A New Wound-Based Severity Score for Diabetic Foot Ulcers : A prospective analysis of 1,000 patients Beckert, Maria Witte, Corinna Wicke, Alfred Königsrainer, Stephan Coerper Diabetes Care. May 2006.Vol.29 R1 문송미
Background
Diabetic foot Risk for foot ulcerations :15% Recur risk : 70% of healed ulcers within 5 yrs Risk factor 1) Peripheral neuropathy 2) Peripheral vascular disease 3) Abnormal plantar pressure load 4) Infection
DM foot classification system Meggit –Wagner classification
DM foot classification system The University of Texas system
DM foot classification system Classification system by Treece et al.
Object
To establish a new wound-based clinical scoring system for diabetic foot ulcers To anticipate chances for healing and risk of amputation
Research and method
Research group December 1997 and April 2004 1,000 consecutive patients DM pts.( the criteria of WHO ) Followed-up for 365 days or until healing or amputation if earlier Excluded less than two visits during the observation period
Diabetic foot ulcer scoring system According to a severity Score rang : O to 4 Parameters 1) Palpable pedal pulses 2) Probing to bone 3) Ulcer location (foot or toe ulcer) 4) The presence of multiple ulcers The aim of scoring system - Prediction of clinical outcome defined as probability of healing and risk for amputation
Wounds Wound depth - Grade 1 : dermis - Grade 2 : subcutaneous - Grade 3 : fascia - Grade 4 : muscle - Grade 5 : bone Single or multiple ulcerations on the same foot Healing : as complete epithelization
Amputation - Minor : toe or forefoot amputation - Major : below or above knee amputation Soft tissue infection - Purulent discharge - Two other local signs : warmth, erythema, edema, lymphangitis, lymphadenopathy or pain
Local wound therapy Wound care - Sharp debridement - Local surgical procedures : limited bone resections - Moist wound therapy - Pressure off loading
Diabetic ulcer severity score(DUSS) 1 Pedal pulses present absent Bone involvement no probing to bone probing to bone Site of ulceration toe foot Number of ulcerations single multiple
Result
Table1. Baseline dermographic details
Figure 1. Probability of healing according to the DUSS
Univariate analysis of parameters reducing chance for healing 1) Nonpalpable pedal pulses (P<0.0009) 2) Probing to bone (P<0.0019) 3) Multiple ulcerations (P<0.00001) 4) Foot ulceration(P<0.00001) - Local soft tissue infection (P<0.5324)
Table2. Multivariate analysis of parameters reducing chance for healing
Table3. Subgroup analysis with respect to ulcer severity score
Discussion
Nylon monofilament test
Usual location of ulcer
The influencing factor of ulcer healing Location of ulcer Consequenent off loading Recurrent soft tissue infection Immediate and adequate therapy
The result of DUSS Increasing in the DUSS by one score point reduced the chance for healing by 35% Adequate local surgery and minor amputation prevent major amputation
The using of DUSS Easy diagnostic tool for anticipating probability of healing, hospital admission and local surgery Daily clinical practice Suitable easily applied in estimating putative health care costs Not setting up the subsequent wound care according to DUSS
Conclusion
DUSS Wound based score Not investigation disease based parameters Predicting clinical outcome The communication index between health care providers