Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk Sense data Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk © Michael Lacewing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Michael Lacewing Idealism Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Advertisements

Perception & the External World
© Michael Lacewing Direct realism Michael Lacewing
René Descartes ( ) Father of modern rationalism. Reason is the source of knowledge, not experience. All our ideas are innate. God fashioned us.
Concept innatism II: the case of substance Michael Lacewing
Berkeley’s idealism (brief)
© Michael Lacewing Hume’s scepticism Michael Lacewing
Michael Lacewing Hume on causation Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Defending Common Sense Direct Realism. The trouble with sense-data  Key feature of Representative Realism and anti-realist theories. But…  The object/appearance.
Direct realism Michael Lacewing
© Michael Lacewing Representative realism Michael Lacewing
© Michael Lacewing Direct and representative realism Michael Lacewing
How Can We Know Anything about the World Around Us? Idealism: we can know about the world because it is comprised of our ideas Phenomenalism: physical.
Indirect realism Michael Lacewing
Descartes on Certainty (and Doubt)
Michael Lacewing Idealism: objections Michael Lacewing
Substance dualism: do Descartes’ arguments work? Michael Lacewing
Descartes on scepticism
Knowledge empiricism Michael Lacewing
Rationalism: Knowledge Is Acquired through Reason, not the Senses We know only that of which we are certain. Sense experience cannot guarantee certainty,
The knowledge argument Michael Lacewing
© Michael Lacewing Plato and Hume on Human Understanding Michael Lacewing
© Michael Lacewing Reason and experience Michael Lacewing
© Michael Lacewing Doubt in Descartes’ Meditations Michael Lacewing
René Descartes ( ) Father of modern rationalism.
PERCEPTION. Why an issue? Sensory perception a key source of our beliefs about the world. Empiricism – senses the basis of knowledge.
Berkeley’s idealism (long) Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
© Michael Lacewing Substance and Property Dualism Michael Lacewing
BERKELEY AND IDEALISM Strange to claim there is an external world;
Substance dualism Michael Lacewing
KNOWLEDGE OF THE EXTERNAL WORLD THEORIES OF PERCEPTION.
A tree falls in a forest but there is no one to hear it, does it make a sound?
The secondary quality argument for indirect realism R1.When I look at a rose, I see something that is red. R2.The red thing cannot be the rose itself (since.
Realism and Idealism Direct/naive from perceptual from from hallucination & from time lag Veridical perception.
What is an example of a secondary quality?
ART EXPRESSION INFORMS FORM
Michael Lacewing Direct realism Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Direct Realism Criticisms
Religious language: cognitive or non-cognitive?
Substance and Property Dualism
Intuition and deduction thesis (rationalism)
Criticisms of Indirect Realism
Knowledge of the external world Realism (continued)
Indirect realism Learning objectives: to understand the objection to indirect realism that it leads to scepticism about the nature of the external world.
Michael Lacewing Mackie’s error theory Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
1st wave: Illusion Descartes begins his method of doubt by considering that in the past he has been deceived by his senses: Things in the distance looked.
Michael Lacewing Indirect realism Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Indirect Realism Understand the argument put forward by the indirect realist. Explain how a indirect realist would respond to perceptual problems. ‘Does.
The secondary quality argument for indirect realism
The mind as a ‘tabula rasa’
Descartes’ trademark argument
Descartes’ conceivability argument for substance dualism
Michael Lacewing Berkeley’s idealism Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Major Periods of Western Philosophy
Introducing Epistemology
Last 4 Lesson Objectives…
Kant’s objection to ontological arguments
Quick Recap – Deductive / Inductive
Plato and Hume on Human Understanding
Recap So Far: Direct Realism
Recap – Direct Realism - Issues
Major Periods of Western Philosophy
Do we directly perceive objects? (25 marks)
Problems with IDR Before the holidays we discussed two problems with the indirect realist view. If we can’t perceive the external world directly (because.
What keywords / terms have we used so far
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 7 Berkeley
Think / Pair / Share - Primary + Secondary Qualities
Rene Descartes Father of Modern Philosophy b. March in La Haye France wrote Meditations in 1641 d. February
Is the concept of substance innate?
Descartes and Hume on knowledge of the external world
Presentation transcript:

Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk Sense data Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk © Michael Lacewing

How do we know about the physical world? We perceive physical objects, which exist independently of our minds. But do we perceive them ‘directly’ or via some form of mental representation? What we perceive isn’t what exists independent of the mind.

Illusions In illusions, you see something, but not as it really is. What you see is an appearance. In veridical perception, you still see an appearance immediately, and the object via its appearance.

Appearance and reality What we see are ‘appearances’, which are mental things What is bent if it is not the stick? What I see in a hallucination We discover physical reality through how it appears to us in sense experience.

Sense data Private: part of an individual consciousness Physical objects are public Mind-dependent: only exist while being experienced Physical objects exist without being experienced They are exactly as they appear. Physical objects can appear differently from how they are.

Objections How do we know reality is anything like our experience? We can’t compare sense data with physical objects Worse: sense data can’t have, e.g., size and shape the way physical objects do But then – how can the sense data of the bent stick be bent?

Objections Can sense data have properties I am not aware of? Number of matches How do we know there is a physical world, causing our sense data?

Implications Can sensory experience give us knowledge of (rather than just beliefs about) the physical world? Hume accepts a form of scepticism: We can’t prove the existence of the physical world, but belief in it is irresistible Experience gives us all we need practically

Implications Empiricist alternatives: a different analysis of experience Reject sense data (direct realism) or Rejects the existence of physical objects (idealism)

Implications Rationalist alternatives: Plato: there is only belief concerning physical objects; knowledge is of the Forms Descartes: we must prove the existence and essential nature of physical objects using reason