2016 Primary Assessment Update 27th September 2016

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Briefing for Governors: Performance in Leeds and the role of governors in improving outcomes Children’s Performance Service March 2014.
Advertisements

Joining the dots Supporting & challenging your school Governor Dashboard 1 Paul Charman Director of Strategy & Operations, FFT Chair of Governors, Dyson.
Data – a focus on vulnerable groups and how governors can use data to positively challenge Directorate Support Team (Data & Statistics) Cornwall Council.
Statutory Assessment and the New National Curriculum Stephen Anwyll Ofqual AAIA Annual Conference Bournemouth 2nd October 2014.
Kent Governors’ Association County Briefing 20 October 2014 Patrick Leeson Corporate Director Education and Young People’s Services.
Governors Association Briefing 22 June 2015
FFT Data Analysis Project – Supporting Self Evaluation  Fischer Family Trust / Fischer Education Project Extracts may be reproduced for non commercial.
Performance Descriptors Consultation October 2014 Summary.
Educational Standards Cabinet January Early Years Performance  The percentage of pupils achieving the target expectations in the Early Years Foundation.
Using Performance Data to Improve Governor Effectiveness Julie Johnson Assistant Director of Schools (Primary) Diocese of Shrewsbury Department of Education.
Mathematics Subject Leader Network Meeting Autumn 2013.
Curriculum 2014 Not statutory for academies Raises expectations across all year groups Years 2 and 6 will be tested under the old arrangements in 2015.
Using Performance Data to Improve Governor Effectiveness
Raising the achievement of disadvantaged children in West Sussex A Strategic Approach.
Reforms to Primary Assessment and Accountability
RAISEonline Data Analysis for Governors and Staff Beaver Road Primary School Clive Davies OBE Beaver Road (c)
The Ilsleys Primary School Review and priorities for 2015/2016.
© Herts for Learning Ltd Assessment Updates - floor standards/‘coasting’ status - KS1 and KS2 teacher assessments Rochford review Ben Fuller Lead.
Reforms to Primary Assessment and Accountability Catherine Wreyford, Department for Education October 2015.
Nikki Tilson – Assessment and Achievement Adviser (Nursery and Primary) Assessment Update September 2015.
RAISEonline Data Analysis St Bernadette's Catholic Primary School St Bernadette's Catholic Primary School (c)
Empowering Informed Decisions Using RAISEonline data to improve governor effectiveness Dave Thomson Head of Data Analysis, RM Education.
Primary Headteacher Meetings January/February 2013 Jacqui Cant Stephen Turp.
A Guide to Raiseonline KEY PERFORMANCE MEASURES. Prior Attainment Informs the Journey KS1 Teacher Assessments KS4 ExamsKS2 TestsPost 16 Expectation to.
School Data Dashboard & RAISEonline Presentation for Governors Thursday 7 th May 2015 Yvonne Broadbent - Headteacher.
Understanding & Using School Governance ….data. Me 8.30ish finish 15 minute break Fire alarms/Loos Introduction to RAISEonline Working in groups Packs.
Monitoring Attainment and Progress from September 2016 John Crowley Senior Achievement Adviser.
Governor Data Training. Secondary National Standards National Floor Standards 5 A*-C including English and maths above 40% rising to 50% in Progress.
Standards report Standards Report CT Board 18 th March 2016.
‘A Flying Start’ Achievement Update November 2014 Chris Snudden Head of Education Achievement Service Head of Virtual School for Children in Care John.
Pupil Premium Chris Snudden. Pupil Premium 2014 – 2015 Indicative Allocations Total Pupil Premium for Norfolk £29,752,000 Primary = £18,032,000 Secondary.
FFT Data Analysis Project Who wants to be in the top 1 percent?
Jacqui Cant Stephen Turp Primary Headteacher Meetings Assessment Update June 2013.
1. 2 Devon Joint School Improvement Partner CPD 9 th October 2008 Tiverton Hotel Target Setting 2010 Hilary Jones.
NEW NATIONAL CURRICULUM ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK 2016.
Newcastle Learning Challenge Data analysis November 2014 Newcastle City Council.
Middlewich Primary School End of Key Stage Statutory Assessment Tuesday 5 th July 2016.
November 2016 Beverley Perin PAJES
Broomfields Junior School
National And SCHOOL BASED Assessment
Attainment, progress and context by disadvantage / pupil premium
Analysing the Primary RAISE
Progress 8 and Attainment 8:
Objectives To explore the data analyses that are available in RAISEonline and how they can be used to identify differences in progression rates To consider.
WPS Assessment Information Evening
Charlton Kings Junior School
Curriculum & Assessment of Children’s Learning
Who wants to be in the top 1 percent?
Governors’ Update RaiseOnline & Fischer Family Trust
Raise Online 2013 Grange Park Primary School
EYFS and KS1 Parent Meeting November 2016
What do the data and research really tell us?
Assessment Changes Meeting
Sheffield Performance Overview
Policy and progress update on the reforms to A levels
Curriculum & Assessment of Children’s Learning
Supporting School Improvement Partners (SIPs) working with Schools Causing Concern, including Hard to Shift 1.
RAISEonline Data Analysis for Governors and Staff
Resource Slides.
Progress 8 and Attainment 8:
Assessment Update February 2015 Barbara Nunn.
Schools Causing Concern – DfE Statutory Guidance
Life beyond levels Analysing school performance using scaled scores
Pupil Tracking Systems
#TrainWithEase. #TrainWithEase School Performance and Accountability 16th November 2016 Our Speakers Jamie Pembroke – School Data Expert Paul Charman.
A Brief Guide to National Data Systems
Understanding ASP and FFT Data
Evelyn CP School - Foundation Stage Results
Evelyn CP School - Foundation Stage Results
Sandhurst Primary School
Presentation transcript:

