EVALUATION OF AN ASSESSMENT BY SUSAN MAVRELIS-LAI 802.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Special Education Secondary Math Intervention Committee Information for Curriculum Council 8/17/10.
Advertisements

Understanding By Design: Integration of CTE and Core Content Curriculum Michael S. Gullett.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Areas of Concentration:  Biology  Physical Science (Physics & Chemistry)  Mathematics  Technology  Earth & Space Science.
1 Oregon Reading First Institute on Beginning Reading: Evaluating and Planning Spring, 2006 Cohort B.
1 Training for the New Georgia Performance Standards Day 1: Standards-Based Education and the New GPS.
Welcome to Unit 6 Seminar: Learning The Language Learning and Assessment Strategies 1.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
MELROSE PUBLIC SCHOOLS MELROSE VETERANS MEMORIAL MIDDLE SCHOOL OCTOBER 2013 MCAS Spring 2013 Results.
Jpschools.org PLATO IN THE MIDDLE SCHOOL CCSS CLASSROOM.
Building Effective Assessments. Agenda  Brief overview of Assess2Know content development  Assessment building pre-planning  Cognitive factors  Building.
HS-MASS 2 Project: Mathematics Overview of Sessions 1&2 for Teachers.
1. Principles Equity Curriculum Teaching 3 Assessment Technology Principles The principles describe particular features of high-quality mathematics programs.
Parent Information Presentation. To nurture potential in all students. To challenge those with advanced learning capabilities through differentiation.
A Day in the Life The Three Approaches to Middle School Reading Instruction.
Transition to PA Common Core Next Steps in Curriculum Copyright ©2010 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 1.
GOMATH! Day 2 Network 609 Core Curriculum Planning June 2013 Presenter: Karen Cardinali.
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
WIDA ELP Standards Providing Educational Equity to ELLs through Language Development.
Lecture 7. The Questions: What is the role of alternative assessment in language learning? What are the Reasons.
Melrose High School MCAS Presentation October 22, 2013.
AFTER-SCHOOL MATH REMEDIATION PROGRAM  Since 2002 the Algebra Readiness Initiative (ARI) has provided mathematics intervention resources and.
Mt. Diablo Unified School District Elementary Mathematics Adoption Buy Back Day Thursday, August 27, 2009.
Fourth session of the NEPBE II in cycle Dirección de Educación Secundaria February 25th, 2013 Assessment Instruments.
Presented by: Shawna Howard Research Professor: Andres Garcia, Ed.D
About this Powerpoint Presentation Use this Powerpoint in conjunction with the “Community and School Board Report” found at
Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative District and School Capacity Building Leadership No Child Left Behind Partnerships & Professional Learning.
Response to Intervention Problem Solving Process –Florida’s Model Evaluate Did the plan work? Problem Analysis Why is it occurring?
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Day 3 Big Ideas Essential Questions.  Review Unit Organizer  Align Standards for Mathematical Practice to the Unit  Create Big Ideas & Essential Questions.
1 Oregon Reading First Institute on Beginning Reading: Evaluating and Planning Spring, 2006 Cohort A (C) 2006 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center.
© TNTP 2013 ACE Observer Training Trombly For observers new to TNTP and the ACE Instructional Framework.
PENFIELD CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: K-5 LITERACY CURRICULUM AUDIT Presented by: Dr. Marijo Pearson Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction,
Tier 1 Instructional Delivery and Treatment Fidelity Networking Meeting February, 2013 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel.
MATHEMATICS YEAR TWO LEADERSHIP SERIES IMPLEMENTING STRATEGIES TO ENGAGE STUDENTS AND RAISE ACHIEVEMENT FEBRUARY 19, MARCH 26, MAY 21, 2014.
Florida Education: The Next Generation DRAFT March 13, 2008 Version 1.0 Best Practices Gradual Release Model Presented by: Curriculum & Instruction Gradual.
Exploring Focus in the 2011 MA Curriculum Framework for Mathematics
Utilizing the Student Teacher for Positive Student Outcomes
Get Ready to Work Sign in & pick up handout Get out your nametag
Snaptutorial ESE 697 Help Bcome Exceptional/ snaptutorial.com
Lesson planning 101 – Assessment & Questions
Introduction to Pearson Forward
Problem solving strategies IN GRADES K - 2
Transitioning to Common Core Math
Chapter 4 • Expectations Generate Clear Expectations
Using the Michigan Focal Points to Guide Instruction and Assessment
Advocacy Ann Ortenzi Team 6B
Teaching the Common Core Using the Math Practices
Curriculum Structures
RTI & SRBI What Are They and How Can We Use Them?
Framing Success with Effective Lesson Objectives and Demonstrations of Learning Introductions, logistics/housekeeping.
Measuring Polygon Side Lengths
Office of Education Improvement and Innovation
Mathematics and Special Education Leadership Protocols
Sample Components of Guided Math Workshop
Instructional Learning Cycle:
Whole group instruction
#1 #3 #4 #2 Onward! To Common Core!.
Building Academic Language
Building Academic Language
1) 2) 3) 4) 5) Warm Up/Do Now Evaluate: OBJECTIVE: Try these problems
SUPPORTING THE Progress Report in MATH
Building Academic Language
Introduction to Envisions
Alignment of curriculum, instruction and classroom assessments
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores
Making Middle Grades Work
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores
Maths No Problem! Parents Workshop
Presentation transcript:

EVALUATION OF AN ASSESSMENT BY SUSAN MAVRELIS-LAI 802

WHO, WHAT, AND WHERE! Who: A talented and gifted first grade class, that scored 99% on the citywide test. What: Math Assessment Where: PS 85, a district 30 school in Astoria, Queens.

ASSESSMENT The math assessment that I have chose to discuss is from the GO Math! Program. Go Math! is a comprehensive Grade K-6 mathematics program developed to support the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics and the **NCTM** Curriculum Focal Points. The program emphasizes Essential Questions and Big Ideas with depth of understanding as the goal. Interactive lessons utilize research based instructional approaches and differentiated instructional resources to ensure success for all students. Enrichment Guides, Assessment Guides, and Strategic Intervention Guides, as well, as on-line material are provided for teachers. **NCTM: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics**

THE PURPOSE OF THE ASSESSMENT The assessment is a two part process. Part One: Before the teacher begins a new chapter in math, she gives the students a “Performance Task”. The purpose of the Performance Task is to measure what the student strengths and weaknesses are before the new chapter begins. After analyzing the performance task, the teacher can plan her lessons according to the data collected. Part Two: Once the teacher has completed the chapter, a final assessment is given. The questions are more in depth and more detail is needed to answer than the questions of the Performance Task. Once the teacher has reviewed this part of the assessment, she can then determine if the students understood the chapter and if she can move on to the next topic.

DELIVERY OF ASSESSMENT Part One of the assessment is given to the students before the start of a new chapter. It is given to the whole class, with hardly any instruction. Only the directions are given. The students are given only a certain amount of time to complete the Performance Task. Part Two of the assessment is given at the end of the chapter. The students are given time to study on their own and a review is given the day before the assessment is given. The assessment is given to the whole class, again minimal instructions are given and the students are timed. However, since this part of the assessment is more in depth and students answers must be more detailed, more time is given to take the assessment.

WHY USE THIS ASSESSMENT This assessment is: A way to measure what a students knows in the beginning of a chapter and what he or she actually learned by the end of the chapter. Clear in the questioning. Formatted exactly like the textbook so students are familiar with the contents.

HOW ARE THE RESULTS USED The Performance Task results are primarily used for the teachers purpose. The results guide her lesson planning. It lets her know what areas of the chapter she can go through quickly and what areas of the chapter she needs to give a lot of focus. The results also help her with differentiation. The final part of the assessment results are first compared with the Performance Task to see if the students have improved on their learning of this particular topic. Next, the results are then reviewed to see if the teacher needs to continue with this topic or if she can go on to the next.

HOW WAS THIS ASSESSMENT DEVELOPED The entire Go Math program was developed through scientific based research. Five major research strands underpin the program. The five strands are: Writing to Learn Vocabulary, Scaffolding Metacognition Graphic Organizers (

CLINICAL RECOMMENDATIONS AND CAUTIONS Through my discussions with the teacher which I observed and through my own research of GO Math!, I could not find any clinical recommendations or cautions. However, the author team for GO Math! consists of mathematics educators and school district personnel and includes representation from the leadership of NCTM. GO Math! was specifically written to provide thorough coverage of the CCSS with an emphasis on depth of instruction. Particular attention was given to providing support for teachers as they transition to a focused, rigorous curriculum. (

PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES The GO Math! Assessment is a quantitative measure of what a student knows. There is only one correct answer to a question. This assessment is both valid and reliable.

PERFORMANCE TASK

FINAL PART OF THE ASSESSMENT

WHAT CAN BE IMPROVED??? The GO Math! Program to my understanding was suppose to be the new “improved” common core aligned textbook that would be “better” because it would offer richer, more interesting experiences with math. Although it is visually pleasing to the eye, things do need to be improved. 1.The lessons are very repetitive, and there is no room for creativity. 2.Lessons are somewhat short. For example, there maybe some lessons that need more attention than others and in this program there is no room for that! Teachers often have to supplement their own worksheets and handouts through other sources and programs. 3.There is no informative assessment ideas for teachers. Only testing. The teacher I observed uses a checklist for every task and assignment given so she can measure a students achievement throughout the chapter.

BIBLIOGRAPHY Houghton, Millfin, and Hartcourt. GO Math!, Houghton, Millfin, and Hartcourt,