1 Studies into Performance and Systematics of ME-PS matching in W+Jets Andrea Messina, CERN Ben Cooper, QMUL Berkeley VB+Jets Workshop 26th March 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ATLAS measurements of jets and heavy flavor produced in association with W and Z bosons Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Tufts.
Advertisements

Low-p T Multijet Cross Sections John Krane Iowa State University MC Workshop Oct , Fermilab Part I: Data vs MC, interpreted as physics Part II:
IMFP Day 4 April 6, 2006 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 XXXIV International Meeting on Fundamental Physics Rick Field University of Florida (for.
M. Lefebvre25 October QCD Multijet Event Generation MLM prescription for the removal of event double counting M. Lefebvre University of Victoria.
Event Generation with HERWIG Nick Brook University of Bristol Introduction Multiple Interactions in HERWIG Parameter Tuning B-production.
CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 1 PYTHIA Tune A versus Run 2 Data  Compare PYTHIA Tune A with Run 2 data on the “underlying event”.
2012 Tel Aviv, October 15, 2012 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Rick Field University of Florida Outline of Talk CMS at the LHC CDF Run 2 
Cambridge Workshop July 18, 2002 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The Sources of b-Quarks at the Tevatron  Important to have good leading (or leading-log)
AcerMC and ISR/FSR systematics at ATLAS Liza Mijovic, Borut Kersevan Jozef Stefan Inst. Univ. of Ljubljana ATLAS approach: Generator level studies Parameters.
Ratio of Three over Two Jet Cross Sections: Update 36 pb -1 P.Kokkas, I.Papadopoulos, C.Fountas University of Ioannina, Greece QCD High p T Meeting 17.
Dijet  and Parton-Shower Matching Marek Zieliński University of Rochester In collaboration with: Michael Begel, Pavel Demine, Alexander Kupčo, Christophe.
Run 2 Monte-Carlo Workshop April 20, 2001 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The Underlying Event in Hard Scattering Processes  The underlying event in a.
Monica D’Onofrio University of Liverpool Boson+jets measurements at the CDF experiment "Vector boson plus jets as a signal and background“ Durham, September.
Fermilab MC Workshop April 30, 2003 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF  Study the “underlying event” as defined by.
CKKW studies and other news J. Huston Michigan State University (with help from Ben Cooper and Bruce Mellado)
Workshop on Early LHC Physics May 6, 2009 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Workshop on Early Physics Opportunities at the LHC Rick Field University of.
Update : Ratio of Three over Two Jet Cross Sections P.Kokkas, I.Papadopoulos, C.Fountas, I.Evangelou, N.Manthos University of Ioannina, Greece Senior Editor.
Γ +Jet Analysis for the CMS Pooja Gupta, Brajesh Choudhary, Sudeep Chatterji, Satyaki Bhattacharya & R.K. Shivpuri University of Delhi, India.
High P T Inclusive Jets Study High P T Inclusive Jets Study Manuk Zubin Mehta, Prof. Manjit kaur Panjab University, Chandigarh India CMS Meeting March,
1 Update on tt-bar signal and background simulation Stan Bentvelsen.
The Underlying Event in Jet Physics at TeV Colliders Arthur M. Moraes University of Glasgow PPE – ATLAS IOP HEPP Conference - Dublin, 21 st – 23 rd March.
1 Pythia versus Alpgen for W+jets (High Mass Dibosons work) Sarah Allwood 07/12/06.
Fermilab Energy Scaling Workshop April 28, 2009 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 1 st Workshop on Energy Scaling in Hadron-Hadron Collisions Rick Field.