2016 Primary Assessment Update 27th September 2016

2016 Headlines – Foundation Stage 69% of children in Sheffield achieved a good level of development at the end of the Foundation Stage. This is equivalent to the provisional national result. Provisional data indicates that the achievement gap has closed by 4% points to 31.7%. All localities showing an upwards trend over the last 4 years.

2016 Headlines – Phonics 77% of children in Sheffield achieved the required standard of phonics decoding. This is 4% points below the national average of 81%. The gap between Sheffield and national has remained the same at 4% points. All localities showing an upwards trend over the last 4 years.

2016 Headlines – Key Stage 1 New assessment framework this year. % of pupils working at or above the expected standard has dropped in Sheffield and nationally compared to % at level 2b+ in previous years. % of pupils working at or above expected standard in Sheffield is: 71% (reading); 65% (writing); 71% (maths). Gaps with national are: 3% (reading); 1% (writing); 2% (maths). Compared to last year the gaps have increased in reading and maths (by 1% point) and narrowed in writing (by 1% point). EXS – working at the expected standard GDS – working at greater depth within the expected standard

Key Stage 1 – subject comparison, % EXS in reading, writing and maths

2016 Headlines – Key Stage 2 New assessment framework – pupils working at the level of test in reading, maths and GPS have received a scaled score between 80 and 120. Pupils working at a ‘higher standard’ are those achieving a scaled score of 110 or higher in reading and maths or working at ‘greater depth’ in writing. The new expected standard is estimated to be roughly equivalent to a level 4a in reading and between a 4b and 4a in maths. Progress will calculated using the difference between the KS2 scaled score and the KS1 average points score. BUT there is no individual level progress target for pupils. Schools will be below floor if: û fewer than 65% of pupils reach the expected standard in ALL of reading, writing and maths AND û the school is below the floor standard for ANY of the individual progress measures in reading (-5), writing (-7) or maths (-5). NB confidence intervals will be applied to the progress measures similar to the method used to show significant ‘greens’ and ‘blues’ in RAISE.

2016 Headlines – Key Stage 2 Significant difference in the % achieving the expected standard in reading, writing and maths – 52% compared to level 4+ (78% in 2015) Sheffield has closed the gap and is only 1% point below national average (53%) 5% of pupils achieved the higher standard or greater depth in all three subjects, equivalent to the national average) For individual subjects the largest gap is for reading – Sheffield 62% compared to a national average of 66% EXS – working at the expected standard GDS – working at the higher standard / greater depth

2016 Headlines – Key Stage 2 EXS – working at the expected standard, GDS – working at the higher standard / greater depth, average scaled score is only available for pupils who sat the tests i.e. were not working below the standard of the tests

Key Stage 2 – subject breakdown Reading tended to be the limiting factor that prevented pupils achieving the combined measure. Only 2% achieved the expected standard in reading only. 78% of pupils achieved the expected standard in at least one of 3 subjects. 17% achieved the expected standard in writing but not in reading. 6% of pupils scored 98 or 99 points in reading (i.e. just missed the threshold).

Key Stage 2 – subject comparison, % EXS in reading, writing, maths & GPS

How does Sheffield’s performance compare to other LAs? National rankings give an indication of how Sheffield’s performance compares to other local authorities – provisional data shows Sheffield ranks 92 out of 150 LAs (1 is best performance) on the combined measure, this is an improvement compared to the 2015 rank of 116. Sheffield deprivation ranking is 105. Subject National rank 2013 National rank 2014 National rank 2015 National rank 2016 (provisional) Combined RWM 123 117 116 92 Reading 139 143 142 119 Writing 131 122 126 77 Maths 129 115 103 99 GPS 141 106 104 National ranks have improved across all measures but reading is still the weakest performing subject relative to other LAs

