Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N BPA Network Open Season 2013 Cluster Study ColumbiaGrid Planning Meeting May 2, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lottery Method in BPA’s Simultaneous Submission Windows and Potential Application to the Simultaneous Defender Matching Process NAESB Meeting 05/01/13.
Advertisements

1 ColumbiaGrid Update June 27, Activities Planning OASIS Redispatch 2.
MISO Southern Region Integration – ARR/FTR Timeline FTR WG February 6,
NTTG Economic Study and Biennial Study Update NTTG Economic Study and Biennial Study Update NTTG Study Cycle.
WELCOME Western Area Power Administration1. Where did the journey begin? Western Area Power Administration2.
Kansas Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Conference Wind 2007 RFP Update John Grimwade - Sr. Director Strategic Planning and Development September.
Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Public Exchange Clarification Briefing June 2009.
ColumbiaGrid Planning Update to PCC Marv Landauer October 7, 2014.
Preliminary Analysis of the SEE Future Infrastructure Development Plan and REM Benefits.
Visibility 10/1/ Agenda Visibility Overview Status –WECC –ColumbiaGrid Issues Preliminary Thoughts Regarding Conclusions and Recommendations Next.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 1 Network Operating Committee (NOC) June 12 th, 2014.
2006 Reliability Study Scope Name Date. DRAFT 2 Purpose of Study Assess the PEC and Duke transmission systems’ reliability Develop a single reliability.
Large Generator Interconnection Procedures Reform Stakeholder Meeting February 19, 2009.
OSC Meeting April 27, Transmission Cost Allocation Overview.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 2009 Draft Resource Program Released: September 30, 2009 Accepting Comments until: November 30,
ISO Outlook Summer 2005 and Beyond Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee February 22, 2005 Jim Detmers Vice President of Grid Operations.
NITS Concepts  Contract Data Model: NITS Agreement represented as a Contract Contract has one or more Facilities Facility may be one or more Resources.
Large Generator Interconnection Procedures Reform 2 nd Stakeholder Meeting May 5, 2009.
October 6, 2006 Public Stakeholder Review Portland, Oregon Conditional Firm.
Nodal Credit Monitoring and Management – Business Requirements ERCOT CREDIT Department October 11, 2006.
April 2, 2008 CRR Team Update PCRRs CRR Team UpdateApril 2, 2008 Table of contents 1.What is a PCRR? 2.Which NOIEs are eligible for PCRRs? 3.What.
Standards Review Subcommittee Update August 17, 2010.
2013 Wind Conference. Transmission Service Study Process Steve Purdy.
Long-Term Solution for Negative Generation Entergy Transmission AFC Stakeholder Meeting August 22, 2006.
Target Reserve Margin (TRM) and Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC) of Wind Plants Evaluation - Input and Methodology ERCOT Planning 03/25/2010.
1 Wind Integration Study Team (WIST) Report to the Northwest Wind Integration Forum Technical Work Group October 29, 2009 Jeff Miller - ColumbiaGrid Rich.
Overview of Governing Document for Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Stakeholder Workshop Mark Patterson, ERCOT Staff March 1, 2013.
Coordinated Planning Concept (For Discussion Only) revised 11/30/04 07/01/04.
ERCOT Transmission Planning Process Overview and Recommendations November 6, 2002.
2006 Reliability Study James Manning Bryan Guy May 12, 2006.
Impact of not including proposed generators lacking RARF data in the planning models Planning Guide Section 6.9 Issues February 17, 2016.
Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Proposal March 7, 2013 TAC Meeting.
EIM AWG July 5, Guiding Principles The intent of the group is to work collaboratively to better understand the WECC EIM costs and benefits analyses.
Northern Tier Transmission Group Report to Columbia Grid Planning Committee February 9, 2012 “To ensure efficient, effective, coordinated use & expansion.
Reliability Must Run Workshop RMR Study Process May 24, 2016.
Study Plan Development & Approach May 5, 2010 Conference Call & Webinar “To ensure efficient, effective, coordinated use & expansion of the members’
Target Reserve Margin (TRM) and Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC) of Wind Plants Evaluation - Input and Methodology ERCOT Planning 03/25/2010.
Visibility Ramu Ramanathan 10/1/2007.
EPS Updates ColumbiaGrid Planning Meeting October 13, 2016
DS3 and Qualifier Trials Update
Local Government Street Light Update
WEQ OASIS Subcommittee
ESB Networks AIP Programme
Outline Background Study Assumptions Study Results To Do
ColumbiaGrid Summary of: COI Utilization Report dated May 4, 2011
Recommended Hydro Improvement April 11, 2017
I-5 Corridor Reinforcement Project
Investing in Innovation (i3) Fund
Pseudo-tie business procedure
Overview of Northwest Wind Integration Action Plan
Vetting the GENESYS Model
Rates & Regulatory Updates
AX7665D82 Areawide Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Design-Build
Out of Region Market Assumptions
Two-Dam Independence Project Update
BPA Overview BPA is part of the U.S. DOE, but it is self-funded and covers all of its costs by selling products and services. Congress created BPA in 1937.
Jonathan young ColumbiaGrid
NTS Entry Charging Review Update
2016 Attachment O True-Up Customer Meeting August 22, 2017
PCM (Production Cost Model) Data Work Group Webinar
Study Results California In-State Net-Short California Out-State Net-Short California Out-State Net-Short w SWIP N This slide deck contains results from.
Recommended Hydro Improvement April 11, 2017
Mod 0621 Amendments to Gas Transmission Charging Regime
PCM (Production Cost Model) Data Work Group Webinar
Statistical Analysis of Power System Faults
PDWG Validation of the 2028 ADS PCM V1.0
ColumbiaGrid Planning Update to PCC Marv Landauer October 7, 2014
Pseudo-tie business procedure
Base on maximum operating wind capacity at end of planning period
Energy Storage Roadmap & Flexibility Roadmap Information Session
Presentation transcript:

Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N BPA Network Open Season 2013 Cluster Study ColumbiaGrid Planning Meeting May 2, 2013

Slide 2 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 2 Objective Provide background and overview of BPA’s Network Open Season (NOS) process to support implementation of the 2013 Cluster Study – What is NOS about? – How has it changed? – How will it be different in 2013? Prepare for discussion of 2013 NOS Cluster Study Assumptions at ColumbiaGrid June Planning Meeting

Slide 3 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 3 What Is BPA’s Network Open Season? Network Open Season (NOS) is a BPA process to manage and respond to long-term firm transmission requests on the BPA network. Network Open Season allows BPA to determine future transmission needs on the network by aligning resource development with projected load forecasts to determine the right transmission solutions for the region. All customers that apply for transmission service on the BPA network (Interties excluded) receive a Precedent Transmission Service Agreement (PTSA). If the customer meets the terms of the PTSA (Customer Agrees to take service if offered at rolled-in rate and provides performance assurance), BPA will Study all requests and determine the requirements for transmission service. Perform required environmental studies and NEPA. Arrange financing, plan, design, and construct required facilities.

Slide 4 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 4 Summary of NOS Participation Listed below is a comparison of the 2010 NOS participation with 2008 and 2009 NOS participation. NOS PTSAs OfferedPTSAs Participating PTSAMWCustomerPTSAMWCustomer , , , , , ,75913

Slide 5 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 5

Slide 6 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 6 NOS Reform Tariff-based cluster study beginning September 2013 – Processed under non-PTSA portion of section (PTP) and 32.6 (NT) of BPA’s current tariff. – Customers will be required to submit data exhibit in accordance with sections 17.2 (PTP) and 29.2 (NT) of the BPA Tariff. – Only TSRs with validated data exhibits will be tendered a cluster study agreement. – Requests for service over the Montana Intertie, Northwest AC Intertie (COI) and Pacific DC Intertie (PDCI) will not be eligible. – Pending requests under an existing 2008, 2009 or 2010 PTSA will not be eligible. – Requests must have a service duration of 5 years or longer Cluster Study financial requirements: – 2013 – Customers advance fund estimated pro rata share of cluster study costs, trued up following study completion Cluster study completion anticipated at the end of December 2013

Slide 7 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 7 Long Term Firm TSR Submittal Period Offer 2013 CSA CSA will be tendered after validation of data exhibits 15 days to sign & fund CSA Cluster Study 4 Months Preliminary plans of service (including BPA- driven builds) Preliminary costs $$ Preliminary energization dates TSR assignment by project Run scenarios & sensitivities (developed in regional collaboration) Project Definition 2-3 Months Refine Plan of Service, Cost Estimate & Schedule. Prepare to initiate NEPA process. Business Evaluation 1-3 Months Projected Rate Impact Estimated Project Cost Potential Service Additional Benefits & Costs Offer PTSA TSR Restack 30 Days Queue is re-evaluated to determine if any offers could be made. Offer ESA OR Prepare for next cluster study Process duration = 12 months Process Map and Timeline Acronym Key: CSA – Cluster Study Agreement NEPA – National Environmental Policy Act PTSA – Precedent Transmission Service Agreement ESA – Environmental Study Agreement Phase I Phase IIPhase III until 5/31 8/1 to 8/31 9/1 to 12/31 6/1 to 7/30 1/1 to 3/30 4/1 to 4/305/1 to 5/31

