Rainer Stamen, Norman Gee

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
6 Mar 2002Readout electronics1 Back to the drawing board Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: Real system New VFE chip A simple system Some questions.
Advertisements

Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
Adding electronic noise and pedestals to the CALICE simulation LCWS 19 – 23 rd April Catherine Fry (working with D Bowerman) Imperial College London.
29 June 2004Paul Dauncey1 ECAL Readout Tests Paul Dauncey For the CALICE-UK electronics group A. Baird, D. Bowerman, P. Dauncey, C. Fry, R. Halsall, M.
28 August 2002Paul Dauncey1 Readout electronics for the CALICE ECAL and tile HCAL Paul Dauncey Imperial College, University of London, UK For the CALICE-UK.
6 June 2002UK/HCAL common issues1 Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: UK commitments Trigger issues DAQ issues Readout electronics issues Many more.
PHOS calibration in CDB framework M.Bogolyubsky, Y.Kharlov B.Polichtchouk, S.Sadovsky IHEP, Protvino ALICE off-line week 3 October 2005.
1 1 Rapid recent developments in Phase I L1Calo Weakly 25 Jul 2011 Norman Gee.
L1Calo Intro Cambridge Group, Dec 2008 Norman Gee.
September 8-14, th Workshop on Electronics for LHC1 Channel Control ASIC for the CMS Hadron Calorimeter Front End Readout Module Ray Yarema, Alan.
Marco Delmastro 23/02/2006 Status of LAr EM performance andmeasurements fro CTB1 Status of LAr EM performance and measurements for CTB Overview Data -
A. Gibson, Toronto; Villa Olmo 2009; ATLAS LAr Commissioning October 5, 2009 Commissioning of the ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Adam Gibson University.
Alan Watson Atlas Trigger Workshop, Amsterdam, 18-22/10/10 1 Calibration of L1Calo L1Calo Calibration Overview L1Calo Calibration Overview Calibration.
Ideas about Tests and Sequencing C.N.P.Gee Rutherford Appleton Laboratory 3rd March 2001.
Dec.11, 2008 ECL parallel session, Super B1 Results of the run with the new electronics A.Kuzmin, Yu.Usov, V.Shebalin, B.Shwartz 1.New electronics configuration.
SL1Calo Input Signal-Handling Requirements Joint Calorimeter – L1 Trigger Workshop November 2008 Norman Gee.
Results from particle beam tests of the ATLAS liquid argon endcap calorimeters Beam test setup Signal reconstruction Response to electrons  Electromagnetic.
Hycal Energy Resolution, Timing, &Trigger Efficiency, A cumulative study. Chris Mauney.
1 Calorimeters LED control LHCb CALO meeting Anatoli Konoplyannikov /ITEP/ Status of the calorimeters LV power supply and ECS control Status of.
Monitoring of L1Calo EM Trigger Items: Overview & Midterm Results Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 11/11/2010.
Calorimeter Digitisation Prototype (Material from A Straessner, C Bohm et al) L1Calo Collaboration Meeting Cambridge 23-Mar-2011 Norman Gee.
26/May/2008Calor LHCb Preshower(PS) and Scintillating pad detector (SPD): commissioning, calibration, and monitoring Eduardo Picatoste Universitat.
Status of MAPMT FEE Electronics Boards Connector board – have 5 boards, 1 assembled Readout board (“MUX” board) – layout completed 12/2, but unfortunately.
Hardeep Bansil (University of Birmingham) on behalf of L1Calo collaboration ATLAS UK Meeting, Royal Holloway January 2011 Argonne Birmingham Cambridge.