KS2 - Progress calculation Provisional progress data was made available to schools on 1st September New progress measures are value-added and measure the distance travelled between Key Stage 1 and Key Stage 2. Steps in working out progress.... 1. Calculate KS1 average points score – average of reading and writing combined with maths 2. Each pupil is assigned to a prior attainment group based on their KS1 average points A progress score of 0... means the pupil has achieved the level of KS2 attainment expected given their KS1 score A progress score above 0... means the pupil has achieved a higher level of KS2 attainment than predicted from their KS1 score A progress score below 0... means the pupil has achieved a lower level of KS2 attainment than predicted from their KS1 score 3. The DfE have calculated the average score for each subject for each prior attainment group. Where a pupil does not have a scaled score (e.g. in writing or if they are working below the test) they are assigned a score based on their teacher assessment. 4. Compare the pupils actual KS2 score with the expected score – the difference is the pupil’s progress score. The school progress score is an average of the individual pupil scores

KS2 - Progress – statistical significance and floor standards A school’s overall progress scores show on average whether pupils make more or less progress compared to pupils with similar prior attainment nationally. A significance test will be applied to the progress scores to determine if they are significantly different from 0. 0 represents national average progress. If the school’s progress score is below -5 in reading or maths or below -7 in writing AND the school has achieved less than 65% then the school is below the floor standard* *providing a sufficient number of pupils have progress results

KS2 - Progress – results Overall progress scores for Sheffield are above average for writing, close to 0 for maths and below 0 for reading. blue = significantly below 0, green = significantly above 0, grey = not significant

KS2 - Progress – distribution of scores Sheffield National Sheffield Sheffield

Pupil groups Group discussion on progress analysis by pupil groups.....

Children’s Profile

RAISEonline Available late October – dates not yet released New thresholds, expected standard and greater depth / higher standard Average scaled scores New progress measures Summary shows breakdown for low, middle, high prior attainment for all pupils and disadvantaged pupils. Disadvantaged pupils are compared against non-disadvantaged pupils nationally. Statistical significance is applied as before AND there will be additional shading to indicate top / bottom 10% Example progress report

RAISEonline Pupil group comparisons fall into 3 types: comparison against the same group (for example gender, EAL, non SEN) comparison against non-disadvantaged group (disadvantaged, CLA, FSM) comparison against all pupils (SEN)

Other key releases Inspection dashboard – to be used for inspection preparation, likely to be released after RAISE, content not yet announced Primary Performance Tables – 15th December Floor standards – provisional data already includes progress and the thresholds have been announced but will not be confirmed until Performance Tables Coasting schools.....

KS2 - Coasting Schools The DfE plans to inform schools if they meet the coasting definition after the 2016 Performance Tables are published in December. These schools will need to demonstrate that they have sufficient capacity to improve or face further action. Schools will be identified as coasting using data from 2014, 2015 and 2016. In 2014 and 2015 a school is coasting if fewer than 85 per cent of pupils achieve Level 4+ in reading, writing and mathematics and the percentage of pupils making expected progress in reading, writing and maths are all below the national medians. In 2016 a school is coasting if fewer than 85 per cent of pupils achieve the new expected standard across reading, writing and mathematics and pupil progress is below the threshold in any one of reading, writing or maths. The progress measure for coasting will be calculated in the same way as the progress floor standards but the coasting standard will be set at a higher level than the progress floor standard. A school is only classified as coasting if it meets these criteria in ALL 3 years School identified as coasting after the 2016 accountability data is published will be notified and will become eligible for intervention. However, they will not “automatically be subject to intervention”.

Primary Categorisation Each locality has a process for carrying out the categorisation: School Information Forms are completed. School & Locality data is available. Locality & Learn Sheffield categorise each school and feed back (where necessary) by Friday 14th October. Learn Sheffield writes to all schools on Monday 17th October. School Profiles will be shared once complete but this will not delay the process. We have agreed that we will write to all schools at the same time, even if that leads to a delay for some localities. The letters will be accompanied by a Guide to Categorisation and some accompanying documents – everything goes to the Headteacher (or equivalent) & Chair of Governors (or equivalent). The process is about the effective targeting of resources and is based on the principle that each school has an entitlement.

Achievement Strategy The strategy includes the activity that will support all schools in preparation for Statutory Tests in 2017: Moderation – city, locality & school level Tracking – using predictions to inform support for schools Briefings – school leaders & FS2/Y2/Y6 teachers Support & Guidance (including Access Arrangements) The team working on this are LSIPs and Associate LSIPs – the discussion and decisions will be taken at the Primary Improvement Board in October. The strategy also includes school improvement activity (school self evaluation, school improvement planning, support with data analysis, Ofsted preparation, etc.) which will be offered to schools as part of the support and challenge entitlement following categorisation.

Locality Action Plans Each locality will develop a School Improvement Action Plan to capture the school improvement activity – there is flexibility about when, how, etc. The content will be based upon the agreement between Learn Sheffield and each locality. The categorisation process may lead to some additional or different activity. The development of the locality data picture may lead to some additional or different activity. The achievement strategy may lead to some additional or different activity. The plan needs to be a working document and, most importantly, needs to support the work of the locality. Each locality can decide how to approach this additional information.