MODULE 3: PLANNING & DESIGN Lesson 2: Modal Characteristics and Impacts.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Vehicle Types Vehicle TypeFreeway Lane Capacity BusesLimited Capacity Bus Rapid Transit Medium/High Capacity Rail TransitHigh Capacity.
Advertisements

Urban Transportation Norman W. Garrick Lecture 3 CE 2710.
This is my “focus” slide, used to make sure that I’m getting the sharpest possible picture on the projection screen. It is the 1954 Freeway Plan for the.
9/7/2012 MBS UU.
1 PRINCETON FUTURE January 11, 2011 PRINCETON BRANCH TRANSPORTATION ISSUES Jack May.
Lecture 6 Bus Rapid Transit, design elements and operational issues Dr. Muhammad Adnan.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Route Design Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design.
VRE Gainesville-Haymarket Extension Feasibility Study and Alternatives Analysis Public Workshop Wednesday, October 22 nd, :30 – 9:00 pm Battlefield.
Lec 31, Handout: Public passenger transport (objectives) Be familiar with mass transit classifications and characteristics Know how urban transport demands.
CHAPTER 8 THE THEORY OF URBAN PASSENGER TRANSPORT MODES
SUSTAINABILITY CONCEPTS IN TRANSPORT SECTOR/ OPTIONS AND BENEFITS
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Comparing Transit Modes Unit 1: Introduction.
The Urban Transport Problem  Fifth Freedom Problem- auto convenience and privacy  Congestion- traffic overloads, poor infrastructure, vehicle diversity.
CHAPTER 10 Light Rail GUIDELINES FOR PASSENGER TRANSPORT IN SOUTH AFRICA A MULTI MODAL ANALYSIS.
Lecture 1: Selecting Between Transit Mode Alternatives This lecture was originally prepared by Dr. Kari Watkins, Georgia Institute of Technology; Dr. Jeff.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Planning Process & Alternatives Analysis Unit 7: Forecasting and Encouraging Ridership.
South/West Corridor Improvements Service and Facility Alternatives September 9, 2014 Planning & Project Development Committee March 3, 2015.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
Transportation Planning and Design in Practice
Public Infrastructure Management Public Transit. What is public transit? Modes.
Mark Phillips BSDA/Metro Long-Range Planner. The Foundation: Moving Transit Forward.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference When is BRT the Best Option? the Best Option? 1:30 – 2:40 p.m. Paul Larrousse Director, National Transit Institute.
Rail Noise & Vibration Update July 10, Overview FTA Revised Noise and Vibration Guidance FRA Final High Speed Noise and Vibration Guidance CREATE.
CHAPTER 12 Trolley Buses and Duo-Buses GUIDELINES FOR PASSENGER TRANSPORT IN SOUTH AFRICA A MULTI MODAL ANALYSIS.
CEO, Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority
Moving People The Electric Tbus Group. Better street environment needs - reduced congestion less pollution quicker journey times better service frequency.
Shreya Gadepalli Regional Director (India) August 2015 The BRT Standard Bus Rapid Transit Best Practices.
Business Logistics 420 Urban Transportation Fall 2000 Lecture 2: The Scope of Public Transportation Services.
Public Transportation Planning: Rapid transit solutions for adequate mass movement Mobility.
Express/Rapid Bus Opportunities for Priority Bus Transit in the Washington Region Sponsored by National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Chun.
S.A.T.U.R.N. Simulation and Analysis Tools for Urban Automated Rapid Transit Networks.
CHAPTER 17 RAIL PASSENGER SERVICES IN U.S..
Lecture 2: Improving Transit Service Through Planning, Design, and Operations This lecture was originally prepared by Dr. Kari Watkins, Georgia Institute.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
Transportation System Engineering 1 , 61360
TRANSIT SYSTEMS PLANNING Module 3, Lesson 4. Learning Objectives Define systems planning Understand the steps required for plan selection and the key.
The Gauteng Economic Indaba Transport and Logistics Mr Piet Sebola Group Executive Strategic Asset Development Date: 09 th June 2016.
TRANSIT AND STATIONS Sustainable Transportation February 2016.
Montana Driver Education and Training Traffic Control Devices and
Transportation Today Policy, Freight, Intercity Travel
Gateway EMX Performance Review
Sustainable Curitiba.
Sustainable Transportation 8 February 2013
Introduction to Public Transportation
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) ACEC Presentation May 25, 2017
Network Characteristics
Combines the best of cars with the best of trains
TRANSIT WALKING BICYCLING THOUGHTFUL DEVELOPMENT
Passenger Train Classification
D Line Station Plan Overview
Advanced Transit Systems Opportunity for Deployments
Network Characteristics
Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles APTA A quick overview August 2, 2011.
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO Board May 27, 2015.
Plug-in and electric buses
D Line Station Plan Overview
Land Use Planning - Goals
Transit Competitiveness and Market Potential
Module 3: Planning & Design
D Line Station Plan Overview
Transit Systems Planning
D Line Station Plan Overview
Focus40 Overview A long-range plan for how the MBTA can meet the needs of the region in 2040: A 20-year plan as required by MBTA enabling legislation A.
D Line Station Plan Overview
Bus Rapid Transit Study
Recommendations to improve the performance of Bus Rapid Transit projects Oscar FARINA (Argentina) – Mathieu LUZERNE (France)
North Suburban Planning Council
Introduction to Public Transportation
Rural Transit Stop Design Guidelines Prof Omer maaitah
HRT Workshop: Transit Strategic Plan and Aug-Dec working items
Presentation transcript:

MODULE 3: PLANNING & DESIGN Lesson 2: Modal Characteristics and Impacts

Learning Objectives Understand the wide range of modes available and the diversity of features and characteristics within each Discuss which mode fits the required role Describe the importance of providing data on characteristics in a way that encourages input from stakeholders

Overall Context There are a number of service modes to choose from in the planning process Deciding on which mode(s) to include is based on passengers, the operator and the community itself

Service Continuum Bus (including bus rapid transit and commuter bus) Commuter Rail Heavy Rail Light Rail (including streetcar and hybrid rail) Demand Response High Speed Rail Ferryboat

Transit Mode Criteria Passengers  Availability, frequency, punctuality, speed, comfort, convenience, security, fare, image. Operator  Coverage, reliability, cycle time, capacity, flexibility, safety, cost (capital and operating), attraction. Community  Ridership, cost, availability, energy consumed, image, environmental impact, long-range impacts.

From APTA Fact Book

Transportation Modes: Density Served Densities – lower to higher Origin/Destination pairs – spread to concentrated  Auto/taxi  Carpool/shared taxi/vanpool  Jitney/publico/demand-response minibus  Fixed Route bus  Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)  Light Rail  Metro/rail rapid transit (incl. automated guideway and monorail, and, to some extent, commuter/regional rail*)

Transit Modes and Downtown Size

F

Elements of Transit Modes Right of Way  C : street with mixed traffic o Shared street space (most buses, streetcar, some LRT) o Signal priority possible  B : partially separated o Separate running lane/track with at-grade crossing (most light rail, some BRT)  A: fully separated o Underground or aerial (heavy rail / metro, some LRT)

Elements of Transit Modes (cont.) Vehicle Support  Steel wheels on rail vs. rubber tires on road surface o Some Metros (Paris, Montreal) are rubber-tired Vehicle Guidance  Steered vs. Guided o Rail vehicles are laterally guided by track o Rubber-tired vehicles can also be guided

Elements of Transit Modes (cont.) Propulsion  Internal Combustion o Diesel (incl. Bio-diesel), CNG, LNG, etc.  Electric o Via external power (overhead wire, third rail, etc.) o Electric/Hybrid via on-board generator, fuel cell, etc. Driving Control o Manual (observe and obey signals) o Automatic Train Operation (with driver assist / override) o Fully automated

Bus (Defined) Vehicle operating as a single unit with rubber tires on pavement, with manual control of movement forward and laterally. Size/capacity has very wide range (minibus to double- articulated). Can run on any type of ROW (fully shared to exclusive), high or low-floor, fare collection on board or off board. Can use any type of propulsion (ICE, electric, hybrid)

Light Rail (Defined) Vehicle operating as a single unit or in 2-4 car trains with electric motors and overhead power, steel wheels on rail. Size can vary from rigid streetcar to double articulated. Can run on any type of ROW (fully shared to exclusive), high or low-floor, fare collection on board or off board. All levels of automation possible, as appropriate for ROW. More commonly manual.

Metro (Defined) Vehicle operating in trains with electric motors on fully separated rights of way with level boarding and off-board fare collection. Train lengths up to length of platforms, with single operator (or automated). Power more typically from below (e.g. 3 rd rail), which is possible because ROW is exclusive. High level of automation up to full automation. ROW can be above or below grade or fenced at grade.

AGT (Defined) Automated Guideway Transit Highest degree of automation Driverless vehicles operating as individual units (or pods) or as multiple unit trains Usually rubber-tire along concrete elevated guideway.  Short distance (Miami, Detroit, Jacksonville)  Long distance (Vancouver SkyTrain) People-Mover vs. Personal Rapid Transit

Cost vs Performance (Vuchic)

Speed vs. Accessibility (Meyer)

Modal Comparisons Higher Investment Modes (e.g., Rail)  Higher capacity  Lower operating cost per passenger  Higher quality of service  Stronger image of permanence and land use influence  Fewer negative impacts from operation Lower Investment Modes (e.g., Buses)  Lower capital cost (shared public investment)  Wider coverage  More flexibility  Easier to update to modern technologies

Cautions about Generalizations Level of Service characteristics associated with modes may not always apply  Speed – based on exclusivity, stop spacing, topography, propulsion, system condition (example: Express Bus vs. streetcar)  Frequency – based on capacity, demand, and operating resources For any mode, higher quality typically requires higher cost  Tradeoffs between aspects of quality

Image is a Very Significant Element Rail as first class / Bus as second class Bus Rapid Transit attempts to make image of bus more positive (in some cases by not calling it a “bus”) Competition between cities Modern looking vehicle = forward thinking region Historic look streetcar can appeal to nostalgic/touristy image

Summary Wide range of modes available Diversity of features and characteristics within modes Key is to find the mode to fit the role  Provide data on characteristics in a way that encourages input from stakeholders  Each element can be considered independently o ROW, Support, Guidance, Propulsion