Overview of USDA - PL-566 Small Watershed Program - EWP Program Mahoning County FRM Informational Meeting August 16, 2016 Natural Resources Conservation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SAFETEA-LU Rollout WebCast Emergency Relief for Federally Owned Roads (ERFO) Program February 2006 David Hilgendorf, WFLHD ERFO Coordinator February 2006.
Advertisements

Tour of Five Small Flood Control Dams in Iowa and Nebraska Rehabilitation Needs of Aging Small Flood Control Dams.
HUD and Disaster Mitigation ASFPM May 22, Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Disaster Recovery In response to a Presidentially-declared disaster,
Watershed Dams in Georgia 1. –357 Total –195 High Hazard (NRCS) –NRCS constructed – owned by local sponsors –Most built between 1950s-1970s for flood.
EWP Emergency Watershed Protection1 N R C S Emergency Watershed Protection Program.
JUNE 18, 2014 BOULDER COUNTY WATERSHED COALITIONS Comprehensive Creek Planning Initiative (CCP)
Plum Creek Reservoir Water for a Better Tomorrow Kickapoo Tribe in Kansas January 13, 2003.
1 National Flood Risk Management Policy Summit Managing Flood Risk: Where do we go? July 14, 2009 Bruce A. Julian USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Update Training Meeting
Flood Avoidance and Mitigation
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Overview of Public Law (PL) Advanced Measures Contingency Operations Directorate.
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Philadelphia District How to start the Corps’ Project Delivery Engine Local Sponsor Identifies A Problem and Requests Corps.
Alachua County Post-Disaster Redevelopment Plan Alachua County Board of County Commissioners Meeting April 27, 2010.
Lecture(3) Instructor : Dr. Abed Al-Majed Nassar
SWUG 2003 The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) in Arizona has led the effort for completion of their WBD. NRCS relies on this data for many.
Seattle District Seattle District U. S. Army Corps of Engineers U. S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) Grazing – Our Most Commonly Used Conservation Practices.
1 Association of State Floodplain Managers Infrastructure: Fixes & Funding June 10, 2009 Bruce A. Julian USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service.
NED COSTS And Other Bewilderments Of COE Planning And Other Bewilderments Of COE Planning.
NRCS Watershed Rehabilitation
N AVIGATING THE T URN : F LOOD R ISK A SSOCIATED WITH L EVEES Sam Riley Medlock, J.D., CFM Association of State Floodplain Managers May 2011.
Emergency Watershed Protection (EWP) Program Recovery Emergency Watershed Protection (EWP) Program Recovery.
California’s Flood Future Recommendations for Managing the State’s Flood Risk National Association of Flood & Stormwater Management Agencies December 10,
Mitigation can include structural and nonstructural efforts.
Rick Swanson USDA Forest Service U.S. Forest Service: C&I’s for: The World’s Largest Water Company U.S. Forest Service: C&I’s for: The World’s Largest.
NRCS NRCS Watershed Program In Texas. Water Resources AuthoritiesAuthorities Project ActivitiesProject Activities RehabilitationRehabilitation FundingFunding.
HAZUS-MH is a multi-hazard risk assessment and loss estimation software program developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (animate on.
Hazard Mitigation Planning and Project Funding. Agenda Objectives Overview of Hazard Mitigation Hazard Mitigation Planning Mitigation Project Funding.
Natural Resources Conservation Service Tom Krapf Assistant State Conservationist NRCS - Wisconsin The Regional Conservation Partnership Program.
1 Floodplain Management SESSION 20 Risks to Human Settlements Mitigation Programs Prepared By Rod Emmer CFM, PhD Larry Larson, CFM, PE.
Hazard Mitigation Assistance Hazard Mitigation means any action taken to reduce or eliminate the long-term risk too human life and property from natural.
Improving Lives, Communities and the Environment Through Natural Resources Conservation.
INTRODUCTION TO SECTION 4(f) Presented by Ian Chidister Environmental Program Manager FHWA – Wisconsin Division December 4, 2013.
COMPREHENSIVE FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT : Promoting Wise Uses of Floodplains CA Department of Water Resources/ CIFMCG Workshop July 2006.
Lake County Watershed Management Board Funding Program Mike Prusila, CFM, Watershed Planner.
Solano Habitat Conservation Plan 580,000 Acres 36 Covered Species; 4 Natural Communities 17,500 acres of Urban Development; 1,280 acres of other New Facilities.
July 14, Rural Electric Cooperatives Procurement/Contracting Guidance Roger Jones Region VIII Disaster Assistance Division.
Finance Long - Term Suppression Repair Workshop January 14-16, 2012 Magalia, California.
Melinda Terry, Executive Director CA Central Valley Flood Control Association 1.
California’s Flood Future Recommendations for Managing the State’s Flood Risk Terri Wegener, P.E., DWR Briefing for Central Valley Flood Protection Board.
Christopher Knotts, P.E. Public Works & Water Resources Association of Levee Boards of Louisiana Annual Meeting December 3, 2015.
BUILDING STRONG ® PLANNING SMART ® US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Partnering Opportunities for Water Supply and Distribution Planning Beverley.
0 FEMA Region 6 Floods: The Response and the Costs Bob Bennett Response Division FEMA Region 6.
California’s Flood Future Recommendations for Managing the State’s Flood Risk Flood Risk Management & Silver Jackets Workshop August 21, 2012.
Tropical Storm Irene.  Set up by Congress to respond to emergencies created by natural disasters.  Relieves imminent hazards to life and property caused.
GDEM Training June 2009 Emergency Watershed Protection (EWP) Program United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service.
 What is EWP & How Does the Program Work? Emergency Watershed Protection Program.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Miles City, Montana Section 205 Gwyn M. Jarrett - Project Manager Omaha District April 27, 2016.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Flood Fighting and Planning US Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Joel Ames Tribal Liaison.
Introduction to the Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP) June 10, 2016 Carol Rivera– Program Manager An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer.
Where critical areas & agriculture meet
GOOSE CREEK WATERSHED LEVEL I STUDY SCOPING MEETING
Farm/Ranch Conservation Issues: NRCS Assistance
USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service
Mahoning County Informational Meeting USACE Programs, Authorities, and Ohio Silver Jackets Program Presented by: Ashley Stephens 16 August 2016.
Using RMMS to Track & Report BMP Implementation
Griffith Park Fire Draft Recovery Plan May 30, 2007
Continuing Authorities Program
Potholes Supplemental Feed Route Project
36 CAs across Ontario (mainly in the south)
Construction Management & Inspection
Emergency Conservation Program (ECP)
NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
Agency Logos. Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Summer 2018 California Wildfires and High Winds DR-4382.
Washington State Infrastructure Financing
Nebraska Water Infrastructure Funding and Financing Programs
Department for Local Government State Flood Control Match Program
California Water Commission
Sacramento Environmental Commission January 2019.
Federal Disaster Relief Supplemental “By the Numbers”
Presentation transcript:

Overview of USDA - PL-566 Small Watershed Program - EWP Program Mahoning County FRM Informational Meeting August 16, 2016 Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)

Watershed and Flood Prevention Operations (WFPO) Program Provides technical and financial assistance to project sponsors to develop Watershed Work Plans and implement the planned activities within a specific geographic area for the benefit of the general public - Also referred to as PL-566 Small Watershed Program PL - 566

Eligible Purposes Flood prevention Watershed protection Agricultural water management Water supply Non-ag water management (wildlife and rec) PL - 566

Scope Max watershed size = 250,000 acres Physically, environmentally, socially, and economically sound plan (Environ Assess or EIS) Economic analysis (benefit/cost ratio) Alternative development Document benefits and impacts PL - 566

Responsibilities NRCS: Develop watershed work plan (EA or EIS) Engineering Project administration 100% construction costs for flood control Local Sponsors Lead locally led planning process Landrights or easements Permits and utilities Installed measure O&M PL - 566

PL-566 Projects Structural Measures Dams, channel restoration, diversions, floodwalls, dikes Non-Structural Measures Upland conservation and erosion protection Floodproofing / relocation Permits and utilities Installed measure O&M PL - 566

History - Ohio 30 watershed projects funded Structural measures: 78 dams 308 miles channel improvement 3 miles dikes PL - 566

Funding Appropriations from Congress $2.2 billion national investment for >2,000 projects (1947 – 2010) Program has as not been funded since 2010 Working to obtain funding for existing authorized projects No new project starts PL - 566

Emergency Watershed Protection (EWP) Program Response Program- Remove the hazard and restore stream hydrology back to pre-disaster conditions Types: - Floodplain Easement - Recovery EWP

EWP - Floodplain Easement State, local or Privately-owned lands state governments is eligible if it meets one of the following criteria: flooding damage occurs at least once within the past calendar year or have been subject to flood damage at least twice within the previous 10 years Additional land is needed to restore floodplain, flow, or control erosion Structures and buildings to be removed/relocated to restore natural environment and improve flood storage and flow Not available in all areas at all times and is most commonly available in areas recently impacted by a natural disaster such as widespread flooding. EWP

EWP Recovery - Eligibility Natural Disaster (flood, fire, drought, windstorms) Sudden Watershed Impairment (clogged streams, unstable streambanks, eroded upland slopes due to drought or fire) Imminent Hazard to Life/Property Economically, Socially, and Environmentally Defensible EWP

EWP Limitations - Cannot be use for: Pre-existing Conditions O&M Problems Federal Aid Highways Projects Private Transportation Facilities Rebuild infrastructure (roads, bridges, utilities, buildings/structures) EWP

Cost Share Federal Cost Share of 75% of Construction Cost Sponsor Cost Share of 25% Limited resource areas (90% fed / 10% local) Sponsor Cost May Include Cash In-Kind Goods (Materials) In-Kind Services EWP

Funding Not a budgeted line item Supplemental appropriations from Congress on an “as needed” basis Eligible projects are typically put on “wait list” Limited funding for “exigency” projects may be available EWP

Implementation - NRCS Damage Survey Report (DSR) Site investigation to determine work necessary Survey Design and drawings Contracting Construction inspection Cost share EWP

Implementation - Sponsor Local Unit of Government Responsible for landrights Responsible for permits Responsible for O&M Responsible for local cost share (or in kind service) EWP

History Began 1970’s Nationally Over $1.6 Billion Ohio first used in the 1980’s Ohio over $25 Million ( > 60 contracts) Shadyside (1990) Massieville (1992) EWP

Information and Website Contact local service center PL-566 Program: From NRCS homepage > type “watersheds” in search box EWP Program: Ohio NRCS homepage > Ohio Engineering > EWP An Equal Opportunity Provider, Employer, and Lender