Aligning the Gas and Electric Markets: EDF Solutions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Advertisements

Which season do you like best? 1106 Grade 8 Unit 9.
Winter 2013/2014 Reliability Solution Including LNG MWHs N. Jonathan Peress Conservation Law Foundation Greg Lander Skipping Stone NEPOOL Markets & Reliability.
Introduction Build and impact metric data provided by the SGIG recipients convey the type and extent of technology deployment, as well as its effect on.
MISO’s Midwest Market Initiative APEX Ron McNamara October 31, 2005.
Solutions to California’s Energy Crisis: Real-Time Pricing by Frank Wolak Chairman, Market Surveillance Committee March 17, 2001.
Utility Regulation March 10, 2011 Raj Addepalli Deputy Director, Electric, Office of Electric,Gas and Water New York State Department of Public Service.
Overview of LMP Markets Features of ISOs / RTOs David Withrow Senior Market Economist Fall 2007 Meeting of the NARUC Staff Subcommittee on Accounting and.
Gas & Power Coordination: Growing Pains in Time of Transition Mark Stultz, BP Natural Gas Supply Association OPSI Annual Meeting Chicago, Illinois October.
1 Are We Ready For The Future? 2005 NIPPC Annual Meeting September 8, 2005 Michael R. Niggli President, Sempra Generation.
NGEIR Technical Conference Presentation May 16, 2006.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
WEATHER BY: JENNIFER FAUTH KINDERGARTEN.
Settlement Accuracy Analysis Prepared by ERCOT Load Profiling.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) A Success Story… In Progress Ingmar Sterzing United States Association of Energy Economics (USAEE) Pittsburgh.
Demand Side Investment Planning Transmission Planning Code Workshop 2 1 st May 2008.
Role Of ERC in the WESM To enforce the rules and regulations governing the operations of the WESM and monitors the activities of the Market Operator and.
Market Implications and Considerations for Enhanced Scheduling Flexibility: Facts Observations Problems Solutions February 2016 Greg Lander– President.
Scheduling, Market Efficiency and Customer Impacts N
California Independent System Operator 1 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July,
Zsuzsanna Csereklyei & David Stern
Accommodate or Achieve
Connecting the Dots in New England: NEPOOL’s IMAPP Initiative
Energy Economics Group, TU Wien
LNBA Subgroup: Avoided Transmission Value
Fuel Cost Components in the Fuel Adder
Natural Gas –generation intersection
Fuel Cost Components in the Fuel Adder
Richard J. Kruse December 1, 2004
Asia-Pacific Energy Regulatory Forum
Winter Outlook Markets Matter
GENESYS Redevelopment Strawman Proposal
Fuel Cost Components in the Fuel Adder
Energy Day Strawman Proposal
Allegheny Power Residential Demand Response Program
Development of an Integrated Energy Market in Saudi Arabia
MRES Resource Operations in SPP
OPSI 10th Annual Meeting Improving Generation Performance
Massachusetts Electric Restructuring Roundtable
The New England Restructuring Roundtable
Presentation to the MA Electric Restructuring Roundtable
Statistical Analysis of Commodities Futures Prices
Michael I. Henderson ISO New England Inc.
2018 Summer Outlook Markets Matter
Draft 2013 Energy-Efficiency Forecast
MIT tour of the California ISO Control Center March 31, 2015
TIMELINES PHOTOS This is an example text
TIMELINES PHOTOS This is an example text
Gas-Electric Coordination Can New Services Bridge the Divide?
December 9, 2005 Allison DiGrande, External Affairs Department, ISO/NE
Year 2 Autumn Term Week 12 Lesson 1
Cold Snap Task Force Update
New England Resource Adequacy
Market Design in New England
HEADING TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE AND DEMOCRATIC ELECTRICITY SYSTEMS
Energy Strategy Center of Scientific Research Institute of Energy
Sandip Sharma ERCOT Manager, Operations Planning
Year 2 Autumn Term Week 12 Lesson 1
Forecasting and Operations CAISO Case
Ahmad Elberry, Abdelghani Aljayyousi
Calendar.
Wholesale Electricity Costs
System Operational Update and Review December 4, 2018
Investments to Reduce Power System Risk from Gas System Dependence
Jim Mcintosh Director, Executive Operations Advisor California ISO
Energy Transition: from Challenges to Solutions
CHALLENGE Match the Key phrases (A-J) with their Definitions (1-10)
Presentation transcript:

Aligning the Gas and Electric Markets: EDF Solutions November 30, 2016

Overarching Goals Improve economic and operational coordination between the gas and electric industries Natural gas markets need tools and services to dynamically respond to the reliability needs of gas-fired generators Products and services in each market should generate effective price signals in and across the two markets so that appropriate right-sized investments are made

Overarching Goals Continue market refinements that promote allocative efficiency. Foster economic incentives and competition to capture the value of services Price formation for, and investment in, deliverability (incl. sub-day variability)

Current Misalignment Several RTOs effectively require generators to use flat daily gas index pricing for fuel, even though electric prices are hourly. Although some hourly variation is possible with documentation, market monitors often mitigate to flat daily gas index. Pipelines are paid for point-to-point throughput capacity, not deliveries. Example: Access Northeast’s proposed take and replace service (facilitated by LNG) is largely unpriced. The service of matching hourly fuel to hourly generation is currently unpriced.

Spring Hourly Patterns for Electric Revenue per MMBTU versus Daily Algonquin Citygate Price Negative Margin Positive Margin Generators are often mitigated based on a flat daily gas index price, but gas use and value varies hourly depending on generator demand.

Summer Variable vs. Ratable Flow The flat line represents uniform hourly (i.e., ratable) flow for the average day, and the shaped line shows what the flows had to be to generate the electrical output.

Summer Hourly Patterns for Gas Costs and Electricity Revenue Generators’ hourly gas spend correlates to output. In general, the market provides sufficient margin to facilitate price formation for the value of peak and sub-day (non-ratable) services.

Margin between Daily Gas Costs and Hourly Electric Revenue by Season Electricity Revenue Total Gas Spend Margin/Rent Winter 2012 $221,000,000 $212,000,000 $10,000,000 Spring 2012 $227,000,000 $182,000,000 $44,000,000 Summer 2012 $405,000,000 $318,000,000 $88,000,000 Fall 2012 $319,000,000 $322,000,000 ($3,000,000) Winter 2013 $490,000,000 $535,000,000 ($46,000,000) Spring 2013 $316,000,000 $299,000,000 $17,000,000 Summer 2013 $423,000,000 $324,000,000 $99,000,000 Fall 2013 $329,000,000 $355,000,000 ($26,000,000) Winter 2014 $639,000,000 $705,000,000 ($67,000,000) Spring 2014 $307,000,000 $277,000,000 $30,000,000 Summer 2014 $337,000,000 $246,000,000 $91,000,000 Fall 2014 $279,000,000 $268,000,000 $11,000,000 Winter 2015 $524,000,000 $552,000,000 ($28,000,000) Spring 2015 $208,000,000 $157,000,000 $51,000,000 Summer 2015 $308,000,000 $210,000,000 $98,000,000 Fall 2015 $230,000,000 $193,000,000 $37,000,000 SUM $5,562,000,000 $5,156,000,000 $406,000,000

Conclusions Generators are not able to buy variable sub-day services and are restricted to what they can bid based on daily index pricing for natural gas supply. Out-of-market procurement solutions are not working – need to correct misalignment by pricing and reflecting the value of variable deliverability (i.e., hourly shaped flows) Shaped flows would allow generators to schedule varying flow quantities of gas for delivery the next day that correlate to their anticipated output levels. With updated scheduling and pricing regimes, sub-day flexibility on the gas side can be efficiently priced providing benefit to pipelines, generators, flexibility service providers and consumer savings. Price formation increases innovation, product definition and spurs investment.

