City of Kodiak Harbor Rates. Harbor Rate Study Recommendations from Northern Economics – Option 1 ▫ 18.5% increase and increase based on Producer Price.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Municipal & Financial Services Group Water and Sewer Rate Study Revenue Requirements and Rates Workshop April 18, 2012 King George County Service Authority.
Advertisements

HCPS Board of Education FY 2010 Budget Approval June 22,
1 FY 11 Airport Budget Recommendations. 2 Aviation Department Mission Statement To provide a safe and secure air transportation system that is economically.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
Financial Review Year Ended June 30, Plante/Moran Audit Results of the Audit Presented to the Finance and Audit Committee on October 6 Unmodified.
1 Combined Utility System Cost of Service Rate Study Presentation April 6, 2010.
Accounting Details We show transfers as a separate line below personnel, operating expense, and capital outlay so true cost of the department before transfer.
2014 Budget Department Presentations Infrastructure Funding Options.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
Wilderness Rim Association Water Rate and Reserve Study Board Meeting April 23, 2014 Presented By: Chris Gonzalez, Project Manager.
Page: Water and Wastewater Rate Study and Financial Forecast Council Presentation City of Cottonwood July 2009.
What a Difference a Plan Makes Master Planning and Realignment of Marinas Pacific Coast Congress April 13, 2006 Julie Bassuk, AICP, partner, MAKERS Paul.
Port Everglades Master / Vision Plan Status Broward County Board of County Commissioners May 4 th, 2010.
Long Beach Water Department Review of FY 12 Budget.
Mott Community College Board of Trustees Committee of the Whole Meeting June 27, 2011 BUDGET RESOLUTIONS.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASIBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP DECEMBER 14, Sec Review requirements. (a) The City Manager shall each fiscal year prepare a preliminary capital improvement.
NMA Report to City Council June 16, 2015 Presented to Newport Beach City Council 1.
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP DECEMBER 21, Sec Review requirements. (a) The City Manager shall each fiscal year prepare a preliminary capital improvement.
Pasadena Water and Power Public Hearing Date Water Capital Improvement Charge Pasadena City Council Meeting November 16, 2015 Agenda Item #13.
December 2, 2008 City of Glendale - Finance Department 1 First Quarter Financial Update December 2, 2008.
Pasadena Water and Power Public Hearing Water Capital Improvement Charge Pasadena City Council Meeting January 11, 2016 Item #12.
August 2, FY 2014 City Budget Comparisons2 Population of Largest Cities.
FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET PREPARATION WORKSHOP City Council November 23, 2015.
City of Palo Alto Utility Rate Changes FY 2013 Facility Managers’ Meeting August 16, 2012 Ipek Connolly, Senior Resource Planner.
Presented By: Budget & Research Department Karen Rhodes-Whitley FY STATUS REPORT & THREE-YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST SUMMARY FISCAL YEARS
Resolution 2014R-100 December 18,  Board Direction ◦ Establish a “Stabilized” cost-of-service rate of $ for FYs 2015 & 2016 that includes.
Resolution 2014R-099 December 18,  Board Direction ◦ Establish a monthly cost-of-service rate of $ for FY 2015 and utilize a General Fund.
WATER & SEWER ENTERPRISE FUNDS. Criteria for Rates  Overall Goal – to set rates to recover costs & avoid significant fluctuations Criteria: o Project.
1 City of Cocoa Michael Burton - President Andrew Burnham - Sr. Vice President Eric Grau - Project Consultant Presented by: Water, Sewer & Reclaimed Water.
Water Rate Presentation City Council Meeting December 14, 2010.
FY 2016 Budget Discussion Prior to Proposed Budget Submittal July 23 rd,2015.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA FINANCIAL FORECAST AND CAPITAL FACILITIES FEES ANALYSIS Prepared in Conjunction With the Utility System Revenue.
City of Port Moody Draft Financial Plan Tuesday, February 26 th, 2013.
City of Sequim Long Range Financial Plan City Council Study Session June 27, 2011.
Kodiak Cash Flow Analysis June 7, 2016 Michelle Humphrey Presentation to Kodiak City Council.
May 31, 2016 WATER & SEWER RATE STUDY PRESENTATION 5/9/2016 City of Greenfield, California.
FY 2012 General Fund 5-Year Forecast Presentation to the Board of County Commissioners Multnomah County Budget Office November 9, 2010.
Long Range Financial Forecast Preview
Accumulated Operating Fund Surplus
City of Petersburg Water and Wastewater Rates
Texas Woman’s University Fiscal Year 2017 Budget
City of Rialto Midyear Changes Budget-Fiscal Year 2013/2014
City of richmond FY mid-year budget review
Strategic Revenue & Expenditure Discussion
City of Somersworth, New Hampshire
Proposed Budget FY August 7, 2017
City of Rialto Midyear Changes Budget-Fiscal Year 2012/2013
Mid-Year Financial Review Fiscal Year
City of Sisters, OR 2017 Water & Sewer Rate Study
City of Petersburg Water and Sewer Rates April 26, 2011
FY2015 ACTUAL AND FY 2016 ESTIMATED REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES
President’s Leadership Council Budget Update
Updates to the Traffic Reduction and Transportation Improvements Fee (TR/TIF) City Council July 24, 2017.
Introduction to the UK Economy
Water Cost-of-Service
Sitka Harbor Department
City of Lebanon, Missouri Electric Department
Presentation Chapter 9 Capital Budgeting Cash Flows.
City of McCall Water Rate Study – Draft Rate Recommendations
Financial Modeling and Forecasting Smart Practices
Work Session Follow UP Aug. 23, 2018.
WHAT IS “HOME RULE”?.
Report to Board of Education – September 6, 2016
Funding the Transportation Infrastructure Improvement Plan (IIP): A Discussion of Cash Flows Town Council Meeting February 15, 2017.
WHAT IS “HOME RULE”?.
2018 Water/Wastewater Rate Study and Financial Forecast
College Council November 29, 2018.
Space Removal Initiative
Ch. 16: Short-Term Financial Planning
Presentation transcript:

City of Kodiak Harbor Rates

Harbor Rate Study Recommendations from Northern Economics – Option 1 ▫ 18.5% increase and increase based on Producer Price Index each year for the next 4 years i.e. average 2.8% increase each year Alternative Recommendation – Option 2 ▫ 6% non-compounding increase per year

Council Questions & Concerns Council Action::  Postponed rate increase (both options) pending more discussion, information and time for public feedback Council Questions & Concerns:  Not enough time for customers to prepare for rate increase July 1, 2016  What will the cost impact be to user?  Why is the moorage rate higher per foot for larger vessels ?  How do we compare to other markets ?

User Cost Impacts: Option % Year One; Average 2.8% Each Year Thereafter Vessel Length ANNUAL FEE PER FOOT Current Rate FY 17FY 18FY 19FY 20FY 21 (Jan 1, 2017)(July 1, 2017)(July 1, 2018)(July 1, 2019)(July 1, 2020) 0 to 40 feet$ to 60 feet$ to 80 feet$ to 100 feet$ to 120 feet$ to 150 feet$ feet$ Vessel Length ANNUAL FEE PER VESSEL Current Rate FY 17FY 18FY 19*FY 20FY feet$1, , , , , , feet$2, , , , , , feet$4, , , , , , feet$7, , , , , , feet$9, , , , , , feet$13, , , , ,185,3517, $15, , , , , , Table : 1 Table : 2

Vessel Length ANNUAL FEE PER FOOT (6% increase per year) Current Rate FY 17FY 18FY 19FY 20FY 21 (Jan 1, 2017)(July 1, 2017)(July 1, 2018)(July 1, 2019)(July 1, 2020) 0 to 40 feet$30.00$31.80$33.60$35.40$37.20$39 41 to 60 feet$41.00$43.46$45.92$48.38$50.84$ to 80 feet$61.00$64.66$68.32$71.98$75.64$ to 100 feet$71.50$75.79$80.08$84.37$88.66$ to 120 feet$82.00$86.92$91.84$96.76$101.68$ to 150 feet$89.00$94.34$99.68$105.02$110.36$ feet$100.00$106.00$112.00$118.00$124.00$ Vessel Length ANNUAL FEE PER VESSEL (6% increase per year) Current Rate FY 17FY 18FY 19*FY 20FY feet$1,200.00$1, $1,344.00$1,416.00$1,488.00$1, feet$2,460.00$2, $2,755,20$2,902.80$3,050.40$3, feet$4,880.00$5, $5,465.60$5,758.40$6,051.20$6, feet$7,150.00$7, $8,008.00$8,437.00$8,866.00$9, feet$9,840.00$10, $11,020.80$11,611.20$12,201.60$12, feet$13,350.00$14, $14,952.00$15,753.00$16,554.00$17, $15,100.00$16, $16,912.00$17,818.00$18,724.00$19, User Cost Impacts: Option 2 (6% per year for 5 years) Table : 3 Table : 4

Vessel Length ANNUAL FEE PER VESSEL (6% increase per year) Current Rate FY 17FY 18FY 19*FY 20FY feet$1,200.00$1, $1,344.00$1,416.00$1,488.00$1, feet$2,460.00$2, $2,755,20$2,902.80$3,050.40$3, feet$4,880.00$5, $5,465.60$5,758.40$6,051.20$6, feet$7,150.00$7, $8,008.00$8,437.00$8,866.00$9, feet$9,840.00$10, $11,020.80$11,611.20$12,201.60$12, feet$13,350.00$14, $14,952.00$15,753.00$16,554.00$17, $15,100.00$16, $16,912.00$17,818.00$18,724.00$19, User Annual Cost Impacts Option 1 VS Option 2 Table : 2 Table : 4 Vessel Length ANNUAL FEE PER VESSEL (18.5% year one, 2.8% thereafter) Current Rate FY 17FY 18FY 19*FY 20FY feet$1, , , , , , feet$2, , , , , , feet$4, , , , , , feet$7, , , , , , feet$9, , , , , , feet$13, , , , ,185,3517, $15, , , , , ,983.32

