16/10/2010ECFA CERN1 Manqi RUAN Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet (LLR) Ecole Polytechnique 91128, Palaiseau SDHCAL PFA Study: Single Particle Event.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proposal for a new design of LumiCal R. Ingbir, P. Ruzicka, V. Vrba October 07 Malá Skála.
Advertisements

P. Gay Energy flow session1 Analytic Energy Flow F. Chandez P. Gay S. Monteil CALICE Coll.
1 Study of the Tail Catcher Muon Tracker (TCMT) Scintillator Strips and Leakage with Simulated Coil Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE.
PFA on SiDaug05_np Lei Xia ANL-HEP. PFA outline Calibration of calorimeter –Done –Not tuned for clustering algorithm Clustering algorithm –Done: hit density.
GEM DHCAL Simulation Studies J. Yu* Univ. of Texas at Arlington ALCW, July 15, 2003 Cornell University (*on behalf of the UTA team; S. Habib, V. Kaushik,
A preliminary analysis of the CALICE test beam data Dhiman Chakraborty, NIU for the CALICE Collaboration LCWS07, Hamburg, Germany May 29 - June 3, 2007.
1/9/2003 UTA-GEM Simulation Report Venkatesh Kaushik 1 Simulation Study of Digital Hadron Calorimeter Using GEM Venkatesh Kaushik* University of Texas.
Cosmic Rays Data Analysis with CMS-ECAL Mattia Fumagalli (Università di Milano Bicocca) CIAO!
Development of Particle Flow Calorimetry José Repond Argonne National Laboratory DPF meeting, Providence, RI August 8 – 13, 2011.
Summary of Calorimetry/Muon Sessions Burak Bilki University of Iowa Argonne National Laboratory.
Mark Thomson Timing, Tungsten and High Energy Jets.
Optimizing DHCAL single particle energy resolution Lei Xia Argonne National Laboratory 1 LCWS 2013, Tokyo, Japan November , 2013.
Status of SiD PFA Development Lei Xia (ANL – HEP) What tools do we need What tools do we need Where are we now Where are we now Future plan Future plan.
Optimizing DHCAL single particle energy resolution Lei Xia 1 CALICE Meeting LAPP, Annecy, France September 9 – 11, 2013.
DHCAL - Resolution (S)DHCAL Meeting January 15, 2014 Lyon, France Burak Bilki, José Repond and Lei Xia Argonne National Laboratory.
1 ACFA8, July , 2005, Youngjoon Kwon (Yonsei Univ.) Simulation / Recon. Workgroup summary for ACFA8  The Framework for Sim./Recon. Status report.
International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve Muon reconstruction and identification in the ILD detector N. D’Ascenzo, V.Saveliev.
Event Reconstruction in SiD02 with a Dual Readout Calorimeter Detector Geometry EM Calibration Cerenkov/Scintillator Correction Jet Reconstruction Performance.
CALICE Digital Hadron Calorimeter: Calibration and Response to Pions and Positrons International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders LCWS 2013 November.
Development of a Particle Flow Algorithms (PFA) at Argonne Presented by Lei Xia ANL - HEP.
25 sep Reconstruction and Identification of Hadronic Decays of Taus using the CMS Detector Michele Pioppi – CERN On behalf.
Pandora calorimetry and leakage correction Peter Speckmayer 2010/09/011Peter Speckmayer, WG2 meeting.
Positional and Angular Resolution of the CALICE Pre-Prototype ECAL Hakan Yilmaz.
PFAs – A Critical Look Where Does (my) SiD PFA go Wrong? S. R. Magill ANL ALCPG 10/04/07.
Bangalore, India1 Performance of GLD Detector Bangalore March 9 th -13 th, 2006 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP) on behalf of the.
1 The CALICE experiment at MTBF (FNAL) summary of a fruitful test beam experiment Erika Garutti (DESY) On behalf of CALICE.
1 D.Chakraborty – VLCW'06 – 2006/07/21 PFA reconstruction with directed tree clustering Dhiman Chakraborty for the NICADD/NIU software group Vancouver.
