New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
creating a sustainable world The Chesapeake Bay TMDL A Policy Model for Nutrient Pollution Reductions James Noonan October.
Advertisements

Howard County, MD Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan October 6, 2011 Howard Saltzman Howard County Department of Public Works.
Commonwealth of Virginia Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Russ Baxter, Chesapeake Bay Coordinator.
TMDL Implementation in the Calleguas Creek Watershed Ashli Desai Larry Walker Associates.
Carin Bisland, EPA Management Board Presentation 5/9/12.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
Chesapeake Bay and New York State Water Quality and the Potential for Future Regulations Presented by the Upper Susquehanna Coalition.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Issues Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 17, 2009 Ted Graham & Steve Bieber COG Department.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Background and Litigation Jon A. Mueller, Vice President For Litigation Chesapeake Bay Foundation William and Mary,
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Katherine Antos Chesapeake Bay Program Office Jenny Molloy Water Protection Division DC Draft Phase II WIP.
Status Report: Chesapeake Bay TMDL Clean Up Plan Presented to P otomac Roundtable by Jack E. Frye April 9, 2010.
The Virginia Bar Association October 22, 2009 Richmond, Virginia Reginald Parrish U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program Update on.
1 “ Understanding the Local Role of Improving Water Quality” Virginia Association of Counties November 14, 2011 Virginia Association of Counties November.
Update on the Development of EPA’s Chesapeake Bay TMDL and Virginia’s Watershed Implementation Plan Russ Perkinson Potomac Roundtable October 8, 2010.
1 Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board Meeting March 6, 2012 Discussion for the Final Evaluation of Milestones.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Jim Edward EPA Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office DDOE Meeting with Federal Partners February.
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
What is the Chesapeake Bay TMDL? Total Maximum Daily Load –Amount of pollutants that a water body can receive and still support designated uses Drinking,
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Suzanne Trevena EPA Water Protection Division Chair Milestone Workgroup December 4,
Status Report on Chesapeake Bay Clean Up Plan Wastewater Sector June 2, 2010.
Chesapeake Bay Policy in Virginia - TMDL, Milestones and the Watershed Agreement Russ Baxter Deputy Secretary of Natural Resources for the Chesapeake Bay.
2004 Tributary Strategies: Assessment of Implementation Options Steve Bieber Water Resources Program Presented at: COG Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
VACo Environment and Agriculture Steering Committee VML Environmental Policy Committee June 2, 2010 Charlottesville, VA Chesapeake Bay Watershed Roanoke.
Preserving York County 2010 Municipal Educational Series January 28, 2010 Rick Keister, Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay Jake Romig, York County Circuit.
Water Resources Technical Committee Chesapeake Bay Program Overview & Updates July 10, 2008 Tanya T. Spano.
Caroline County Pilot Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Katheleen Freeman, AICP, Director Caroline County Department of Planning & Codes Leslie Grunden,
Chesapeake Bay Watershed Implementation Plans: Why, What, and When Katherine Antos U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office MACo Winter Conference January.
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SPRING MEETING MARCH 1—2, 2012 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA EPA’s Evaluation of Bay Jurisdictions’ Draft Phase II WIPs & Final
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Meeting March 17, 2011 Virginia Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Approach.
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Workgroup March 17, 2011.
Williamsburg’s Local Strategies to meet the ChesBay TMDL March 2012 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Virginia Maryland Pennsylvania New York Delaware West Virginia.
Improving Local Water Quality in Pennsylvania and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay.
Innovative Data Management and Planning Strategies for TMDL Compliance
MS4 and Trading Considerations
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit
Stormwater Management and MS4 Compliance
It’s The Final Countdown To The Mid-point Assessment:
Agriculture Initial Inspections Update
Chesapeake bay program
Land Use Challenges In Maryland Today
Moving to Phase II: Watershed Implementation Plans
MACo Winter Conference
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
Local Planning Process…
Watershed Implementation Plan
GIS Data Management for SHA’s Bay Restoration Program
Federal Facilities and the District’s Phase III WIP
U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office June 1, 2012
Funding at Record Levels
Water Quality Improvement Projects and Engineering Planning Grant
[[[Draft Slide-deck]]] January /June 2018
Nutrient Trading for NPDES Permittees
Presentation to Maryland’s Trading Advisory Committee March 21, 2016
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
Maryland’s Phase III WIP Planning for 2025 and beyond
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Milestones, Progress, Mid-point Assessment
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
Chesapeake Bay Program Climate Change Modeling 2.0
Nutrient Trading for NPDES Permittees
Presentation to Maryland’s Trading Advisory Committee March 21, 2016
Expectations for Federal Agencies in Support if Chesapeake WIPs/TMDL
Upper Clark Fork Watershed Restoration and TMDLs
Maryland’s Draft Phase III WIP for the Chesapeake Bay
Watershed Restoration, Chesapeake Bay
VIRGINIA’S Phase iii watershed implementation plan
Presentation transcript:

New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP Overview Upper Susquehanna Watershed Forum November 3, 2016

Chesapeake Bay Watershed TMDL

Chesapeake Bay Program Background 1983 A multi-state program formed to restore Chesapeake Bay “dead zones” -.EPA, D.C., MD, PA, VA original program members 2000 DE, NY, WV signed on to help with water quality goals 2009 Clean Water Act Lawsuit 2010 TMDL Finalized Chesapeake Bay impaired due to excess nutrients and sediment Informal agreement between EPA and the states that comprise the majority of the Chesapeake Bay watershed Other states added to the agreement in 2000 Voluntary agreement included goals for WQ improvement –not largely successful in achieving improvement Lawsuit brought in 2009 against EPA for failure to enforce the Clean Water Act Resulted in the creation of the CB watershed TMDL – finalized in 2010

Total Daily Maximum Load (TMDL) A TMDL defines the capacity of a waterbody to absorb a pollutant and still meet water quality standards - “Pollution diet” Chesapeake Bay TMDL is for nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment Legal mechanism to address impaired waters TMDL – defines the maximum amount a waterbody can receive of a pollutant and still meet WQ standards EPA completed a multistep process to develop the TMDL Set nutrient allocations for nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment for each watershed state and D.C. States that contribute the most pollution are required to achieve higher reductions Legal mechanism – higher level of implementation compared to voluntary agreement

Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) All 7 Chesapeake Bay watershed “jurisdictions” have a WIP. The WIP provides BMP implementation goals (“input deck”) and reasonable assurance that the goals can be met Phase II – 60% reduction (2017) Each jurisdiction developed watershed implementation plan – plan to move toward achieving load reductions WIP covers point and NPS pollution Point sources – regulated via SPDES permits (WWTPs, General SPDES – CAFO, MS4, construction) NPS – voluntary programs, structural/non-structural BMPs EPA evaluates progress (i.e. Two-year Milestones)

NY Portion of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed 10% of watershed area 4% of watershed population 76% forested 21% agricultural 3% developed NY portion of the watershed – majority is forested Ag. is dominant land use type Not highly developed overall

New York Pollution Sources Wastewater Treatment Plants Urban Runoff Agriculture Phosphorus Septic 3% Percentages from 2009 Watershed Model 5.3.2 Nitrogen

NY’s Wastewater Sector Targets

Nutrient Effluent Limits Limits established for Bay-significant facilities (~30 facilities with greatest contributions) Monitoring only for Bay-nonsignificants Nitrogen Establishes a total “bubble” limit (Next slide) Phosphorus Individual Effluent Limits assigned for individual facilities

The Nitrogen “Bubble” Cumulative limit placed on all significant facilities within the Bay Individual Limits assigned for tracking purposes Enforcement only if bubble is broken Could focus enforcement on those facilities who exceeded their individually assigned limits Helps us achieve our overall nutrient reduction goals without forcing costly upgrades.

NY’s Urban Sector Targets

Urban BMP Lack of BMP inputs to model Summer of 2016 effort to input historical BMPs into model Erosion and Sediment Control inputs from Construction Stormwater General Permit database Stormwater practice inputs from MS4s MS4s required to maintain post-construction control practice inventory within their jurisdiction The model showed very little stormwater BMP implementation prior to the historical BMP collection effort of 2016. With those practices now included in the model, the model should better reflect what is actually discharging from the Urban sector.

NY’s Agricultural Sector Targets We’re going to let Wendy Walsh from USC describe whats going on with the Agricultural Sector and our unique, we believe very successful, relationship with USC to help us fulfill our TMDL obligations.

Currently in the works

Current projects underway WWTP Optimization Tweaking plant maintenance and operations to get further nutrient reductions Involving NYSARC Better Urban BMP tracking using MS4s Inspection/maintenance tracking Installation tracking New York State Association of Regional Councils (NYSARC) are a group that works with MS4s to help them meet their regulatory obligations. We hope to use them to help us collect better stormwater data from MS4s for our use in the Watershed model.

Thank You For more information visit: EPA TMDL: http://www.epa.gov/chesapeake- bay-tmdl Chesapeake Bay Program: http://www.chesapeakebay.net/ DEC Chesapeake Bay Watershed Program: http://www.dec.ny.gov/lands/33279.html Sara Latessa Environmental Program Specialist Division of Water, Albany sara.latessa@dec.ny.gov (518) 402-8279