Build & Operating Cost - Per slip Table : 5 Slip Length(1) Build Cost Per LF (2) Total Build Cost Per Slip (3) Annual Build Cost Per Slip (4) Annual Operating Cost Per Slip ($60 ft) (5) Total Annual Slip Cost (6) Total Annual Revenue per slip Percent of Cost Billed 231,59336,6391,2211,3802,6011,09242% 241,59338,2321,2741,4402,7141,14042% 301,59347,7901,5931,8003,3931,42542% 401,59363,7202,1242,4004,5241,90042% 481’59376,4642,5492,8805,4292,80852% 551,59387,6152,9213,3006,2213,18852% 601,858111,4803,7163,6007,3163,51048% 621,858115,1963,8403,7207,5604,86764% 851,947165,4955,5165,10010,6167,56671% 1002,528252,8008,4276,00014,4278,90062% 1102,528278,0809,2696,60015,86910,94569% 1502,780417,00013,9009,00022,90015,97570% 1512,780419,78013,9939,06023,05217,74377% Build Cost Formula: total cost divided by total linear footage of facility (1), x length of slip = build cost per linear foot (2), divided by 30 year life cycle = slip build cost per year (3). 23 to 62 foot slips build cost based on PND estimates for replacement (2016). M, and P floats build cost based on actual cost (2008). N float build cost based on M&P actual cost (2008) plus inflation adjustment of 10%. Operational cost Formula: 50% of annual harbor enterprise fund operating cost (1,802,500), divided by total linear feet of moorage = cost per linear foot x length of slip = annual operational cost per slip (4). Annual Revenue per slip formula: Total transient revenue (525k) divided by total moorage linear feet (30k) = transient revenue per linear foot (17.50) x slip length = transient revenue per slip, + exclusive revenue per slip = total annual revenue per slip (6).

St Herman Harbor  N float cost 5 million in 2000  M&P floats cost 9.2 million in 2008  Estimated E thru L floats replacement cost 29 million N P M Shipyard & Travelift site

Market Comparisons AlaskaWashington Vessel SizeKodiakHomerSeawardDutch Harbor Fisherman’s Terminal Edmonds Marina Shilshole Bay Marina Harbor Island 40ft1, , , , , , , , ft9, , , , , , , NA

FY 2017 Harbor Revenues by Source

Harbor FY 2017 Budget - Charges for Services

Harbor Fund Balance Restricted for Capital Assets Restricted for Debt Service Assigned to Capital ProjectsUnassigned 2014 Actual 11,146, ,581Unknown 3,273, Actual 9,877, ,581Unknown 3,523, Estimated 9,877, ,581 2,940, , Budget 9,877, ,581 2,940,901 (4,187,501) 2018 Forecast 9,877, ,581 (4,953,392) 2019 Forecast 9,877, ,581 (5,821,913) 2020 Forecast 9,877, ,581 (6,793,063) 2021 Forecast 9,877, ,581 (7,866,875)

Harbor Fund – Appropriations YearAnnual Net Deficit - Appropriations FY 2016 Estimated (474,216) FY 2017 Budget(1,369,696) FY 2018 Forecasted(765,891) FY 2019 Forecasted(868,521) FY 2020 Forecasted(971,150) FY 2021 Forecasted(1,073,812)

Harbor Fund Balance

Harbor Charges for Services – Option 1 Charges for Services FY 2017 Budget FY % 1/1 FY % FY % FY % FY % Dockages AMHS 32,500 Exclusive Moorage 1,240,000 1,510,543 1,552,838 1,596,318 1,641,015 Transient Moorage 525, , , , , ,784 Other Misc Fees 167, , , , , ,008 Pier / Dock Fees 198, , , , , ,033 Total Charges for Services 2,162,500 2,278,588 2,627,224 2,699,875 2,774,562 2,851,340

Harbor Charges for Services – Option 2 Charges for Services FY 2017 Budget FY % 1/1 FY % FY % FY % FY % Dockages AMHS 32,500 Exclusive Moorage 1,240,000 1,388,800 1,463,200 1,537,600 1,612,000 Transient Moorage 525, , , , , ,500 Other Misc Fees 167, , , , , ,100 Pier / Dock Fees 198, , , , , ,400 Total Charges for Services 2,162,500 2,200,150 2,418,100 2,545,900 2,673,700 2,801,500

Harbor Charges for Services – Comparison Charges for Services FY 2017 Budget FY % 1/1 FY % FY % FY % FY % Option 1 2,162,500 2,278,588 2,627,223 2,699,876 2,774,562 2,851,340 Option 2 2,162,500 2,200,150 2,418,100 2,545,900 2,673,700 2,801,500 Difference -0- (78,438) (209,124) (153,975) (100,862) (49,840) * Note Option 1 generates $592,240 more revenue than Option 2 over a 5 year period

Summary Proposed rate increase (either option) doesn’t fully address the harbors financial short falls but option 1 generates $592,240 in additional funds over the 5 year period. The tiered rate structure is justified based on build costs for the varying slip sizes, bigger slips cost more per SF to build. The smaller vessel are not charged anywhere near the build and operational cost and are far below other comparable Alaska markets. Large vessels are exceeding current Alaska markets after 5 years. What is Councils direction moving forward?