Jet Studies at CDF Anwar Ahmad Bhatti The Rockefeller University CDF Collaboration DIS03 St. Petersburg Russia April 24,2003 Inclusive Jet Cross Section.
Andrey Korytov, University of Florida EPS 2003 July 17-23, 2003, Aachen Soft QCD Phenomena in High-E T Jet Events at CDF Abstracts covered in this talk.
March 9, 2001Rick Field - CDF B Group MeetingPage 1 The Sources of b-quarks at the Tevatron  Important to have good leading (or leading- log) order predictions.
Run 2 Jets at the Tevatron Iain Bertram Lancaster University/DØ Experiment PIC2003  Inclusive Cross Section  Dijet Mass  Structure.
PWG4 meeting, CERN S.Kiselev 1 Jet hadrochemistry. PYTHIA vs HERWIG Sergey Kiselev, ITEP Moscow for the TOF group Motivation Input info/assumptions.
TeV4LHC - Fermilab October 20, 2005 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 TeV4LHC Workshop Rick Field University of Florida CDF Run 2 Talk #1.
Cambridge Workshop July 20, 2002 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The “Underlying Event” in Hard Scattering Processes  What happens when a proton and an.
QCD Summary Report S. Ellis U. of Washington “Gee, I sure hope Joey wrote me a good talk.”
Moriond 2001Jets at the TeVatron1 QCD: Approaching True Precision or, Latest Jet Results from the TeVatron Experimental Details SubJets and Event Quantities.
Royal Holloway Department of Physics Top quark pair cross section measurements in ATLAS Michele Faucci Giannelli On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
(members of the group) Underlying CMS F.Ambroglini, D.Acosta, P.Bartalini, A.De Roeck, L.Fanò, R. Field, K.Kotov, E.Izaguirre, A.Vilela.
Energy Dependence of the UE
Implications of First LHC Data: Underlying Event Measurements
A study on AlpGen and Sherpa in Z+jets events
N. ILINA, V. GAVRILOV (ITEP, Moscow)
YETI’11: The Standard Model at the Energy Frontier
The “Underlying Event” CDF-LHC Comparisons
Sarah Allwood-Spiers ATLAS UK Top Meeting 17/09/08
MB&UE Working Group Meeting UE Lessons Learned & What’s Next
PHZ 6358 Fall 2011 The Modeling of the Underlying Event Rick Field
The “Underlying Event” in Run 2 (CDF)
MB&UE Working Group Meeting CMS UE Data and the New Tune Z1
Alessandro Tricoli W → en + jets events By
Predicting “Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” at the LHC
Modeling Min-Bias and Pile-Up University of Oregon February 24, 2009
Predicting “Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” at the LHC
YETI’11: The Standard Model at the Energy Frontier
“Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” at CDF
Monte-Carlo Generators for CMS
Min-Bias and the Underlying Event in Run 2
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
The Tevatron Connection
“Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF and the LHC
W/Z+jets Background Determination in the ATLAS ICHEP SUSY Notes
XXXIV International Meeting on Fundamental Physics
RHIC & AGS Annual Users’ Meeting
CDF Run 2 Monte-Carlo Tunes
International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics
“Min-Bias” & “Underlying Event” at the Tevatron and the LHC
The “Underlying Event” CDF-LHC Comparisons
Adam Phillips, Fergus Wilson
“Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event”
The Underlying Event in Hard Scattering Processes
PYTHIA 6.2 “Tunes” for Run II
Workshop on Early Physics Opportunities at the LHC
Study of Top properties at LHC
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Presentation transcript:

1 Studies into Performance and Systematics of ME-PS matching in W+Jets Andrea Messina, CERN Ben Cooper, QMUL Berkeley VB+Jets Workshop 26th March 2008

2 Overview Used Alpgenv2 to study performance and possible systematics of ME-PS matching in W+Jets: –Dependence on PS/UE –Dependence on P T min generation cut –Dependence on CKKW K T factor –Hadron-Parton level relationship All studies done at particle-level and at 1.96 TeV. Plan to extend this study to other approaches and LHC energies - this is a snapshot! Compare predictions to W+Jets measurement (see Andrea’s talk) but also to each other.

3 Details of Study (i) Cross-section definition for predictions identical to our measurement: –E T ele >20 GeV, |  ele | 30 GeV, M T W > 20GeV/c 2 –Particle-level predictions clustered using JETCLU cone 0.4. Distributions under study: –  (W +  n jet) inclusive cross-section jet E T > 25 GeV. –Differential d  (W +  n jet)/dE T nth jet spectra for jet E T > 20 GeV –Differential d  (W +  2 jet)/d  R jj jet spectra for jet E T > 15 GeV

4 Details of Study (ii) Constants of our generation: –Alpgen v2.13 matrix element - showering with literally identical generation. –PDF: CTEQ5L –Renorm/Factorisation scale Q = Default generation parameters: –Parton P T min 15 GeV –  R jj > 0.4, |  jet | < 2.5 –CKKW K T factor = 1.0 “Matching” parameters are always: –Jet E T > (P T min + 5) GeV –R cone = 0.4, |  jet | < 2.5 –  R(parton-jet) < 0.6

5 Details of Study (iii) Variables: –Parton shower: Pythia(v3.325) or Herwig(v6.510) –For Pythia MSTP(81) = 1 or MSTP(81) = 0 –Parton P T min generation cut –CKKW K T factor –Fully matched or W + np inclusive generation? Keys to different PS/UE generation: –“py” = Pythia (calling PYEVNT, MSTP(81) = 1) –“hw” = Herwig (default tuning - no Jimmy) –“pynoUE” = Pythia with MSTP(81) = 0 UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED IT IS ALWAYS THE ALPGEN MATCHED PREDICTION.

6 Dependence on parton shower/underlying event

7 Herwig & Pythia vs Data PYTHIAHERWIG

8 Herwig & Pythia vs Data PYTHIAHERWIG Substantial difference in predictions at low E T PY/HW

9 Turning UE “off” in Pythia PYTHIA UE Off HERWIG Impact of UE larger for higher njet. PYnoUE/PY

10 Turning UE “off” in Pythia PYTHIA UE OffHERWIG No significant shape change. PYnoUE/PY

11 W+1p Inclusive Generation PYTHIA W+1p inclusive HERWIG W+1p inclusive Pythia/Herwig differences much smaller than for the matched. PY1p/HW1p

12 Herwig & Pythia vs Data:  R jj HERWIG PYTHIA PYTHIA W+2p inclusive HERWIG W+2p inclusive

13 Dependence on parton P T min cut

14 Lead d  /dE T : Pythia & Herwig HERWIGPYTHIA

15 Herwig Stack Plots: Lead Jet E T P T min 15 P T min 25 P T min 50P T min 8

16 Pythia Stack Plots: Lead Jet E T P T min 15 P T min 25 P T min 50P T min 8

17 Lead Jet E T : Scan of P T min PYTHIA Matched PYTHIA W+1p inclusive

18 Lead Jet E T : Scan of P T min HERWIG Matched HERWIG W+1p inclusive

19 2nd d  /dE T : Pythia & Herwig HERWIGPYTHIA

20 Herwig Stack Plots: 2nd Jet E T P T min 25 P T min 50P T min 8 P T min 15

21 Dependence on CKKW vertex K T factor

22 Comparing different K T factors PYTHIAHERWIG See change in njet rates - greater for larger njets

23 Comparing different K T factors PYTHIAHERWIG

24 Comparing different K T factors PYTHIAHERWIG

25 Hadron-level to Parton-level relationship

26 Herwig Inclusive W+1p Matched

27 Pythia UE turned “off” Inclusive W+1p Matched

28 Work-In-Progress Things we have tried but don’t fully understand yet.

29 Herwig

30 Herwig + Jimmy

31 Future plans What is the source of the difference between matched Pythia and Herwig? To what extent are matched predictions independent of generation cuts? Investigate different UE tunes - Pythia v2 Tunes, v3 tunes, Jimmy. Examine further  R jj distributions. Look at different approaches: MadEvent, Repeat studies at LHC energies.

32 Backups

33 SMPR vs Alpgen + Pythia

34 SMPR vs Alpgen + Pythia

35 Turning UE “off” in Pythia

36 W +  n jet Pythia & Herwig PYTHIA HERWIG

37 Herwig Stack Plots P T min 15 P T min 25 P T min 50

38 Ptmin 25 vs data PYTHIA HERWIG

39 E T > 20 Inclusive

40 Pythia Inclusive W+1p Matched