A Productive Partnership

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Five -Year Strategic Title I School Plan. Session Objectives Review the five year components utilizing the rubric Organize actions steps to meet the requirements.
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
STEM ACTION CENTER HB 150 Applied Science 7 th and 8 th Grade STEM Pathways and Certification.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
School Improvement Plan Results & Next Steps December, 2009 Central Elementary School Home of the Eagles.
Pam Stewart, Commissioner SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN [ DRAFT ] Memorial Elementary School 851 E HICKORY ST Arcadia, FL
Session Materials  Wiki
Report to the Board of Education October 15, 2007.
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
Woodrow Wilson Indiana Fellowship Program Vision Statement –Highly qualified STEM teachers –Problem-based STEM curricula –Rural schools network –New models.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
DeAnn Huinker, UW-Milwaukee MMP Principal Investigator 26 August 2008 This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Governor’s Teacher Network Action Research Project Dr. Debra Harwell-Braun
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Aiken County Public Schools’ Middle School STEM Initiative April 15, 2014.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
STEM Contacts at IDOE Dr. Jeremy Eltz Assistant Director of CCR Bill Reed Secondary Math Specialist Nick Flowers Elementary.
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
North Carolina Standard for School Executives Standard 1 By: Barbara Bumgardner Aleen Besmer James Westbrook Kristy Christenberry.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
School Governance Council Meeting February 18, 2016 River Eves Elementary School NEIL PINNOCK, PRINCIPAL MATTHEW DONAHOE, ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL.
YOUR STEM PROFILE.  What they need to know and be able to do  At what level must performance be demonstrated?  How do we know they know what we want.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
MSP Summary of First Year Annual Report FY 2004 Projects.
ESP Contact Meeting FY 17.
SAM (Self-Assessment of MTSS Implementation) ADMINISTRATION TRAINING
Teaching and Learning with Technology
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
Grades 7 to 12 Math & Science Specialist Talent Management Strategy
STEM Connect A STEM Initiative funded by Golden Leaf.
The Big Bang (Theory): A Framework for maximizing a STEM program
DMUSD LCAP Update Spring 2015.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
(Miles Intermediate).
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
School Governance Council Meeting February 9, 2016
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers
Collaborative Inquiry and Professional Learning Communities
A Guaranteed, Viable, and Engaging Curriculum
Strategic Planning Update
Engaging Students through CTE and STEM
School Governance Council Meeting February 18, 2016
Berkeley County School District
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
The CCPS Strategic Plan
Mountain Park Elementary School
Implementing Race to the Top
The Public Schools of Dover and Sherborn
February 21-22, 2018.
What Does a 21st Century School Administrator Look Like?
New Prospect Elementary School
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Strategic Plan: Heards Ferry Elementary
STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE Board of Education May 2018
Woodson Park Academy (Douglas Cluster)
Humphries Elementary School
S.T.E.A.M. Focused Instruction:
Mountain Park Elementary School
Presentation transcript:

A Productive Partnership Palm Beach County STEM Initiative A Productive Partnership Between The School District of Palm Beach County & The University of Florida Lastinger Center for Learning September 16, 2016 Funding for the Initiative is Provided By:

The STEM School Certification Rubric An Overview The STEM School Certification Rubric Benchmark 1: Focus on STEM Mission 1.1 The school has developed and maintains a shared mission and vision of STEM education. 1.2 The school has allocated time, resources, and facilities to advance the achievement of the STEM education mission and vision. Benchmark 2: Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment 2.1 The school’s curriculum supports the STEM education mission and vision. 2.2 Classroom instruction supports and maintains the STEM education mission and vision. 2.3 The school’s assessment practices support and maintain the STEM education mission and vision. Benchmark 3: Teacher Selection, Development, and Retention 3.1 The school’s teacher selection process ensures teacher competence in the STEM education mission and vision. 3.2 The school’s professional development plan for teachers ensures teacher competence in the STEM education mission and vision. Benchmark 4: Strategic Alliances 4.1 The school has created a STEM Program Plan that involves key business, industry, and community partners to support the STEM education mission and vision.

The STEM Certification Process PILOT Steps towards STEM Certification in Palm Beach County: SUMMARY The STEM Certification Process PILOT The PLC created their definition of STEM Education. The STEM Certification Rubric was developed. A sub-committee of Principals, interested in becoming a STEM Certified School formed. Together with the District STEM Team, and the UF Team, they determined how the Benchmarks of the Rubric would translate into a Certification Process. Referencing the framework of the Indiana DOE’s STEM School Certification Application, the sub-committee created a draft application. Schools are currently being invited to pilot this process.

Piloting the Process: District Committees STEM Certification Assistance Team This team works directly with the STEM Leadership Team of the pilot schools to assist them through the certification process. The team may help them interpret the rubric or suggest sample artifacts to collect. STEM Certification Review Committee The role of this team is to make the final determination of certification level (candidate, certified, model/demonstration site) for a school under review. This team will examine the binders of the pilot schools and conduct a school site visit before making this decision.

