© Ole Solvang/Human Rights Watch, October 2016

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Australias Universalisation Efforts in the Asia Region Leisa Gibson, Acting Mine Action Coordinator, AusAID.
Advertisements

World Missions.
Pauline Rose Mokoro, Oxford 29 January 2014 Aid for education after 2015: Lessons from the past decade.
Sida’s Humanitarian Work. Sida’s Strategy for Humanitarian Work Based on the Government’s Humanitarian Policy (2005). Aim: Save lives, alleviate.
Slide 1 Welcome Address Regulating Authorities E&P Service Industry E&P Operators.
Nuclear WeaponsChemical WeaponsBiological Weapons.
I NTERNATIONAL A SSISTANCE DONOR PERSPECTIVES Mr Tim Horner Mine Action Advisor, Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery, UNDP New York March 2013 Addis.
Global Health and Human Rights, March 27, 2010 Physicians for Global Survival.
THE PROBLEM WITH LANDMINES... © Tim Grant 1997 IS THE HUMAN IMPACT… – NEW LANDMINE VICTIMS PER YEAR IN MOST OF THE WORLD’S POOREST COUNTRIES.
Where Is the World’s Wealth? The World’s GDP WORLD65,950,000,000,000 U.S.13,130,000,000,000 EU13,060,000,000,000 CHINA10,170,000,000,000 JAPAN 4,218,000,000,000.
Newcastle University, England, UK Peter Selman Newcastle University, UK June 2015 Twenty years of the Hague Convention: a Statistical.
THE WORLD The world map on this slide is currently ‘grouped’ together with no place names. This is good for ‘copying and pasting’ into other presentations.
MONITORING AND COUNTERING THE ILLICIT ARMS TRADE.
“War violates every right of a child – the right to life, the right to be with family and nurtured and respected”, (Grace Machel, UN, 1996).
Program for Comprehensive Action against Antipersonnel Mines Report to the Committee on Hemispheric Security March 26, 2015 Department of Public Security.
THE PROBLEM WITH LANDMINES. THE PROBLEM WITH LANDMINES… IS THEIR HUMANITARIAN IMPACT At least 4,000 new casualties in ,000 km 2 of contaminated.
The forgotten victims of conflict. What are landmines?  Explosive devices designed to injure or kill people  Set off by the victims themselves  Remain.
“Neighbors to the Nations” Boone’s Creek Baptist Church Lexington, Kentucky September 11, 2011.
1 Critical issue module 5 Landmine awareness. 2 Topic 1 The issue for children Topic 2 The law and child rights Topic 3 Assessment and situation analysis.
Presentation of Landmine Monitor Report 2009 Ban Policy Mine Action Casualties Risk Education Victim Assistance Support for Mine Action.
Afghanistan Albania Algeria Andorra Angola.
Photo © Jared Bloch / ICBL-CMC, June Landmine Monitor 2014 (Presentations, December 2014) Overview Landmine use remains isolated. New casualties.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Laura LIGUORI 8 – 10 APRIL 2008, PENANG, MALAYSIA ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM SEMINAR ON ANTI-PERSONNEL MINES.
Mine Ban Policy Mine Action Casualties and Victim Assistance Support for Mine Action.
1 DOE Regulation 10 C.F.R. Part 810 Presented by: Jo Anna Sellen June 9, 2009.
Mine Ban Policy Mine Action Casualties and Victim Assistance Support for Mine Action.
Statistics Project Wendy Kim & Tina Shin.  What is the most visited country in the world?
Photo © Bas Bogaerts/Handicap International, March 2015.
Flags Quiz Peru or Algeria or Iraq.
MAP QUIZ. Find England / Great Britain / United Kingdom Great Britain is the entire island that the red arrow is pointing to England is the southern part.
Latest Trends in Religious Restrictions and Hostilities Overall Decline in Social Hostilities in 2013, Though Harassment of Jews Worldwide Reached a Seven-Year.
Introduction to Victim Assistance AN OBLIGATION AND AN OPPORTUNITY H bernard LAOS 2013.
German Efforts towards a World free from the Impact of Landmines Presented by Burkhard Ducoffre Senior Official German Federal Foreign Office, Berlin Kuala.
Mines Action Canada March Women, War & Peace March 8 is the International Day for Women’s Rights and International Peace. Women and men, girls and.
Mines Action Canada February
Global Printing Ink Market to Market Size, Growth, and Forecasts in Over 70 Countries “This comprehensive publication enables readers the critical.
And the Rest of the Title Here Title of Your Presentation W. Cole Durham, Jr. Susa Young Gates Professor of Law and Director of the International Center.
Program for Comprehensive Action against Antipersonnel Mines Report to the Committee on Hemispheric Security April 21, 2016 Department of Public Security.
Senior Leadership Programme Presentation by Agnès Marcaillou Director of the United Nations Mine Action Service New York, 17 March 2016.
Global Vitamin and Provitamin Market Size, Share, Global Trends, Company Profiles, Demand, Insights, Analysis, Research, Report, Opportunities, 2018 Published.
1 International migrants as a share of population Source: United Nations.
N= 14,210 * Includes English Learners (ELs) in Philadelphia School District schools as of February 15,2017. Incluye estudiantes de inglés como segundo.
Somya Gupta, Reuben Granich
Fatima Ibrahim al-Marzuqi is being carried by her brother because she is not able to walk due to injuries sustained during a cluster munition attack on.

