Changing Expectations for Assessment Linda Suskie Assessment & Accreditation Consultant AICUP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.
Advertisements

The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
Understanding Middle States Expectations for Assessment
Meeting MSCHE Assessment Expectations
Understanding MSCHE Expectations for Follow-Up Reports Linda Suskie Website:
Standard 2: Planning, Resource Allocation, and Institutional Renewal Some Things to Consider Andrea A. Lex, Ph.D. Dean, Planning, Assessment, & Institutional.
Understanding MSCHE Expectations for Assessment Linda Suskie, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education 3624 Market Street, Philadelphia.
Briefing: NYU Education Policy Breakfast on Teacher Quality November 4, 2011 Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor NYC Department of Education.
Best Practices in Assessment, Workshop 2 December 1, 2011.
Tips and guidelines.  Too much time  First, do no harm: many things do appear to be going well. Let’s not screw them up.  Why help others evaluate.
How to Interpret and Apply the Characteristics of Excellence: A Framework for Determining Compliance Karen Stout, President Montgomery County Community.
Assessment of Learning at the Peralta Community Colleges Engaging the College Community in Assessment Opportunities and Transforming the Institutional.
Dr. Gino Pasquariello 2011 Annual TRACS Conference.
Understanding and Using Assessment Results Linda Suskie, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education 3624 Market Street, Philadelphia PA.
Understanding Middle States’ Expectations for Assessment Linda Suskie, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education 3624 Market Street,
ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS FOR TSPC ACCREDITATION Assessment and Work Sample Conference January 13, 2012 Hilda Rosselli, Western Oregon University.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Dr. Timothy S. Brophy Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida GRADUATE AND PROFESSIONAL PROGRAM ASSESSMENT PLANS.
Welcome… The attendee will understand assessment basics with a focus on creating learning activities and identifying assessment expectations. Apply the.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
Making It Meaningful: Authentic Assessment for Intentional Education David W. Marshall, PhD Joanna M. Oxendine, MEd.
1 Evaluation is a Partnership Dr. Darla M. Cooper Associate Director Center for Student Success Basic Skills Coordinators Workshop September 17, 2009.
Assessment 101: Unpacking the Complexities Dr. Linda J.
Student Learning Outcome Assessment: A Program’s Perspective Ling Hwey Jeng, Director School of Library and Information Studies June 27,
Assessing Student Learning Lynn Merklin Assistant Provost Office of Institutional Effectiveness August, 2014.
Why Are We Assessing? Linda Suskie Assessment & Accreditation Consultant University at Buffalo November 22, 2013.
TEN-T Experts Briefing, March Annual Call Award Criteria.
Organizing for General Education Assessment Linda Suskie, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education 3624 Market Street, Philadelphia.
A Common Sense Approach to Assessing Student Learning Linda Suskie Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education Fitchburg State College.
Creating a S.I.M.P.L.E. & Comprehensive Assessment Plan for Residence Life and Housing Dr. Mike Fulford Emory University Student Affairs Assessment Conference.
Full-Time Faculty In-Service: Program and Student Learning Outcomes Fall 2005.
Improving the Institutional Effectiveness Process 1.
What Does Middle States Want? Linda Suskie, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education 3624 Market Street, Philadelphia PA Web:
Practicing Meaningful Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA Department of Crop and Soil Sciences August 10, 2015 Dr. Leslie Gordon Associate Director for.
What Your Program Needs to Know about Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA.
Assessing Student Learning Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors January 9, 2007.
Getting Ready for the Higher Learning Commission (NCA) July 2011 Dr. Linda Johnson HLC/Assessment Coordinator/AQIP Liaison Southeast Technical Institute.
Institutional Effectiveness at MVCC Institutional Effectiveness at MVCC.
Student Services Meeting December 11, Accountability…  What gets measured gets done  If you can’t see success, you can’t evaluate it  If you.
+ Montgomery College Program Assessment Orientation Spring 2013.
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
What are students able to demonstrate upon completion of a course? (Not about what instructors provide) Use specific and simple action verbs. Example:
Middle States Re-Accreditation Town Hall September 29, :00-10:00 am Webpage
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
Implementing QM towards Program Certification
FROM A - Z: AN ASSESSMENT TOOLKIT
The Assessment Process: A Continuous Cycle
The assessment process For Administrative units
The assessment process
Quality Assurance of Higher Education Programs:
Director of Policy Analysis and Research
Effective Outcomes Assessment
Standard IV Students.
Assessment Committee Meeting Continuous Program Improvement
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Reframing the Future: Outcomes Assessment
Assessment Presentation
To Self- and Peer Assess
Assessment Leadership Day Continuous Program Improvement
Program Assessment Processes for Developing and Strengthening
Working with Student Success Data
Engaging Institutional Leadership
The City University of New York Performance Management Process (PMP)
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Institutional Development
What to do with your data?
Curriculum Committee Report
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
NEASC Self –Study Appraisal.
Presentation transcript:

Changing Expectations for Assessment Linda Suskie Assessment & Accreditation Consultant AICUP Conference August 7, 2012

The Teaching-Learning-Assessment Cycle 1. Learning Goals 4. Using Results 2. Learning Opportunities 3. Assessment

Four Rules

1. Tie to Clear & Important Goals. What should graduates be able to do?

Levels of Learning Outcomes Institutional General Education Program Course

2. Useful…and Used.

Do You Use Assessment Results to Inform Important Decisions? Pervasive culture of evidence-informed planning & decision-making Funding priority to requests supported by assessment evidence Strategic goals & plans based on assessment evidence

Do You Use Assessment Results to Tell the Story of Your Success?

3. Reasonably Accurate, Truthful Information Good Enough to Use with Confidence to Inform Decisions

Principles of Good Practice Systematic, not anecdotal or scattershot Enough evidence Multiple approaches Justifiable standards A perpetual work in progress Direct evidence of student learning

Direct Evidence Explicit, clear, & convincing Tests (local or published) Rubrics (local or published) Certification or licensure exams Field experience supervisor evaluations

Indirect Evidence Optional, implicit and insufficient by itself –Job placement rates & salaries –Retention & graduation rates –Course grades & pass rates –Transfer rates –Surveys of students & alumni

4. Sustained and Pervasive Culture of Evidence-Informed Planning & Decision-Making

How Much Has Been Implemented? Any significant gaps or shortcomings? –Why? How sizable are they? –What is their impact? Do you recognize the gaps? –What are you doing about them?

Does everyone “get it”? Will momentum slow after this review? How do campus leaders support and facilitate assessment? Are you keeping things simple? Are time & money invested in proportion to value?

Documenting Compliance Compliance in substantial measure Sufficient documentation of compliance Not just –Assertions –“Examples” –Plans

Consistent documentation of compliance –Undergrad & graduate programs –Professional & liberal arts programs –On- & off-campus locations –Online & face-to-face programs –Student learning & other aspects of institutional effectiveness

Report Organization Summary & overall analysis Charts –Programs –Gen ed requirements –Institution-wide goals Links to appendices of evidence –Answers without links to evidence aren’t answers.

Organize by Goals Not by Assessment Remove data unrelated to goals. How you’re assessingGood practice? ResultsSuccess & rigor? What the results are telling youAnalysis? Use of results & analysisUse? Where you’re going with assessmentSustained?

Ideally... Make Visible What You’re Already Doing Information and reports you already share –Information, not just data Minutes/ streams documenting –Analysis: What the results are telling you –Decisions +An overview and overall analysis

Read the Directions!