Philosophy of Religion

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Michael Lacewing Religious belief Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Advertisements

The Fine-Tuning Argument One common response to this argument goes thus: Of course the universe is of a sort suitable for life. If it were not, no one.
Explaining the universe
A2 Ethics How to assess arguments and theories. Aims  To discuss various methods of assessing arguments and theories  To apply these methods to some.
Religious language: Flew, Hare and Mitchell
Verificationism and religious language Michael Lacewing
THIS WORLD IS AMAZING, IT CAN’T HAVE JUST FORMED. THERE MUST BE A GOD! GOD THIS WORLD IS AMAZING! HOW INCREDIBLE IT EXISTS & WE ARE HERE TO ENJOY IT!
Epistemology revision Responses: add a ‘no false lemmas’ condition (J+T+B+N) Responses: replace ‘justified’ with ‘reliably formed’ (R+T+B) (reliabilism)
© Michael Lacewing Hume’s scepticism Michael Lacewing
Swinburne’s argument from design
© Michael Lacewing The Argument from Design Michael Lacewing
The argument from design: Paley v. Hume Michael Lacewing
Faith & Reason: Kierkegaard, Clifford, & Aquinas ~ slide 1
 A religious experience (sometimes known as a spiritual experience, sacred experience, or mystical experience) is an experience which causes someone to.
The Existence of God Daniel von Wachter. Issues involved How does “God” refer? What is God supposed to be like? What makes theistic belief rational? (basic.
© Michael Lacewing Plato and Hume on Human Understanding Michael Lacewing
Philosophy of Religion Michael Lacewing
© Michael Lacewing Miracles Michael Lacewing
© Michael Lacewing Faith without reason? Michael Lacewing
Ethical and religious language Michael Lacewing
A Questions AO1 – Knowledge and Understanding – one side. Explain in lots of detail 20 mins Approx 2 sides Link back to the question Make links between.
The Teleological Argument October 7 th The Teleological Argument Learning Objective: To analyse the argument from Design, considering its strengths.
PHL 201 Problems of Philosophy March 25 th Chapter Five, ‘God’
What Christianity explains that Naturalism cannot Naturalism (materialism) and Christianity (theism) are considered the two possible positions or worldviews.
Assessment.  Introduction… “Billions of people around the world are religious, following faiths such as Islam, Christianity and Buddhism…” “Why is it.
Believing in God (need Christian knowledge only in this unit) Revise key aspects of the unit Create set of revision notes.
By Arunav, Aran, Humza.
Ethical non-naturalism
Arguments for design Michael Lacewing
Believing in God (or not) THEISm – THEre IS a God (someone who believes in God is called a THEIST) Atheism – God DOES NOT exist (someone who doesn’t believe.
Arguments for the existence of GodProblems/reasons to be against COSMOLOGICAL (FIRST CAUSE) DESIGN/TELEOLOGICAL MIRACLES RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE MORALITY.
Two central questions What does it mean to talk of, or believe in, God? –Is talk about God talk about something that exists independently of us? Or a way.
Revision Notes Courtesy of Mr Dixon. Instructions This PowerPoint has all the information you need to complete your Revision Booklets for the Science.
By Jagrav and Rahul.  Theist - A person who believes in God  Atheist - A person who believes there is no God  Agnostic - A person who believes we cannot.
To express reasons for different views of belief in God. To analyse the concepts of theist, atheist and agnostic.
A Level Philosophy, Religious Studies and 2017
Believing in God (need only Christian knowledge in this unit)
Believing in God Unit 1 Religion and Life.
Miracles.
Michael Lacewing Religious belief Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
The Argument from Design
Religious language: cognitive or non-cognitive?
Michael Lacewing Arguments for design Michael Lacewing
Michael Lacewing Ethical naturalism Michael Lacewing
ATHEISM & AGNOSTICISM HUMANISM - KS3
Religious language: the University debate
Philosophy and History of Mathematics
SCIENCE & KNOWLEDGE OF THE WORLD
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 7 The argument from evil
Explaining the universe
Paley’s design argument
Religious responses to the verification principle
Verificationism on religious language
AQUINAS’ FIFTH WAY QUA A Latin word meaning ‘relating to’. REGULARITY
The analogy of the Arrow
The Anthropic Principle
Ethics: Theory and Practice
Plato and Hume on Human Understanding
Religious beliefs, religious attitudes
Christian Apologetics
In pairs, attempt to describe an object in the room by saying what it is not…. It is not red…..
The Argument from Design
What point is it trying to make?
Revision Beliefs about God
Ethical and religious language
Religious beliefs, religious attitudes
Miracles – A Comparative Study of Two Key Scholars
Argument for the existence of God
How do secularists think about decisions?
Religious faith and emotion
Presentation transcript:

Philosophy of Religion Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk

Two central questions What does it mean to talk of, or believe in, God? Is talk about God talk about something that exists independently of us? Or a way of talking about life? Does ‘God exists’ state something that can be true or false? Or express an attitude? Does God exist? Can we answer this question by argument?