1 Hadronic calorimeter simulation S.Itoh, T.Takeshita ( Shinshu Univ.) GLC calorimeter group Contents - Comparison between Scintillator and Gas - Digital.
1 1 - To test the performance 2 - To optimise the detector 3 – To use the relevant variable Software and jet energy measurement On the importance to understand.
LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 1 Tracking Performance in CLIC_ILD and CLIC_SiD e + e –  H +
Calice Meeting Argonne Muon identification with the hadron calorimeter Nicola D’Ascenzo.
1 IWLC 2010 Geneva Oct.’10David Ward Tests of GEANT4 using the CALICE calorimeters David Ward  Electromagnetic particles (, e) were used to understand.
1 LumiCal Optimization Simulations Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University Collaboration High precision design May 6 th 2008.
Strip-splitting method for ECAL clustering K. Kawagoe (Kobe) for K. Kotera (Shinshu) CALICE meeting, Casablanca 24th September,
Calibration of the ZEUS calorimeter for hadrons and jets Alex Tapper Imperial College, London for the ZEUS Collaboration Workshop on Energy Calibration.
7/13/2005The 8th ACFA Daegu, Korea 1 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP), M-C.Chang(Tohoku), K.Fujii (KEK), T.Fujikawa (Tohoku), A.Miyamoto (KEK), S.Yamashita.
Mark Thomson University of Cambridge High Granularity Particle Flow Calorimetry.
12/20/2006ILC-Sousei Annual KEK1 Particle Flow Algorithm for Full Simulation Study ILC-Sousei Annual KEK Dec. 20 th -22 nd, 2006 Tamaki.
Imaging Hadron Calorimeters for Future Lepton Colliders José Repond Argonne National Laboratory 13 th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation Vienna University.
Manqi Ruan Discussing & Support: Roman, Francois, Vincent, Supervisor: Z. ZHANG (LAL) & Y. GAO (Tsinghua)) DQ Check for CERN Test.
Energy Reconstruction in the CALICE Fe-AHCal in Analog and Digital Mode Fe-AHCal testbeam CERN 2007 Coralie Neubüser CALICE Collaboration meeting Argonne,
John Marshall, 1 John Marshall, University of Cambridge LCD-WG2, July
I.Laktineh IPNL. Outline  Technological Prototype Present activities To-do List Complementary R&D  SDHCAL for ILD Simulation Optimization study Integration.
Shower Fractal Dimensional Analysis at PFA Oriented Calorimeter
21/09/2010CALICE Manqi RUAN Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet (LLR) Ecole Polytechnique 91128, Palaiseau Status of DHCAL PFA Study.
PFA Study with Jupiter Contents : 1. Introduction 2. GLD-PFA
Electroweak physics at CEPC
Test Beam Request for the Semi-Digital Hadronic Calorimeter
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
on behalf of ATLAS LAr Endcap Group
CEPC 数字强子量能器读出电子学预研进展
SLAC: SiD AHCAL Status and Update Ross McCoy, Andrew Myers, Andy White.
CALICE scintillator HCAL
The Simulation Status of SDHCAL
Starting up the CLIC detector design study CLIC Workshop, 15. Okt 2008
Studies with PandoraPFA
State-of-the-art in Hadronic Calorimetry for the Lepton Collider
ILD Optimisation: towards 2012 University of Cambridge
Status of ECAL Optimization Study
Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE Collaboration
Argonne National Laboratory
Detector Optimization using Particle Flow Algorithm
ZHH: Linear collider Benchmark
Michele Faucci Giannelli
Status of CEPC HCAL Optimization Study in Simulation LIU Bing On behalf the CEPC Calorimeter working group.
Steve Magill Steve Kuhlmann ANL/SLAC Motivation
ZHH Analysis preliminary results on different detector models
LC Calorimeter Testbeam Requirements
Sheraton Waikiki Hotel
What does it change for ECAL design ?
Presentation transcript:

16/10/2010ECFA CERN1 Manqi RUAN Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet (LLR) Ecole Polytechnique 91128, Palaiseau SDHCAL PFA Study: Single Particle Event Analysis

16/10/2010ECFA CERN2 Outline ● Introduction ● SDHCAL reco soft status ● Observation: UDS jet reconstruction with SDHCAL ● Single pion event: ● Performance at SDHCAL Barrel ● Comparison to Endcap and corner region ● Comparison to AHCAL ● Single Klong event ● AHCAL/SDHCAL Comparison ● Summary and Plan

16/10/2010ECFA CERN3 ● DHCAL: Finer granularity = less confusion; Possibility to reconstruct Calo tracks better: better leakage correction ● SDHCAL reconstruction software status ● PandoraPFA based reconstruction chain: – Preliminary RPC digitization : to be upgraded with multiplicity effects: Ran's presentation – PandoraPFA: learning phase -> optimize the parameters & orders of different modules ● DHCAL based algorithms: under development – Kalman filter, Density & NN analysis, Hough transform... – Dedicated clustering + shower energy estimator: to be developed and integrated ● Event Display: to be heavily employed to understand the performance Introduction

16/10/2010ECFA CERN4 ● Treated as black box ● For SDHCAL: Pandora + Preliminary Digitization + Calibration constant tuning ● Performance with uds evts: slightly Zthreshold, much 360GeV ● To achieve better understanding: Single Particle events ● Single Pion, Klong and Tau ● Statistic: ~300k each. 1 ~ 2k * 10 energies (10 ~ 100GeV) * 9 polar angles (10º ~ 90º) * 2 concepts ● Simulation ( with grid & mokka ) almost finished. Analysis on going. PRELIMINARY Pandora: learning phase

16/10/2010ECFA CERN5 SDHCAL, Pion at θ = 80º SDHCAL, 10k evts 81% evts (8097) has single PFO Low energy tail in delta(E) spectrum, correlated with MCEnergy: Multiple scattering / dE/dx effect

16/10/2010ECFA CERN6 Single PFO evts in the tail, θ = 80º Pion decay: 40GeV Pion ~ 12GeV neutrino + 28GeV muon... Evt 821, 40GeV Pion at MCTruth Identify as 46.6GeV PFO with 38GeV cluster Failure of track energy Reconstruction? Rare... but happens

16/10/2010ECFA CERN7 Events with 2 -5 PFOs SDHCAL, 10k evts ~ 18% (1766) events has PFOs Higher estimated energy No significant MC energy dependency

16/10/2010ECFA CERN8 Reconstruction: 4 PFOs: 100GeV Pion (86.3GeV) + 28GeV Neutron (24.4GeV) +... Total PFO energy = 130GeV Events with PFOs Evt 216 Simulation level Double counting! To be improved... (Evt 286) 2 PFOs, Identify as 100GeV Pion (80.7GeV cluster) + 45GeV Neutron (45.4GeV) Total PFO energy = 145GeV Seed at deep ECAL Layer...

16/10/2010ECFA CERN9 Events: more than 5 PFOs SDHCAL, 10k evts ~ 1.5% (137) events has more than 5 PFOs Large smearing in measured energy ( Smearing amplitude increase with MC energy )

16/10/2010ECFA CERN10 (Evt 867) Simulation level Interaction based double counting Reconstruction level: 15PFOs Leading PFO (54GeV cluster) identified as 100GeV pion. Others contribute to double counted 32GeV... Tough case... interaction near the end of Tracker! Higher estimated energy for NPFO > 5 events

16/10/2010ECFA CERN11 Even more crazy... Evt 646: Interaction Inside TPC (1/3 of the radius) Confused tracker: 3 LDCTrack found 6PFOs: 2 leading PFO assigned with tracks + cluster, with energy 110GeV (40GeV cluster) and 148GeV (55GeV cluster) Totally reconstructed energy: 264GeV Simulation level Flag on those kind of evts Relay more on cluster info? PFO level

16/10/2010ECFA CERN12 “Lower” estimated energy for NPFO > 5 events dude... you are a pion? Evt 346, Interaction at TPC entrance 18 PFOs, Total Energy 79GeV Simulation level

16/10/2010ECFA CERN13 Compare to corner & endcap ● For single PFO events: ● Large energy smearing in Endcap region (track smearing) ● Large low energy tail in Corner (also for 2-PFO events) ● Corner & Endcap: More material near the end of tracker ● More Interactions ● Linear dependency of delta(E) and NPFO ~ interaction based double counting?

16/10/2010ECFA CERN14 Low energy tail at θ = 40º Simulation level PFO level Failed to link the track (Track reconstructed: LDCTrack Number = 1): 100GeV Pion at 40Deg: Above: Evt 427, Single PFO Left: Evt 872, Double PFOs Neither linked to track...

16/10/2010ECFA CERN15 Single PFO Crazy track energy ~ 217GeV Cluster Energy = 87GeV Double counting: 2 PFOs, Total measured energy = 105GeV Higher estimated energy at θ = 20º Interaction based double counting...

16/10/2010ECFA CERN16 “Lower” energy at θ = 20º Pion decay: 42GeV neutrino + 58GeV muon... Theta = 20 deg Smearing of Track energy resolution Track energy = 91.2GeV Interaction before Calo + Cluster energy resolution uncertainty

16/10/2010ECFA CERN17 Comparing with AHCAL SDHCAL, 10k evts AHCAL 20k evts 18k evts 30GeV Run failed

18 Compare to AHCAL: NPFO A little surprising: AHCAL has more double PFO events, especially in corner region: Geometrical effects? NPFO = 1, 2 NPFO > 2