World Development Chart 2004
ALL Justice for Our Neighbors Case Data as of August 31, 2015
CONSIDERATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS TABLED
© Syria Civil Defence, June 2017
The Eliminate Project Fundraising campaign
**The percentage share held in gold of total foreign reserves, as calculated by the World Gold Council. The value of gold holdings is calculated using.
Disarmament.
© Helaine Boyd/HALO Trust, May 2017
United Arab Emirates**
Economic Exports.
State of play: Refugee situation in and beyond Europe Senior Specialist Tuomas Koljonen Finnish Immigration Service
Latest Trends in Religious Restrictions and Hostilities
Name the world flag… Bell Ringer Activity
Eastern Europe, Russia and Middle and South America
Landmine Monitor is the research and monitoring program of the Nobel Peace Prize-winning International Campaign to Ban Landmines, and also provides research.

How to improve IM in countries
WORLD MAP TEST.
20th ANNUAL EDITION Deminer Jeniffer Diaz, 22, at work in Vista Hermosa, Colombia © J.M. Vargas/Humanity & Inclusion (HI), November 2017 Pictured here.
Latest Trends in Religious Restrictions and Hostilities
World Populations and Populations Pyramids Lab
**The percentage share held in gold of total foreign reserves, as calculated by the World Gold Council. The value of gold holdings is calculated using.
Disclaimer This document contains data provided to WHO by member states. Note that some member states only provide aggregate data to WHO, and for these,
Disclaimer This document contains data provided to WHO by member states. Note that some member states only provide aggregate data to WHO, and for these,
French Institute of International Relations
Presentation transcript:

© Ole Solvang/Human Rights Watch, October 2016 A family member stands next to the graves of three children who were killed when an improvised mine planted by the so-called Islamic State (IS) in a school in Manbij, Syria, detonated on 27 September 2016. © Ole Solvang/Human Rights Watch, October 2016 Breaking from what have been recent past covers of Landmine Monitor annual reports, this year we felt appropriate and are saddened to show the tragedy of landmine use documented in the past year. Pictured here a family member near gravesites of children killed by improvised mines in Syria.

Main Sections of Report Landmine Ban Policy Contamination and Clearance Casualties and Victim Assistance Support for Mine Action Landmine Monitor 2016, the 18th annual edition, provides a global overview of efforts in 2015, and into October 2016 where possible. The report is divided into four chapters, while updated country profiles are available online. This presentation generally follows the order of these sections, highlighting the Major Findings of the report.

Landmine Monitor 2016: overview Global ban endures; landmines used by very few government forces—all outside the Mine Ban Treaty—and by non-state actors in 10 countries Casualties rose to decade-high level Support for mine action at lowest level in ten years Clearance continues, but only a few countries on track Landmine Monitor 2016 continues to detail progress toward the goal of a mine-free world, but also reports a decade-high number of casualties, at a time when support for mine action fell to its lowest levels in 10 years. Rejection of antipersonnel mines remains the global norm even as non-state armed groups and a small number of states not party to the Mine Ban Treaty use the weapons. Many countries continue to clear mine contamination, however global clearance declined in 2015 and very few States Parties appear to be on track to meet clearance deadlines.

Mine Ban Treaty There are 162 State Parties to the Treaty, and one signatory. Marshall Islands has not yet ratified. There were no new ratifications or accessions in the reporting period. The last country to accede was Oman in August 2014. In March 2016, it was announced that Sri Lanka’s cabinet of ministers had approved accession to the Mine Ban Treaty, but the instrument of accession had not been deposited as of 1 November 2016.

