3.
CH.III : APPROXIMATIONS OF THE TRANSPORT EQUATION
Lesson 6: Particles and barriers
CH.IV : CRITICALITY CALCULATIONS IN DIFFUSION THEORY
Mathematics-I J.Baskar Babujee Department of Mathematics
Coordinate Transformations
Transfer Functions Convenient representation of a linear, dynamic model. A transfer function (TF) relates one input and one output: The following terminology.
Equation of Continuity
Development of adjoint B.E.
Classical EM - Master in Physics - AA
Ground State of the He Atom – 1s State
The Hydrogen Atom The only atom that can be solved exactly.
Schrodinger wave equation
Review of Linear Algebra
The Transport Equation (cont’d)
Beginning Chapter 2: Energy Derivation of Multigroup Energy treatment
Spatial treatment in 1D Slab Discrete Ordinates
Recap and iteration practice Reduction of B.E. to 1D 1D Quadratures
Depth from disparity (x´,y´)=(x+D(x,y), y)
Definition of “outer” (energy) iteration
NEUTRON DIFFUSION THE CONTINUITY EQUATION
Nodal Methods for Core Neutron Diffusion Calculations
REACTOR THEORY The basic principles are simple but detailed calculations are difficult Use very simplified models to understand principles of calculations.
Chapter 5 Series Solutions of Linear Differential Equations.
Higher-Order Linear Homogeneous & Autonomic Differential Equations with Constant Coefficients MAT 275.
Systems of First Order Linear Equations
Quantum One.
Lesson 3.1 How do you solve two-step equations?
Quantum One.
Chapter 27.
Quantum Two.
Numerical Analysis Lecture 16.
Solving Linear Equations
Chapter 3 Linear Algebra
The Stale of a System Is Completely Specified by lts Wave Function
SKTN 2393 Numerical Methods for Nuclear Engineers
Chapter 4. Time Response I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be. Pusan National University Intelligent.
The Transport Equation
More on One-Speed Diffusion
Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
Lesson 4: Application to transport distributions
Presentation transcript:

Development of source terms Resulting full Boltzmann Equation Lesson 4 Objectives Development of source terms Review of Legendre expansions Resulting full Boltzmann Equation Source vs. Eigenvalue calculations Four eigenvalue formulations

BE so far The time-independent Boltzmann Equation we have derived to this point is: But you will remember that we swept a bunch of terms under the rug by wrapping them up into the q term (Which ones?)

Transport with Secondary Particles We will now “unwrap” the source terms: External fixed sources Scattering sources Fission sources

External Fixed Source This source term comprises particle sources that do not depend on flux (e.g., radioactive isotopes, cosmic rays) These are simply specified for the calculation as: In many cases of interest there is no or dependence.

Functional expansions The general field of functional expansion involves the approximation of a continuous function as a linear combination of a basis function set: Use of a “complete” basis functions set means that as L goes to infinity, the approximation approaches the function The trick is finding the coefficients that “best” fit the function Determining the “best” comes down to finding the approximation

Functional expansions (2) Determining the “best” comes down to finding the approximation (for a given L) that is “closest” to the function according to some “norm” A “norm” is simply a measure of difference between two functions that satisfies two simple criteria: The value of the norm is always positive The value is only zero if the two are identical Example: Distance norms for points from Pythagorean theorem

Functional expansions (3) The norm that we will use is the least-square norm, , which is a member of the series defined by: For a basic function expansion, this becomes:

Functional expansions (4) We find the optimum coefficients by setting the partial derivatives to zero: This gives us a set of linear (matrix) equations: Thus minimizing the least squares norm comes down to preserving the moments of the expansion functions themselves (Galerkin method).

Functional expansions (5) This can be written as a (L+1)*(L+1) matrix equation as: where Notice that the A matrix (and its inverse) just depend on the basis functions (not the function being examined), so can be pre-calculated

Functional expansions (6) Solving for the coefficients becomes much easier if the basis functions are orthogonal (which means that the integral of the product of any two different basis functions is zero): This makes the A matrix diagonal and simplifies the solution of the coefficients to:

Use of Legendre expansions Using the cosine of the deflection angle, we can represent the angular dependence of the distribution in a Legendre expansion: This allows us to represent the scattering distribution by determining the Legendre coefficients:

Use of Legendre expansions (2) Using the orthogonality of the Legendre polynomials: We can operate on both sides of the expansion (1st eqn. previous slide) with:

Use of Legendre expansions (3) And remembering that a Kronecker delta works pulls out a single element like this: To get: Work this out for yourself (Prob. 4-1)

