Paul M. Guinther, Ph.D. Portland Psychotherapy Clinic, Research, & Training Center Michael J. Dougher, Ph.D. University of New Mexico, Department of Psychology.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Key points for lecture 4 Forgetting: good or bad?

Advertisements

THE TRANSFER OF SAMENESS AND OPPOSITION.

Experiment Basics: Variables Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology.

Design If the context change theory explains directed forgetting, children should have no problem intentionally forgetting objects through a mental context.

Reticulated Science Steven C. Hayes, University of Nevada.

BHS Memory and Amnesia Memory and Reality.

"If the doors of perception were cleansed every thing would appear to man as it is, infinite. For man has closed himself up, till he sees all things thru'

PSY 402 Theories of Learning Chapter 5 – The Role of Conditioning in Behavior.

Experiment Basics: Variables

I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=

I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=

 The misinformation effect refers to incorrect recall or source attribution of an item presented after a to-be-remembered event as having been presented.

INTRODUCTION TYPES OF TRANSFER CONDTIONS FOR TRANSFER STRATEGIES FOR TEACHING FOR TRANSFER OF LEARNING TRANSFER OF LEARNING.

Stimulus Control of Operant Behavior Discrimination Generalization Generalization Gradients Peak Shift Concepts Overview of stimulus control of operant.

TRANSFER OF LEARNING INTRODUCTION TYPES OF TRANSFER

Implicit Memory SNU CSE Son, Suil. Contents  Question  implicit memory vs. explicit memory  Various ways of Experiment  Can learning occur without.

Elementary Statistical Methods André L. Souza, Ph.D. The University of Alabama Lecture 22 Statistical Power.

TEMPLATE DESIGN © Difference in reaction times between true memories and false memories in a recognition task Marta Forai.

Ausubel’s Meaningful Learning Theory and Teaching Application (Ausubel 有意義的學習理論與教學應用 )

To start learning RFT Niklas Törneke Törneke 1. The structure of the presentation Basic assumptions: Functional contextualism Basic understanding of relational.

Implicit Relational Learning in a Multiple-Object Tracking Task: Do People Really Track the Objects? Tiffany Williams and Olga Lazareva (Department of.

Learning and Memory in the Auditory System The University of Iowa Department of Psychology Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Amy Poremba, Ph.D. 1.

Paradoxical False Memory for Objects After Brain Damage Stephanie M. McTighe 1,2 ; Rosemary A. Cowell 3, Boyer D. Winters 4, Timothy J. Bussey 1,2 and.

Chapter 4 The Development of Memory Basic laws of habituation and operant conditioning are sufficient for understanding behavioral relations called “memory.”

1 Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception Sandra Anacleto uOttawa.

Lecture #15: Learning -- Classical Conditioning, Part I Copyright © 2002 L.A. Lowe.

Some of your best ideas are mine: unconscious antiplagiarism Nicholas Lange, Timothy J. Perfect and Ian Dennis.

1/10 Problem Frame Analysis Eunyoung Cho Kyu Hou Minho Jeung Heejoon Jung Oct. 25, 2005.

Laurie S. Hunter, Alaina Manley, Casey Papa, Ashley Currin, Lynn Ray, Megan MacLane, Samantha Scalsky Department of Psychology Importance of the Research.

1 Basics of Inferential Statistics Mark A. Weaver, PhD Family Health International Office of AIDS Research, NIH ICSSC, FHI Lucknow, India, March 2010.

Getting you thinking: Extension: Read the ‘Apply your knowledge’ section on p55. Discuss the task with your neighbour.

New Survey Questionnaire Indicators in PISA and NAEP

Contextual Control of Derived Perspective Taking Using an Operant Relational Triangulation Perspective Taking Protocol Paul M. Guinther, Ph.D. Portland.

To start learning RFT Niklas Törneke Törneke.

3rd International Conference on Missing Children and Adults

Analyzing Assessments and Needs

Evolution of Populations

Emmy Lebleu Emmy Lebleu, Shelley Greene, Gina Quebedeaux, Emmie Hebert

Classical Conditioning

Are Your Educational Programs Learning-Centered? Can You Measure This?