16/10/2010ECFA CERN19 Summary on Pion analysis ● SDHCAL Barrel Region ● More than 80% events has only one PFO: – Lower estimated energy: energy loss, pion decay and track energy resolution smearing – Higher estimated case. Very rare. Due to Failed track energy resolution? ● ~17% events with 2-5 PFOs, most of which are according to wrong cluster splitting, and result in double counted energy. Where we might improve. ● ~1.4% events has heavy interaction inside the tracker (could happen even at the entrance of TPC), caused lots of uncertainty. Some more dedicated treatment? ● (SDHCAL) Endcap and corner: ● More interactions, more double counting observed ● Corner: linking of track – cluster need to be improved ( 1% ~ 2% events fails, θ = 35º - 45º ) ● Endcap: Larger track energy resolution smearing. Relay more on cluster info? ● Comparing to AHCAL: ● Similar behaviour ● More single PFO event & less double counting event in DHCAL: might be Geometrical effects

16/10/2010ECFA CERN20 SDHCAL Klong: Multiply PFO events Interaction inside tracker 3PFOs: Back scattering + wide HCAL Shower

16/10/2010ECFA CERN21 SDHCAL, Klong Barrel 16k evts Corner 14k evts Endcap 16k evts ● Relatively simple PFO. NPFO(Barrel) > NPFO(EndCap) > NPFO(Corner) ● Large smearing in energy resolution: better estimator and correction needed for SDHCAL...

16/10/2010ECFA CERN22 AHCAL, Klong Barrel 16k evts Corner 14k evts Endcap 16k evts ● Energy measurement: biased (Correction included?) ● Asymmetry low energy tail – inefficiency? Leakage? Barrel 18k evts Corner 20k evts Endcap 18k evts

16/10/2010ECFA CERN23 SDHCAL/AHCAL Comparison ● Closed NPFO distribution ● AHCAL has better energy resolution – but larger lower estimation tail in Corner & Endcap BarrelCornerEndcap

16/10/2010ECFA CERN24 90GeV Klong... Can be really penetrate deposit only 11GeV energy in the end of Calo Or create a huge cluster... SDHCAL Klong: events in energy resolution tail 80GeV Pion, create 127GeV cluster in the Endcap

16/10/2010ECFA CERN25 Lower estimated energy in AHCAL Barrel. leakage? GeV Klong at θ = 80º. High penetrate events, interact deep inside HCAL. Left (evt 623), Reconstructed Energy 42.7GeV. Right (evt 1798), Reconstructed Energy 48.8GeV

16/10/2010ECFA CERN26 And AHCAL Endcap Also observed in Endcap region: 100GeV Klong with only 44GeV cluster

16/10/2010ECFA CERN27 Checking geometry From gearfile: same in both... (2.0/2.65 cm) * 48 layer = 96cm iron/127.2cm thickness... Checking from gdml + Druid Reference points (cm): SDHCAL: (100, 0, 265), (100, 0, 397) AHCAL: (100, 0, 265), (100, 0, 394), (100, 0, 397) One more layer in SDHCAL? Sufficient to explain the difference??

16/10/2010ECFA CERN28 Summary and Plans ● Study of single particle reconstruction on Pandora: ● Pion: – AHCAL & SDHCAL has similar behaviour. SDHCAL has slightly more Single PFO event, might be geometrical effect. – Possible to improve on double counting ( ~ 10% - 20% of events), track cluster linking in corner, identification and specialized treatment on pre-interaction pion. ● Klong: – Similar NPFO for AHCAL & SDHCAL – Need better energy estimator for SDHCAL – More leakage in AHCAL? ● Tau: should coming soon... ● SDHCAL Reco software is progressing in various directions with Looooooong to do list ● Identify man power ● Parameters & order optimization of PandoraPFA ● SDHCAL energy estimator & clustering development and integration ● Testing on benchmark processes at different energy (ZZ, ZH, ttbar, SUSY events with multiple jet final state)

16/10/2010ECFA CERN29 BK Slides

16/10/2010ECFA CERN30 SDHCAL: Total PFO energy Most of the Event has nice energy resolution (from tracker) Higher estimated total PFO energy ~ Track energy resolution smearing (forward region) + double counting + interaction before calo Lower estimated total PFO energy: Pion decay, interaction before calo, track energy smearing (forward), cluster energy smearing...

16/10/2010ECFA CERN31 SDHCAL Pion: Cluster Energy Resolution ~ 80%/sqrt(E) Similar behaviour in different polar angle ~1% - 2% event has very low clustered energy -> Pion Decay

16/10/2010ECFA CERN32 DHCAL Pion evts Hadronic Shower is complex... Interaction before calo 100 GeV Pion, 20Deg polar angle; Total Measured PFO energy = 84.46GeV Not satisfactory but fine... Simulation level PFO level