AUGUST 2016

DESIRED OUTCOMES  An understanding of the two PGP options available for teachers  Knowledge of the Professional Growth Plan [PGP] Rubric for consistency in scoring, so that participants can share with their school’s Peer Review Teams

AGREEMENTS  Be present  Participate  Use technology politely  Take responsibility for your own learning  Avoid side-bar conversations

NON-NEGOTIABLES  Evidence of every indicator  All PGP Development options require teacher reflection  PRT members reconvene to resolve differences if scores vary by 2 or more points from final average score  Once scored, PGP’s are not re-evaluated  Option to submit draft PGP for feedback no later than 10/19/2015

NON-NEGOTIABLES  Option to submit draft PGP for feedback no later than 10/17/2016  Administration provides feedback on draft PGP no later than 10/28/2016  Final submission of PGP is due no later than 11/18/2016  PGP’s must be scored and shared with teachers no later than 12/16/2016

NON-NEGOTIABLES  Teachers hired after 11/18/2016 on a regular contract must submit a PGP no later than 1/30/2017  All PGP Development and Implementation will have the same scoring for both options  PGP Implementation for both options is due on 3/17/2017 for AC and PSC teachers

REMINDERS  Non-compliance: failure to submit or implement a PGP may result in 0 points  No Plan Development = No Points for Implementation

WHO COMPLETES A PGP?  Anyone who is receiving the complete Summative 1 Evaluation.  Teachers hired for a short term contract do not complete a PGP

SCORING – DEVELOPMENT OF GOAL  Worth 8 points  All 3 PRT scores are averaged and then averaged again with the administrator’s score

÷ 2 [( 7 )+ 8 ] ÷ 2 ÷ 2 = ÷ 2 = 7.5 SAMPLE SCORING

TWO OPTIONS FOR THE PROFESSIONAL GROWTH PLAN (PGP TWO OPTIONS FOR THE PROFESSIONAL GROWTH PLAN (PGP)  Option A: Quantitative (Traditional)  Option B: Evaluation-based (IPPAS Summative Part 1)

PGP OPTION A  Focuses on quantitative data only  Same format as previous years  Teachers hired on or after 9/16/2016 may choose this option

PGP OPTION B  Teacher uses the Summative Part 1 and feedback from supervising administrator  Teacher chooses one element in any of the five dimensions as the focus for improving professional practice

PGP OPTION B  District created drop-down options and options for creating or personalizing own strategies and outcomes for improvement  Teachers hired on or after 9/16/2016 may choose this option

PGP OPTION B CLARIFICATIONS To receive Distinguished on the Work Plan Strategies:  It is optional to fill out the top portion with the drop down choices  You must create of your own Work Plan strategies

PGP OPTION B CLARIFICATIONS Creating your own specific strategies aligns to the language of the rubric.  “The selected strategies directly connect to the selected dimension/element, are action oriented, and deeply embedded within practice.”

COMPLETING THE TEMPLATE  To receive Distinguished on the Work Plan Strategies:  Complete the drop down portion by choosing strategies and then personalize each strategy with specific details in the “Create Your Own Work Plan Strategies” section. OR  Only complete the “Create Your Own Work Plan Strategies” section with specific, selected strategies.

IMPORTANT  Teachers who received a Distinguished rating on last year’s Summative Part I in a particular Dimension/Element and want to continue to work on the same Dimension/Element this year, must write a rationale to support the decision in order to receive a Distinguished rating  Rationale should be added to the Anticipated Outcomes section

PGP IMPLEMENTATION  Implementation for both options is due on 3/17/2017 for Annual Contract(AC) and Professional Services Contract (PSC) teachers

PGP IMPLEMENTATION  Worth maximum 10 points  Teacher’s self-assessment -10 points  Administrator’s assessment -10 points  Both scores are averaged for a maximum total of 10 points  (Teacher Score + Admin Score) ÷ 2 ( ) ÷ 2 = 9

PROGOE  Peer Review Guide (Administrators) - how to assign peer review rights to the Peer Review Team  Conducting Peer Reviews (Peer Review Team) - how to complete the PGP Development Peer Score Activity

IPPAS WEBSITE   Staff  Training, Professional Development and Certification  IPPAS (left column)  All items available (rubrics, timelines, PGP templates)

MODEL SCORING - PGP OPTION A  Review rubric  Review PGP Option A - Mr. Brown  Identify key indicators that resulted in a Distinguished rating for this PGP

TABLE DISCUSSIONS Review PGP Option A - Mrs. Green Identify key indicators that resulted in a Distinguished rating for this PGP Choose a reporter to share out

MODEL SCORING - PGP OPTION B  Review rubric  Review PGP Option B - Mrs. Jones  Identify key indicators that resulted in a Distinguished rating for this PGP

TABLE DISCUSSIONS  Review PGP Option B - Mrs. White  Identify key indicators that resulted in a Distinguished rating for this PGP  Choose a reporter to share out

TABLE DISCUSSIONS  Review PGP Option B - Mr. Black  Discuss what could be added to the Work Plan Strategies and Anticipated Outcomes to make it Distinguished

WRAP UPS  Questions  Session Evaluation

Contacts  Linda Buffum  Courtney Maynor  Peggy Yelverton