THE USE OF CARDIAC MONITORING FOR NON-ICU MEDICINE PATIENTS AT UCI: A FOLLOW UP OF A FOLLOW UP Michelle Le – PGY2 DSR2 Cost Conscious Project.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Bed Management Center BMC. BED MANAGEMENT CENTER STAFFING Manager Assistant Manager Care Coordinators(RNs) 3 Admission Coordinators.
Advertisements

Program Content (cont...) Module 3: Responding to clinical deterioration – managing common acute conditions Communicating clinical concerns—using ISBAR.
Pediatric Early Warning Score
Troponin Use in A&E/EAU
B USINESS IN M EDICINE H OW ARE WE USING T ELEMETRY ? Asad Qasim MD, MPH – PGY2.
Donation After Cardiac Death May 26, 2010 Margie Whittaker, RN MSN.
Walk 4 Your Heart CABG Ambulation Project Project Team: 3NEWS 3NE/SW Nursing Staff Cardiac Rehabilitation.
Surviving the Pitfalls. Aka Medicare fraud Two nationwide Hospitalist groups have been charged with Medicare Fraud for upcoding in the past few years.
Courage To Listen And To Implement Patient Feedback Pamela Taylor Ward Manager Ward AM3.
Cost-Containment Project: “Just a Liter of Normal Saline” Part II William Graham, PGY2.
Cost-Containment Project: “Just a Liter of Normal Saline” Mohammad Usman Qazi, PGY2 Department of Internal Medicine.
Team Membership Stephanie Detterline, MD Mary E. Altier, MSN, RN Clinical Departments: Emergency Medical Services, General Medicine, Cardiac Services Hospital.
CRUSADE: A National Quality Improvement Initiative CRUSADE: A National Quality Improvement Initiative Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina.
Duplicate HgA1c Testing
EKGs in pre-operative management for OSH transfers.
CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Strategies for Collecting and Entering Early Mobility ARMSTRONG INSTITUTE FOR PATIENT.
PROPRIETARY NAME EVALUATION AT FDA Jerry Phillips, RPh Associate Director for Medication Error Prevention Office of Drug Safety December 4, 2003.
Rapid Response Team Patty Gessner, RN MSN Alexian Brothers Medical Center.
ACS Clinical Pathway. Who? Pts with Acute Ischemic Heart Disease now described as having ACS.
Catholic Medical Center Rapid Response Teams
A Stroke is a Stroke No Matter How Small  Bleeds and Clots Risk Factors for All  Enhancing Patient Awareness through Staff Education and Mentoring A.
How to break the enigma of the OPAT code Debbie Cumming How to break the enigma of the OPAT code Debbie Cumming.
EAcute Dr Paul Sullivan Clinical Director of Quality Improvement, Salford Royal Foundation Trust Senior Quality Improvement Fellow, Centre for Healthcare.
Utilization of APPE Students in Electronic Rounds for Joint Commission Core Measures for Stroke Therapy in a Community Hospital Amber M. Hutchison, PharmD,
You Are Now Entering The IMC/TeleUNIT. Designed to provide care for those who need less monitoring than those in the Intensive Care units, but, still.
Rapid Response Team. What is a Rapid Response Team? A Rapid Response Team or RRT, is a working team of clinicians who bring critical care expertise to.
RML Specialty Hospital FALL PREVENTION PROGRAM NATIONAL NALTH WINNER 2006 for BEST PRACTICE.
Potassium repletion in the CCU: IV vs PO. Background Potassium repletion is commonly performed in the wards and ICU/CCU Normal potassium (per Quest) is.
Unnecessary Lipid Screening of Inpatient Admissions Dennis Whang 4/2/12 DSR2.
Dr Priya Rajyaguru Foundation Year 2 Doctor North Bristol NHS Trust The use of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) in an old age psychiatry unit.
Question Are Medical Emergency Team calls effective in reducing cardiopulmonary arrest rates in the general medical surgical setting? Problem The degree.
THE USE OF CARDIAC MONITORING FOR NON-ICU MEDICINE PATIENTS AT UCI: A FOLLOW UP Jerry Yu DSR2.
Pain Control in the Laboring Patient Dr John Gianopoulos MD Dr Ku-mie Kim MD Sandra Swanson RN MSOD Maureen Davey RNC Denise Goray RN BSN.
Cost Containment: Use of Troponin testing in the Inpatient Wards Setting Neal Kaushal, R2 DSR2, May 2013.
Ordering CT Heads on the inpatient setting An Update of the Original Project from January 2012 Cost Containment Project DSR II June 2016 Thi Mai, PGY-2.
What the Diff? (Cost Analysis Project)
Potassium Repletion: IV vs. PO
Safer Staffing The Right Staff, with the Right Skills, in the Right Place at the Right Time Sara Courtney – Head of Professions SEISD.
QUESTIONSTO BE ADDRESSED
Velindre NHS Trust June 10th 2011
A system for addressing patient needs
Ashraf Butt Consultant in EM
Inpatient Laboratory Testing: To A1c or Not to A1c
Not Wanting to Miss a Beat – Is it Costing Us?
Cost Effective Use of Troponin to Rule Out Acute Coronary Syndrome
Engaging Nursing Staff
Altru Patient Discharge Team
The Importance of Bedside Report on CICU
Cost-analysis project: Daily CBC
Clinical Alarm Systems - NPSG Goal # 6 -
Fort Hays State University, Department of Nursing
Welcome to Jacobi Medical Center
Plan of Correction CNA NCU 2014
Home First.
Hamilton General Hospital Hamilton, Ontario
68.3 million errors (28% of total) cause moderate or serious harm
MANAGING DELAYED DISCHARGES AT MCSI
WELCOME Orientation to Harper University Hospital
PRBC Transfusions Medicine Floors Internal Medicine, PGY-3
Observation/Inpatient
Example Patient Journeys
PNEUMONIA Team Membership: Susan A . Tuzik, MS, RN
National COPD Audit Programme
Principal recommendations
WELCOME Orientation to Harper University Hospital
Ordering Sputum Cultures in Community Acquired Pneumonia
Appropriateness of Potassium Repletion on UCI Wards
China PEACE risk estimation tool for in-hospital death from acute myocardial infarction: an early risk classification tree for decisions about fibrinolytic.
The use of telemetry cardiac monitoring on inpatient wards at UCI
Admission status orders
Presentation transcript:

THE USE OF CARDIAC MONITORING FOR NON-ICU MEDICINE PATIENTS AT UCI: A FOLLOW UP OF A FOLLOW UP Michelle Le – PGY2 DSR2 Cost Conscious Project

Cardiac Monitoring Introduced >40 years ago to the inpatient setting Includes computerized arrhythmia detection, ST segment monitoring, noise reduction, multi-lead monitoring Will determine which floor pt can be transferred and nursing ratio/level of care

The drawbacks Deliberately set for high sensitivity at the expense of specificity Consequently telemetry can give false-positive alarms: misinterpretation of artifacts as arrhythmia Telemetry is expensive: 1998 study estimates cost at $683 per patient per day (bill of $9,108 /day in 2012 at UCI) When and how telemetry should be used has been a matter of debate. Some physicians not aware of indications. Known shortage of telemetry beds available at UCI can often impede transfer of patients

2004 AHA Guidelines for Cardiac Monitoring Separation of patients into 3 risk classes: Class I: Telemetry indicated for nearly all patients Class II: Telemetry MAY be indicated in some patients Class III: Telemetry is NOT indicated Guidelines are based on expert opinion consensus

Current UCIMC non-ICU telemetry capacity T5: 28 beds T3: 28 beds DH 78: 15 beds DH 66: 15 beds DH 68: 15 beds Total = 101 telemetry beds Non-telemetry beds: T4: 25

Prior Projects – UCI ward teams 54 patient charts were reviewed 39% of patients were found to not have class I or II indications for telemetry Most common reasons to be on telemetry: Stable GI bleeding Chest pain r/o Respiratory compromise Acute decompensated Heart failure

Prior Projects – UCI ward teams 53 patient’s charts were reviewed 24.4% of patients were found to not have class I or II indications for telemetry (14.6% reduction in non-indicated cardiac monitoring use) Most common indications for cardiac monitoring 1. Syncope 2. A fib/A flutter w/ RVR 3. Sepsis with hypotension 4. Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

Team# of pts on tele unit # of patients w/ cardiac monitor # of Class I # of Class II # of class III % of patients on tele w/ class III A % B % C % D % E87223 G % Total % Prior Projects – 2015

Current Results – UCI ward teams 42 patient’s charts were reviewed 27% of patients were found to not have class I or II indications for telemetry (2.6% increase in non-indicated cardiac monitoring use compared to last year) Most common indications for cardiac monitoring 1. Sepsis with risk for hypotension 2. Syncope 3. ACS rule out 4. EtOH withdrawal

Team# of pts on tele unit # of patients w/ cardiac monitor # of Class I # of Class II # of class III or no indication % of patients on tele w/ class III or no indication A % B % C882600% D % E % G % Total Average: 27% Current Results – 2016

Let’s look at the costs! Estimated Average Bill at UCIMC for 2012 General Med/Surg Bed: $5,359 /day Monitored (Tele) Bed: $9,108 /day Excess Cost per day: $3,750 / day With our 10 patients that had non-indicated cardiac monitoring  excess of $37,500 in 1 day If we continue this for 365 days  $13.7 million in 1 year True value is likely higher given increased cost of healthcare since 2012

Limitations Small sample size. Only a 1-day cross-section look at teams’ census. Subjective assessment (classification bias) in applying AHA guidelines and categorization of indications or lack of indication Some patient charts were excluded due to lack of H&P/progress note or level of care order not yet entered

Areas for improvements at UCI Continued daily examination of telemetry use during morning rounds with RN staff Early cessation of cardiac monitoring when indications are no longer met Make telemetry orders self-expiring every X hours requiring active renewing for use Continued need to educate house staff and attending alike regarding AHA recommendations

Thank you! Asad Qasim and Jerry Yu for establishing the ground work for this project Dr. Swaroop and Dr. Rucker for this DSR2 rotation