1 Polk County Review Meeting 1 June 25, 2012. ATP 2 County Crash Data Overview 06/25/2012 Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, 2007-2011 Severe is fatal and serious.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Safety Conversation: NLTAPA Conference Michael S. Griffith Director Office of Safety Technologies Federal Highway Administration.
Advertisements

1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
County Road Safety Plans Experiences with Development and Implementation Richard (Rick) West, PE Otter Tail County Public Works Director/County Engineer.
Maryland Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Education Program Maryland Highway Safety Office City of Rockville Toole Design Group, LLC Rockville, MD April 11,
Safety at Signalized Intersections. Signalized Intersections FHWA Safety Focus Areas 2.
Jurisdictionally Blind Safety Roadway Departure Crash
Hardin County Engineering Department September 12, 2006.
Carver County Crash Data Overview Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 6/15/ Year Crashes Carver.
Red-Light Running. 2 Traffic Signals Red-Light Running 3 Intersection Fatalities There were 8,657 intersection fatalities in 2007.
City of Evansville and Vanderburgh County Intersection Crash Analysis.
Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2 June 25,
Data Analysis and Use 3-1 NLTAPA Joint Safety Work Group Webinar November 18, 2013.
1 MnDOT County Roadway Safety Plans Review Meeting 1 Metro June 21, 2012.
Annual Safety Meeting February 21, 2007 Ron Marshall, SD LTAP Local Rural Road Safety in SD - What does the data tell us?
Odd Fellows Road Interchange and Roadway Improvements Citizen Information Meeting April 15, 2015.
Local Rural Highway Investment Program (LRHIP)
May 1, 2014 East Gude Drive Pedestrian Road Safety Audit Stakeholder Pedestrian Safety Meeting.
A Systemic Approach to Safety Management NLTAPA Annual Conference July 30, 2012 Hillary Isebrands, P.E., PhD.
City of Henderson Citizens Traffic Advisory Board NDOT SAFETY UPDATE.
1 Ramsey County Review Meeting 1 June 21, Metro* County Crash Data Overview 2 Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury.
1 Washington County Review Meeting 1 June 21, 2012.
1 MnDOT County Roadway Safety Plans Review Meeting #1 - ATP 2 June 25, 2012.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
1 September 28, 2011 Safety Strategies Workshop Brown County Faribault County Martin County Watonwan County.
All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Angela Kargel Region 2 Traffic Manager Oregon Department of Transportation January 2015.
University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research - Results of Crash Analysis University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research.
Unsignalized Intersections Safety at Unsignalized Intersections.
1 Update Update MnDOT’s County Roadway Safety Plans CTS Transportation Research Conference May 23, 2012 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
1 Watonwan County Review Meeting 1 August 31, 2011 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
Name Agency Date, Year Understanding Younger Drivers.
Jurisdictionally Blind Safety Doug Bish OTCDC March 8th.
Polk County Crash Data Overview Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 6/1/ Year Crashes Polk.
1 Marshall County Review Meeting 1 June 25, 2012.
Evaluation of Automated Camera Enforcement on Red Light Running Violations by Time into the Red Phase Nicole Oneyear and Shauna Hallmark.
1 Red Lake County Review Meeting 1 June 25, 2012.
ATP 2 Crash Data Overview Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 6/1/ Year Crashes ATP 2 7,072.
PHASE IV REVIEW MEETING ---- CURVES September 24, 2012.
Southeastern Minnesota Toward Zero Deaths Dodge County Board Presentation October 12, 2010.
Red light Enforcement Enforcement lights A simple tool for safer highways. Prepared by Lieutenant Steven Burch (ret.) Clearwater Police Department.
2011 National Association of County Engineers Conference Mn/DOT County Roadway Safety Plans April 20, 2011 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
ATP 1 County Road Safety Plan 1 Brad Estochen MnDOT Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology
Iihs.org Automated enforcement. Number of U.S. communities with speed cameras and red light cameras January 2016 Automated enforcement uses technology.
Rural Intersection Decision Support - Crash Analysis Rural Intersection Decision Support - Crash Analysis Presented at Pooled Fund Meeting April 19, 2004.
INDOT Office of Traffic Safety Manager, Mike Holowaty
1 Faribault County Review Meeting 1 August 31, 2011 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
1 St. Louis County Review Meeting 1 August 29, 2011 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
Understanding Younger Drivers
What’s UP with County Roads?
Unlicensed Driving.
Walk This Way Our next category is “Walk This Way” and these questions all have to do with how to be a safe pedestrian.
Intersection Crash Analysis in the State of Oregon
Florida Department of Transportation
Using State Data to Assess Vehicle Performance
Name Unit Safety Officer
What factors lead to older drivers’ crashes?
Customer Training Topic Ryder Fleet Risk Services
Monthly Training Topic NV Transport Inc. Safety & Loss Prevention
Bus Services Act 2017 Open Consultation.
HSM Applications to Multilane Rural Highways and Urban Suburban Streets Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural.
Rush-hour truck ban.
D R I V E R S E D G E USA Curriculum Use mouse to advance slides.
John W. Gardner Center for Youth and Their Communities
Interface Interchange Session CU Denver
Crash Severity for Lane Departures Crashes
HSM Applications to Multilane Urban Suburban Multilane Intersections
HSM Applications to Multilane Urban Suburban Multilane Intersections
Ed Sullivan Safety Officer
U.S. Department of Justice Career Information Fair
Walk This Way Our next category is “Walk This Way” and these questions all have to do with how to be a safe pedestrian.
Contributing Factors for Focus Crash Types and Facility Types Raghavan Srinivasan University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center (UNC HSRC)
Presentation transcript:

