Results from MINER  A Rick Snider Fermilab on behalf of The MINER  A collaboration ICHEP 2012 Melbourne, Australia 7-July-2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HARP Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) K2K Neutrino CH Meeting Neuchâtel, June 21-22, 2004.
Advertisements

A status report on the MINER A neutrino Experiment Steven Manly, University of Rochester Representing the MINER A collaboration HEP 2012, Valparaiso, Chile.
P AUL N IENABER S AINT M ARY ’ S U NIVERSITY OF M INNESOTA FOR THE M INI B OO NE C OLLABORATION J ULY DPF2009.
MiniBooNE: (Anti)Neutrino Appearance and Disappeareance Results SUSY11 01 Sep, 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL 1.
MINERvA Overview MINERvA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: – Study.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
F.Sanchez (UAB/IFAE)ISS Meeting, Detector Parallel Meeting. Jan 2006 Low Energy Neutrino Interactions & Near Detectors F.Sánchez Universitat Autònoma de.
The Design of MINER  A Howard Budd University of Rochester August, 2004.
Measurement of B (D + →μ + ν μ ) and the Pseudoscalar Decay Constant f D at CLEO István Dankó Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute representing the CLEO Collaboration.
Bari Osmanov University of Florida MINERvA: neutrino cross-sections for the future EPS HEP July, Krakow, Poland Bari Osmanov, University of.
Direct Measurement of the NuMI Flux with Neutrino-Electron Scattering in MINERvA Jaewon Park University of Rochester On behalf of MINERvA Collaboration.
Physics Topics in MINER A David Boehnlein - Fermilab for the MINERvA Collaboration Overview of MINERvA The high intensity of the NuMI beamline at Fermilab.
July 19, 2003 HEP03, Aachen P. Shanahan MINOS Collaboration 1 STATUS of the MINOS Experiment Argonne Athens Brookhaven Caltech Cambridge Campinas Dubna.
MINERvA Overview MINERvA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: – Study.
1 Overview of the MINER A Experiment Vittorio Paolone(representing the MINER A Collaboration) University of Pittsburgh  Motivation  MINER A Detector.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
Recent results from the K2K experiment Yoshinari Hayato (KEK/IPNS) for the K2K collaboration Introduction Summary of the results in 2001 Overview of the.
The Muon Neutrino Quasi-Elastic Cross Section Measurement on Plastic Scintillator Tammy Walton December 4, 2013 Hampton University Physics Group Meeting.
R. Ransome - PANIC July 26, Charged Current Neutrino Scattering in MINER A Ronald Ransome Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey On behalf.
July 6, INPC 1 The MINER A Experiment R. Ransome Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey for the MINER A collaboration ν Full MINERνA Detector.
Pion Production in MINERνA Brandon Eberly University of Pittsburgh July 27, 2012 On behalf of the MINERνA collaboration MINER ν A 1.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
Long Baseline Experiments at Fermilab Maury Goodman.
MINER A (FNAL E938) Gabriel Niculescu, JMU MINERA web site: Miner a Main Injector MINOS Near Detector NuMI Beam Where?  FERMILAB.
Quasi-Elastic Scattering on MINERvA Kevin McFarland University of Rochester NuINT11, Dehradun 8 March 2011.
Teppei Katori Indiana University Rencontres de Moriond EW 2008 La Thuile, Italia, Mar., 05, 08 Neutrino cross section measurements for long-baseline neutrino.
Preliminary Results from the MINER A Experiment Deborah Harris Fermilab on behalf of the MINERvA Collaboration.
MiniBooNE Cross Section Results H. Ray, University of Florida ICHEP Interactions of the future!
1 Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, 2012 Workshop on Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments March 21, 2012 Fermilab David.
Detector Monte-Carlo ● Goal: Develop software tools to: – Model detector performance – Study background issues – Calculate event rates – Determine feasibility.
1 Mike Kordosky – NuFact 06 - Aug 27, 2006 Neutrino Interactions in the MINOS Near Detector Mike Kordosky University College London on behalf of the MINOS.
Recent results from SciBooNE and MiniBooNE experiments Žarko Pavlović Los Alamos National Laboratory Rencontres de Moriond 18 March 2011.
Measurements of neutrino charged current scattering in K2K Fine-Grained Detector Introduction Introduction K2K Near Detector K2K Near Detector CC interactions.
1 Physics Requirements on Reconstruction and Simulation Software Jorge G. Morfín - Fermilab.
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
1 Constraining ME Flux Using ν + e Elastic Scattering Wenting Tan Hampton University Jaewon Park University of Rochester.
T2K muon measurement 2014 Momentum module A.Ariga, C. Pistillo University of Bern S. Aoki Kobe University 1.
MiniBooNE MiniBooNE Motivation LSND Signal Interpreting the LSND Signal MiniBooNE Overview Experimental Setup Neutrino Events in the Detector The Oscillation.
1 Absolute Hadronic D 0 and D + Branching Fractions at CLEO-c Werner Sun, Cornell University for the CLEO-c Collaboration Particles and Nuclei International.
April 26, McGrew 1 Goals of the Near Detector Complex at T2K Clark McGrew Stony Brook University Road Map The Requirements The Technique.
The MINER A Experiment Sacha Kopp, University of Texas at Austin on behalf of the Minerva Collaboration.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
Results and Implications from MiniBooNE: Neutrino Oscillations and Cross Sections 15 th Lomonosov Conference, 19 Aug 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL
MINER A at the Triple Point: Three Phases at once Deborah Harris AEM August 31, 2009.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
Extrapolation Techniques  Four different techniques have been used to extrapolate near detector data to the far detector to predict the neutrino energy.
MINERvA Deborah Harris Fermilab Physics Advisory Committee Meeting January 22, 2014.
The MINERvA Experiment: precision -A cross sections Eric Christy, Hampton University Elba, 2010 (for the MINER A Collaboration) MINERVA.
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
Nuclear Target Cross Section Ratios at MINERvA Brian G. Tice - Argonne National Laboratory With travel support from Rutgers, The State University of New.
INPC 2013 June 4 th ‘13 Alessandro Bravar for the Miner a Collaboration The MINER A Experiment What is Miner a ? beam and  flux Why Miner a ? / CCQE x-sections.
MINERνA Overview  MINERνA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei  Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: t Study.
Precision Measurement of Muon Neutrino Disappearance with T2K Alex Himmel Duke University for the The T2K Collaboration 37 th International Conference.
Recent Results from the T2K ND280 detector Jonathan Perkin on behalf of the T2K collaboration KAMIOKA TOKAI 295 km.
MINERνA Overview  MINERνA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei  Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: t Study.
Measuring Nuclear Effects with MINERnA APS April Meeting 2011 G. Arturo Fiorentini Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas On behalf of the MINERnA collaboration.
T2K Oscillation Strategies Kevin McFarland (University of Rochester) on behalf of the T2K Collaboration Neutrino Factories 2010 October 24 th 2010.
NuMI Flux, Leonidas Aliaga William & Mary July 25, 2012 Current Uncertainties And Future Plans International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super Beams.
Neutral Current Interactions in MINOS Alexandre Sousa, University of Oxford for the MINOS Collaboration Neutrino Events in MINOS Neutrino interactions.
The MiniBooNE Little Muon Counter Detector
Neutrino-nucleus deep inelastic scattering with MINERvA
Neutrino factory near detector simulation
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
n – N Deep Inelastic Scattring at MINERnA
Status of the OPERA experiment
Chris Smith California Institute of Technology EPS Conference 2003
F.Sánchez for the K2K collaboration UAB/IFAE
Quarkonium production in ALICE
6. Preliminary Results from MINOS
Impact of neutrino interaction uncertainties in T2K
Presentation transcript:

Results from MINER  A Rick Snider Fermilab on behalf of The MINER  A collaboration ICHEP 2012 Melbourne, Australia 7-July-2012

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP Introduction Cross sections for neutrino and anti-neutrino interactions in nuclear matter important for oscillation experiments ◈ Cross sections not well measured in 1 – 10 GeV range J.A. Formaggio and G.P. Zeller, “From eV to EeV: Neutrino Cross Sections Across Energy Scales”, to be published in Rev. Mod. Phys., Neutrino Anti-neutrino

July 7, Introduction Energy dependence of quasi-elastic cross section not understood ◈ QE interactions an important signal channel for oscillation experiments ◈ MINERvA well positioned to resolve apparent disagreement and shed light on the underlying dynamics Neutrinos a weak-interaction probe of nuclear structure ◈ Complementary to charged lepton measurements ◈ Unique probe of axial form factor, complementary probe of EMC effect ◈ Flavor-sensitive probe of parton distribution functions T. Katori, MIT

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP Ottebein University Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru University of Pittsburgh University of Rochester Rutgers University Tufts University University of California at Irvine University of Minnesota at Deluth Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María William and Mary University of Athens University of Texas at Austin Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas Fermilab University of Florida University of Geneva Universidad de Guanajuato Hampton University Inst. Nucl. Res. Moscow Mass. Col. Lib. Arts Northwestern University A collaboration of about 80 nuclear and particle physicists from 22 institutions The MINER  A Collaboration (Main Injector Experiment  -A)

