Cost Optimization Models for SRF Linacs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
12GeV Project CD-4 Leigh Harwood Associate Project Manager Accelerator Systems.
Advertisements

Tom Powers Practical Aspects of SRF Cavity Testing and Operations SRF Workshop 2011 Tutorial Session.
Lorentz force detuning measurements on the CEA cavity
Simultaneous Four-Hall Operation for 12 GeV CEBAF Reza Kazimi November 2012.
SRF_BizPlan_31Oct2010_Rev_14 Production Preparations at JLAB JLab SRF Team EDMS – PLM DESY TeamCenter Meeting at SLAC 31 MAR 2014.
Jefferson Lab Status Hall A collaboration Dec. 16, 2013 R. D. McKeown Deputy Director For Science.
Dark Current Measurements and Simulations Chris Adolphsen 2/4/15.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 23 rd Annual HUGS Program June 2-20, 2008 CEBAF Overview HUGS08 June 3 CEBAF Overview HUGS08 June.
Longitudinal transfer function a.k.a. (M 55 ) measurements at the JLab FEL Pavel Evtushenko, JLab  Jlab IR/UV upgrade longitudinal phase space evolution.
LLRF ILC GDE Meeting Feb.6,2007 Shin Michizono LLRF - Stability requirements and proposed llrf system - Typical rf perturbations - Achieved stability at.
LLRF-05 Oct.10,20051 Digital LLRF feedback control system for the J-PARC linac Shin MICHIZONO KEK, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (JAPAN)
Contractor Assurance System Peer Review April Page 1 NSTAR 2011 May 16, 2011 Jefferson Lab Hugh Montgomery.
Recent LFD Control Results from FNAL Yuriy Pischalnikov Warren Schappert TTF/FLASH 9mA Meeting on Cavity Gradient Flatness June 01, 2010.
1Matthias LiepeAugust 2, 2007 LLRF for the ERL Matthias Liepe.
Tom Powers LLRF Systems for Next Generation Light Sources LLRF Workshop October 2011 Authored by Jefferson Science Associates, LLC under U.S. DOE.
Marc Ross Nick Walker Akira Yamamoto ‘Overhead and Margin’ – an attempt to set standard terminology 10 Sept 2010 Overhead and Margin 1.
Welcome to Jefferson Lab R. D. McKeown Jefferson Lab Hypernuclear Workshop May 27, 2014.
BIA’s Director Review, September Accelerator Improvements FY11-16 Fulvia Pilat.
Machine Protection at the 1MW CEBAF Electron Accelerator and Free Electron Laser Facility Kelly Mahoney Presented at the Workshop for.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Kirk Davis.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility SensL 6-Oct CHL-2 12 GeV CEBAF Upgrade magnets and power supplies Two 1.1GV linacs Enhanced capabilities.
Matthias Liepe. Matthias Liepe – High loaded Q cavity operation at CU – TTC Topical Meeting on CW-SRF
Jefferson Lab Cryomodule Cost and Optimization. Based Jlab energy upgrade Cryomodule design and produced to increase the energy gain of CEBAF to 12 GeV.
1 new module Seven cell Cavity, 0.7 m long (high Q L ) 8 Cavities per Cryomodule Fits the existing Cryomodule footprint.
1 Tuner performance with LLRF control at KEK Shin MICHIZONO (KEK) Dec.07 TTC Beijing (Michizono) S1G (RDR configuration) - Detuning monitor - Tuner control.
Overview Step by step procedure to validate the model (slide 1 and 2) Procedure for the Ql / beam loading study (slide 3 and 4)
Long Range PIT Summary and Plan PIT Team. Long Range PIT Team Goals Investigate, understand, and improve long term SRF linac performance –Quantify/Summarize.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Jefferson.
LLRF regulation of CC2 operated at 4˚K Gustavo Cancelo for the AD, TD & CD LLRF team.
Microphonics Discussion For LLRF Design Review Tom Powers 13 June 2016 Not for release outside of JLAB There are several MSWord documents located at: M:\asd\asddata\C100Microphonics2016.
Operation Status of the RF Systems and Taiwan Photon Source
Microphonics Discussion For LLRF Design Review Tom Powers 13 June 2016 Not for release outside of JLAB There are several MSWord documents located at: M:\asd\asddata\C100Microphonics2016.
RF System for C100 Cryomodule C100 GDR mode – Original/Modified Tuner Phase noise 25.6 deg rms /14 Hz rms Phase noise 7.5 deg rms /4 Hz rms.
R100/C100 Cryomodule Microphonics
RF Systems and Controls for the LERF CM Tests
Test of the dressed spoke cavity
TTC Topical Workshop - CW SRF, Cornell 12th – 14th June 2013
Failure analysis at BEPCII
The status of the CEBAF Upgrade Fulvia Pilat
Update on HW commissioning
Test plan of ESS HB elliptical cavity
LLRF Functionality Stefan Simrock How to edit the title slide
Experience with High Loaded Q cavity Operation at JLAB
Jefferson Lab Low Level RF Controls
High Q Cavity Operation in the Cornell Horizontal Test Cryomodule
C100 Operational Performance
TTC meeting, Feb. 6-9, 2018, Milan Trouble Shorting of CW Operation of Superconducting Linac for Chinese ADS Yuan He, Yongming Li, Xinmeng Liu, Zheng Gao,
Gradient Team Plans Bob Legg 29 June 2016.
Microphonics and Energy Jitter
Cost Optimization Models for SRF Linacs
Introduction to Jefferson Lab
CEPC RF Power Sources System
Operations Department
Operations Department
Thoughts on Energy Reach
C75 Commissioning Michael Drury SRF Operations Support
FRIB summary of performance degradation - VTA to cryomodule
First High Power Test of the ESS Double Spoke Cavity package
Performance Recovery at CEBAF
SOLID Collaboration Meeting
CEBAF Pulsed Operation for JLEIC Electron Injection
Cryomodule Test Schedule
ERL Director’s Review Main Linac
Field Emission and Mitigation in the CEBAF Linacs R Legg, R Geng Jlab SRF Ops Dept. TTC,
Comparison between 4K and 2K operation performance of CEBAF injector cryomodules Grigory Eremeev Monday, August 19, 2019.
C100 Operation Enhancing gradient reach for the
C100 Cavity Faults as Determined By Time Domain Waveforms
SNS-PPU upgrades the existing accelerator structure
Summary of the maximum SCRF voltage in XFEL
Facility for Research Instrumentation and Accelerator Development
Presentation transcript:

Cost Optimization Models for SRF Linacs TTC Workshop June 2013 Final Cost Optimization Models for SRF Linacs Tom Powers

JLAB C100 Cryomodule Commissioning Tom Powers (For Joe Preble and Mike Drury)

Enhanced capabilities The 12 GeV Upgrade Upgrade is designed to build on existing facility: vast majority of accelerator and experimental equipment have continued use New Hall Add arc Enhanced capabilities in existing Halls Add 5 cryomodules 20 cryomodules Upgrade arc magnets and supplies CHL upgrade Maintain capability to deliver lower pass beam energies: 2.2, 4.4, 6.6…. The completion of the 12 GeV Upgrade of CEBAF was ranked the highest priority in the 2007 NSAC Long Range Plan. Scope of the upgrade includes: Doubling the accelerator beam energy Doubling the injector energy New Hall and beam-lines Upgrades to existing Experimental Halls

C100 Cryomodule

Standard Commissioning C100 Cryomodules Validate interlocks, LLRF, HPRF, and calibrate cables Turn cavity on in self excited loop mode (SEL) Ramp the gradient up to quench, trip, etc. over a period of ½ hour to 2 hours. Run the cavity just below the trip level (Emax) for one hour. Ramp the gradient down and determine radiation onset. Perform Qo measurements from 7 MV/m to Emax in 1 MV/m steps. Run all eight cavities at Emax for one hour. Turn the zone over to the LLRF group so that they can tune up the field control chassis gains, bandwidths, etc.

Q vs E results 1

Qo vs E Statistics

Radiation onset

Microphonics Studies Microphonics were measured to be relatively high in the cryomodule test cave on the first production cryomodule. By this time the first three were well into the cryomodule assembly process. I was measured in the tunnel and while within system specifications it was high. Cryomodule production was stopped while it was investigated.

C100-1 Cryomodule Microphonics

Microphoincs 2 First 4 Cavities (Upper) and Last 4 Cavities (Lower) in Cryomodule C100-1

Modal Analysis and Off Line Measurements Modal Response Testing A warm cavity was instrumented with 9 triaxial accelerometers A series of warm impulse hammer response tests were performed on structures ranging from bare cavities to a fully assembled cryomodule. Results shown are for the response of a bare cavity with the original and stiffened tuners assemblies Background Microphonics Testing Data taken using digital low level RF system operated in a fixed frequency mode at 1497 MHz The RF phase angles between the incident power and the cavity field probe readings were recorded at 1000 S/sec for 100 seconds. Phase angle and cavity loaded-Q used to calculate the detune frequency 8 channels of data were acquired synchronously.

Microphonics Cavity C100-1-5 Cavity C100-4-5 Determines the Feedback Gain needed for control. Effects are driven by QL and the available klystron power for lightly loaded cavities Microphonic Detuning* C100-1 C100-4 RMS (Hz) 2.985 1.524 6s(Hz) 17.91 9.14 Minor change to the tuner pivot plate substantially improved the microphonics for the CEBAF C100 Cryomodules. While both meet the overall system requirements the improved design has a larger RF power margin Cavity C100-1-5 How one determines klystron margin in lightly loaded cavities. Good shot of the cavities doing their own thing. Not vector sum friendly! Point out the stiffened tuner in C100-4 and the impact on the better microphponics. Mechanical modes at 11, 22 and 43 Hz (check with Kirk) are seen on the graphs. Cavity C100-4-5

Summary All ten C100 cryomodules have been tested in the cryomodule test facility. At least 5 have been tested in the tunnel Although there are a few that do not the aggregate of the cavities meet the specified gradient and Qo specifications. Microphonics issues observed in the first three zones were addressed for the remaining cryomodules. One was operated in the machine with beam. Operations are scheduled to start this fall.