Landmine Use Use of antipersonnel mines by states remains rare No confirmed new use of the weapons by States Parties during October 2015 – October 2016 Government forces in states not party Myanmar, North Korea, and Syria used antipersonnel landmines in the past year Non-state armed groups used antipersonnel landmines in 10 countries The use of antipersonnel mines by states remains a relatively rare phenomenon. There was no confirmed new use of the weapons by States Parties from October 2015 through October 2016. The government forces of Myanmar, North Korea, and Syria—all states not party to the Mine Ban Treaty—again used antipersonnel landmines in the past year.   Over the past year, non-state armed groups have used antipersonnel landmines in 10 countries: Afghanistan, Colombia, Iraq, Libya, Myanmar, Nigeria, Pakistan, Syria, Ukraine, and Yemen. Non-state armed groups mostly used improvised mines, also known as victim-activated improvised explosive devices (IEDs), and booby traps—rather than factory-made landmines. Such devices are banned by the Mine Ban Treaty as they explode due to the presence, proximity, or contact of a person. The Monitor recorded but could not independently verify allegations of new mine use in States Parties Cameroon, Chad, Niger, Philippines, and Tunisia, or in states not party Iran and Saudi Arabia.

Stockpile Destruction, Production & Transfer States Parties destroyed > 2.1 million landmines in 2015 4 States Parties still have stocks to destroy - Ukraine, Belarus, Greece remain beyond their treaty deadlines 31 of 35 non-states parties estimated to stockpile landmines 11 producers include: China, Cuba, India, Iran, Myanmar, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, Singapore, South Korea, and Vietnam. Most likely to be actively producing are: India, Myanmar, Pakistan & South Korea Non-state armed groups producing antipersonnel landmines & improvised mines in: Afghanistan, Colombia, Iraq, Myanmar, Nigeria, Pakistan, Somalia & Syria Low level of illicit transfer appears to continue, de facto global ban on state-to-state transfers continues Collectively, States Parties have destroyed more than 51 million stockpiled antipersonnel mines, including more than 2.1 million destroyed in 2015. Four States Parties possess more than seven million antipersonnel mines remaining to be destroyed: Ukraine (5.4 million), Belarus (1.5 million), Greece (643,265), and Oman (15,734). Ukraine, Belarus, and Greece all missed their treaty-mandated destruction deadlines. The Monitor estimates that as many as 31 of the 35 states not party to the Mine Ban Treaty stockpile landmines. In 1999, the Monitor estimated that, collectively, states not party stockpile about 160 million antipersonnel mines, but today the global total may be less than 50 million. Transfer and Production The Monitor identifies 11 states as producers of antipersonnel mines, unchanged from the previous report: China, Cuba, India, Iran, Myanmar, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, Singapore, South Korea, and Vietnam. Most of these countries are not believed to be actively producing mines but reserve the right to do so. Those most likely to be actively producing are India, Myanmar, Pakistan, and South Korea. Non-state armed groups in countries including Afghanistan, Colombia, Iraq, Myanmar, Nigeria, Pakistan, Somalia, and Syria make antipersonnel mines, including victim-activated IEDs (improvised mines). A de facto global ban on the state-to-state transfer of antipersonnel mines has been in effect since the mid-1990s. Use of factory-produced antipersonnel mines in States Parties Yemen and Ukraine, where declared stockpiles had been destroyed, indicates that some illicit transfers have occurred either internally among actors or from sources external to the country

SAMPLE A global picture of landmine contamination

Contamination 64 states and areas contaminated by antipersonnel mines (up from 61 states and areas in 2014) 36 States Parties to Mine Ban Treaty, 24 states not party, 4 other areas Increase due to: new use of antipersonnel mines in Nigeria, and acquisition of new data on pre-existing contamination in Palau and Mozambique Massive contamination (>100 km2 per country) believed to exist in Afghanistan, Angola, Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cambodia, Chad, Croatia, Iraq, Thailand, Turkey and in area of Western Sahara Sixty-four states and areas are contaminated by antipersonnel mines as of October 2016. This includes 36 States Parties to the Mine Ban Treaty, 24 states not party, and four other areas. This is an increase from 61 states and areas in 2015. The increase is due to new use of antipersonnel mines, including improvised mines, in Nigeria, and to the acquisition of new data on pre-existing contamination in Palau and Mozambique. Massive antipersonnel mine contamination (more than 100 km2 total per country) is believed to exist in Afghanistan, Angola, Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cambodia, Chad, Croatia, Iraq, Thailand, Turkey, and in the area of Western Sahara.  

