PPD Global Feasibility Services

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Comparison of INSTI vs PI  FLAMINGO  GS  ACTG A5257.
Advertisements

Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI  QDMRK  SPRING-2. Raffi F. Lancet 2013;381:  Design  Objective –Non inferiority of DTG at W48: % HIV RNA < 50 c/mL.
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV  STARTMRK  GS-US  SINGLE.
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV  STARTMRK  GS-US  SINGLE.
Switch to TDF/FTC/RPV  SPIRIT Study. SPIRIT study: Switch PI/r + 2 NRTI to TDF/FTC/RPV TDF/FTC/RPV STR 24 weeks 48 weeks Primary Endpoint Secondary Endpoint.
Phase 2 of new ARVs  Fostemsavir, prodrug of temsavir (attachment inhibitor) –AI Study  TAF (TFV prodrug) –Study –Study  Doravirine.
Comparison of INSTI vs PI  FLAMINGO  GS  ACTG A5257  WAVES.
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV  STARTMRK  GS-US  SINGLE.
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV  STARTMRK  GS-US  SINGLE.
Phase 2 of new ARVs  Fostemsavir, prodrug of temsavir (attachment inhibitor) –AI Study  TAF (TFV prodrug) –Study –Study  Doravirine.
NRTI-sparing  SPARTAN  PROGRESS  NEAT001/ANRS 143  MODERN.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Comparison of INSTI vs PI  FLAMINGO  GS  ACTG A5257.
21st International AIDS Conference, July 2016, Durban, South Africa Superior Efficacy of Dolutegravir/Abacavir/Lamivudine FDC Compared With Ritonavir-Boosted.
21st International AIDS Conference; July 18-22, 2016; Durban, South Africa J Lake, 1 B Trottier, 2 J Garcia-Diaz, 3 H Edelstein, 4 P Kumar, 5 UF Bredeek,
Switch to DTG/ABC/3TC  STRIIVING Study.  Design  Endpoints –Primary: proportion of patients maintaining HIV RNA < 50 c/mL at W48 (ITT-E, snapshot)
Switch to PI/r monotherapy
Rilpivirine-TDF-FTC versus Efavirenz-TDF-FTC STaR Trial
Treatment-Naïve Adults
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Switch to INSTI + NNRTI Switch to DTG + RPV SWORD Study
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Dolutegravir plus Rilpivirine as Maintenance Dual Therapy SWORD-1 and SWORD- 2: Design
Comparison of INSTI vs PI
Switch to PI/r + 3TC vs PI/r monotherapy
ARV-trial.com Switch to ATV/r + 3TC ATLAS-M Study.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Switch to DTG + RPV Switch to DTG + RPV SWORD Study
ARV-trial.com Switch to LPV/r + RAL KITE Study 1.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Etravirine versus Protease Inhibitor in ARV-Experienced TMC 125-C227
Switch to Etravirine from Efavirenz due to CNS Toxicity SSAT-029 STUDY
Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir in HIV-HCV Coinfected Patients ASTRAL-5
Switch ABC/3TC to TAF/FTC
Switch to DTG + 3TC ASPIRE Study.
Phase 2 Treatment Naïve Injection Drug Use
Elbasvir + Grazoprevir + Ribavirin in PI-experienced HCV GT1 C-SALVAGE
Switch to DTG-containing regimen
Disponible en: natap. org/
Phase 3 Treatment Naïve HIV Coinfection
Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF GS-US GS-US GS-US
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Switch to DRV/r + 3TC DUAL Study.
PPD Global Feasibility Services
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF GS-US GS-US GS-US
Switch to E/C/F/TAF + DRV
Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF GS-US GS-US GS-US
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF GS-US GS-US GS-US
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Switch to DTG-containing regimen
Switch to INSTI + NNRTI Switch to DTG + RPV SWORD Study
Switch to DTG + RPV Switch to DTG + RPV SWORD Study
Comparison of INSTI vs PI
HIV Replication at
NRTI-sparing SPARTAN PROGRESS RADAR NEAT001/ANRS 143 A VEMAN
ARV-trial.com Switch to DTG/ABC/3TC STRIIVING NEAT
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
DTG + 3TC vs DTG + TDF/FTC GEMINI.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Presentation transcript:

PPD Global Feasibility Services 22 March 2013 Switching to Dolutegravir/Abacavir/Lamivudine Fixed Dose Combination (DTG/ABC/3TC FDC) from a PI, INI or NNRTI Based Regimen Maintains HIV Suppression at 48 Weeks J Lake,1 B Trottier,2 J Garcia-Diaz,3 H Edelstein,4 P Kumar,5 UF Bredeek,6 M Loutfy,7 C Brennan,8 J Koteff,8 B Wynne,9 J Hopking,10 M Aboud11 1University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; 2Clinique Médicale l‘Actuel, Montreal, QC, Canada; 3Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA, USA; 4Highland Hospital, Alameda Health System, Oakland, CA, USA; 5Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA; 6Metropolis Medical, San Francisco, CA, USA; 7Maple Leaf Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 8ViiV Healthcare, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA; 9ViiV Healthcare, Collegeville, PA, USA; 10GlaxoSmithKline, London, United Kingdom; 11ViiV Healthcare, London, United Kingdom FS_Slide Deck_Kol Discussion Summary_43792_Millennium _Prostate Cancer_21 March 2013

Introduction DTG/ABC/3TC (Triumeq) is a complete regimen built around DTG, an unboosted INSTI with a high barrier to resistance First approval of DTG/ABC/3TC: August 2014 in North America The study enrolled April 2014 to Oct 2014 STRIIVING was conducted to evaluate the efficacy, safety, tolerability, and treatment satisfaction of switching to DTG/ABC/3TC in subjects stable and suppressed on a variety of regimens T7.7 Lake et al. AIDS 2016; Durban, South Africa. Abstract THAB0203.

STRIIVING Study Design Countries: US, Canada, Puerto Rico Open-label, randomized 1:1 DTG/ABC/3TC 2 NRTIs + PI/r Current ARTa DTG/ABC/3TC Screening Week 24 Week 48 Primary endpoint at 24 weeks: VL <50 c/mL (Snapshot) Inclusion criteria Virologically suppressed (confirmed HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL) HLA‑B*5701 negative Assessments CD4 cell count changes Clinical and laboratory safety Lipids, renal, bone, and cardiovascular changes Development of resistance Treatment satisfaction aStable suppressive current ART with 2 NRTIs plus either a PI, an NNRTI, or an INI. ≥40% PIs, at least 25% INIs. 90% power based on 10% non-inferiority margin (estimated response rate = 85%). Lake et al. AIDS 2016; Durban, South Africa. Abstract THAB0203.

Study Populations Subjects randomized to DTG/ABC/3TC on Day 1 who received at least 1 dose of DTG/ABC/3TC → Early-switch Subjects randomized to continue current ART on Day 1, completed Early Switch Phase at W24, and received at least 1 dose of DTG/ABC/3TC upon switching at Week 24 → Late-switch Treatment arm Data included Early-switch Day 1 to Week 24 Day 1 to Week 48 Late-switch Week 24 to Week 48 Lake et al. AIDS 2016; Durban, South Africa. Abstract THAB0203.

Study Disposition: Week 48 Screened (N=841) Early Switch group DTG/ABC/3TC Discontinuations: Day 1- Week 24 Day 1- Week 48 Adverse event 10 (4%) Lack of efficacy (virologic failure) Protocol deviation 15 (5%) Stopping criteria met Lost to follow-up 3 (1%) 8 (3%) Investigator discretion 5 (2%) Withdrew consent 4 (1%) 6(2%) Per sponsor request 1 (<1%) Randomized and treated DTG/ABC/3TC (n=275) Randomized and treated cART (n=278) Completed Wk 24 (N=239, 87%) Completed Wk 24 (N=245, 88%) Late Switch group DTG/ABC/3TC Discontinuations: Week 24-48 Adverse event 4 (2%) Lack of efficacy (virologic failure) Protocol deviation 1 (<1%) Stopping criteria met Lost to follow-up 3 (1%) Investigator discretion Withdrew consent 5 (2%) Late switch to DTG/ABC/3TC (N=244) Completed Wk 48 (N=230, 84%) Completed Wk 48 (N=230, 94%) Lake et al. AIDS 2016; Durban, South Africa. Abstract THAB0203.

STRIIVING 48 Week Early Switch Arm Week 24 and 48 DTG/ABC/3TC, Day 1–Week 24 (n=275)a cART, Day 1–Week 24 (n=278)a DTG/ABC/3TC, Day 1–Week 48 (n=275) Switch to DTG/ABC/3TC , Week 24–Week 48 (n=244)b aITT-E analysis. Lake et al. AIDS 2016; Durban, South Africa. Abstract THAB0203.