Piloting the Process: UF Lastinger Center Role STEM Certification Assistance Team This team provides training on the rubric; facilitates meetings with STEM Leadership Teams and collects data for research on the pilot process. STEM Certification Review Committee The committee provides training on the rubric; inter-rater reliability training for reviewers; facilitates meetings; assists in designing a school site visit protocol and collects data for research on the pilot process.

Resources and Acknowledgements Tina Marcus, North Carolina STEM School Rubric, http://www.dpi.state.nc.us/stem/ Gilda Lyons, Georgia STEM School Rubric, https://www.georgiastandards.org/resources/Pages/STEM-Georgia.aspx Texas STEM School Rubric, http://www.tstemblueprint.org/rubric/ Outlier Report of Characteristics of Successful STEM Schools (U. of Chicago), http://outlier.uchicago.edu/outlier/resources/stem_schools/ Teachers and Title 1 Principals of the School District of Palm Beach County

BENCHMARK ONE: FOCUS ON STEM MISSION STEM SCHOOL RUBRIC – Benchmark One BENCHMARK ONE: FOCUS ON STEM MISSION 1.1 The school has developed and maintains a shared mission and vision of STEM education. Examples of development and maintenance: STEM Leadership Team; 80% of students included in STEM culture; culture incentivizes innovations in STEM for students and teachers Examples of shared mission: monthly communication of progress on STEM Plan; regular meetings with community stakeholders; one-way and two-way communications with community; model STEM classrooms established; participation in local STEM network

BENCHMARK ONE: FOCUS ON STEM MISSION STEM SCHOOL RUBRIC – Benchmark One BENCHMARK ONE: FOCUS ON STEM MISSION 1.2 The school has allocated time, resources, and facilities to advance the achievement of the STEM education mission & vision. Examples of time & resources: 70% of teachers participate in PLCs which plan vertically and horizontally for integrated STEM lessons on a monthly basis; funds are allocated to implement STEM strategies and purchase needed technology; stakeholders assist in formulating the STEM Plan and establishing long-term funding streams Examples of resources & facilities: technology use is ubiquitous; technology is supported and rarely inoperable; space is available for students to virtually collaborate/communicate/plan; exhibition space is provided.

BENCHMARK TWO: CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION, AND ASSESSMENT STEM SCHOOL RUBRIC – Benchmark Two BENCHMARK TWO: CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION, AND ASSESSMENT 2.1 The school’s curriculum supports the STEM education mission and vision. Examples: Teacher have access to information regarding STEM resources, STEM career information and best practices for STEM lessons aligned to FL standards; project-and/or problem-based learned are regularly utilized.

BENCHMARK TWO: CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION, AND ASSESSMENT STEM SCHOOL RUBRIC – Benchmark Two BENCHMARK TWO: CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION, AND ASSESSMENT 2.2 Classroom instruction supports and maintains the STEM education mission and vision. Examples: Instruction provides explicit integration of STEM disciplines within lessons via project- and/or problem-based learning; instruction is student-centered and team-based; student autonomy is emphasized; students participate in STEM initiatives, competitions, forums; students and teachers have direct experiences with STEM professionals; students and teachers proficiently utilize technology as tools of learning; students receive daily instruction in math and science.

CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION, AND ASSESSMENT STEM SCHOOL RUBRIC – Benchmark Two BENCHMARK TWO: CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION, AND ASSESSMENT 2.3 The school’s assessment practices support and maintain the STEM education mission and vision. Examples: In addition to state and unit assessments, students are provided multiple indicators of success in STEM areas, using both knowledge- and performance-based assessments.

TEACHER SELECTION, DEVELOPMENT, AND RETENTION STEM SCHOOL RUBRIC – Benchmark Three BENCHMARK THREE: TEACHER SELECTION, DEVELOPMENT, AND RETENTION 3.1 The school’s teacher selection process ensures teacher competence in the STEM education mission and vision. Examples: STEM teachers have applicable state certification; strategies are used to retain high quality STEM teachers 3.2 The school’s professional development plan for teachers ensures teacher competence in the STEM education mission and vision. Examples: Technology PD; on-going STEM-specific PD; evidence of classroom implementation; STEM teachers attend more than one type of PD or an integrated discipline PD.

BENCHMARK FOUR: STRATEGIC ALLIANCES STEM SCHOOL RUBRIC – Benchmark Four BENCHMARK FOUR: STRATEGIC ALLIANCES 4.1 The school has created a STEM Program Plan that involves key business, industry, and community partners to support the STEM education mission and vision. Examples: These key partners are involved in the STEM instructional program 1-4 times per year and are directly connected to in-class learning; students work directly with these key partners during and/or outside school hours.

STEM Principals Community of Practice STEM Education: STEM Principals Community of Practice The STEM Principals Community of Practice collectively created their definition of STEM Education. STEM Education is an integrated approach to teaching science, technology, engineering, and mathematics through inquiry-based learning. Collaborating with local industry and leveraging community resources, ALL students will develop 21st century skills and a foundation to pursue their potential in STEM careers.