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP The MINER  A Experiment Designed for detailed study of neutrino and anti-neutrino interactions with nuclei in the energy range E  = 1 – 10 GeV ◈ Fine-grained detector for excellent kinematic measurements ◈ Multiple nuclear targets within the same detector and beam Many measurements to be pursued ◈ Charged current (CC) inclusive cross sections ◈ Charged current quasi-elastic (CCQE) cross sections ◈ Pion production cross sections ◈ Strangeness production cross sections ◈ Inclusive cross section versus A: He, C, O, Fe, Pb ◈ Structure functions ◈ … ◈

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP The MINER  A Experiment Designed for detailed study of neutrino and anti-neutrino interactions with nuclei in the energy range E  = 1 – 10 GeV ◈ Fine-grained detector for excellent kinematic measurements ◈ Multiple nuclear targets within the same detector and beam Many measurements to be pursued ◈ Charged current (CC) inclusive cross sections ◈ Charged current quasi-elastic (CCQE) cross sections ◈ Pion production cross sections ◈ Strangeness production cross sections ◈ Inclusive cross section versus A: He, C, O, Fe, Pb ◈ Structure functions ◈... ◈ This talk See poster by H. Ray!

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP Outline Neutrino beam and flux The MINERvA detector Neutrino CC inclusive analysis Anti-neutrino CCQE cross section Neutrino CCQE analysis Summary

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP Muon Monitors Figure courtesy Ž. Pavlović FLUKA Production Models ◈ 120 GeV p beam on C target ► 35xE 12 protons on target (POT) per “spill” at ~0.5 Hz ► Beam power of 300–350 kW ◈ Focus  + and K + (or  - and K - ) for    (   ) beam ►  +, K + →  +   in decay pipe ◈ Muon monitors to augment flux estimation ◈ Tune E  spectrum by moving target and horn ► Will run in “low energy” and “medium energy” beam configurations The NuMI beam line (Neutrinos at the Main Injector) ~210 m of rock MINER  A Expected neutrino flux FLUKA: A. Ferrari, P.R. Sala, A. Fasso`, and J. Ranft, CERN (2005), INFN/TC_05/11, SLAC-R-773

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP Neutrino flux Estimate flux from hadron production ◈ Re-weight MC to match NA49 data ◈ Use GEANT4 to calculate flux ◈ Uncertainties from NA49 data and hadron production model Check with muon monitors Study with alternate beam configurations (Not yet included in flux estimates) ● NA49 data — GEANT4

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP The MINER  A detector ◈ 120 stacked modules, mostly planes of scintillator strips ◈ Fully active, finely-segmented tracking region in center ◈ LHe and nuclear target region on upstream side ◈ Side and end EM and hadronic calorimeter regions ◈ MINOS near detector used as muon spectrometer  beam

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP Nuclear targets 250 kg liquid He upstream of detector 5 sets of nuclear targets (C, Fe, Pb) +  beam water

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP Charged current inclusive analysis   + N →   + X Analysis uses 25% of available data

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP ◈ Event selection and reconstruction: ► A single MINOS-matched   track candidate ► Reconstructed vertex in fiducial volume ► Measure recoil energy calorimetrically ▻ Sum energy in other tracks, showers, isolated energy depositions in tracker and EM calorimeter ◈ Signature: muon track + energy deposition associated with vertex   beam Strip number Module number Vertex Muon track Associated tracks and showers Isolated energy Neutrino CC inclusive analysis

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP Muon energy Neutrino CC inclusive kinematic distributions Muon energy sys. uncertainties

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP Neutrino CC inclusive A-dependence Measured ratio of CC inclusive cross sections in Fe and Pb ◈ Systematic errors cancel in a double-ratio method ◈ Achieve a statistics limited measurement ◈ See poster presented by H. Ray from Univ. of Florida for details! Systematic uncertainty for Fe Sys. uncertainty for Pb/Fe double ratio

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP Anti-neutrino Charged CurrentQuasi- Elastic cross section   + p →  + + n Analysis uses ~20% of available  data in a sub-sample collected with partially constructed detector (55%)

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP Anti-neutrino Charged Current Quasi-Elastic cross section ◈ Signature: muon track + energy deposition consistent with a neutron   beam Strip number Module number Signal region ◈ Event selection: ► MINOS-matched  + track candidate ▻ No activity in 4 planes upstream along track trajectory ► Reconstructed vertex in fiducial volume ► Number of shower activity regions  1 ▻ Recoil energy away from vertex (10 cm) < Q 2 - dependent maximum ► Reconstructed  energy < 10 GeV

