April 2010 Faculty of Engineering International week – Spring 2010  Introduction to this weeks theme – problem and project based learning  Associate.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Experts in Teams at Faculty of Engineering, SDU
Advertisements

Change strategies. Why change? New skills and competencies updating -life long learning searching for new knowledge interdisciplinary and creative problemsolving.
Doc.dr. Rasa Balvočiūtė, doc.dr. Dalia Rudytė, lekt.dr. Janina Šeputienė ir lekt. Jūratė Marcišauskienė Workshop on Problem Based and Project Based Learning.
INTRODUCTION.- PROGRAM EVALUATION
ICT TEACHERS` COMPETENCIES FOR THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY
1 Implementation of learning styles at the teacher level in higher education Tine Nielsen CBS Learning Lab, Copenhagen Business School
Competence Analysis in the Two-subject Study Program Computer Science Jože Rugelj, Irena Nančovska Šerbec Faculty of Education Univesity of Ljubljana 1Beaver.
Designing and implementing of the NQF Tempus Project N° TEMPUS-2008-SE-SMHES ( )
Educating Engineers in Sustainability Dr. Carol Boyle International Centre for Sustainability Engineering and Research University of Auckland.
BUSINESS INFORMATICS descriptors presentation Vladimir Radevski, PhD Associated Professor Faculty of Contemporary Sciences and Technologies (CST) Linkoping.
Learning outcomes for BUSINESS INFORMATCIS Vladimir Radevski, PhD Associated Professor Faculty of Contemporary Sciences and Technologies (CST)
1 Tuesday, the 28th of August: The Aalborg model 8.30 Opening of day two and questions 8.45 Problem based learning and/or Project Work Why use these new.
1 Ideas of Problem-based Learning As a learner-centred process, problem- based learning meets the learners' interests and as such gives room for developing.
Graduate studies - Master of Pharmacy (MPharm) 1 st and 2 nd cycle integrated, 5 yrs, 10 semesters, 300 ECTS-credits 1 Integrated master's degrees qualifications.
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
POPBL GUIDELINE BOOK FOR TEACHERS 1.Introduction to POPBL 2.Planning POPBL 3.Projects in POPBL 4.Applying POPBL in your course 5.E-learning Tools in POPBL.
1 Problem based Learning – The AAU Way A Work Shop given by: Mona Dahms Department of development and planning Fibigerstraede 11, DK Aalborg East.
What does Internationalization mean for Western? Faculty workshop 1 (27 and 28 October 2014)
The TUNING Russia project outcomes Maria Seninets DSTU Tuning Centre.
Dr. Dan Y. Jacobsen: The LAOS-project at NTNU; UNIQUAL Conference
Hochschule Wismar, Germany Centre for Education and Innovation Research, Latvia 1May 8, 2015 INTEGRATION OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP INTO EDUCATION SCIENCES IN.
Promoting the Interaction between Education, Research and Professional Practice Prof. Stig Enemark President Aalborg University, Denmark FIG COMMISSION.
COURSE AND SYLLABUS DESIGN
Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden, CDIO conference 2009 Lessons learned from developing and operating a large-scale project course.
School practice Dragica Trivic. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM TEMPUS MASTS CONFERENCE in Novi Sad Practice should be seen as an integral part of the.
PBL problem based and project based learning
TEMPUS IV MASTS Master curriculum design workshop in Nis Subject Teacher Education Master Programme at University of Belgrade.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
Introduction to the PV course September 3rd 2012 Lars Peter Jensen and Lone Stub Pedersen © SLP-gruppen,
© E. Moesby & T. Rosenørn, Aalborg University Denmark, 2003 Towards a new educational model, Siam University Thailand October Towards a new Educational.
© Crown copyright 2007 Study Plus training. © Crown copyright 2007 Aims of Study plus To accelerate the progress of pupils who are not on track to attain.
Writing Teaching Philosophies
CHAPTER 7 DELIVERY OF YOUR COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL COUNSELING PROGRAM
21st Centruy Approaches to Teaching Physics
Prof. dr Svetislav Paunović BBA
Praha, 1. – ročník mezinárodní konference k profesnímu rozvoji pedagogických pracovníků Profesní rozvoj pedagogů.
Subject specialist teaching
DEVELOPMENT OF STUDY PROGRAMS IN UNIVERSITY OF PRISHTINA/KOSOVO
Modernisation of study programme
Day 1 Session 2/ Programme Objectives
WORKSHOP Computer Science Curriculum Development
STRATEGIC ACADEMIC UNIT “PEOPLE & TECHNOLOGIES”
Finnish National Framework for Qualifications and Other Learning
Teacher Education Improvement Program- Practicum (TEIP-1)
Introduction – Process View on Management
ENTREPRENEURSHIP EDUCATION IN ENGINEERING CURRICULA
Efficiency of English for Academic Purposes Activity in Students’ Language Education: Developing the System of the External and Internal Perspectives.
Organization and Knowledge Management
SUNY Applied Learning Resolution.
Ana Kanareva-Dimitrovska, PhD
The Concept of INTERDISCIPLINARY TEACHING
JET Education Services: Innovations in Teacher Support and Curriculum Development Presentation to the Care and Support for Teaching and Learning Regional.
Assist. Prof. Magy Mohamed Kandil
Supervision and creating culture of reflective practice
Intercultural Learning in a PBL Environment
Topic Principles and Theories in Curriculum Development
IEEE EAB Strategy 19 June 2011 New Brunswick, NJ.
Introduction to Student Achievement Objectives
COURSE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS OVERVIEW AND GUIDELINES
Welcome to the School of Education
EDU 402 SYLLABUS DESIGN.
Curriculum Learning Communities
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
Intercultural Learning in a PBL Environment
Plan your journey.
Assessing educational/training competencies of trainers of trainers
PBL at Aalborg University
Teacher Training for Professional Competence
General Aspects of Project Work
LEARNER-CENTERED PSYCHOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES. The American Psychological Association put together the Leaner-Centered Psychological Principles. These psychological.
Presentation transcript:

April 2010 Faculty of Engineering International week – Spring 2010  Introduction to this weeks theme – problem and project based learning  Associate Professor Jørgen Bro Røn, Educational consultant at the Faculty of Engineering.

April 2010 Faculty of Engineering History – Now and before  More than 100 years of engineering education (since 1905)  Before 1997 the curriculum focus had a technical subject oriented view with some content of PBL.  1997 – first real approach towards implementing full scale PBL (in this connection, the term PBL covers both Problem Based Learning and Project Based Learning)  Each semester had a semester project to tie up the different technical subjects associated with the semester, but because the project load increased, the technical subjects taught had to decrease  increased student autonomy/responsibility.

Odense Modellen  2003 – Odense Modellen  The fundamental pedagogical idea was, that the student is the center for all teaching/learning activities.  The main focus was on  Competencies with the technical subjects applicable within the field of study  Personal competencies – how to act in cooperation with others in the process of learning.  How to learn – students individual learning styles April 2010 Faculty of Engineering

The Engineering Education Model of the University of Southern Denmark (DSMI)  As a result of the merger between IOT and SDU in 2006, a joint model DSMI was developed, based on Odense Modellen and incorporating the educational tradition/culture of both IOT and SDU.  DSMI applies to all engineering study programs  Through a project based and holistic approach, DSMI focuses on the development of the students’ academic, personal and learning competences  Students educated according to DSMI are characterized by being internationally orientated, creative, innovative and interdisciplinary as well as business oriented. April 2010 Faculty of Engineering

The Engineering Education Model of the University of Southern Denmark (DSMI) DSMI is based on a constructivistic philosophy which implies:  Activating teaching/learning  In dialogue with students  PBL (problem based learning)  PjBL (project based learning)  Working in teams April 2010 Faculty of Engineering

The Engineering Education Model of the University of Southern Denmark (DSMI) DSMI basically differentiates between two types of engineering competencies: Specific scientific and technical competencies An essential element of the engineering profile. Depend of the field of engineering and are shown in the curricula’s syllabi. General engineering competencies (GEC) April 2010 Faculty of Engineering

The Engineering Education Model of the University of Southern Denmark (DSMI) DSMI is developed with focus on an educational environment where the success of the student is linked to his/her own initiative and accountability. DSMI establishes a sphere of learning where the student will perceive him/herself as both an individual and a team player and enables him/her to be technically and creatively challenged, in close interaction with fellow students and teachers. April 2010 Faculty of Engineering

The Engineering Education Model of the University of Southern Denmark (DSMI) A wide range of important GEC have been identified (regardless of the branch of study) and should characterise engineers who graduate from SDU. To independently learn new knowledge, including the ability to evaluate one’s own learning process and plan strategies for efficient learning To take a problem-oriented approach to one’s work, including the ability to formulate a problem and analyse a problem in a structured manner To work in a project-organised context, including the ability to plan, manage and evaluate projects To work in an interdisciplinary context, including to work with persons with a different scientific and/or cultural background April 2010 Faculty of Engineering