Depression II Recent Research in Treating Depression (2015 )

Are You Ready for 21st Century Parents?

PSYCHOLOGY & PSYCHOLOGISTS Chapter 1

L.T.M. Contents & the case of H.M. September 14, 2012

Level of Encoding and False Memory Typicality

” روان شناسی تربیتی ” Educational Psychology

“Laws” of Human Performance

Chapter 1: Intro to Social Psychology

Evaluating Therapies.

EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos, PhD

EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos, PhD

Different Types of Psychologist

علم النفس التحليلي كارل غوستاف يونغ

Memory: Memory Failures & Improving Memory.

WHO WANTS TO BE A M I L L I O N A I R E.

Module 17 The little Quiz! June 2018.

DISCUSSION ON MEASURING DISABILITY IN POPULATION AND HOUSING CENSUS

Frequency-specific network connectivity increases underlie accurate spatiotemporal memory retrieval Andrew J Watrous, Nitin Tandon, Chris R Conner, Thomas.

PEIMS/Information Management System txGradebook

Assignment: Create a Comic Strip of Canti I, II, III

Do Now: Students will be broken up into groups; each group will receive cut-outs of the kinds of stress. The students will have to rationalize the correct.

Why I Like Why Don’t Students Like School

Chapter 10 Memory & Thought

Project Requirements Choose Section I, II or III of Orwell’s 1984.

What is Learning? The process of acquiring new and relatively enduring information Any relatively permanent change in behavior brought about by experience.

Student Learning and Development

Psychological Foundations

Social Sciences Librarian University of Nebraska at Omaha

Presentation transcript:

Paul M. Guinther, Ph.D. Portland Psychotherapy Clinic, Research, & Training Center Michael J. Dougher, Ph.D. University of New Mexico, Department of Psychology Paper presentation for the 2012 ACBS World Conference X

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Paradigm and False Memories 2

Cognitive Account of False Memory 3

Behavior Analytic Account of False Memory 4

Derived Relational Intrusions Following Training (DRIFT) Paradigm Guinther & Dougher, JEAB

Correcting False Memories 6

Experiment I: Design & Intended Effects 7

8 MTS1 Training

Extend the DRIFT paradigm to correct the false memories: 9

Experiment I: Results Time x Type of Intrusion F(1, 9) =.012, p =.915, η p 2 =

Why Didn’t the Additional Learning Correct the False Memories?  Using R1 as the basis for R2  R2 was a “delayed echoic” of R1  Insufficient discrimination (MTS2) training  Inadequate C rel at MTS2  Not making the connection between discrimination training and the memory test  Inadequate C func at R2 11

Experiment II: Design and Intended Effects 12

Experiment II: Results 13 t(7) = 2.74, p =.029, d = 1.29

Why Didn’t the Additional Learning and Instructions Correct the False Memories?  I don’t know. But…  Even though MTS2 and MTS3 didn’t produce retroactive correction,  MTS1 did produce proactive distortion  Perhaps MTS could be used to make a proactive correction? 14

Experiment III: Design and Intended Effects 15

Experiment III: Results 16 Group x Time x Type of Intrusion F(1, 35) =.274, p =.604, η p 2 =.008

Summary of Findings  The only manipulation that reduced T3 intruding was a second chance (S2) to study the T1 words.  Does a second chance to study T1 words alter the functions of previously intruded T3 words?  Strips remembering functions from T3?  Transforms remembering functions of T3?  Does a second chance to study T1 words overshadow the effects of MTS1?  Increases R2 contextual control over T1 responding? 17

Question to Research  Class partitioning via MTS does not appear to strip or transform previously acquired functions from sub-classes.  Function transformation between relata in a frame of distinction may occur in the context of newly acquired functions only. 18

Untested Design… 19

Q&A Thank You! 20

21

22

23 MTS1 Training

24 MTS2 Training Partition A Partition B

25 MTS3 Training Partition A Partition B

Correcting False Memories 26