L1Calo Installation Status Murrough Landon, QMUL Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger (University of Birmingham, University of Heidelberg, University of Mainz,
L1Calo EM Efficiencies Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham L1Calo Joint Meeting, Stockholm 29/06/2011.
LHC Symposium 2003 Fermilab 01/05/2003 Ph. Schwemling, LPNHE-Paris for the ATLAS collaboration Electromagnetic Calorimetry and Electron/Photon performance.
Calorimeter global commissioning: progress and plans Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay & CERN, 25 jun 2008.
L1Calo EM Efficiency Maps Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham L1Calo Weekly Meeting 07/03/2011.
Vladimir Zhulanov for BelleII ECL group Budker INP, Novosibirsk INSTR2014, Novosibirsk 2014/02/28 1.
Upgrade Intro 10 Jan 2010 Norman Gee. N. Gee – Upgrade Introduction 2 LHC Peak Luminosity Lumi curve from F.Zimmermann : Nov Upgrade Week ? ?
DAQ and Trigger for HPS run Sergey Boyarinov JLAB July 11, Requirements and available test results 2. DAQ status 3. Trigger system status and upgrades.
TAB-To-L3(Tape) ● At the L1Cal2b sidewalk test stand we have a setup to transmit the data coming from detector to tape using the new system. ● We installed.
 13 Readout Electronics A First Look 28-Jan-2004.
L1Calo Databases ● Overview ● Trigger Configuration DB ● L1Calo OKS Database ● L1Calo COOL Database ● ACE Murrough Landon 16 June 2008.
L1Calo DBs: Status and Plans ● Overview of L1Calo databases ● Present status ● Plans Murrough Landon 20 November 2006.
DB and Information Flow Issues ● Selecting types of run ● L1Calo databases ● Archiving run parameters ● Tools Murrough Landon 28 April 2009.
L1Calo Databases ● Overview ● Recent Activitity ● To Do List ● Run types Murrough Landon 4 June 2007.
Online Database Developments ● Overview ● OKS database status and plans ● COOL database developments ● Validating calibrations ● Tools ● Summary Murrough.
Calibration Operations ● Recent Changes ● Required Changes ● Calibration by Shifters Murrough Landon 23 March 2011.
Configuration and local monitoring
USBPix Readout System using FE-I4/A Chip Status Update: ToT calibration and Finalization of Tuning Procedure Jimin Kim and Austin Piehl Department of Physics.
Multi-step Runs – an L1Calo Perspective
Calorimeter Status Electronics Installation and Commissioning
Online Database Work Overview Work needed for OKS database
Calibration Status Energy Calibration Stabilities/instabilities
ATLAS calorimeter and topological trigger upgrades for Phase 1
Marcin Chrząszcz Cracow University of Technology Itamar Levy
Run Control (and Other) Work
PSD Front-End-Electronics A.Ivashkin, V.Marin (INR, Moscow)
APV Readout Controllers DAQ
Online Database Status
CMS Preshower: Startup procedures: Reconstruction & calibration
ATLAS L1Calo Phase2 Upgrade
Online Software Status
Online SW, DB & Calibration
Online Software Status
Remaining Online SW Tasks
Level 1 (Calo) Databases
Cabling Lengths and Timing
Online Software “To Do” List
A First Look J. Pilcher 12-Mar-2004
Level-1 Calo Monitoring
BESIII EMC electronics
Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML
Trigger issues for the CALICE beam test
Peter Kodyš, Zdeněk Doležal, Jan Brož,
The Ohio State University USCMS EMU Meeting, FNAL, Oct. 29, 2004
Status of the Calibration
Presentation transcript:

Rainer Stamen, Norman Gee Calibration Status       Rainer Stamen, Norman Gee 15 March 2007

Analogue Pulse Shape and Timing – using calibration pulser FADC DAC scan Find the DAC value needed to set the chosen FADC pedestal Pedestal Run Measure exact FADC pedestal and noise. DAC scan only sets pedestal to 3-4 FADC counts Coarse Timing Scan Measure DAQ readout memory offset Fine Timing Scan Measure fine timing. May change coarse timing setting Analogue Pulse Shape Measure analogue pulse shapes Status: All now store results in COOL database; runs are ~automatic; but the information is not yet used in module services to set up hardware. 15 March 2007 Rainer Stamen, Norman Gee - Calibration Status

FIR Filter and “Electronics ET Calibration” FIR Filter coefficients Compute the coefficients and “drop bits” settings for each trigger tower. Assume we are using matched filter. Aim for best resolution. Electronics ET Calibration Compute receiver and LUT values to reproduce simulated ET deposits All these results should go to database in a “Pulser” settings area. Status: Not started. Not hard. BUT requires combined running with calorimeters which we have not developed – see foil 6. 15 March 2007 Rainer Stamen, Norman Gee - Calibration Status

Detector Performance and Beam Corrections Physics Pulse Delay Latency L1A to analogue pulse is not the same as calibration system Will need different software to find coarse & fine timing. Physics Pulse Shape Particle pulses not identical in shape to charge injection systems. Measure particle pulse shapes – not so easy as amplitudes are varying and usually small, and can have pulses in adjacent timing bins. Then convert to FIR coefficients. Initially adjust ET calibration to keep same area under pulse per GeV? Correction factors: dead material. One multiplicative factor per tower, from Monte Carlo? dead cells. One factor per tower, probably just eta and layer dependent Status: all of these not started. 15 March 2007 Rainer Stamen, Norman Gee - Calibration Status

Rainer Stamen, Norman Gee - Calibration Status Analogue Checks These can all be done with the same L1Calo run mechanisms, but need different calorimeter conditions and/or different data analysis Connectivity – verify the routing of calorimeter towers to PPMs Crosstalk – check no significant communication between towers. Relative timing of raw cells – check that they are equal for a tower Pulse shapes from raw cells – check they are very similar Pulse amplitudes from raw cells – check injected energies contribute equally Match precision readout to tower readout – beginning of physics calibration Status: Connectivity is started. Needs PPMs (coming very soon). Tilecal has generated the patterns we need. More discussions needed with LAr. Other areas not studied. Needs extra calculations on data from the analogue pulse shape runs, and a few similar types of run. 15 March 2007 Rainer Stamen, Norman Gee - Calibration Status

Interface with Calorimeters Most of the runs rely on calibration signals from calorimeters Electronic calibration (ET in trigger matching injected pulses) Also various data patterns are needed to verify crosstalk, signal addition Calorimeters are capable (willing!!) to generate patterns We also need access to the trigger cables… Need to work on combined runs with calorimeters Need extra hardware (LTPI) to share triggers, plus software setup & tests, plus software to analyse and present large numbers of results and trends Status: No actual development yet. Useful discussions with Calo groups, but no tests. Needs some effort which we are pretty short of. 15 March 2007 Rainer Stamen, Norman Gee - Calibration Status

Rainer Stamen, Norman Gee - Calibration Status Digital Timing Automatic procedures to set up digital timing: PPM LVDS into CPM & JEM. CPM and JEM clock alignment with CAM; CMM & JEM FIO alignment. CPM-CMM; JEM-CMM; CMM-CMM; CPM, JEM & CMM G-Link pointers. Overall system timing alignment. Results to go to database. Module services to use values from database. Status: Procedures within single crates mostly exist, but results do not go into database (except PPM). No CAM runs yet. Timing between crates (LVDS, CMM) and overall optimisation not yet done? Multi-step runs not viable, so use kicker-style (CMM needs updating). 15 March 2007 Rainer Stamen, Norman Gee - Calibration Status

Rainer Stamen, Norman Gee - Calibration Status Summary Analogue pulser measurements just need more channels and cables Electronics ET calibration not started but not hard Beam pulses (timing, shape) and correction fro dead material need significant work. Detailed checks of analogue cabling and signal uniformity not done yet but can be done mostly with data stored by calibration pulser runs Interface with calorimeters coming – but slowly. Can be developed in parallel with collecting calib pulser data by hand. Digital Timing needs completing 15 March 2007 Rainer Stamen, Norman Gee - Calibration Status

Rainer Stamen, Norman Gee - Calibration Status Backup Material 15 March 2007 Rainer Stamen, Norman Gee - Calibration Status

Comment on Database handling 15 March 2007 Rainer Stamen, Norman Gee - Calibration Status