Slide 8 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 8 Project Groupings w/ PTSAs Study Areas/ Technical Studies Projects, Schedule, & Cost Estimates Updated TTC Plans of Service & Report Verification w/ ATC Base Case Flow Gate Impacts ATC Analysis & Sub-Grid Assessment PTSA Previous NOS Cluster Study Process Authorized External Review

Slide 9 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N & 2009 Cluster Study Assumptions Assumptions BPA made for the 2008 & 2009 Cluster Study: – Generation Assumptions: Generator dispatch patterns (from ATC Base Case) FCRPS and Mid-C generation were backed off – Load Assumptions: Load growth modeled through 2014 COI and PDCI at maximum export capability – Based on the above assumptions, the 2008 Cluster Study was able to balance load and generation to model the new transmission requests. In addition to the above assumptions, in the 2009 NOS customers were required to submit Exhibit B as part of the PTSA requirement. – Customers were required to provide the specific generator tied to the TSR. – Customers were asked to provide non-binding load information related to sink. – Based on the above assumptions, the 2009 Cluster Study was able to balance load and generation to model the new transmission requests.

Slide 10 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Cluster Study Assumptions Studies could not continue to support increased exports on the COI and PDCI along with backing down hydro generation (on the Mid-C and FCRPS). Because of Renewable Portfolio Standard requirements, an increasing number of Load Serving Entities are accumulating transmission contracts which exceed their load – providing them with additional resources with a firm right to dispatch. Existing obligations and new requests for the 2010 Cluster Study added more generation with a firm right to dispatch than there is load and export capability. – Through a public review of the 2010 Cluster Study Assumptions, BPA developed new assumptions including Thermal Generation Dispatch Study Sequence to balance load and generation while accommodating new requests for transmission service. – BPA also included additional sensitivity analysis – Base, 100% Wind, No Wind.

Slide 11 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Cluster Study Generation Scenarios Base Case: 95 th Percentile FCRPS Hydro Gen., 60% Wind Generation in the NW, 100% of the Montana and Northern Intertie requests. – Reduced thermal generation based on thermal generation dispatch study sequence Generation Scenario 1: 95 th Percentile FCRPS Hydro Gen., 100% Wind Generation in the NW, 100% of the Montana and Northern Intertie requests. – Further reduced thermal generation based on thermal generation dispatch study sequence Generation Scenario 2: FCRPS Hydro Gen. High Upper Columbia and Low Lower Columbia, No Wind Generation in the NW, 100% of the Northern Intertie requests. – Increased thermal generation based on thermal generation dispatch study sequence

Slide 12 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 12 Thermal Generation Dispatch Study Sequence Used to Balance Requests for Incremental Transmission Service The Tiers indicate generation groups that, for study purposes will be assumed to be re- dispatched to balance NW area generation and load. The Tier sequence was based on age of the plant, heat rate, and past operation. The sequence within a Tier may change for seasonal power flow studies.

Slide 13 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Cluster Study Assumptions

Slide 14 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Cluster Study Generation Assumptions & Results 2010 Cluster Study Generation Assumptions & Results are posted online at the following URL: s/open_season_2010/2010_nos_fed_gen_ass umptions_ pdf s/open_season_2010/2010_nos_fed_gen_ass umptions_ pdf

Slide 15 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Cluster Study Assumptions Assumptions: Basecases: 2018 (HW & HS); 2022 (HW), 2023 (HS) COI/PDCI: 4800/3100 MW Prior NOS projects assumed to be in service Results of PTSA Reform to be incorporated Assumptions for discussion: Scenarios: Starting point – similar to 2010 NOS (Base, 100% Wind, No Wind) Hydro 95 th percentile MW Application of Thermal Generation Dispatch Study Sequence Wind (Base: 60% of requested) Other regional projects (B2H, CCTP)?

Slide 16 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 16 Next Steps  May 2: ColumbiaGrid Planning Meeting May 15: Deadline for TSRs in pending queue to submit data exhibits. May 31: Post official Cluster Study notice – Deadline to submit TSRs for inclusion in 2013 Cluster Study June 6: ColumbiaGrid Planning Meeting – Review 2013 Cluster Study Basecases and Assumptions June 14: Deadline for TSRs submitted between April 30 and May 31 to submit data exhibits August 1: Long Term Firm Queue Restack September 1: Begin 2013 BPA Network Cluster Study December 31: Conclude 2013 BPA Network Cluster Study

Slide 17 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 17 Questions?