Re-designating Beneficial Use Impairments in Great Lakes Areas of Concern COA Management Committee Meeting June 5, 2012 Agenda Item 4.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EPAA Conference 5 November 2007 Georgette LALIS Enterprise and Industry DG European Commission The international dimension of regulatory acceptance.
Advertisements

LAMP 101 Elizabeth LaPlante US Co-Chair, Superior Work Group US Environmental Protection Agency.
1 INAC First Nation Education Policy Framework Regional Dialogues Coordinated by AFN and INAC Education Policy Framework - Joint Steering Committee (EPF-JSC)
Canada-U.S. Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement 2012 Sandra Kok Senior RAP Program Engineer Niagara River RAP Implementers Session April 10, 2013.
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Update on the Niagara River U.S. RAP Niagara River Remedial Action Plan Implementers Session April 10, 2013.
Briefing to the Caribbean Fisheries Management Council April 23, 2014.
ISO Current status of development
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive 17th March 2010, Newcastle North Sea Stakeholders Conference Leo de Vrees European Commission (DG Environment,
Sector Planning Process Alachua County Commission July 8 th,
Lake Superior Binational Program and Lakewide Management Plan Lynelle Hanson Lake Superior Binational Forum Meeting Ashland, Wisconsin March 23, 2012.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Issues Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 17, 2009 Ted Graham & Steve Bieber COG Department.
Integrated Catchment Management Key Elements - Julie Burke.
Lake Huron Initiative: A Work in Process Presented by: Jim Bredin - Michigan Office of the Great Lakes.
Current Great Lakes Toxic Prevention Programs Maumee Bay, OH February 22, 2005.
Progress on Coordinating CBP and Federal Leadership Goals, Outcomes, and Actions Principals’ Staff Committee Meeting 2/16/12 Carin Bisland, Associate Director.
Gerry Pratt State AOC Coordinator, Division of Water New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway, Albany, NY P: 518.
Programmatic Regulations PDT Workshop COMPREHENSIVE EVERGLADES RESTORATION PLAN April 18, 2002.
Great Lakes Perspective Samuel W. Speck Chair, Water Management Working Group Council of Great Lakes Governors Chair, Great Lakes Commission Director,
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
1 ISO/PC 283/N 197 ISO Current status of development November 2015.
Hydro One Community Liaison Committee Minister’s Conditions Meeting #2 August 19, 2014 Solina Hall.
Multistate Research Program Roles & Responsibilities Eric Young SAAESD Meeting Corpus Christi, TX April 3-6, 2005.
Tracy McCracken SPS Technical Advisor East Africa Region United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Kenya and East Aferica/Office of Regional.
AGRO PARKS “The Policy Cycle” Alex Page Baku November 2014.
Healthier Together Joint Committee Wednesday 15 th June 2016.
INSPIRE and the role of Spatial Data Interest Communities (SDIC)
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Overview of public participation in strategic decision-making in the UNECE area David Aspinwall.
Electric Vehicles and the Environment (EVE IWG)
Overview of the WTO SPS Agreement and the role of
Business environment in the EU Prepared by Dr. Endre Domonkos (PhD)
Niagara River Area of Concern
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Expert Group on the Birds and Habitats Directives (NADEG)
Marine Environment and Water Industry Unit
Principles and rationale for SAC/SPA designation and management
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
EU Thematic Strategy for the Protection and Conservation of the Marine Environment Outline of impact assessment François Wakenhut – European Commission.
The Revised SAH Agreement
Purpose Independent piece of legislation, closely integrated in a larger regulatory framework (complement to WFD): prevent deterioration protect, enhance.
Legal framework of territorial classifications and typologies for European statistics – state of play NUAC meeting, Brussels June 2015 Gorja Bartsch.
EU Water Framework Directive
Reliability Standards Development Plan
Vanda Nunes de Lima 18th June 2009
Proposed EQS Directive
Taking forward the common understanding of Art. 8, 9 and 10 MSFD
CEOS Workplan Steven Hosford LSI-VC-5 Agenda Item #1.3 February 2018
DG Environment, Nature Protection Unit (D3)
The normal balance of ingredients
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
EU Water Framework Directive
Marine Strategy Framework Directive 2008/56/EC
Developing a common understanding of Articles 8, 9 & 10 MSFD
Common Understanding Way forward
73rd General Session of the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE)
Guidelines on the Mid-term Evaluation
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Exemptions and Disproportionate Costs
Water Framework Directive, Habitats Directive and Inland Waterway Transport Marieke van Nood WFD Team, DG ENV.D.2, European Commission.
Workshop for Regional INT Charts / ENC Coordinators
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
North Shore Streamkeepers February 23, 2019
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Marine Environment and Water Industry
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
EU Water Framework Directive
Towards a prioritised action framework for financing Natura 2000
Item 6 of the Agenda Balance of Payments Working Group 2-3 April 2012
Presentation transcript:

Re-designating Beneficial Use Impairments in Great Lakes Areas of Concern COA Management Committee Meeting June 5, 2012 Agenda Item 4

2 To inform COA MC of the planned more pro-active approach to re-designating BUIs in AOCs. Purpose

Outline Basis for the Impaired Beneficial Use designation and progress Great Lakes Water Agreement requirements and practices to date Proposed approach, requirements, steps and COA AIC & MC’s role

Beneficial Use Impairments Canada-U.S. Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement commits the Parties to “identify and work toward the elimination of Areas of Concern”. Areas of Concern defined as “a geographic area that fails to meet the General or Specific Objectives of the Agreement where such failure has caused or is likely to cause impairment of beneficial use”. Impairment of beneficial use defined as a change in chemical, physical or biological integrity sufficient to cause one or more of the environmental, human health or economic impacts described in the Beneficial Use Impairment Framework Once all remedial actions have been completed and environmental monitoring demonstrates that impaired beneficial uses have been restored, Government with concurrence of the International Joint Commission can formally “delist” an Area of Concern BENEFICIAL USE IMPAIRMENT FRAMEWORK degradation of fish wildlife populations; fish tumours or other deformities; bird or animal deformities or reproduction problems; degradation of benthos; degradation of phytoplankton and zooplankton populations; loss of fish and wildlife habitat eutrophication or undesirable algae; restrictions on drinking water consumption, or taste and odour problems restrictions on fish and wildlife consumption; beach closings; added costs to agriculture or industry; restrictions on dredging activities; tainting of fish and wildlife flavour; degradation of aesthetics; 3

5 Great Lakes Areas of Concern

BUI Status 2010

Restoration Progress

Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement 1987 GLWQA: The Parties shall cooperate with State and provincial governments to classify AOCs by their stage of restoration…and when identified BUIs are no longer impaired and the area restored, the removal of its designation as an AOC.

COA & Re-designation "COA Guide to Changing the Designation of BUI, Preparing Stage 3 Reports and Delisting AOCs" Approved by COA MC in July 1995.

Practice to date… Stage 1 Remedial Action Plans – identifies the BUIs and causes RAP Stage 2 – updates status of BUIs and lays out the remedial plans RAP Stage 2 Updates – assess status of BUIs and may re-designate some Occasionally BUIs re-designated on individual basis Area in Recovery reports – may re-designate some BUIs RAP Stage 3 – re-designates all remaining BUIs and delists the AOC.

Re-designation Approach Rationale:  A more proactive approach more effectively demonstrates progress and focuses resources;  Consistent with US approach – targeting 46 BUIs by 2014 Principles:  Transparent and accountable Outcome:  Anticipate re-designating 30 to 40 BUIs over next 5 years (e.g., Requires Further Assessment, restrictions on dredging, aesthetics, fish tumours, fish tainting)

Re-designation Process Steps 1) AOC Remedial Action Plan Team produces BUI assessment report. 2) Draft BUI assessment report reviewed by agencies as needed. 3) RAP team submits report to COA Annex 1 leads – if necessary Annex 1 leads obtain independent peer review. 4) COA Annex 1 leads may request changes.

Steps continued… 5) RAP Team posts report public comment. 6) Annex 1 leads submit assessment report(s) to COA AIC to ensure no concerns with content and concurrence with re- designation. 7) COA MC approves change in designation; informs the IJC 8) Canada (EC) with MOE and RAP Team announce Re-designation – demonstrating environmental restoration progress…etc.

Going forward… Upcoming BUI re-designations: Toronto Region AOC:  Fish Tumours & Other Deformities  Bird or Animal Deformities Detroit River  Fish Tainting and Wildlife Flavour St. Clair River  Added Costs to Agriculture or Industry Many AOCs  Restrictions on Dredging Activities

Questions?