1 Polk County Review Meeting 1 June 25, 2012

ATP 2 County Crash Data Overview 06/25/2012 Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 5 Year Crashes ATP 2 7, Year Crashes ATP 2 7, State System 3,963 – 53% 128 – 43% State System 3,963 – 53% 128 – 43% CSAH/CR 1,705 – 23% 139 – 46% CSAH/CR 1,705 – 23% 139 – 46% Rural 1,353 – 79% 131 – 94% Rural 1,353 – 79% 131 – 94% Urban 352 – 21% 8 – 6% Urban 352 – 21% 8 – 6% All Way Stop 3 – 2% 0 – 0% All Way Stop 3 – 2% 0 – 0% Run off Road 461 – 67% 51 – 65% Run off Road 461 – 67% 51 – 65% On Curve 153 – 33% 23 – 45% On Curve 153 – 33% 23 – 45% Example All – % Severe – % Example All – % Severe – % Right Angle – 42 (48%), 1 (50%) “Other” – 8 (9%), 1 (50%) Left Turn – 12 (14%), 0 (0%) Rear End – 6 (7%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 42 (48%), 1 (50%) “Other” – 8 (9%), 1 (50%) Left Turn – 12 (14%), 0 (0%) Rear End – 6 (7%), 0 (0%) Thru-Stop 88 – 60% 2 – 100% Thru-Stop 88 – 60% 2 – 100% Rear End – 12 (25%), 0 (0%) Ran Off Road – 9 (19%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 8 (17%), 0 (0%) “Other” – 4 (8%), 0 (0%) Rear End – 12 (25%), 0 (0%) Ran Off Road – 9 (19%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 8 (17%), 0 (0%) “Other” – 4 (8%), 0 (0%) Signalized 8 – 5% 0 – 0% Signalized 8 – 5% 0 – 0% Inters-Related 317 –28% 41 – 33% Inters-Related 317 –28% 41 – 33% City, Twnshp, Other 1,837 – 24% 34 – 11% City, Twnshp, Other 1,837 – 24% 34 – 11% Inters-Related 147 – 42% 2 – 25% Inters-Related 147 – 42% 2 – 25% Not Inters-Related 126 – 36% 5 – 63% Not Inters-Related 126 – 36% 5 – 63% Run Off Road – 32 (25%), 2 (40%) Head On/SS Opp – 10 (8%), 2 (40%) Rear End – 33 (26%), 1 (20%) Right Angle – 10 (8%), 0 (0%) Run Off Road – 32 (25%), 2 (40%) Head On/SS Opp – 10 (8%), 2 (40%) Rear End – 33 (26%), 1 (20%) Right Angle – 10 (8%), 0 (0%) Animal 204 – 15% 7 – 5% Animal 204 – 15% 7 – 5% Not Inters-Related 692 – 60% 79 – 64% Not Inters-Related 692 – 60% 79 – 64% Head On, SS Opp 47 – 7% 13 – 16% Head On, SS Opp 47 – 7% 13 – 16% On Curve 16 – 34% 4 – 31% On Curve 16 – 34% 4 – 31% Unknown/Other 79 – 22% 1 – 12% Unknown/Other 79 – 22% 1 – 12% Unknown/Other 140 – 12% 4 – 3% Unknown/Other 140 – 12% 4 – 3% Other/Unknown 48 – 33% 0 – 0% Other/Unknown 48 – 33% 0 – 0% Right Angle – 50 (31%), 17 (55%) “Other” – 39 (24%), 8 (26%) Rear End – 20 (12%), 2 (6%) Run Off Road – 16 (10%), 1 (3%) Right Angle – 50 (31%), 17 (55%) “Other” – 39 (24%), 8 (26%) Rear End – 20 (12%), 2 (6%) Run Off Road – 16 (10%), 1 (3%) Thru-Stop 161 – 51% 31 – 76% Thru-Stop 161 – 51% 31 – 76% Run Off Road – 49 (34%), 5 (56%) Right Angle – 14 (10%), 2 (22%) “Other” – 29 (20%), 1 (11%) “Not Coded” – 1 (1%), 1 (11%) Run Off Road – 49 (34%), 5 (56%) Right Angle – 14 (10%), 2 (22%) “Other” – 29 (20%), 1 (11%) “Not Coded” – 1 (1%), 1 (11%) Other/Unknown 143 – 45% 9 –22% Other/Unknown 143 – 45% 9 –22% Not Animal 1,149 – 85% 124 – 95% Not Animal 1,149 – 85% 124 – 95% All Way Stop 7 – 2% 1 – 2% All Way Stop 7 – 2% 1 – 2% Signalized 6 – 2% 0 – 0% Signalized 6 – 2% 0 – 0%

