INVESTMENTS: Analysis and Management Third Canadian Edition W. Sean Cleary Charles P. Jones Prepared by Khalil Torabzadeh University of Lethbridge

Chapter 9 Capital Market Theory

Learning Objectives Explain capital market theory and the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). Discuss the importance and composition of the market portfolio. Describe two important relationships in CAPM as represented by the capital market line and the security market line. Describe how betas are estimated and how beta is used. Discuss the Arbitrage Pricing Theory as an alternative to the Capital Asset Pricing Model. Cleary Jones/Investments: Analysis and Management, 3rd Canadian Edition, Chapter 9 2

Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) Focus on the equilibrium relationship between the risk and expected return on risky assets Builds on Markowitz portfolio theory Each investor is assumed to diversify his or her portfolio according to the Markowitz model Cleary Jones/Investments: Analysis and Management, 3rd Canadian Edition, Chapter 9 2

Assumptions of the CAPM All investors: Use the same information to generate an efficient frontier Have the same one-period time horizon Can borrow or lend money at the risk-free rate of return No transaction costs, no personal income taxes, no inflation No single investor can affect the price of a stock Capital markets are in equilibrium Cleary Jones/Investments: Analysis and Management, 3rd Canadian Edition, Chapter 9 3

The Market Portfolio Most important implication of the CAPM All investors hold the same optimal portfolio of risky assets The optimal portfolio is at the highest point of tangency between RF and the efficient frontier The portfolio of all risky assets is the optimal risky portfolio Called the market portfolio Cleary Jones/Investments: Analysis and Management, 3rd Canadian Edition, Chapter 9 4

Composition of the Market Portfolio All risky assets must be in portfolio, so it is completely diversified Contains only systematic risk All securities included in proportion to their market value Unobservable, but proxied by S&P/TSX Composite Index In theory, should contain all risky assets worldwide Cleary Jones/Investments: Analysis and Management, 3rd Canadian Edition, Chapter 9 5

Figure 9-2 The Capital Market Line and the Components of Its Slope Line from RF to L is capital market line (CML) Cleary Jones/Investments: Analysis and Management, 3rd Canadian Edition, Chapter 9 6

The Capital Market Line Slope of the CML is the market price of risk for efficient portfolios, or the equilibrium price of risk in the market Relationship between risk and expected return for portfolio P (Equation for CML): Cleary Jones/Investments: Analysis and Management, 3rd Canadian Edition, Chapter 9 7

The Capital Market Line RF is the price of forgone consumption E(RM) – RF/σM is the market price of risk σP is the amount of risk taken on a particular portfolio Cleary Jones/Investments: Analysis and Management, 3rd Canadian Edition, Chapter 9

The Security Market Line CML Equation only applies to markets in equilibrium and efficient portfolios The Security Market Line depicts the tradeoff between risk and expected return for individual securities, inefficient portfolios, or efficient portfolios Under CAPM, all investors hold the market portfolio. The important issue is: How does an individual security contribute to the risk of the market portfolio? Cleary Jones/Investments: Analysis and Management, 3rd Canadian Edition, Chapter 9 8

The Security Market Line Equation for expected return for an individual stock similar to CML Equation Cleary Jones/Investments: Analysis and Management, 3rd Canadian Edition, Chapter 9 9

Figure 9-3 The Security Market Line Beta = 1.0 implies as risky as market Securities Y and Z are more risky than the market Beta > 1.0 Security X is less risky than the market Beta < 1.0 Cleary Jones/Investments: Analysis and Management, 3rd Canadian Edition, Chapter 9 10

The Security Market Line Beta measures systematic risk Measures relative risk compared to the market portfolio of all stocks Volatility different than market All securities should lie on the SML The expected return on the security should be only that return needed to compensate for systematic risk Cleary Jones/Investments: Analysis and Management, 3rd Canadian Edition, Chapter 9 11

SML and Asset Values Er rf β Underpriced SML: Er = rf +  (Erm – rf) Overpriced rf β Underpriced  expected return > required return according to CAPM  lie “above” SML Overpriced  expected return < required return according to CAPM  lie “below” SML Correctly priced  expected return = required return according to CAPM  lie along SML Cleary Jones/Investments: Analysis and Management, 3rd Canadian Edition, Chapter 9