Clearance About 171 km2 reported to be cleared of landmines in 2015 In 2015 nearly 158,000 antipersonnel mines and some 14,000 antivehicle mines were destroyed Clearance lower than in 2014, due to factors including decrease in funding 70% of 2015 clearance took place in Afghanistan, Cambodia, Croatia Ukraine is in violation of article 5 of the Mine Ban Treaty having missed its 1 June 2016 clearance deadline Only 4 State parties on track to meet their clearance deadlines: Algeria, Chile, Democratic Republic of Congo, and Ecuador About 171 km2 of land was reported to be cleared of landmines in 2015, a decrease from an estimated 201 km2 in 2014. In 2015, nearly 158,000 antipersonnel mines and some 14,000 antivehicle mines were destroyed in the context of mine clearance. As in 2014, the largest total clearance of mined areas in 2015 was achieved in Afghanistan, Cambodia, and Croatia, which together accounted for more than 70% of recorded clearance. It is not possible to attribute the 2015 decrease in clearance to a single cause, but the severe reduction in funding available for mine action probably played a major role. Over the past five years, approximately 960 km2 of mined areas have been cleared. Some 1.3 million antipersonnel and more than 66,000 antivehicle mines have been destroyed in the context of mine clearance.   Twenty-six States Parties, one state not party, and one other area have completed clearance of all mined areas on their territory since the Mine Ban Treaty entered into force in 1999. One state, Ukraine, is in violation of Article 5 of the Mine Ban Treaty due to missing its 1 June 2016 clearance deadline without being granted an extension. Five States Parties were granted extended clearance deadlines at the Fourteenth Meeting of States Parties in 2015: Cyprus, Ethiopia, Mauritania, Niger, and Senegal. Two States Parties requested deadline extensions in 2016, awaiting approval at the Fifteenth Meeting of States Parties: Niger and Peru. Only four States Parties appear to be on track to meet their treaty-mandated clearance deadlines: Algeria, Chile, Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Ecuador.

Casualties In 2015 the Monitor recorded 6,461 mine/ERW casualties, a 75% increase compared to 2014 (3,965) The increases are due to more recorded casualties in armed conflict in Libya, Syria, Ukraine and Yemen 2015 saw highest number of casualties from improvised mines In 2015, there was a sharp rise in the number of people killed and injured by mines, victim-activated IEDs that mostly act as antipersonnel mines (also called improvised mines), cluster munition remnants, and other explosive remnants of war (ERW). In 2015, the Monitor recorded 6,461 mine/ERW casualties, of which at least 1,672 people were killed, marking a 75% increase from casualties recorded for 2014. A revised total of 3,695 casualties was recorded in 2014. The sharp increase in casualties in 2015 was due to more casualties recorded in armed conflicts in Libya, Syria, Ukraine, and Yemen. The increase also reflects greater availability of casualty data, particularly from unique systematic surveys of persons injured in Libya and Syria in 2015. The casualty total in 2015 marked the most annual recorded casualties since 2006. 2015 also marked the highest number of annual casualties by improvised mines (also known as IEDs) recorded by the Monitor, with 1351 recorded in 2015 (compared to 1,075 in 2014)  

Casualties in more detail Casualties in 56 states and 5 other areas in 2015 37 of which are States Parties to the Mine Ban Treaty 78% of casualties were civilians Children accounted for 38% of all civilian casualties Women and girls made up 14% of casualties 60% of recorded casualties occurred in States Parties Casualties were identified in 56 states and five other areas in 2015, of which 37 are States Parties to the Mine Ban Treaty. The vast majority of recorded landmine/ERW casualties were civilians (78%) where their status was known, which is similar to the past two years. In 2015, children accounted for 38% of all civilian casualties where the age was known. Women and girls made up 14% of all casualties where the sex was known, a slight increase compared to recent years. Some 60% of recorded global casualties occurred in States Parties, down from 70% in 2014. The Monitor has recorded more than 100,000 mine/ERW casualties for the period since its global tracking in began in 1999, including some 73,000 new survivors.

