Objectives of the session

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Denver Health Lean Training Created by: Katie Stanek, Lean Facilitator
Advertisements

Project Management Skills for QOF leads Quality and Outcomes Framework Assessor Training.
Facilitation skills & Group based learning
SADC Course in Statistics Revision on tests for proportions using CAST (Session 18)
Title: The title should accurately describe the issue to be addressed and can never contain a proposed countermeasure. Overview Note: Remember that the.
LEARNING PROGRAMME Hypothesis testing Part 2: Categorical variables Intermediate Training in Quantitative Analysis Bangkok November 2007.
Action Implementation and Evaluation Planning Whist the intervention plan describes how the population nutrition problem for a particular target group.
Series: Guide to Investigating Convergence. Understanding the Convergence of a Series.
Series: Guide to Investigating Convergence. Understanding the Convergence of a Series.
Handling Categorical Data. Learning Outcomes At the end of this session and with additional reading you will be able to: – Understand when and how to.
WELCOME TO A PRESENTATION BY THE SHARAVATHI TEAM >>>
STEP 1: DEFINE THE PROBLEM Problem Statement: What is the problem? A problem is a discrepancy between a standard and the current situation. The ‘standard’
© The Scout Association Module 29 Page: 1 of 12 Cambridgeshire Module 29 Presenting Session 1.
NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT DESIGN. Needs assessment WHY – Identifying specific needs – Understanding present situations – Knowing about the community/organization.
DEVELOPMENTAL COUNSELING 3 Counseling Subordinate-centered communication that outlines actions necessary for subordinates to achieve individual and organizational.
Research Objectives Prepare by :Dr. Amira Yahia. Learning outcomes: by the end of this session the student will be able to: - Define terms related - Identify.
BREAKEVEN ANALYSIS An important tool for management decision making.
Objectives of the session
Objectives of the session
Objectives of the session
AGRO PARKS “The Policy Cycle” Alex Page Baku November 2014.
Implementation Training
Objectives of the session
Objectives of the session
Objectives of the session
Catering Food Service Development
Objectives of the session
KAIZEN Step 5: “Implementation of countermeasure” KAIZEN Training of Trainers 2015 KAIZEN Facilitators’ Guide Page __ to __.
17 Costs and break-even © Malcolm Surridge and Andrew Gillespie 2016.
How to show your social value – reporting outcomes & impact
Understanding NMC allegations data, and developing a coding frame to categorise future allegations data Rob Francis Matt Reynolds March 2017 Restricted.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 9. Periodic data collection methods.
Measurement for Improvement
Professional Growth Plans
Facet5 Audition Module Facilitator Date Year.
Leadership in Teams and Decision Groups
Psych 638: Training needs assessment
SFHN Quality Academy 2017: Title
Measurement for Improvement
PDCA Problem Solving Guide
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 7. Managers’ and stakeholders’ information needs.
School Community Council Implementation Timeline Checklist
X AND R CHART EXAMPLE IN-CLASS EXERCISE
SATs Information Evening
PDCA Problem Solving Guide
KAIZEN Theme selection
Monitoring and recording
<PROJECT NAME> THEME STAKEHOLDERS BACKGROUND CURRENT CONDITION
8 Step Problem Solving Step 1: Clarify the Problem
Title: What are you talking about
NU3S01 Research for Nursing Practice
GHSP Problem Solving Team Champion: Team Members: Team Mentor:
RISK ASSESSMENT AND METHOD STATEMENT
5S-KAIZEN IMPLEMENTATION IN BMC
Standards-Based Individualized Education Programs
Iraq Assessment Working Group Rapid Needs Assessment
Your gon’na need to know it eventually.
Program Planning and Evaluation Methods
The Variance How to calculate it.
Team Structure…Active Learning
8th Grade Science Content Standard
Advanced Extremely High Frequency (AEHF)
Preparation of Session Plan
A3 Story Boards Plan Adjust (Act) Do Check Do Plan Dave LaHote
Feasibility Report.
PDCA PROBLEM SOLVING TRAINING SESSION 1. Kaizen our way of life Prepared by: Serge Paluku.
Report of Japanese Test Phase <Cyber Security>
6 Step Problem Solving Process
8th Grade Science Content Standard
5b. Presentation for Reviewing Photos
Presentation transcript:

KAIZEN Step 6 : “Check effectiveness of countermeasure” KAIZEN Training of Trainers 2015 KAIZEN Facilitators’ Guide Page __ to __ .