STRIIVING 48 Week Late Switch Arm 24 Weeks Post Switch Switch to DTG/ABC/3TC , Week 24–Week 48 (n=244) Lake et al. AIDS 2016; Durban, South Africa. Abstract THAB0203.

Week 24 and 48 Snapshot Outcomes Early Switch Late Switch DTG/ABC/3TC N=275 n (%) Day 1 to Wk 24 Day 1 to Wk 48 N=244 n (%) Wk 24 to Wk 48 Virologic Success 233 (85) 227 (83) 224 (92) Virologic Non-response 3 (1) 1 (<1) 3 (<1) Data in window not below threshold Discontinued while VL not <50* No Virologic Data 39 (14) 47 (17) 17 (7) Discontinued due to AE or death 10 (4) 4 (2) Discontinued for other reasons 25 (9) 32 (12) 7 (3) Missing data during window but on study 4 (1) 5 (2) 6 (2) 4% of the Early Switch group discontinued treatment due to AEs at Week 24, with none between Weeks 24 and 48; 2% of the Late Switch group discontinued treatment due to AEs between Weeks 24 and 48 *Includes categories: Discontinued for lack of efficacy and Discontinued for other reason while not below threshold Lake et al. AIDS 2016; Durban, South Africa. Abstract THAB0203.

Virologic Endpoints: DTG/ABC/3TC No subjects met protocol-defined virologic failure in either study arm 4 subjects >50 at Week 48 window: ES (51), LS (54, 53, 156); All 4 resuppressed < 50 c/mL Early Switch Late Switch DTG/ABC/3TC N=275 Day 1 to Wk 24 Day 1 to Wk 48 N=244 Wk 24 to Wk 48 PDVFa Viral load ≥50 c/mL (snapshot) 3 (1%) 1 (<1) aSubjects with HIV-1 RNA ≥400 c/mL on 2 consecutive assessments any time after randomization are withdrawn = meets protocol defined virologic failure. Lake et al. AIDS 2016; Durban, South Africa. Abstract THAB0203.

Adverse Events: DTG/ABC/3TC Overall Summary Early Switch Late Switch DTG/ABC/3TC N=275 n (%) Day 1 to Wk 24 Day 1 to Wk 48 N=244 n (%) Wk 24 to Wk 48 Any adverse event, n (%) 180 (65) 206 (75) 146 (60) Any drug-related event (occurring ≥2% of subjects in either arm) 57 (21) 60 (22) 32 (13) Nausea 20 (7) 9 (4) Diarrhea 9 (3) 3 (1) Fatigue Headache 7 (3) 6 (2) Insomnia 5 (2) Dizziness 2 (<1) Abnormal dreams 4 (1) Any serious eventa Any fatal eventa 1 (<1) Discontinuations due to AE or death 10 (4) 4 (2) . aNone were considered drug-related events. Lake et al. AIDS 2016; Durban, South Africa. Abstract THAB0203.

Common Adverse Events: DTG/ABC/3TC (≥5% in Any Treatment) Early Switch Late Switch DTG/ABC/3TC N=275 n (%) Day 1 to Wk 24 Day 1 to Wk 48 N=244 n (%) Wk 24 to Wk 48 Nausea 27 (10) 28 (10) 15 (6) Upper respiratory tract infection 20 (7) 35 (13) 22 (9) Diarrhea 9 (4) Fatigue 19 (7) 22 (8) 6 (2) Headache 13 (5) 17 (6) 10 (4) Cough 14 (5) Insomnia Nasopharyngitis Lake et al. AIDS 2016; Durban, South Africa. Abstract THAB0203.

Conclusions Efficacy The virologic response rate was maintained through 48 weeks in the Early Switch group In the Late Switch group, virologic suppression was observed in 92% of subjects on DTG/ABC/3TC (24 weeks post-switch) There were no PDVFs in the study Tolerability There were no further discontinuations due to AEs in the Early Switch arm post-Week 24 Low rates of discontinuations in the Late Switch arm (2%) Summary Data through 48 weeks support switching to DTG/ABC/3TC once daily for HIV‑1 subjects on stable suppressive cART Lake et al. AIDS 2016; Durban, South Africa. Abstract THAB0203.