EDF Solutions – NAESB Order No. 809 directed NAESB to explore new options and standards for faster and more flexible pipeline scheduling. EDF proposed standards for provision of “mutual agreement” scheduling for natural gas pipeline transportation that is: a) scheduled outside of the standard grid-wide nomination cycles, b) permits flow changes outside of standard schedule flow periods; and/or c) involves Shaped Flow Transactions (allow generators to schedule varying flow quantities of gas for delivery the next day that correlate to their anticipated output levels).

EDF Solutions – Pilot Program Three-year voluntary pilot program Continue gas-electric coordination enhancements Delineate and price new services for scheduling non-ratable flows

EDF Solutions – Pilot Program Benefits of Program Shaped flows will allow generators to schedule varying flow quantities of gas that correlate to their anticipated output levels Variability is crucial, as gas generators increasingly become providers of flexible services to balance renewable integration New revenue streams for pipelines will help shift current market design to reward pipelines for flexible capacity Pricing receipt and delivery of flexible services will help create the right market signals for investment that is most efficient

Appendix: Methodology and Data EPA Air Markets Program Data (AMPD) NE-ISO aggregated real-time hourly electricity prices (internal hub) SNL Daily Algonquin Citygate Price (Day ahead) Scope: Gas generators in AMPD located in MA, CT and RI ‘pipeline gas’ as primary fuel Seasons (selected by months with most similar patterns): Winter: January – March Spring: April – June Summer: July – September Fall: October – December Electricity revenue per MMBTU of gas: weighted seasonal average for the hourly electricity price times the hourly average conversion efficiency for all plants ($/MWH*MWH/MMBTU)

The following four slides depict: 1 The following four slides depict: 1. Average Algonquin Citygate daily gas prices for each of the graphed time periods (Springs 2012–2015, Summers 2012–2015, Falls 2012–2015 and Winters 2012-2015) 2. Average hourly electric prices by hour for all hours of each day across the same periods 3. The positive or negative hourly value of the difference between cost of delivered gas and value of delivered gas (i.e., electric revenue per MWH converted to commensurate value of gas)

Spring Hourly Patterns for Electric Revenue per MMBTU versus Daily Algonquin Citygate Price Negative Margin Positive Margin

Summer Hourly Patterns for Electric Revenue/MMBTU versus Daily Algonquin Citygate Price

Fall Hourly Patterns for Electric Revenue/MMBTU versus Daily Algonquin Citygate Price

Winter Hourly Patterns for Electric Revenue/MMBTU versus Daily Algonquin Citygate Price

The following four slides show four representative months’ daily gas prices versus daily average electric revenue converted to the underlying value of the delivered gas that generated the electricity.

February 2015 Electric Revenue vs Gas Price

April 2012 Electric Revenue vs Gas Price

June 2013 Electric Revenue vs Gas Price

October 2014 Electric Revenue vs Gas Price

The following four slides show for each of the seasons over the four year 2012-2015 period, the average hourly variance in gas deliveries by the pipeline that were required to match the hourly output by the pipeline-connected electric generators. The flat line represents uniform hourly (i.e., ratable) flow for the average day, and the shaped line shows what the flows had to be to generate the electrical output.

Spring Variable vs. Ratable Flow

Summer Variable vs. Ratable Flow

Fall Variable vs. Ratable Flow

Winter Variable vs. Ratable Flow

The following four slides show, by season, across the 2012-2015 period those hours of each day, where, on average, there is value available to be captured by matching variable pipeline flow to variable electric generator output. Electric prices are hourly – but gas commodity and gas transportation prices are at best daily. Moreover, the service of matching hourly fuel to hourly generation is currently unpriced.

Spring Hourly Patterns for Gas Costs and Electricity Revenue

Summer Hourly Patterns for Gas Costs and Electricity Revenue

Fall Hourly Patterns for Gas Costs and Electricity Revenue

Winter Hourly Patterns for Gas Costs and Electricity Revenue

Background Material: Graphs on Real-time Electricity Price

Spring Real-Time Electricity Price

Summer Real-Time Electricity Price

Fall Real-Time Electricity Price

Winter Real-Time Electricity Price