Section 7.3 What Do You Know? Knowing What Knowledge Is McGraw-Hill © 2013 McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights Reserved.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Knowledge as JTB Someone S has knowledge of P IFF: 1. S believes P 2. S is justified in believing P 3. P is true.
Advertisements

Believing Where We Cannot Prove Philip Kitcher
Epistemology Epistemology is the philosophical field in which one studies knowledge, understanding, wisdom, justification, the ethics of belief, and various.
Theories of Knowledge Knowledge is Justified-True-Belief Person, S, knows a proposition, y, iff: Y is true; S believes y; Y is justified for S. (Note:
Justified True Belief Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Empiricism on a priori knowledge
Gettier and the analysis of knowledge Michael Lacewing
Reliabilism and virtue epistemology
Epistemology Tihamér Margitay – Péter Hartl 6. Reliabilism.
Introduction to Epistemology. Perception- Transparency Good case and bad cases: illusion and hallucination Intentionalism- content of experience is same.
Best Practice Precepts [... next] Arguments Arguments Possibility of the Impossible Possibility of the Impossible Belief, Truth, and Reality Belief, Truth,
Dear friends, don’t believe every spirit. Test the spirits to see if they are from God because many false prophets have gone into the world. 1 John.
Section 2.4 There Ain’t No Such Things as Ghosts Mind as Myth.
Hume on Taste Hume's account of judgments of taste parallels his discussion of judgments or moral right and wrong.  Both accounts use the internal/external.
The Virtue Epistemological Approach to Epistemic Rationality Shawn Shih National Chung-Cheng University, Taiwan.
The tripartite theory of knowledge
Gettier’s response to JTB. Gettier put forward many examples to show that JTB doesn’t always mean we have knowledge, that actually in fact sometimes it’s.
How Claims of Knowledge Are Justified Foundationalism: knowledge claims are based on indubitable foundations –I can doubt whether there is a world, whether.
Knowledge Gettier’s Argument. Review The Tripartite Analysis: S knows that p iff S has a justified, true belief that p. The Knowledge Thesis: In order.
Knowledge as justified true belief We have knowledge only when a proposition is believed to be true We have knowledge only when a proposition is believed.
Knowledge Belief and Truth By Prof.Dr Shadia Abd Elkader Prof.Dr Shadia Abd Elkader.
DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY
What is Knowledge? Knowledge=Justified True Belief? The Causal Theory What Goodman’s Riddle Means for Knowledge Claims Chris Dierich & Kristin Schaupp.
Knowledge and Belief Some fundamental problems. Knowledge: a problematic concept “Knowledge” is ambiguous in a number of ways; the term can mean variously:
Pascal’s Wager. Epistemic Reasons Epistemic reasons to believe are related to truth. If I believe there is a God because I think the evidence supports.
Section 2.3 I, Robot Mind as Software McGraw-Hill © 2013 McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights Reserved.
Evidential Challenge: Kierkegaard and Adams
Reliabilism.
Epistemology – Study of Knowledge
Section 6.3 Faith and Meaning Believing the Unbelievable McGraw-Hill © 2013 McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights Reserved.
Key questions:  What is Reliabilism?  Does Reliabilism describe knowledge well? What are the strengths and weaknesses of Reliabilism?  How well does.
PHIL/RS 335 Divine Nature Pt. 2: Divine Omniscience.
And the search for truth. Knowledge. Knowing: Introduction to a classification scheme In ToK we may treat knowledge as falling into 3 categories. These.
Critical Thinking Lecture 7a Gettier
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 8 Epistemology #1 By David Kelsey.
INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to recognize, analyze and evaluate inductive arguments.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 8 Epistemology #1
Paul Poenicke Gettier Problem Ontology. Gettier, “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?” (1963)
World Philosophy Mr. Zuercher. What is philosophy? ▪ Philosophy is critical and creative thinking about fundamental questions. – What is a person – What.
CRITICAL THINKING - purpose - definition
The Nature of Knowledge
Take-Home Message: Principles Unique to Alternate Assessments
AECR Writing Strategy.
Zeno Vendler and Traditional Epistemology
The Tripartite Definition of Knowledge
Justified True Belief Understand JTB Know the key definitions
Aristotle’s Causes.
Criticisms of JTB model of Knowledge
Gettier and the analysis of knowledge
Michael Lacewing Reliabilism Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
How to get started with critical writing
New Horizon College English II
On whiteboards Summarise Gettier’s two examples and explain what they show. Can you think of any responses to Gettier?
Knowledge by Description
3-2-1 On the front of your index card, complete the following tasks:
How can I be sure I know something?
Because He Lives Studies in First John.
Conclusion – Truth and wisdom
1 John 4: Dear friends, if God loved us this way, we also ought to love each other. 12 No one has ever seen God. If we love each other, God remains.
Argument from Design We are learning to …
What can you remember? Why did we say Justification is necessary for knowledge? What did we say some of the issues with saying truth is necessary for.
Michael Lacewing What is knowledge?.
2. Knowledge and relativism
Concise Guide to Critical Thinking
How do you deal with doubt?
Tonight.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 8 Epistemology #1
Knowers and knowing: Nature of knowledge
Jesus Being Jesus John 1:35-51 Pastor Bruce Rosa.
The Definition of Knowledge:
Presentation transcript:

Section 7.3 What Do You Know? Knowing What Knowledge Is McGraw-Hill © 2013 McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights Reserved.

7.3-2 Traditional Analysis of Knowledge  Knowledge is justified true belief.  S knows a proposition P if and only if: P is true, S believes that P is true, and S is justified in believing that P is true.

7.3-3 Gettier’s Guy in Barcelona  Suppose Smith has strong evidence for the claim that Jones owns a Ford but doesn’t know where his friend Brown is.  So he concludes that (h) Either Jones owns a Ford or Brown is in Barcelona.  It turns out that Jones does not own a Ford, but Brown is in Barcelona.  Even though Smith is justified in believing (h), he doesn’t know (h).

7.3-4 The Defeasibility Theory  Knowledge is undefeated justified true belief.  Diagnosis of the Gettier problem: there is additional evidence which, if known, would defeat the knowledge claim.

7.3-5 Thought Experiment: Lehrer and Paxson’s Demented Mrs. Grabit  Suppose Lehrer sees someone who looks like Tom Grabit steal a book from the library.  Mrs. Grabit, however, testifies that it was his twin brother John who stole the book.  This piece of evidence defeats your claim (d) that Tom stole the book.  But unbeknownst to you, Mrs. Grabit is a compulsive liar. So you do know (d) despite the defeaters.

7.3-6 The Causal Theory  Knowledge is suitably caused true belief.  Diagnosis of the Gettier problem: what makes the claim true is not what caused the person to believe it.

7.3-7 Thought Experiment: Goldman’s Fake Barns  Suppose that Henry is driving through the countryside and points out to his son “That’s a barn.”  Suppose it is a barn, but suppose further that there are a number of fake barns in the area.  Even though the son’s belief that the object is a barn is caused by a real barn, he doesn’t know that it is.

7.3-8 The Reliability Theory  Knowledge is reliably produced true belief.  Diagnosis of the Gettier problem: the beliefs were not produced by reliable means.

7.3-9 Thought Experiment: Lehrer’s Human Thermometer  Suppose Mr. Truetemp has a thermometer implanted in his skull that causes him to have reliable beliefs about the temperature.  Suppose further that Mr. Truetemp never checks his temperature beliefs.  Even though his beliefs are reliably produced, they don’t constitute knowledge.

Virtue Perspectivism  An intellectual virtue is a skill or ability that reliably produces true beliefs, like perception, memory, and reason.  Virtue perspectivism claims that knowledge is apt belief—belief that is taken to be true because of one’s intellectual virtue.

Evaluating Performances  A performance is accurate if it achieves its goal.  A performance is adroit if it manifests the skill of the performer.  A performance is apt if it’s accurate because it’s adroit.

Knowledge as a Performance  The goal of knowledge is true belief. So: A belief is accurate if it’s true. A belief is adroit if it manifests the intellectual virtue of the believer. A belief is apt if it’s believed to be true because of that virtue.  Only apt belief is worthy of being considered knowledge.

Animal Knowledge vs. Reflective Knowledge  Animal knowledge is apt belief.  Reflective knowledge is belief that we know to be apt.

Virtue Perspectivism Solutions to Gettier-type Problems  Gettier’s Guy in Barcelona has neither animal nor reflective knowledge because his belief is not apt.  The subjects in Goldman’s fake barns and Lehrer’s Human Thermometer have animal knowledge but not reflective knowledge.  The subject in the Demented Mrs. Grabit may have both animal and reflective knowledge.