Victim Assistance Local surveys are important for improved understanding of needs of mine victims continued in States Parties 2/3 of State Parties actively coordinated to advance efforts of mine victims Victim assistance plans expired in: Burundi, Croatia, Senegal, and Uganda without being revised or renewed in 2015. In Afghanistan and Sudan, expired plans for assistance have not been updated since 2011 Assistance efforts often integrated with other disability rights & development efforts Most States Parties to the Mine Ban Treaty with significant numbers of mine victims suffered from a lack of adequate resources to fulfill the commitments of the 2014–2019 Maputo Action Plan. Findings below relate to the 31 States Parties with significant numbers of mine victims. Localized surveys to improve understanding of the needs of mine victims continued in in most States Parties. Approximately two-thirds of the States Parties had active coordination mechanisms or relevant national plans in place to advance efforts to assist mine victims and uphold their rights. However, victim assistance plans expired in Burundi, Croatia, Senegal, and Uganda without having been revised or renewed in 2015, while expired action plans for assistance in Afghanistan and Sudan have not yet been updated since 2011. In most States Parties, assistance efforts have been integrated into other disability rights and development efforts, through collaborative coordination, combined planning, and survivor participation. Unfortunately, such integration has not resulted in mobilizing the funding and resources required to fill the growing gap between assistance available and the obligations that states have to victims. In nearly all the States Parties, survivors were joining in coordination processes that affect their lives, although in many countries their participation must be better supported, especially in decision-making roles. Many States Parties still need to demonstrate that they are doing their utmost to increase survivors’ participation in all relevant matters. More than half of the States Parties included some information on victim assistance activities and progress in their transparency reports covering calendar year 2015. However, the States Parties still needed to start reporting concretely on time-bound and measurable objectives and progress toward victim assistance goals.

Support for Mine Action: overview National and international donor support totaled US$471.3 million, a 23% decrease from 2014 Contributions per sector: 64% clearance and risk education, 27% various, 7% victim assistance, 1% Capacity building, 0.5% Advocacy, 0.5% Stockpile destruction Donors and affected states contributed approximately US$471.3 million in international and national support for mine action in 2015, This was a decrease of $139 million (23%) from 2014, the third year in a row of declining support, and lowest level since 2005. Contributions per sector: 64% Clearance and risk education, 27% Various, 7% Victim assistance, 1% Capacity building, 0.5% Advocacy, 0,5% Stockpile destruction

Support for Mine Action: a closer look at donors & recipients 35 international donors contributed $340.1 million to 41 states and 3 other areas, a decrease of $77million 14 affected states provided $131.2 million in contributions to their own national mine action programs, a 32% decrease from last year Top 5 donors: the US, Japan, the EU, Norway & the Netherlands, contributing 71% ($240 million) of all international funding Top 5 recipients were Afghanistan, Iraq, Lao PDR, Cambodia and Syria, received 48% ($161.9 million) support   Thirty-five donors contributed $340.1 million in international support for mine action to 41 states and three other areas. This represents a decrease of almost $77 million from 2014, and the first time since 2005 that international support fell below $400 million. The top five mine action donors—the United States, Japan, the European Union, Norway, and the Netherlands—contributed 71% of all international funding, with a combined total of $240 million. Thirteen donors decreased their funding in 2015, with the EU and Norway accounting for $57 million (74%) of the global decline. The top five recipient states—Afghanistan, Iraq, Lao PDR, Cambodia, and Syria—received $161.9 million, or 48% of all international support in 2015. Afghanistan received more funding than any other country for the thirteenth consecutive year. In 2016, donors hosted three international pledging conferences, during which they committed resources to support mine action activities as well as the treaty’s implementation support unit. While this was an unprecedented number of events of this kind, it is not yet possible to determine how these conferences will impact overall support for mine action in 2016 and future years. Fourteen affected states reported providing $131.2 million in national support for their own mine action programs, a decrease of $62 million compared with 2014.  National contributions: The Monitor identified 14 affected states that provided $131.2 million in contributions to their own national mine action programs, $62.4 million less than in 2014 (a 32% decrease), when 13 affected countries reported contributing $193.6 million

Additional Resources… Country profiles Factsheets & Reports Maps Visit www.the-monitor.org Email monitor2@icblmc.org Tweet @MineMonitor @minefreeworld Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor produces several research products including the annual Landmine Monitor and Cluster Munition Monitor reports, online country profile reports, as well as factsheets and special reports, including this year: “Extraordinary Pledges to Support Mine Action in 2016” Revised “Impact of Mines/ERW on Children” The ICBL and CMC websites are excellent resources for additional information and campaign activities. http://www.icbl.org/ and http://www.stopclustermunitions.org/ We extend our gratitude to Monitor contributors*.   Government of Australia Government of Denmark Government of France Government of Germany Government of Norway Government of Sweden Government of Switzerland Holy See UNICEF UN Mine Action Service (UNMAS) The Monitor’s supporters are in no way responsible for, and do not necessarily endorse, the material contained in this report. We also thank the donors who have contributed to the organizational members of the Monitoring and Research Committee and other participating organizations. * List accurate as of November 2016. Thank you!