New Teacher Induction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
 Teacher Evaluation and Effectiveness laws are now in place  Legislature has passed a law that student performance can now be a part of teacher evaluation.
Advertisements

BRISTOL WARREN REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Implementation of RI Educator Evaluation System
PUSD Teacher Evaluation SY12/13 Governing Board Presentation May 10, 2012.
Completing the Classroom Teacher and Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluations for Presented by: The Office of Talent Development Employee Evaluations.
Changes To Florida’s School Grades Calculations Adopted By The State Board Of Education On February 28, 2012 Prepared by Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
Read to Achieve North Carolina: Excellent Public Schools Act.
Compass: Louisiana’s path to educator excellence
Teacher Evaluation Update
Educator Evaluations Education Accountability Summit August 26-28,
Merit Award Program The School District of Lee County Merit Award Program Training November 2007.
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.
Deliberate Practice Technical Assistance Day
Our Shared Agenda: Empowering Effective Teaching Florida Educational Negotiators Annual Conference.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Florida Department of Education Value-added Model (VAM) FY2012 Using Student Growth in Teacher and School Based Administrator Evaluations.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Measuring Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Name of School.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Overview 1.
Davis Junior High Action Plan English Department Tier II Indicator: Writing 2010 – 2011.
1 Student Assessment Update Research, Evaluation & Accountability Angela Marino Coordinator Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
Standards IV and VI. Possible Artifacts:  School Improvement Plan  School Improvement Team  North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey  Student.
TAPCo. Full Staff Mtg March 17 th Agenda ● ADVANCE ● Regents.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.
Teacher SLTs General Format for Teacher SLTs with a District-wide Common Assessment The percent of students scoring proficient 1 in my 8 th.
MWSD. Differentiated Supervision Mode (DSM)  Reference Pages in Plan Book 8-16 Description of Differentiated Mode Relevant Appendices 34 Teacher.
Value Added Model and Evaluations: Keeping It Simple Polk County Schools – November 2015.
Student Achievement Through Teacher Evaluation Presenters Dr. Jane Coughenour Dr. Karen Chapman Mr. Michael Matta.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
FLORIDA STATE EOC EXAMS. **Districts will select testing dates. REQUIRED TESTING Students enrolled in the Florida Public Schools are required to participate.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
TEACHNJ Proposed Regulations. TEACHNJ Regulations Proposal  Two Terms that are very important to know: SGO – Student Growth Objective (Created in District)
APPR 2.0 (based on CR 3012-d) NSCSD Goals The NSCSD District Goals Can be evidenced in planning, classroom instruction, assessment and teacher’s.
Leader slts PRIOR TO : Principal set a minimum of two goals, which express an expectation of student growth. SPS available for use.
Mark Howard, Chief Performance Accountability
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Introduction to the Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model for USD 259
INSTRUCTIONAL EVALUATION SYSTEM
Teacher SLTs
2016 State Assessment Highlights
Helping your Child Prepare for Testing
Teacher Evaluation System
Teacher SLTs
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
January 17, 2017 Board Workshop
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
and Beyond School Grades DRAFT Specifications For Each Component February 2016 Principals Meeting February 2016 Gisela Feild Assessment, Research.
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Baldwin FLEXIBLE CLERICAL AND PROFESSIONAL LEARNING and DIFFERENTIATED SUPERVISION.
Teacher SLTs
and Beyond School Grades DRAFT Specifications For Each Component Revised with Principal feedback from Meetings February 2016 Principals Meeting.
Sachem Central School District Teacher Evaluation Training 2012
Introduction to Student Achievement Objectives
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff:
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Leader SLTs
Leader SLTs
Creating Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Evaluation Information
The best way to predict the future is to create it.
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Teacher SLTs
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

New Teacher Induction

Walton County School District Teacher Evaluation System

Summative Evaluation Measurements 3 Components: Administrative Evaluation (Instructional Practice) Deliberate Practice Student Proficiency Measure Each component counts as 1/3 of the summative Evaluation Measurement

Administrative Evaluation Instructional Practice

Teacher Evaluation System WCSD Evaluation System developed from Copeland model Based on research from: John Hattie Charlotte Danielson Robert Marzano FEAPs