THE NATURE OF RELIGIOUS BELIEF AND LANGUAGE

Belief-that ‘I believe him’ = Standard analysis: content + attitude Content: what the person believes, given by a proposition E.g. ‘He believes that elephants are grey.’ Belief-that aims at truth: To believe that p is to believe that p is true. ‘I believe him’ = ‘I believe that what he says is true’ ‘I believe that he is trustworthy/sincere’

Belief in ‘I believe in God’ = ‘I believe that God exists’? ‘I believe in love’ Not belief-that (no truth claim), but faith, trust, commitment

Religious belief Does belief in God presuppose belief that God exists? Yes: you can’t believe in a person if you think they don’t exist No: you don’t have believe that love exists (literally) to believe in love What is more basic in religious belief? Should belief-that be analysed as (really) belief-in or vice-versa?

Does ‘God exists’ state a fact? Not tested against empirical experience Not purely intellectual Theism not acquired by argument or evidence Religious ‘belief’ is belief-in, an attitude or commitment, towards life, others, history, morality… a way of living.

Objections Different religions can prescribe similar ways of life while arguing for different beliefs about God Orthodoxy (right belief) has been thought very important What supports or justifies the attitude if not beliefs about how things are? Perhaps religions distinguished by their stories But stories don’t justify commitments This approach makes religion too subjective

Traditional belief ‘God exists’ is objectively true or false. ‘God’ refers to a being (in some sense) that exists independently of us, and has certain attributes. Monotheism: perfect knowledge, power, goodness, creator of the universe…

Faith So: can we know whether God exists? What is faith based on? Belief in God = faith What is faith based on? Reason: at least reason can justify faith, even if it doesn’t often cause it Revelation: scripture (Religious) Experience: mundane and miraculous

Approaches Pope John Paul II: rational knowledge and philosophical discourse are important for ‘the very possibility of belief in God’. Richard Swinburne: The Coherence of Theism: God’s existence is probable, considering all the evidence. Extreme ‘fideism’: sin has damaged our ability to reason, so ignore reason. Moderate ‘fideism’: faith goes ‘beyond’ reason, but doesn’t oppose it.

Objection Many religious believers think that they do have some reason to believe in God. But they are willing to accept that the evidence for God’s existence is not very strong, so they say it is a matter of faith. This seems inconsistent: it accepts belief in God is a matter of evidence and argument, but that we don’t need to justify our conclusion by the balance of evidence.

DOES GOD EXIST?

Amazement Two natural phenomena often inspire amazement in us: the night sky and life The first is vast, awesome The second is wonderful and intricate Philosophers can also be amazed that we can understand the world at all

Life Organs serve a purpose – heart – pump blood; eye – seeing We understand parts of an organ in relation to serving this purpose A living organism requires huge coordination of tiny parts each functioning well – complexity

Design Complexity of this kind, the way parts work together, can indicate planning and design – intentional purpose If life involves design, by definition, there must be a designer But are living organisms designed?

Evolution by natural selection Darwin explained how the appearance of design is possible without design Genetic alterations happen randomly; most disappear. But those that improve reproduction survive and spread in a population, altering the species Such alterations are not actually ‘selected’ – natural forces secure their survival

Starry sky

The ‘fine tuning’ argument Why do we live in a universe in which life (and evolution) is possible? The conditions for life are very, very improbable. Life needs planets, and planets need stars. For stars to exist, the conditions of the Big Bang (how big, how much bang) had to be exact to 1/1060

1 in 1060 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 percent As precise as hitting a one-inch target on the other side of the universe That’s for stars– life is even more improbable Of course, if God designed the universe to develop life, this is not a massive coincidence

Does the universe need explaining? The lottery argument It’s incredibly unlikely, before the draw, that whoever wins will win. But someone will win. With enough chances, the incredibly unlikely can become inevitable. If there are lots of universes, one of them would have the right conditions for life.

More questions What explains why and how the universe – any universe – exists in the first place? What is the best explanation for religious experience and miracles? If God is all-powerful, all-loving, and all-knowing, why does evil and suffering occur?