The Engineering Education Model of the University of Southern Denmark (DSMI) To be innovative and creative in one’s way of thinking and to take solution- oriented approach to one’s work, including being open minded to new angles on problems and solutions To apply one’s scientific and technical knowledge To document and communicate one’s knowledge and results, verbally and in writing to different target groups For scientific absorption To work in teams To evaluate the work of others To participate in entrepreneurial activity April 2010 Faculty of Engineering

The Engineering Education Model of the University of Southern Denmark (DSMI) Subject Student TeamProject A BC 13 2 The student will interact with the three elements. Subject: Study activities in delimited courses of study Project: Interdesciplinary and application-oriented problems in a project context Team: Group of fellow students with whom the student participates in a study-related context April 2010 Faculty of Engineering

The Engineering Education Model of the University of Southern Denmark (DSMI) n The result of the learning process will heavily depend on the specific basis of the learning process. April 2010 Faculty of Engineering

The Engineering Education Model of the University of Southern Denmark (DSMI) If the basis consists of the subject’s/discipline’s theories, rules and principles, and the use of these for analysing standard situations, the result of the learning process will be limited to the acquisition of factual knowledge and skills that can be applied in similar situations. The subject could also be referred to as a craft. This approach has the following strengths: the subject receives an identity; scientific and technical overview can be established; and specific methods and skills can be learned. This approach has a crucial shortcoming, however: the subject risks becoming isolated, disconnected from the normally complex, multi- disciplinary and social sphere in which the knowledge and skills are applied. April 2010 Faculty of Engineering

The Engineering Education Model of the University of Southern Denmark (DSMI) If the basis of learning is comprised of specific problems that can lay the groundwork for generalisations and subsequent derivative cognition, the learning process may change the student’s ways of thinking and acting and acquiring knowledge. One strength of problem-based learning is that it includes the potential for deeper scientific absorption; another is that it serves as the basis for learning many key aspects of general engineering competencies. April 2010 Faculty of Engineering

The Engineering Education Model of the University of Southern Denmark (DSMI) The EEM ensures that a balance is struck among the various theoretically different approaches to the learning process. This conventional approach to building up scientific and technical competencies that are essential to an education will ensure that the student possesses basic, coherent scientific and technical knowledge. The problem-oriented approach to topics representative of the education ensures that important scientific and technical fields are brought into an applied context and, the problem-oriented approach will ensure that the student develops general engineering competencies. April 2010 Faculty of Engineering

The Engineering Education Model of the University of Southern Denmark (DSMI) Interaction between Student and SubjectInteraction between Student and Subject (A) Interaction between Student and ProjectInteraction between Student and Project (B) Interaction between Student and TeamInteraction between Student and Team (C) Interaction between Subject and ProjectInteraction between Subject and Project (1) Interaction between Project and TeamInteraction between Project and Team (2) Interaction between Subject and TeamInteraction between Subject and Team (3) Subject Student TeamProject A BC 13 2 April 2010 Faculty of Engineering

The Engineering Education Model of the University of Southern Denmark (DSMI) April 2010 Faculty of Engineering The four first semesters are organised around themes supporting the semester’s competency targets and with a semester project of at least 10 ECTS points. (Reference)Reference

The Engineering Education Model of the University of Southern Denmark (DSMI) April 2010 Faculty of Engineering Progression A study (subject) progression is ensured with regard to subjects and semester themes

The Engineering Education Model of the University of Southern Denmark (DSMI) A semester coordinator is appointed to each semester. And a planning group with participation of the semester coordinator, involved teachers and supervisors is constituted, responsible for coordinating the semester activities. The 5th semester project is an “Experts in Teams” project with students from at least two different engineering programmes. The project include entrepreneurship and/or innovation. April 2010 Faculty of Engineering

The Engineering Education Model of the University of Southern Denmark (DSMI) The examination and evaluation form must be deliberately chosen to underpin the learning process wherever possible, and at the same time, the performance of the individual study activity must be clearly related to the examination and evaluation form to which it is associated. Ongoing evaluation will be used for giving students feedback/feedforward and motivation during the course of the semester, whereas final evaluations as examinations will be used for giving the students marks as a conclusion to the semester. April 2010 Faculty of Engineering

The Engineering Education Model of the University of Southern Denmark (DSMI) The use of ongoing evaluation during the semester will maximise the students’ learning process under the given circumstances at the time in question. The ongoing evaluation will give the students the opportunity to steer their way through the course of study, to adapt their study efforts and to adjust their areas of focus. April 2010 Faculty of Engineering

The Engineering Education Model of the University of Southern Denmark (DSMI) Thank you for your attention. Workshop on Problem Based Learning tomorrow facilitated by Dr. Erik de Graaff, Associate Professor Delft University of Technology. April 2010 Faculty of Engineering