Administrative Evaluation Based on 4 domains: Domain 1: Planning/Preparation Domain 2: Classroom Management Domain 3: Direct Instruction Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities Domain 2 and 3 must be observed FEAPs Aligned (see crosswalk)

Teacher Observations First year teachers and teachers new to Walton County must receive two formal evaluations per year Teachers who have been with Walton County for more than one year must receive only one formal evaluation Each evaluation must include at least one formal observation. Must be at least 30 minutes in length Must be scheduled 48 hours in advance

Lesson Walkthroughs Administrators may conduct informal walkthroughs at anytime during the year. Walkthroughs: Are for the purpose of providing instructional feedback Will only review domains 2 and 3 Do not require prior notice May last for any length of time

Final Evaluation Ratings The WCSD Teacher Evaluation System is holistic Administrators will consider all evidence collected throughout the year before determining the final rating of each indicator. Teachers should collect artifacts throughout the year to show proof of proficiency in domains 1 and 4. Administrators will review previous walkthrough data to determine ratings in domains 2 and 3. The ratings in each domain will determine the final evaluation rating and score. Visit http://www.walton.k12.fl.us/index.cfm?p=instruction-evaluation-guideand for specific details on evaluation domain calculations.

Final Evaluation Rating Unsatisfactory: 0 – 55 Needs Improvement: 56 – 113 Effective: 114 – 140 Highly Effective: 141 - 160

Deliberate Practice

DP Purpose The DP was designed to allow teachers to have input into their evaluation. DP goals are teacher created and Principal approved. DP goals must be based on teaching responsibilities. Administrators may require additional goals based on previous evaluation data

Setting Goals Teachers may choose up to 4 goals. Goals should be: Specific Measureable Attainable Realistic Timely

SMART Goals Goals will include the current level of performance, a SMART data driven target, and the practices that will change as a result of the new learning. 49% of my students scored on grade level on their 2016 8th grade FSA math assessment. By May of 2017, 54% of my students will score on grade level on the Algebra I EOC. In order to assist students with performing on grade level, small group instruction will be implemented in order to provide differentiated instruction at least once weekly.

Professional Learning Teachers will choose professional learning activities to assist them in meeting their goal(s). The DP refers to these activities as progress points. Completing progress points is essential to receiving a highly effective rating on the DP portion of the teacher evaluation.

DP Ratings Ratings are determined based on: Unsatisfactory: 0 – 55 Percentage of goals achieved Percentage of professional learning activities completed (progress points) 100% of progress points must be completed to be highly effective Unsatisfactory: 0 – 55 Needs Improvement: 56 – 113 Effective: 114 – 140 Highly Effective: 141 - 160

Student Performance Measure

What are student performance measures? Florida Statute requires school districts to count student data as at least 1/3 of each teacher’s evaluation. Performance measures can be broken down into: State Measure – Calculated and produced by FLDOE Local Measures – Calculated local by Walton County School District

State Measures FLDOE has adopted the Value Added Model (VAM) VAM scores are produced for roughly 1/3 of our teaching population: ELA/Reading courses in grades 4-10 Math courses in grades 4-8 Algebra I in grades 8 and 9 VAM Video

Local Measures Local Measures are based on: STAR Enterprise Reading, Math and Early Literacy Assessments Florida Alternative Assessment FCAT 2.0 5th Grade Science FCAT 2.0 8th Grade Science Civics EOC Biology EOC US History EOC Geometry EOC Algebra II EOC Algebra I EOC for grades other than 8 and 9

Local Measures Each assessment used for a local measure is based on teaching assignment. See Chart

STAR Taking the Test

STAR Progress Monitoring in Reading and Math STAR is administered up to 4 times a year Mandatory August/September January/February April May School-Based Decision October/November

Progress Monitoring and Statute Florida Statute 1008.25 requires one of three things for students showing deficiencies in reading and/or math: A federally required student plan, such as an IEP An individual progress monitoring plan The student is monitored through a schoolwide system of progress monitoring STAR allows us to satisfy the 3rd option