Scattering Source This source term comprises all particle reactions (other than fission) from which particles that we are interested in are emitted The basic cross section is: Note that it is a distribution in destination energy and direction

Scattering Source (2) The scattering source is: Again, Legendre expansions are normally used for the scattering cross section:

Scattering Source (3) The coefficients are given by: Substituting this expression gives:

However, we can use the Legendre addition theorem, which says: Scattering Source (4) However, we can use the Legendre addition theorem, which says: where

Substituting this expression gives: Scattering Source (5) Substituting this expression gives: where

Scattering Source (5) Conveniently, this term is also the coefficient of the angular flux expansion in spherical coordinates: The scattering terms are therefore implemented through these flux moments

Fission Source The text develops the time-dependent fission source term, including prompt and delayed fission neutron terms. Our primary concern is not time-dependent, so we will use: Note that there is no angular dependence and that it is “per unit solid angle”

Complete Source Combining the three parts of the source: where the “double zero” moment is equivalent to the normal scalar flux.

Full Equation The full time-independent Boltzmann Equation is:

Source vs. Eigenvalue Calculations The nature of the source terms divides the solution into two categories: Source problems: subcritical with: Eigenvalue problems with: The subcriticality requirement is because there is no time-independent physical solution for critical or super-critical systems with sources Mathematical solutions would have negative fluxes

Eigenvalue Calculations Without external souces, we get the homogeneous equation: Two characteristics of the solution: Any constant times a solution is a solution. There probably isn’t a meaningful solution

Eigenvalue solution normalization For the first point, we generally either normalize to 1 fission neutron: or to a desired power level: where k is a conversion constant (e.g., 200 MeV/fission)

Eigenvalue approach For the second problem (i.e., no meaningful solution), we deal with it by adding a term with a constant that we can adjust to achieve balance in the equation. We will discuss four different eigenvalue formulations: Lambda (k-effective) eigenvalue Alpha (time-absorption) eigenvalue B2 (buckling) eigenvalue Material search “eigenvalue”

Lambda (k-effective) eigenvalue The first (and most common) eigenvalue form involves dividing n, the number of neutrons emitted per fission: Keep largest of multiple eigenvalues

The criticality state is given by: Lambda eigenvalue (2) The criticality state is given by: Advantages: Everybody uses it Guaranteed real solution Fairly intuitive (if you don’t take it too seriously) Good measure of distance from criticality for reactors Very straightforward calculation (no search required) Disadvantages: No physical basis Not a good measure of distance from criticality for CS

Alpha (time-absorption) eigenvalue The second eigenvalue form involves adding a term to the removal term: Keep largest of multiple eigenvalues

Alpha eigenvalue (2) Physical basis is the representation of the time dependence as exponential:

The criticality state is given by: Alpha eigenvalue (3) The criticality state is given by: Advantages: Physical basis Intuitive for kinetics work Disadvantages: No guaranteed real solution Not intuitive for reactor design or CS work Search required (to make k-effective go to 1)

B2 (buckling) eigenvalue The third eigenvalue form also involves adding a term to the removal term: Physical basis is the diffusion theory approximation of leakage by

B2 eigenvalue (2) Mathematical basis is the representation of spatial dependence of flux as Fourier transform: This substitutes to give us:

The criticality state is given by: B2 eigenvalue (3) The criticality state is given by: Advantages: Physical basis Good measure of distance from criticality Disadvantages: No guaranteed real solution Not intuitive for kinetics or CS work Search required (to make k-effective go to 1)

Material search “eigenvalue” The last “eigenvalue” is a multiplier on the number density of a key nuclide: Advantages: Physical basis Great for design Guaranteed real solution (fuel isotopes) Disadvantages: No guaranteed real solution (non-fuel isotopes) Search required (to make k-effective go to 1)

a. Show that if we expand: Homework 4-1 a. Show that if we expand: that the coefficients can be found from: b. Use this fact to expand Expand it to enough terms so that the error is less than 0.1% at all values of x.

Homework 4-2 Find the lambda, B2, and alpha eigenvalues for infinite medium cross sections (Use EXCEL, MatLab, whatever) Find the resulting group fluxes. Use Scattering 1->2=.07 2->3=.13 3->4=.58 (others 0) Base eqn: Group constants Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group4 c 1 nsf 0.0055 0.068 2.48 2.00 sa .072 .20 2.02 1.0 D (cm) 2 .7 0.2 0.3 V (cm/sec) 2.2e9 3.2e8 2.7E7 2.5e5