6/25/20123 Polk County Crash Data Overview

ATP 2 Crash Data Rural Crashes 94% of the CSAH/CR severe crashes occurred in rural areas. Non-Intersection Related Crashes o 64% of CSAH/CR rural severe crashes are non-intersection related. ‒ 65% of these are road departure crashes, 45% of which occurred on a curve. Intersection Related Crashes o 33% of CSAH/CR rural severe crashes are intersection related. ‒ 76% of these crashes occurred at a thru-STOP intersection. Polk County Crash Data Rural Crashes 97% of the CSAH/CR severe crashes occurred in rural areas. Non-Intersection Related Crashes o 46% of CSAH/CR rural severe crashes are non-intersection related. ‒ 54% of these are road departure crashes, 29% of which occurred on a curve. Intersection Related Crashes o 36% of CSAH/CR rural severe crashes are intersection related. 6/25/20124

Polk County Emphasis Areas 6/25/20125

Safety Workshop Objective: Multidisciplinary discussion of a short list of safety strategies (Note: there is no discussion of specific crash locations.) Date: July 26 Location: U of M Crookston Agriculture Research Center, Crookston, MN Agenda 8:30 AM – Coffee and Registration 9:00 AM – Introductions o Presentations – Law Enforcement and Local Safety Advocates o Background Information/Desired Outcomes o Breakout Sessions – Prioritize Strategies 12:00 – 1:00 PM - Lunch o Report Back/Final Presentation 2:45 – 3:00 PM - Wrap-up 6/25/20126

7 Polk County’s Sample Invite

6/25/20128 Safety Workshop – County Assignments April/May Confirm groups and select group leaders Select dates June Secure Location and Caterer – Group Coordinator people $12/person (“all in” including delivery, tax and tip) Send invites (example has been provided) July All Counties: RSVP Head Count to Rich Sanders, Polk County by July 13th Group Coordinator (Rich): Confirm final headcount by July 16th Group Coordinator (Rich): Carla Stueve (SRF) at Provide final headcount Audio-visual availability for the workshop