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP Reconstructed kinematic distributions for  CCQE ◈ Use muon energy and direction to extract neutrino energy and Q 2 assuming 2-body kinematics with target proton at rest (Nuclear binding energy E b = 30 MeV)

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP  CCQE cross section Background subtraction ◈ Non-CCQE neutrino and anti-neutrino interactions: ► Fit recoil energy distribution in bins of Q 2 to MC shape templates for BG Resolution unfolding estimated from MC ◈ Diagonal elements between about 0.5 to 0.9 Efficiency  acceptance correction from MC ◈ About 0.65 at low Q 2 to 0.13 for Q 2 around 1.65 GeV 2 After BG subtraction After unfolding After effic/acc correction

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP  CCQE cross section result MC: GENIE M A = 0.99 GeV/c 2 RFG Pauli-blocking No MEC Systematic uncertainties ◈ Systematic uncertainties ► Estimate by varying inputs within uncertainties, re-running analysis ► Extract uncertainty bands from the ensemble of results GENIE: NIM A614, 87 (2010)

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP NuWro: Acta Phys. Polon. B40, 2507 (2009)  CCQE cross section result

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP Neutrino CC Quasi-Elastic analysis   + n →   + p Analysis uses 25% of available data

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP ◈ Event selection: ► MINOS-matched   track candidate ▻ No inactive strips along track trajectory in 4 planes upstream ► Reconstructed vertex in fiducial volume ► At most one other track associated with muon vertex ► Recoil energy away from vertex (10 cm) < Q 2 -dependent maximum Neutrino CCQE analysis ◈ Signature: muon track + recoil consistent with p   beam Strip number Module number

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP Neutrino CCQE Q 2 distributions In bins of neutrino energy

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP Summary MINERvA has completed data-taking run with low-energy beam ◈ Detector is working well ◈ Analysis of the first 25% of LE data is well underway ► Preliminary results for CCQE cross section for   ► CC inclusive and CCQE analyses for    in advanced state ◈ Now preparing to analyze the full LE dataset Greatly looking forward to medium energy run starting in 2013 See poster by H. Ray on A-dependence of inclusive cross section!!

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP Backup

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP MINER  A data taking ◈ Recently completed low energy running ► LE   mode ► 3.98x10 20 POT ► LE  mode ► 1.7x10 20 POT ► Special runs ► 4.94x10 19 POT ► Livetime ▻ 97.1% MINER  A ▻ 93.3% with MINOS ND ◈ Expect to begin medium energy run ~ spring 2013 Date Present results

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP Neutrino production model spread Re-interactions in target Tertiary production in horns

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP NA49 pi minus production

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP  + parents of neutrinos in MINER  A  + that produce  in MINERvA

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP Neutrino flux – low energy beam

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP Neutrino flux uncertainties

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP The MINER  A detector 33 Extruded plastic scintillator + wavelength shifters Triangular geometry allows charge sharing for better position resolution EM calorimeter Strips arrange into planes. Pairs of U/X and V/X planes bonded to form modules Modules stacked to form fully active tracker. Surrounded by electromagnetic and hadronic calorimeters. Hadron calorimeter Front elevation view 16.7 mm 17 mm

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP Energy scale and stability

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP Track resolution Hit resolution = 3 mm

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP Reconstructed objects MINOS matched track vertex recoil energy recoil energy MINOS MINERvA COIL vertex

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP Reconstructed vertex resolution Based on split-track studies of muons produced in rock upstream of MINER  A

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP Where do muons go?

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP MINOS-matching affects acceptance ◈ Energy threshold ~ 2 GeV ◈ Good angular acceptance up to scattering angles of about 10 degrees, with limit of about 20 degrees ◈ Bias is complex, but well understood

40 Neutrino CC inclusive kinematic distributions Neutrino energy Recoil energy Recoil energy sys uncertainties Neutrino energy sys uncertainties

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP  CCQE: Recoil energy distribution fits for BG determination

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP Neutrino CCQE kinematic distributions

July 7, 2012MINERvA results F.D. Snider, Fermilab ICHEP Neutrino CCQE Q 2 uncertainties

Introduction Neutrino-nucleus, anti-neutrino-nucleus cross sections important for oscillation experiments ◈ Cross sections not well measured in 1 – 10 GeV range ◈ Quasi-elastic interactions a signal channel for oscillation measurements ► Nuclear effects not well understood in QE interactions ▻ Can alter details of 2-body kinematics often used to infer neutrino energy J.A. Formaggio and G.P. Zeller, “From eV to EeV: Neutrino Cross Ssections Across Energy Scales”, to be published in Rev. Mod. Phys., Neutrino Anti-neutrino NOvA