Reload images Reload Images Understanding the AEDI results.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding the Early Years Action Planning Session Thursday, May 22, 2008 Delta Brunswick Hotel Saint John, NB.
Advertisements

EDI Neighbourhood Data EDI Results & 2011 Neighbourhood Demographics.
Translational science fostering integration The predictive validity of the AEDI: Predicting later cognitive and behavioural outcomes. Assoc Prof Sally.
Bridging the Divide How a collaborative approach is developing inter-sectoral links in rural WA Robin Surridge & Zoe Upson - Amity Health 2014.
Proportion of languages other than English spoken in the home Prepared by: AEDI National Support Centre Source: ABS Census 2001 Basic Community Profile.
Updated January “There’s an enormous brain drain being lost in our country. Children under 5 are not being empowered to reach their potential and.
Understanding The Early Years Niagara College ECE Program  October 2007 Glory Ressler, B.A., Dip. GIT Coordinator, Understanding the Early Years Niagara.
This PowerPoint was developed by ECMap to be used as a framework by coalitions and communities in presenting their community profile results.
2010 Annual Employee Survey Results
CITIES OF THE FUTURE sustainability, vitality and wellbeing In the Zone Conference 2009 Perth, Western Australia 10 November 2009 Professor Fiona Stanley.
1 UEY Red Deer Preliminary Results Research Forum: December 1, 2009 The School Readiness of Red Deer’s Kindergarten Children: A Preliminary Report on the.
1 The Early Childhood Development Association of PEI Understanding the Early Years Prince Edward Island Profile.
COMMUNITY KNOWLEDGE: Readiness to Learn in Niagara GLORY RESSLER Coordinator Understanding the Early Years TIFFANY GARTNER Data Analysis Coordinator Ontario.
Slide 1. slide 2 slide 3 Risk to Ready begins with the Early Development Instrument Developed in Canada in 1998 and expanding across US since 2009 through.
Reload images Reload Images Understanding the AEDI results Blue Mountains LGA – Key Stakeholders 16 September 2013.
Measuring School Readiness : The Early Development Instrument Washington, DC, 17 February 2005 Magdalena Janus, Ph.D.
+ Third Party Evaluation – Interim Report Presentation for Early Childhood Advisory Council December 19, 2013.
Playgroups, School Readiness and Child Development.
Summary of EDI SK Results Algoma 2004/05 & 2005/06 Sept 25th 2007 Algoma-Manitoulin Ontario Early Years.
Getting Ready Opportunities for Progress on Early Childhood Education Presented by: Elizabeth Burke Bryant Rhode Island KIDS COUNT May 1, 2009.
Template provided by: “posters4research.com” Data were collected by interviewing the caseload holders at Services A and B with reference to patients case.
Assessment Assessment is the collection, recording and analysis of data about students as they work over a period of time. This should include, teacher,
USING DATA TO INSPIRE PROGRAMMATIC CHANGE EARLY DEVELOPMENT INDEX (EDI) & DRDP/ASSESSMENTS.
Parent’s Guide to Individual Profile Report
Our Children Our Communities Our Future Australian Early Development Census (AEDC) Prepared by Gail Clark, WA AEDC Coordinator.
Australian Early Development Census
Chawton CE Primary School Assessment Tuesday 4th October 2016
Updates of the 2013 CYSN Report Card
Our Children, Our Community, Our Change
Sheffield Performance Overview
This morning looking at the information you need to be successful
CogAT Cognitive Abilities Test ™ Report to Parents
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING
Understanding ITBS Scores
RAISEonline Data Analysis for Governors and Staff
Understanding My Paper Score Report
OSEP Project Directors Meeting
Using Data To Learn About Our Young Children: Mapping Early Development Instrument (EDI) Results in Miami-Dade County. Zafreen Jaffery, Ed.D.
Linking Standards, IFSPs and Service Delivery
Understanding Results
Welsh Baccalaureate – Results at St Alban’s
General Level Structure
11/19/2018 Welcome to PDIS 101 An Introduction to the Professional Development Information System (PDIS) Welcome to PDIS 101. This presentation is meant.
Sel in ymca afterschool project results
The Web Based Teaching Tool
Human Wellbeing Index.
Cognitive Abilities Test (CogAT)
School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Understanding ITBS Scores
The 2016 Early Development Instrument Results
Redesign Family Meeting
Principles of Development
KS2 SATS 2018.
Kindergarten School Readiness:
Dance and Pipe Consolidation
P ! A L S Interpreting Student Data to
CogAT Cognitive Abilities Test ™ Report to Parents
Child Care and Young Children’s Development
Support for parents and guardians
Achieving Success in the Early Years Thursday 11th October 2018
2 Simple Workshop.
Early Development Instrument: Results
Measuring EC Outcomes DEC Conference Presentation 2010
Office of Strategy, Innovation and Performance
EDI Neighbourhood Data
Integrated Math 2 - Santowski
Measuring Part C and Early Childhood Special Education Child Outcomes
Psychological Testing
Scatterplots and Two-Way Tables
Presentation transcript:

Reload images Reload Images Understanding the AEDI results

The AEDI results provide important information about the development of Australia’s children as they start school.

Teachers complete a Checklist for children in their first year of formal full-time school. The checklist measures five key areas, or domains, of child development: physical health and wellbeing social competence emotional maturity language and cognitive skills (school-based) communication skills and general knowledge. For a full description of the AEDI visit How is the information collected?

An AEDI score (0 – 10) is allotted for each domain which will place each child in the following categories relative to other children in Australia in 2012: Developmentally ‘on track’ Developmentally ‘at risk’ Developmentally ‘vulnerable’ For this reason the AEDI is a relative measure How are AEDI results calculated?

On track Developmentally Vulnerable Developmentally at risk AEDI domain percentile th percentile 10 th percentile The AEDI is a relative measure In 2009, children who scored above the 25 th percentile were classified as ‘developmentally on track’. In 2009, children who scored between the 10th and 25th percentile were classified as ‘developmentally at risk’. In 2009, children who scored below the 10 th percentile were classified as ‘developmentally vulnerable’. 50

The AEDI is a relative measure AEDI results are reported at a: AEDI Local Community AEDI community State/territory and National level.

The AEDI results pinpoint where communities are doing well and where they can improve to better support children

Understanding the AEDI: numbers and proportions Numbers: the actual number of children developmentally vulnerable (e.g. 10 children) Proportion: a percentage of children developmentally vulnerable (e.g. 10 children out of 20 = 50%) Why is it important to consider both the proportion of children developmentally vulnerable and the number of children this represents? A high proportion does not necessarily mean a large number of children. Similarly, a low proportion in a large community may still equate to a large number of children.

Understanding the 2012 AEDI results The best way to understand the 2012 AEDI results is to compare how well children in a community are doing relative to other children both within their community and across Australia.

Understanding the 2009 and 2012 AEDI results With each successive AEDI data collection ( ) there is an opportunity to track how Australian children are progressing over time

2009 – 2012 comparative results If children are doing better... On track Developmentally Vulnerable Developmentally at risk On track Vulnerable Developmentally at risk Cut off same as Larger proportion of children are on track Smaller proportion of children are developmentally vulnerable AEDI domain score

The AEDI results help communities understand where their strengths and vulnerabilities lie. This enables communities to work together, learn how to strengthen their community and give their children the best start in life.

The AEDI results can be used with other sociodemographic and community indicators

Where can I find the results? AEDI results are publicly reported via: National report Online maps Community Profiles School Profiles

AEDI maps and tables: green shading The proportions and numbers of children developmentally vulnerable are shown as follows: Areas shaded in lighter greens have lower proportions of developmentally vulnerable children Areas shaded in darker greens have higher proportions of developmentally vulnerable children. Highest proportion Lowest proportion No data

Australian Early Development Index For further information, please visit…