Switch NNRTI to NNRTI  Switch EFV to ETR –CNS toxicity study –Patient’s preference study.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Switch EFV to ETR - Efavirenz to Etravirine. Efavirenz to Etravirine switch in patients with CNS adverse events Waters L, AIDS 2011;25:65-71 Design Endpoints.
Advertisements

Switch to EVG/c/FTC/TDF  STRATEGY-PI Study  STRATEGY-NNRTI Study.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Comparison of INSTI vs PI  FLAMINGO  GS  ACTG A5257.
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV  STARTMRK  GS-US  SINGLE.
The impact of switching to etravirine on efavirenz-related CNS toxicity. Laura Waters 1, Martin Fisher 2, Alan Winston 3, Chris Higgs 1, Wendy Hadley 2,
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
Switch to TDF/FTC/RPV - SPIRIT Study. SPIRIT study: switch PI/r + 2 NRTI to TDF/FTC/RPV STR  Design TDF/FTC/RPV STR 24 weeks 48 weeks Primary Endpoint.
Switch to ATV/r + RAL  HARNESS Study. ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + TDF/FTC N = 37 N = 72 ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + RAL 400 mg bid  Design Randomisation 2: 1 Open-label.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Switch to TDF/FTC/RPV  SPIRIT Study. SPIRIT study: Switch PI/r + 2 NRTI to TDF/FTC/RPV TDF/FTC/RPV STR 24 weeks 48 weeks Primary Endpoint Secondary Endpoint.
Phase 2 of new ARVs  Fostemsavir, prodrug of temsavir (attachment inhibitor) –AI Study  TAF (TFV prodrug) –Study –Study  Doravirine.
Switch to ATV/r + 3TC  SALT Study. ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + 2 NRTI (investigator-selected) N = 143 ATV/r 300/100 mg + 3TC 300 mg qd  Design Randomisation*
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen  ATAZIP. Mallolas J, JAIDS 2009;51:29-36 ATAZIP ATAZIP Study: Switch LPV/r to ATV/r  Design  Endpoints –Primary:
Switch to RAL-containing regimen  Canadian Study  CHEER  Montreal Study  EASIER  SWITCHMRK  SPIRAL  Switch ER.
Switch NNRTI to NNRTI  Switch EFV to ETR –CNS toxicity study –Patient’s preference study.
Comparison of INSTI vs PI  FLAMINGO  GS  ACTG A5257  WAVES.
Comparison of NRTI combinations  ZDV/3TC vs TDF + FTC –Study 934  ABC/3TC vs TDF/FTC –HEAT Study –ACTG A5202 Study –ASSERT Study  FTC/TDF vs FTC/TAF.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy  ATARITMO  Swedish Study  ACTG A5201  OREY  MODAt Study.
Switch to ATV-containing regimen  ARIES Study  INDUMA Study  ASSURE Study.
Randomisation* 2 : 1 Double blind *Randomisation was stratified on genotype (1a or 1b or other) and IL28B genotype (CC, CT or TT) N = 133 N = 260 W24W48.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Switch to ATV ± r-containing regimen  SWAN Study  SLOAT Study.
Switch ABC/3TC to TDF/FTC  SWIFT Study. SWIFT Study: Switch ABC/3TC to TDF/FTC  Design Campo R, CID 2013, Jan 29 (epub ahead of print) LPV/rATV/rFPV.
Switch PI/R to ETR  Etraswitch. Etraswitch Study: Switch PI/r to ETR Continuation of current PI/R + 2 NRTI N = 21 N = 22 ETR 400 mg QD* + 2 NRTI  Design.
Phase 2 of new ARVs  Fostemsavir, prodrug of temsavir (attachment inhibitor) –AI Study  TAF (TFV prodrug) –Study –Study  Doravirine.
Switch to ATV- or ATV/r-containing regimen Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen  ATAZIP Switch to ATV ± r-containing regimen  SWAN Study  SLOAT Study.
Switch to RAL-containing regimen  Canadian Study  CHEER  Montreal Study  EASIER  SWITCHMRK  SPIRAL  Switch ER.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Comparison of INSTI vs PI  FLAMINGO  GS  ACTG A5257.
Switch to DTG/ABC/3TC  STRIIVING Study.  Design  Endpoints –Primary: proportion of patients maintaining HIV RNA < 50 c/mL at W48 (ITT-E, snapshot)
Switch to PI/r monotherapy
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Switch to PI/r + 3TC vs PI/r monotherapy
ARV-trial.com Switch to ATV/r + 3TC ATLAS-M Study.
ARV-trial.com Switch to LPV/r + RAL KITE Study 1.
Switch to Etravirine from Efavirenz due to CNS Toxicity SSAT-029 STUDY
Switch to DTG-containing regimen
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch ABC/3TC to TDF/FTC
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
ARV-trial.com Switch to DRV/r + RPV PROBE Study 1.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Switch to DTG-containing regimen
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
ARV-trial.com Switch to ATV/r + RAL HARNESS Study 1.
ARV-trial.com Switch to DTG/ABC/3TC STRIIVING NEAT
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Comparison of NRTI combinations
ARV-trial.com Switch to FTC + ddI + EFV ALIZE 1.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Presentation transcript:

Switch NNRTI to NNRTI  Switch EFV to ETR –CNS toxicity study –Patient’s preference study

Switch EFV to ETR: CNS toxicity ETR 400 mg QD + 2 NRTI 24 weeks 48 weeks Primary Endpoint Secondary Endpoint N = 20 N = 18 EFV 600 mg QD + 2 NRTI ETR + 2 NRTI  Design Randomisation 1: 1 Double blind 12 weeks Primary Endpoint 24 weeks Secondary Endpoint  Objective –Primary Endpoint: change in proportion of patients experiencing grade 2-4 CNS toxicity at W12 –Secondary endpoints: change in CNS score at W12 and W24; combined change (immediate and delayed switch) 12 weeks after switch; median number of grade 2-4 CNS adverse events; viral suppression ; CD4 change; fasting lipids; safety SWITCH EFV/ETR Open-label phase 38 HIV+ adults Stable EFV+ 2 NRTI ≥ 12 weeks EFV-related CNS symptoms HIV RNA < 50 c/mL CD4 > 50/mm 3 No prior ETR or RPV exposure Waters L, AIDS 2011;25:65-71 W12W24

Baseline characteristics and disposition * Frequency of individual events similar in both groups except for insomnia (75% vs 39%, p = 0.024)  Median duration of EFV exposure: 21.4 months Switch EFV to ETR: CNS toxicity SWITCH EFV/ETR Immediate switch N = 20 Delayed switch N = 18 Grade 2-4 CNS AE*18 (90%)16 (89%) CNS score1410 NRTI backbone TDF/FTC60%61% Atripla50% ABC/3TC35%22% ABC/TDF5%11% TDF/3TC06% Completed follow-up1913 Waters L, AIDS 2011;25:65-71

 Primary endpoint –Grade 2-4 CNS AE at W12: 60% in immediate switch vs 81.3% in deferred switch (significant decrease in immediate switch; p = 0.041) –Abnormal dreams decrease from 50% to 20% in IS group (p = 0.041) vs no change in DS : 67% to 63% –Median number of grade 2-4 CNS AE IS: 4 at baseline vs 1.5 at W12 (p = 0.003) DS: 3 at baseline vs 3 at W12 –CNS score: IS = change from 14 to 6 (p = 0.001); DS = 10 to 7.5 (NS)  Change from W12 to W24 –No further significant change in immediate switch group –Significant improvement in deferred group  Other results –No virologic failure –Improvement in lipids after switch to ETR –Grade 2 AE deemed related to ETR: fatigue, headache, reduced libido Switch EFV to ETR: CNS toxicity SWITCH EFV/ETR Waters L, AIDS 2011;25:65-71

 Conclusion –Switching EFV to ETR led to a significant reduction in overall grade 2-4 CNS adverse events, including insomnia, abnormal dreams and nervousness as individual adverse event –No virological failures occurred in the 19 and 15 patients completing 24 and 12 weeks of once-daily ETR-based HAART –Improvement in lipids with significant reductions in total and LDL-cholesterol after 12 weeks of ETR – Proactive switch away from EFV may yield significant reductions in CNS toxicity Switch EFV to ETR: CNS toxicity SWITCH EFV/ETR Waters L, AIDS 2011;25:65-71