Objectives of the session At the end of the session, trainees are able to: Describe process of effectiveness check of KAIZEN activities Identify effective countermeasures Demonstrate the process of effectiveness check at working environment

KAIZEN Process 7 6 Check effectiveness of countermeasure 5 4 3 2 1 STEP 7 Standardization STEP 6 Check effectiveness of countermeasure STEP 5 Implementation of countermeasure STEP 4 Identification of countermeasure STEP 3 Root Cause Analysis STEP 2 Situation Analysis STEP 1 Selection of KAIZEN theme

Outline of effectiveness check 1 Situation analysis 2 3 Effectiveness check Reduction rate Comparison Pareto chart Relation between countermeasures and effectiveness Implemented・ Not effective Not implemented・ Not effective Not implemented・ But effective Implemented・Effective 4 Go to Step 7: Standardization

How to check effectiveness of KAIZEN Compare frequency and reduction rate of frequency between before and after KAIZEN Check achievement to your target set in Step 2 (reduction rate) Compare other information in terms of: Cost Work labor cost effectiveness Quality Work process Human resource etc.

Data collection (Situation analysis after KAIZEN) Review methods of situation analysis done in KAIZEN Step 2 Conduct situation analysis in the same methods: Same data Same period of data collection Same methodologies of data collection

Development of a comparison calculation table SQ# Contributing factors Before KAIZEN After KAIZEN Reduction of frequency Reduction rate (%) Frequency Cumulative frequency Accumulation ratio (%) 1 Number of giving wrong injectable medicines 25 46.3 7 46.7 18 72.0 2 Number of giving wrong inhale medicines 16 41 75.9 4 11 73.3 12 75.0 3 Giving wrong oral medicines 6 47 87.0 14 93.3 50.0 Giving wrong volume of insulin 5 52 96.3 15 100 80.0 Number of giving wrong ointment 54 100.0 Total - 39 72.2 Data of before KAIZEN Data of after KAIZEN Reduction between before and after KAIZEN Formula of reduction rate

Development of comparison Pareto chart Adjusting scale as same level of before KAIZEN Before KAIZEN After KAIZEN 80.0 80.0 Same order of “the contributing factors” between before and after KAIZEN even if the order of contributing factors is changed.

(Example) Comparison results between before and after KAIZEN SQ# Contributing factors Before KAIZEN After KAIZEN Reduction of frequency Reduction rate (%) Frequency Cumulative frequency Accumulation ratio (%) 1 Number of giving wrong injectable medicines 25 46.3 7 46.7 18 72.0 2 Number of giving wrong inhale medicines 16 41 75.9 4 11 73.3 12 75.0 3 Giving wrong oral medicines 6 47 87.0 14 93.3 50.0 Giving wrong volume of insulin 5 52 96.3 15 100 80.0 Number of giving wrong ointment 54 100.0 Total - 39 72.2

Breaking down your effectiveness Clarify whether each countermeasures were effective or not Relation between countermeasures and effectiveness can be categorized into 4 groups Effectiveness Effective Not effective Implementation Countermeasure implemented ①  It is effective and need to be standardized ② It is not effective and need to review measures Countermeasure not implemented ③ Need to clarity why it is effective ④ Implement some measures (DO something)

Cont. Effectiveness should be measured by each countermeasure The countermeasure that is not implemented but show good effects need to be investigated the reason The countermeasure that is not implemented and cannot measure effectiveness need to be implemented

Cont. It is necessary to review countermeasures if the countermeasures were not effective The countermeasures that were implemented and judged as “effective” will be standardized in Step 7 The countermeasures may cause bad effects. If bad effects are greater than effectiveness, it is necessary to review the countermeasures

Identify effective countermeasures Which countermeasure was leading?? Your target Achieved Expected outcome Partially achieved KAIZEN Step 7 Got worse KAIZEN Step 3, 4, 5, 6 Good effect Unexpected outcome Bad effect

Thank you for listening