Water Availability 1996 Texas drought –Governor Bush asks “how much water do we have? How much are we using? How much do we need?” -- Ooops. No good answers!

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presentation Texas Water: What You Should Know November 6, 2010.
Advertisements

Climate Change and Water Availability Models Applying climate change predictions Clark Siler 6 Dec 2007 Physical Climatology Class Presentation University.
Hydrologic Measurement Precipitation Evaporation Streamflow Channel Properties Topography GIS datasets Reading: Applied Hydrology Chapter 6.
G EOSPATIAL D ATA L AYERS FOR A RC H YDRO R IVER Arc Hydro River Meeting Clark Siler Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin.
Water Resources Engineering by David R. Maidment The challenges –floods, droughts, poor water quality What we are doing about them –engineering structures,
City of Austin Water Quality Master Planning - GIS Model David Maidment Francisco Olivera Mike Barrett Christine Dartiguenave Ann Quenzer CRWR - University.
Hydrologic Measurement
CURVE NO. DEVELOPMENT STEP 8 Soils data, land use data, watershed data, and CN lookup table are used to develop curve numbers for use in the SCS Curve.
PrePro2004: Comparison with Standard Hydrologic Modeling Procedures Rebecca Riggs April 29, 2005.
1-Degree USGS DEM Control Points Locations National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) Drainage Lines Corrected Stream Lines Filled DEM Burned DEM Flow Area Accumulation.
Hydrologic Analysis Francisco Olivera, Ph.D., P.E. Srikanth Koka
CVEN 689 Instructor: Dr. Francisco Olivera Estimating Salt Concentration at Ungaged Locations from Parameters derived using GIS Ganesh Krishnamurthy Water.
DEM-Based Stream and Watershed Delineation
Apalachicola/Chattahoochee/Flint Focus Area - USGS WaterSMART NIDIS SE Climate Forum Lake Lanier Islands, GA December 2, 2011.
Hydrologic/Watershed Modeling Glenn Tootle, P.E. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Model Input
CEE 795 Water Resources Modeling and GIS Learning Objectives: List the essential data needed for water resource modeling Identify sources of water resources.
From Topographic Maps to Digital Elevation Models Daniel Sheehan IS&T Academic Computing Anne Graham MIT Libraries.
Fort Bragg Cantonment Area Cape Fear River Basin LIDAR data have been used to create digital contours and topographic maps. 1.A Digital Elevation Model.
Why calculate slope and Aspect? Study the flow of water Identify the habitats of plants Identify potential sites for urban growth Drainage patterns on.
Data Management, Data Assimilation and Modeling David R. Maidment Director, Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Presented.
Hydrologic Cycle. Hydrologic Cycle Processes Surface Water Soil water Atmospheric water Groundwater Processes Precipitation Evaporation Surface Runoff.
DEM’s, Watershed and Stream Network Delineation DEM Data Sources Study Area in West Austin with a USGS 30m DEM from a 1:24,000 scale map Eight direction.
Flow Time Time Series Hydro FeaturesHydro Network Channel System Drainage System ArcGIS Hydro Data Model.
Topographic Maps vs DEM. Topographic Map 1:24,000 Scale 20 ft contour 100 ft contour Stream Center Line.
WATER AVAILABILITY MODELING for the SULPHUR RIVER BASIN Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission Austin, Texas Consultant: R. J. Brandes Company.
DEQ Water Supply Planning Integrating Monitoring, Modeling, and Scientific Study with Adaptive Management and Planning.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G. Tarboton and Ayse Irmak GIS in Water Resources Fall 2009.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G. Tarboton and Ayse Irmak GIS in Water Resources Fall 2011.
Streamflow Information in Texas David R. Maidment Director, Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin USGS Workshop, Fort Worth,
Arc Hydro and Modeling Intrinsic Modeling – within a particular application eg Excel, ArcGIS Dynamic Linked Library – tightly coupled package of functions.
Map-Based Flood Hydrology and Hydraulics David R. Maidment Jan 10, 1998.
Stream and Watershed Delineation from DEM’s David Maidment, Ph.D. and Francisco Olivera, Ph.D. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas.
1 Contractor for the USGS at the EROS Data Center NHD Plus as a geospatial framework for drought indicators Jim Verdin.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G
Introduction to GIS in Water Resources David R. Maidment Director, Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin CRWR.
1 Center for Research in Water Resources The University of Texas at Austin Water Management Information System for the Rio Grande/Rio Bravo Basin Carlos.
BASIN SCALE WATER INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT EVALUATION CONSIDERING CLIMATE RISK Yasir Kaheil Upmanu Lall C OLUMBIA W ATER C ENTER : Global Water Sustainability.
Determining Watershed Parameters for Water Rights in the Cypress River Basin By: Hema Gopalan GIS in Water Resources (C E 394K) Fall 2001.
Building Hydrologic Information Systems David R. Maidment Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Modeling.
Watershed Parameters for Water Rights in the Trinity River Basin Melissa Figurski CE 394K.
Water Availability Modeling in the State of Texas CE 394 K.2 - Surface Water Hydrology University of Texas at Austin David Mason.
1 Byung Sik, Kim Kangwon National University Advanced Hydrology and Water Resources Management.
Geospatial Hydrology Group
Introduction to GIS David R. Maidment
Raster/Map Algebra/Hydrology
Map-Based Flood Hydrology and Hydraulics
DES 606 : Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS
National Hydro Data Programs
Arc Hydro for EPA Basins
Map-Based Hydrology and Hydraulics
Water Rights Analysis Package A Front-end Look at the WRAP Model
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
Calculating Hydrologic Parameters for Estimating Surface Water Flow at Ungaged Locations Richard Hoffpauir Water Resources Engineering.
Digital Elevation Models and Hydrology
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
GIS FOR HYDROLOGIC DATA DEVELOPMENT FOR DESIGN OF HIGHWAY DRAINAGE FACILITIES by Francisco Olivera and David Maidment Center for Research in Water Resources.
Relating Actual Runoff to Potential Runoff
ArcGIS Interface to the WRAP Model
Regional Hydraulic Model for the City of Austin
Recharge to the Edwards Aquifer in the Nueces Basin
From GIS to HMS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center University of Texas at Austin Center for Research in Water Resources Francisco.
University of Texas at Austin
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Presentation of Jordan Case Study Second Management Board Meeting
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by Ayse Irmak, David R
Flood Modeling Tools for Response and Alerting
ESRI User Conference Water Resources User Group, July 15, 2010
Presentation transcript:

Water Availability 1996 Texas drought –Governor Bush asks “how much water do we have? How much are we using? How much do we need?” -- Ooops. No good answers! 1997 Senate Bill 1 passed by Legislature –Regionalizes water planning in Texas and establishes surface water availability modeling 2001 Senate Bill 2 passed by Legislature –Establishes groundwater availability modeling and initiates instream flow assessment

Improvements from Senate Bill 1: Water Modeling and Planning Before Senate Bill 1, water planning was done state-wide by TWDB SB1 established 14 water planning regional groups, who are now responsible for planning water supply in their area Water Availability Modeling (TNRCC)

Improvements from Senate Bill 1: Digital Map of Texas: 100K → 24K 1° 7.5' 7.5' Quadrangles 1:24,000 scale 4400 maps cover Texas 1° Quadrangles 1:100,000 scale Approx. 100 maps cover Texas

Improvements from Senate Bill 1: Water Availability Modeling Rio Grande Colorado Brazos Sulphur Trinity Nueces City of Austin 8000 water right locations 23 main river basins Inform every permit holder of the degree of reliability of their withdrawal during drought conditions (TCEQ)

CRWR Mission for Senate Bill 1 CRWR (UT Austin) aids in the response to Senate Bill 1 by providing to TNRCC watershed parameters defined from geospatial data for each water right location These data are input by TCEQ contractors to a Water Rights Assessment Package (developed at TAMU) which determines the % chance that the water will actually be available at that location TCEQ sends the owner of the water right a letter specifying the availability of water

Water Rights in the Sulphur Basin Water right location Stream gage location Drainage areas delineated from Digital Elevation Models are used to estimate flow at water right locations based on flow at stream gage locations

Digital Elevation Model

Topographic Map of West Austin 1:24,000 scale Hog Pen Ck 4 km

Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Contours

Austin West 30 Meter DEM

Cell Size 30m100m

Eight Direction Pour Point Model Water flows in the direction of steepest descent

Flow Direction Grid

Cell to Cell Grid Network Through the Landscape Stream cell

Streams and Watersheds Defined from the DEM

Comparison of Drainage Areas DEM USGS Difference is ~ 0.5%

Watershed Properties Averaged over the Drainage Area Property grid (CN or Precipitation) Drainage Areas +

Connectivity of the Control Points Neches Basin This flow order is used in the Water Rights Analysis Package

Data Products GIS coverages for determining watershed parameters Watershed parameters as input for WRAP model = Analysis completed for more than 10,000 locations in all river basins of Texas

Ralph Wurbs ______________________________________ Professor and Division Head Environmental and Water Resources Division Department of Civil Engineering Texas A&M University College Station, Texas (979)

Water Availability Modeling in Texas Pursuant to 1997 Senate Bill 1 Water Rights Analysis Package (WRAP) model developed at Texas A&M University and adopted for Texas WAM System Water Availability Modeling (WAM) System implemented by TNRCC/TCEQ, its partner agencies, and contractors pursuant to Senate Bill 1 (SB1) enacted by the Texas Legislature in June 1997

Internet Sites WRAP software and reference and users manuals waterperm/wrpa/wam.html TCEQ Water Availability Models

Water Availability Modeling Process Historical Hydrology Develop sequences of naturalized monthly flows for the period-of-analysis at selected gaging stations. Distribute flows from gaged sites to ungaged sites. Current Water Management and Use Simulate a specified scenario of water management/use during an assumed repetition of historical hydrology. Develop measures of water supply reliability and water availability.

Water Rights Analysis Package (WRAP) Generalized model for simulating management of rivers, reservoirs, and water use in a river basin or multiple-basin region under a priority-based water allocation system. Tool for evaluating hydrologic and institutional water availability. Set of Fortran computer programs.

Features of WRAP Spatial configuration (control points) Hydrologic period-of-analysis Natural hydrology Water management and use Water availability indices

Natural Hydrology Naturalized flows at gaged sites Flow distribution to ungaged sites Channel losses Net reservoir evaporation- precipitation

Water Management and Use Water right priorities Water supply diversions Return flows Reservoirs Multi-reservoir system operations Off-channel reservoirs Interbasin transfers Instream flow requirements Hydroelectric power

Water Availability Indices Volume reliability Period reliability Frequency relationships for storage, regulated flows, and unappropriated flows

Current WRAP Development Efforts Daily time step features Conditional reliability model Salinity tracking Other Continuing refinements

Observations Regarding Texas WAM Project Model development is an institutional partnership effort. Many people contribute. Regulatory and planning functions are integrally related. A modeling system is constructed rather than just a model. Data management is a governing concern. Model development is a process of continual expanding and improving.