CAPM’s Expected Return-Beta Relationship Required rate of return on an asset (ki) is composed of risk-free rate (RF) risk premium (i [ E(RM) - RF ]) Market risk premium adjusted for specific security ki = RF +i [ E(RM) - RF ] The greater the systematic risk, the greater the required return Cleary Jones/Investments: Analysis and Management, 3rd Canadian Edition, Chapter 9 12

Estimating the SML Treasury Bill rate used to estimate RF Expected market return unobservable Estimated using past market returns and taking an expected value Estimating individual security betas difficult Only company-specific factor in CAPM Requires asset-specific forecast Cleary Jones/Investments: Analysis and Management, 3rd Canadian Edition, Chapter 9 13

Estimating Beta Market model Characteristic line Relates the return on each stock to the return on the market, assuming a linear relationship Rit =i +i RMt + eit Characteristic line Line fit to total returns for a security relative to total returns for the market index Cleary Jones/Investments: Analysis and Management, 3rd Canadian Edition, Chapter 9 14

How Accurate Are Beta Estimates? Betas change with a company’s situation Not stationary over time Estimating a future beta May differ from the historical beta RMt represents the total of all marketable assets in the economy Approximated with a stock market index Approximates return on all common stocks Cleary Jones/Investments: Analysis and Management, 3rd Canadian Edition, Chapter 9 15

How Accurate Are Beta Estimates? No one correct number of observations and time periods for calculating beta The regression calculations of the true  and  from the characteristic line are subject to estimation error Portfolio betas more reliable than individual security betas Cleary Jones/Investments: Analysis and Management, 3rd Canadian Edition, Chapter 9 16

Tests of CAPM Empirical SML is “flatter” than predicted SML Fama and French (1992) Market Size Book-to-market ratio Roll’s Critique True market portfolio is unobservable Tests of CAPM are merely tests of the mean-variance efficiency of the chosen market proxy Cleary Jones/Investments: Analysis and Management, 3rd Canadian Edition, Chapter 9

Arbitrage Pricing Theory Based on the Law of One Price Two otherwise identical assets cannot sell at different prices Equilibrium prices adjust to eliminate all arbitrage opportunities Unlike CAPM, APT does not assume single-period investment horizon, absence of personal taxes, riskless borrowing or lending, mean-variance decisions Cleary Jones/Investments: Analysis and Management, 3rd Canadian Edition, Chapter 9 17

Factor Model APT assumes returns generated by a factor model Factor Characteristics Each risk must have a pervasive influence on stock returns Risk factors must influence expected return and have nonzero prices Risk factors must be unpredictable to the market Cleary Jones/Investments: Analysis and Management, 3rd Canadian Edition, Chapter 9 18

APT Model Most important are the deviations of the factors from their expected values The expected return-risk relationship for the APT can be described as: E(Rit) =a0+bi1 (risk premium for factor 1) +bi2 (risk premium for factor 2) +… +bin (risk premium for factor n) Cleary Jones/Investments: Analysis and Management, 3rd Canadian Edition, Chapter 9 19

APT Model Reduces to CAPM if there is only one factor and that factor is market risk Roll and Ross (1980) Factors: Changes in expected inflation Unanticipated changes in inflation Unanticipated changes in industrial production Unanticipated changes in the default risk premium Unanticipated changes in the term structure of interest rates Cleary Jones/Investments: Analysis and Management, 3rd Canadian Edition, Chapter 9 19

Limitations of APT Factors are not well specified ex ante To implement the APT model, the factors that account for the differences among security returns are required CAPM identifies market portfolio as single factor Neither CAPM or APT has been proven superior Both rely on unobservable expectations Cleary Jones/Investments: Analysis and Management, 3rd Canadian Edition, Chapter 9 20

Copyright Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. All rights reserved. Reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Access Copyright (The Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency) is unlawful. Requests for further information should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. The purchaser may make back-up copies for his or her own use only and not for distribution or resale. The author and the publisher assume no responsibility for errors, omissions, or damages caused by the use of these programs or from the use of the information contained herein. Cleary Jones/Investments: Analysis and Management, 3rd Canadian Edition, Chapter 9